The Book in PDF Format
May 17, 2010
Solving 9/11 - The Deception That Changed The World is available as a PDF file of about 265 pages. Click on the title to read or download the book as a PDF file.
How to read the book online
March 12, 2010
Comments from readers of my book online:
Dear Christopher,
Thank you for sending the link. I already have it on my website and appreciate your personal e-mail to me very much. Your book is definitely the top notch work of the 9-11 collection and is, in my opinion, the work of a brave genius. I have always admired your work but this, your new book, is truly THE book on 9-11 which should be studied by everyone for generations to come (of course I know that this will most likely not happen). Thank you for publishing it on the internet and even more so, thank you for writing it!
- H.H. in Savannah, Georgia (USA)
Dear Christopher Bollyn,
You are one of my heroes because I care about the truth. We have really gotten ourselves into a major pickle here with all these wars for “fake” reasons. I have to agree with you that it is unlikely that we will be able to experience the satisfaction of the truth realizing justice, but I do think that it matters that you are telling it because in a strange way it keeps them on the run. All the best, and I will contribute to your cause as well as read your book.
- K.B. in California
Dear Mr. Bollyn,
Thank you for your investigative work -- it is a quantum step superior to most others I have read -- thanks also for fingering Mr. Eric Hufschmid -- a donation will follow.
- R.J.C. (M.D.)
I've been in this website for 2 days now, it's fascinating, and it answers so many questions for me and it all makes sense. Sort of like the puzzle came together. I totally admire your strength and courage. It takes a special person to expose this sort of thing, and I truly hope it all works out for you and you get justice for what was done to you. May God bless you.
- Nancy
Your brilliant work is the most important book ever written on 9/11, and every American should contemplate your research. I would very much like to buy printed copies to give to family and friends, and I want to support you by purchasing your book. Please find a way to get it printed. I would like to pledge to buy 25 copies myself, and that you can depend on.
- G.V.R.
Over the last several years I have been scouring the internet for a factual and coherent source of information and analysis which would dare to expose the criminal network which is destroying my world. In your work I have found my source. Your on-line book, Solving 9-11, gives me hope that truth and liberty can ultimately prevail.
- R.W.W. in Arizona
My book about 9-11 is available online and can be read and printed out for free, which I recommend doing. The first fourteen chapters and 134 historical articles about are now online under Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World. The chapters have all been carefully edited and proof-read by an American editor. A key chapter, "The Architecture of Terror" (Chapter VII) was scrutinized by an independent fact-checker in Britain (who is critical of my thesis) and passed without a single error. More than one hundred points were checked. Every single point was found to be correct.
HOW TO PRINT THE CHAPTERS AND ARTICLES
The bold blue titles in the Table of Contents are clickable and bring the reader to the specific chapter or article. Each chapter has a print icon in the top right corner for the print-friendly format to facilitate printing each article or chapter separately. The bold blue heading title for each year of articles is also clickable and brings one to the complete set of articles for that year in chronological order. These articles may also be found by going to the 9-11 section on this website. These articles make up the second half of Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World. I will be adding illustrations and giving each article its own URL.
The articles, which are historical and essential reading to understand the book can be read in chronological order by clicking on the 9-11 section in the left-hand margin. The article files are laid out in a way to facilitate printing them out, which is a good idea. I strongly recommend that readers print out the chapters and articles and put them in a three-ring binder. This will facilitate reading and studying the material.
I am still trying to find out who made the super-thermite that was found in the dust of the World Trade Center. When we know who made this extremely powerful explosive and who put it in the twin towers, we will know who committed this false-flag terror atrocity. That will be a most suitable conclusion for my book, especially if it supports my thesis that 9-11 is a false-flag terror crime committed by Israelis and high-level Zionist agents in the United States and Britain. My next article will name the designers and manufacturers of the super-thermite used on 9-11.
I look forward to the day I will be able to see the book in print and available in the public libraries of the United States. I certainly intend to see this atrocious crime solved, the criminals exposed, and my book published. Thank you for your support.
Christopher Bollyn and Dr. Steven E. Jones discuss the evidence of thermitic explosives in the World Trade Center at Brigham Young University, May 2006.
Table of Contents
Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World
By Christopher Bollyn
Table of Contents
Last Update - March 30, 2010
(The bold blue titles of the chapters and articles by year are clickable (through 2005) and take the reader to the specific chapter or article. Each article has a Print icon in the top right corner for the print-friendly format for printing.)
Preface - We Are Not Afraid
Foreword by Glen Stanish - Truth Marches On
Chapters
1. 9-11 Through the Eyes of an American Skeptic
As a journalist and skeptic of the unproven official version, I have examined the facts and evidence and concluded that the U.S. government and controlled media have engaged in a conspiracy to deceive the world about what really happened on 9-11.
2. The Planes of 9-11
A foreign and privately-owned aircraft leasing company is connected to the airport security and passenger screening company at the center of the terror attacks of 9-11.
3. America the Target: 9-11 and the History of False Flag Terrorism
An examination of key events in the history of false-flag terror attacks and the people behind them.
4. The Terror Drills That Became Real: 9-11, the London Bombings & the Sinking of Estonia
The past two decades have been marked by a number of terror events which occurred during security exercises in which the scenario was identical to the real-life terror attack.
5. How Did Spy Software Get Onto FAA Computers?
9-11 was also a sophisticated computer crime, carried out through long-term foreign infiltration of the most sensitive U.S. military and government computer networks.
6. Who Controls Our Elections?
The stealing of American elections is primarily a computer crime, as were the terror attacks of 9-11. These crimes are carried out by criminals using computer code and enterprise software.
7. The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11
Information from material in the public domain supporting the thesis that Israeli military intelligence agencies were involved in the false-flag terror of 9-11.
8. The Mass Media & the 9-11 Cover-Up
Who controls the "hidden hand" in the U.S. mass media that censors and suppresses the crucial 9-11 evidence? What is the nexus connecting the architects of 9-11 with the mass media moguls who are covering up the truth?
9. Who Really Controls Our Political Parties?
Politicians in the United States and Britain are made to submit to the Zionist masters who control our political parties. By forcing our leaders to accept the Zionist yoke our nations have become subjugated to a foreign agenda.
10. Who Runs the Obama White House?
The day after Barack Obama was elected president, the Israeli press reported he had chosen the "Israeli Rahm Emanuel" to manage his administration. The "free" press in the United States, however, failed to report that the chief of staff is a dual-national with terrorist roots and a loyalty to a foreign state.
11. The Fleecing of America: 9-11 and the Crisis on Wall Street
The government bail-out of Maurice Greenberg’s criminal operation, American International Group (A.I.G.), brings into the spotlight one of the key individuals in the network behind 9-11.
12. The Nexus Linking 9-11 and the Financial Crisis
Behind such massive criminal hoaxes as 9-11 and the financial crises and government bail-outs are years of planning and preparation by high-level criminal organizations.
13. Ptech, 9-11, and the Financial Collapse
"P-Tech is the one thread, the one golden thread you pull on, and all of this is unraveled. ... All of this stuff took money to fund. And it was funded through major financial crimes, money laundering, and looting, looting of the S&L’s, looting of the banking system...it’s all being done systematically to keep the slush funds up for the game at play." – Indira R. Singh
14. Game Over: The Discovery of Super-Thermite in the Rubble
The discovery of active super-thermite in the dust of the WorldTradeCenter is crucial to understanding what really happened on 9-11. This scientific discovery reveals that tons of sophisticated explosives were packed into the twin towers long before the planes struck them.
9-11 Articles - 2001
15. Israeli Terror Suspects Captured by FBI
September 18, 2001
The first indications of Israeli involvement: Israelis with apparent ties to Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, are taken into custody after being seen photographing themselves and celebrating with the burning towers in the background.
16. The Great Game for the Oil & Gas of the Caspian Region
September 26, 2001
President Bush's "crusade" against the Taliban of Afghanistan has more to do with control of the immense oil and gas resources of the CaspianBasin than fighting terrorism.
17. The Family Ties Between Bush and Bin Laden
October 3, 2001
The bizarre death of Salem bin Laden, Osama's oldest brother, in Texas in 1988, brought to an end a long and intriguing relationship between President Bush and the head of the Bin Laden family fortune.
18. What Does Bin Laden Really Want?
October 11, 2001
"Neither I, nor my organization Al-Qaida is involved in the attacks," Bin Laden told the Karachi daily Ummat. "The attackers could be anybody, people who are part of the American system yet rebel against it, or some group that wants to make this century a century of confrontation between Islam and Christianity."
19. The Profiteers of 9-11
October 17, 2001
9-11 marked a devastating loss for the nation, but shrewd financial speculators with ties to the CIA apparently profited from the disaster, raising questions about prior knowledge of the attacks.
20. Survivors Witnessed Explosions Inside Twin Towers
October 17, 2001
Although reporters on the scene heard or saw explosions before the collapse of the World Trade Center, the mass media has been silent about the evidence of explosions.
21. U.S. Lacks Evidence against Taliban
October 24, 2001
Legal experts say that the Bush administration has not presented evidence to substantiate its claim that the events of 9-11 constituted an act of war.
22. War Is Sell - Washington Elite Benefits from War
October 31, 2001
The close connections of the Carlyle Group, a Washington-based private equity investment firm and major war profiteer, to the Bush and Bin Laden families raise unavoidable questions about waging war for profit.
23. Israeli 9-11 Terror Suspects Still Held
October 31, 2001
Among the suspects being held in connection with the terror attacks of Sept. 11 are a number of Israelis who were seen rejoicing while photographing the burning World Trade Center.
24. A Coup d'Etat against the U.S. Constitution
November 21, 2001
"What we've seen, since 9-11…is a coup d'etat against the U.S. Constitution," says Francis A. Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois.
25. German Intelligence Experts: 9-11 is "Hollywood" Deception
December 12, 2001
In Germany, where plans to invade Afghanistan were already being discussed in July 2001, intelligence experts say the 9-11 terror attacks could not have been carried out without the support of a state secret service.
26. Bin Laden Video: Smoking Gun or CIA Fake?
December 19, 2001
A blurry videotape purportedly showing Osama Bin Laden boasting of masterminding the 9-11 terror attacks raises serious doubts about its authenticity.
27. British Chief of Staff Critical of War on Terror
December 19, 2001
Britain's top military officer warns that the "war on terrorism" will "radicalize" friendly states and lead to increased terrorism.
28. U.S. Knew About 9-11 Terror Plot Since 1995
December 19, 2001
The terrorist scenario that unfolded 9-11 was not at all unexpected. Both the CIA and the FBI have known of a plan to execute such an act for more than six years.
9-11 Articles - 2002
29. The Spoils of War: The Minerals of Afghanistan
January 7, 2002
Afghanistan has an extraordinary abundance of rare and strategic minerals within reach of the global planners who control the puppet government they installed.
30. The Manipulated Bin Laden Tape
January 7, 2002
German experts say the "smoking gun" videotape of Osama bin Laden is worthless.
31. German Intelligence Expert Refutes Bush Version of 9-11
January 9, 2002
Andreas von Bülow, a former German intelligence chief refutes the official version of what happened on Sept. 11 and asks why Congress has not called for a special investigation.
32. U.S. Lies to Sell War on Terror
February 20, 2002
The Pentagon has a new propaganda office that plants "disinformation" in media outlets in order to sell the "War on Terror."
33. Deceptive PR Firm Joins War Effort
February 20, 2002
In Washington, the name of the game is public relations. The Bush administration has contracted PR pros to promote the war on terrorism.
34. Israel's Vast Spy Network of Fake Art Students
March 20, 2002
An Israeli spy network using agents posing as "art students" has sought access to U.S. government offices, defence companies, and the homes of employees of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). What are they up to?
35. Fire Engineers Refute 9-11 Collapse Theory
May 27, 2002
Fire Engineering, a trade magazine for fire fighters and engineers, calls the official investigation of the collapse of the WorldTradeTowers a farce and a sham.
36. Mass Media Avoids Questions about 9-11
June 12, 2002
The media avoids events organized by 9-11 families and activists in Washington raising questions and demanding an independent investigation of 9-11.
37. The Zionists Who Gained from 9-11
June 19, 2002
Larry Silverstein and the former Israeli commando Frank Lowy, lease-holders of the World Trade Center, and Lewis Eisenberg, the man who negotiated the lease, are all devoted supporters of Israel.
38. Israeli Agents Confess to 9-11 Mission
June 28, 2002
The Israelis caught photographing the attacks on the WorldTradeCenter return to Israel and explain the purpose of their mission on a television program, saying, "Our purpose was to document the event."
39. Video Evidence of 9-11 Explosions Censored
June 28, 2002
Video footage and photographs from 9-11 have been suppressed to prevent Americans from seeing evidence of unexplained explosions at the WorldTradeCenter.
40. BBC Reported "Series of Explosions" in Twin Towers on 9-11
June 28, 2002
The official investigation (NIST) fails to address the most obvious cause of the collapse: the explosions witnessed by survivors from the towers.
41. Video Evidence of Unexplained Explosion in WTC 6
July 2, 2002
Images of unidentified aircraft and missiles photographed during the attack on the WTC suggest that 9-11 was a covert and special operation.
42. What Caused the WTC 6 Crater?
July 10, 2002
A mysterious explosion apparently shot debris 550 feet into the air above the U.S. Customs House at WTC 6. This unexplained blast left a huge crater at the Customs House which has neither been investigated nor reported in the mainstream media.
43. What Exploded at WTC 6?
July 12, 2002
A CNN archivist and photos taken by Carmen Taylor confirm the time of the mysterious explosion at WTC 6. It reportedly occurred at 09:03, when the plane struck the SouthTower.
44. 9-11 Terror Suspect Hiding in Israel
July 31, 2002
The Israeli owner of the Mossad "front" company fled to Israel after his "movers" were caught filming the attacks. He remains at large in Israel although the FBI has his name on its terror suspect list.
45. Firefighters' Final Words Debunk Fire Collapse Theory
August 7, 2002
Evidence debunking the official explanation for the collapse of the WorldTradeCenter is being kept secret by the U.S. Dept. of Justice on a flimsy pretext.
46. Foreign Firms Destroyed Crucial Evidence
August 14, 2002
A foreign company, headed by a knight of the British Empire, managed the clean-up of the rubble at the WorldTradeCenter and the Pentagon. No effort was made to preserve the integrity of the crime scenes and crucial evidence was treated like garbage.
47. Open Letter to 9-11 Investigators
August 24, 2002
"The evidence is now compelling - the twin towers were blown off their feet. The plane crashes and fires were but secondary distractions to the main event."
48. The Seismic Evidence & Molten Iron in the Rubble
August 27, 2002
Pools of "molten steel" were discovered beneath the rubble at the base of the three demolished towers weeks after they collapsed. This super-intense residual heat, found in an oxygen starved environment, could explain how these crucial structural supports failed.
49. The Big Lie Banned in America
September 7, 2002
The books by the French author Thierry Meyssan, which "challenge the official version of the Sept. 11 attacks," are banned in U.S. bookstores for being "anti-American."
50. El Al Crash Exposes Israel's Chemical Weapons Arsenal
October 9, 2002
It is Israel's immense arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, not Iraq's, that poses the most serious threat to peace in the Middle East - and endangers global health.
51. 9-11 Evidence Hidden from Public
October 23, 2002
Evidence from 9-11, which has been gathered in secret, may be locked away and permanently sealed.
52. The Death of a Senator and 9-11: The Uncanny Connections
November 1, 2002
The untimely death of Minnesota’s anti-war and populist senator in a suspicious plane crash 11 days before elections reveals bizarre and uncanny connections to 9-11.
53. Spy Agency’s 9-11 Drill Exposes Government Lies
November 1, 2002
The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), a key U.S. intelligence agency, was running a drill in which an imaginary plane hit their building on 9-11.
54. Zionist 'Prince of Darkness' Craves War
November 27, 2002
The Pentagon's top civilian security adviser told British politicians that the U.S. would attack Iraq even if UN inspectors fail to find weapons of mass destruction.
55. Legal Experts: Pre-emptive War Illegal
December 4, 2002
President Bush's policy of "pre-emptive action" opens the door to global gangsterism.
56. Bin Laden Tape Exposed as Fake
December 10, 2002
The tape is a fake, according to Swiss voice recognition experts, who are 95 percent sure the voice on the tape is that of an impostor.
57. 9-11: The "New Pearl Harbor" of the Zionist War Plan
December 18, 2002
Candidate Bush’s cabal of Zionist war hawks signed a secret Middle East war plan in the summer of 2000 that said America would need a "new Pearl Harbor" in order to realize their plan to reshape U.S. defence policy to suit the Zionist agenda.
9-11 Articles - 2003
58. Iraq: An Illegal War
March 21, 2003
By suppressing the fact that the war against Iraq is illegal, the controlled media misrepresents the Anglo-American aggression and why it is opposed by so many around the world.
59. Cover-Up: The 9-11 Commission
July 10, 2003
The controlled media and the appointed 9-11 commission are complicit in concealing the truth about 9-11.
60. Skull & Bones, 9-11, and the Bogus "War on Terror"
September 14, 2003
The Bush administration blocked an independent investigation of 9-11 and exploits the attacks to launch costly and unjust wars of aggression. The obvious question arises: Are they complicit?
61. The Mystery Engine Part in the Pentagon Photo
September 14, 2003
Official photographs of the Pentagon crash site show a disc from a small jet engine, but no one seems interested in identifying it.
62. Fox News Tries to Smear Bollyn
September 25, 2003
Fox News smear tactics reveal the controlled media's agenda to marginalize independent 9-11 research. Why would Rupert Murdoch's network attack an honest 9-11 researcher?
63. Did Rupert Murdoch Have Prior Knowledge of 9-11?
October 3, 2003
Eighteen months before 9-11, Rupert Murdoch produced a television program that depicted a passenger aircraft being hijacked by remote control and flown into the World Trade Center. Did Rupert Murdoch have prior knowledge of 9-11?
64. Is the Pentagon Jet Wheel from a Global Hawk?
October 12, 2003
An official FEMA photograph reveals a crucial piece of evidence, which if positively identified, could identify the exact aircraft that hit the Pentagon on 9-11.
65. Bush on 9-11: Out of the loop?
October 17, 2003
As 9-11, "the Pearl Harbor of the 21st century," unfolded in New York and Washington the president remained conspicuously "out of the loop" - in Florida.
9-11 Articles - 2004
66. Chief UN Weapons Inspector Calls Iraq War Illegal
March 10, 2004
Hans Blix, the Swedish diplomat who supervised UN inspectors that scoured the country in a search for weapons of mass destruction says the war against Iraq is illegal.
67. Media Admits Failing Public on Iraq War Coverage
March 30, 2004
Senior editors and journalists admit that the mainstream media "failed the American public" for its uncritical acceptance of the administration’s claims about the need to invade Iraq.
68. Is Israeli Intelligence behind Terrorism in America?
May 28, 2004
The "War on Terror" has a blind spot: the suspicious activity of Israeli military agents near sensitive military sites in the United States, which is neither investigated nor reported.
69. Controlled Press Ignores Questions about 9-11
September 17, 2004
Three years after the events of 9-11, half of the residents of New York City believe U.S. leaders had foreknowledge and "consciously failed" to act to prevent the disasters, while two in three want a new investigation of the "still unanswered questions."
70. Was Flight 93 Shot Down?
September 18, 2004
Eyewitnesses to the "crash" of Flight 93 report having heard a massive explosion - not a crash of a plane into the soft reclaimed soil of a former strip mine.
71. Was 9-11 an Inside Job?
September 29, 2004
The pulverization of the concrete and the free falling towers defy the laws of physics.
72. Did 9-11 Planes Fire Incendiary Missiles?
September 30, 2004
The explosions that accompanied the impacts of the planes that 11 hit the twin towers were apparently caused by missiles fired immediately before impact.
73. Video Indicates Planes Were Not Passenger Jets
October 7, 2004
Examination of the videos of the planes striking the twin towers in slow motion suggests that the kamikaze attacks were a military operation.
74. Radiation Danger at Pentagon & Other Crash Sites
October 20, 2004
The recent crash of a Boeing 747 in Halifax, Canada, raises questions about the use of depleted uranium (DU) during the 9-11 attacks.
75. Were DU Missiles Used on 9-11?
October 23, 2004
Were DU missiles used to ignite the fuel in the airplanes to create the spectacular explosions that were used to explain the pre-planned demolition of the twin towers?
76. Citizen Grand Jury & Radioactivity at Pentagon
October 29, 2004
The photographic evidence indicates that depleted uranium missiles accompanied the plane impacts.
9-11 Articles - 2005
77. Massive Israeli Spy Ring Uncovered
January 3, 2005
The U.S. media are ignoring the breakup of a major Israeli espionage operation in the U.S. aimed at infiltrating the Justice and Defense departments.
78. The Windsor Tower Inferno and 9-11
February 17, 2005
After burning "like a candle" for nearly 24 hours, Madrid's WindsorTower did not collapse behind billowing clouds of concrete dust. What does this say about the official explanation about 9-11?
79. Controlled Press Hides Chertoff's Israeli Roots
March 4, 2005
Michael Chertoff, the new head of the Department of Homeland Security, was approved in a 98-0 vote in the U.S. Senate without the question of his Israeli nationality even being raised.
80. Chertoff Family Member Wrote 9-11 Propaganda
March 4, 2005
Benjamin Chertoff, the "senior researcher" behind the "Debunking 9-11 Lies" article, is a cousin of Michael Chertoff, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.
81. The Hidden Role of the CIA at Popular Mechanics
March 17, 2005
A purge at Popular Mechanics preceded the publication of its propaganda piece about 9-11. Pulling the strings is the grand dame of Hearst Magazines and her husband – a veteran propaganda expert and former special assistant to the director of the C.I.A.
82. The Rewriting of the History of 9-11
March 24, 2005
The government has confiscated crucial evidence from the terror attacks of 9-11 while news reports that contradict the official version have been removed from public news archives.
83. Is MITRE the Trojan Horse of 9-11?
April 1, 2005
Did a central controller with "super user" privileges of the command and control systems of the Department of Defense, NORAD, the Air Force, and the FAA, control the aerial attacks of 9-11?
84. Did Mossad Deceive the U.S. Military on 9-11?
April 2, 2005
How Israel's military intelligence infiltrated the most sensitive computer networks in the United States through a little start-up company known as Ptech.
85. The Israeli Connection to 9-11
April 8, 2005
U.S. investigators and the controlled media have ignored a preponderance of evidence that Israeli intelligence was involved in the terror attacks of 9-11.
86. The John Birch Society & 9-11 Disinfo
May 6, 2005
The mouthpiece for the John Birch Society seeks to bolster the official version of 9-11 by ignoring evidence and unfairly attacking independent researchers.
87. The FBI's Role in Hiding Evidence at the Pentagon
May 13, 2005
The report from the damaged Pentagon indicates that federal officials are for hiding crucial evidence and concealing what really happened on 9-11.
88. Morgan Reynolds on WTC Demolition
June 16, 2005
"Only professional demolition" explains the collapses of the three towers on 9-11, a former Bush administration official says. "How can they maintain this giant lie?"
89. The 9-11 European Truth Tour
June 16, 2005
A group of researchers and victims participates in a European 9-11 truth tour.
90. The Censored Eyewitness Testimony of William Rodriguez
June 16, 2005
William Rodriguez, a janitor in the WorldTradeCenter, experienced explosions in the tower before the plane hit.
91. Eyewitnesses Saw Military Aircraft at Scene of Flight 93
July 15, 2005
Eyewitnesses saw military aircraft at the scene before Flight 93 went down but federal agents pressured people not to talk about what they saw.
92. Who is Behind the London Bombings?
July 22, 2005
The controlled press blames British Moslems for the terror bombings in London. But were the Pakistanis from Leeds the architects of terror - or merely unwitting patsies?
93. Israeli Security Firms in London: Fortress GB & ICTS
August 16, 2005
ICTS UK Ltd. and Fortress GB Ltd., two Israeli security firms, are co-located in Tavistock House South, exactly where the bus blew up on July 7.
94. A 9-11 Widow's Quest for Truth
August 2, 2005
Ellen Mariani, the widow who filed the first 9-11 lawsuit, explains how her lawyers conspired with the government to thwart her pursuit of the truth.
95. How the Controlled Press Avoids 9-11 Truth
August 25, 2005
The controlled press avoids William Rodriguez, a key eyewitness and survivor of 9-11, because his testimony exposes the lies of the official version.
96. The Zionist Strategy to Balkanize Iraq
October 3, 2005
An Israeli foreign policy advisor articulated the Zionist strategy to Balkanize the Middle East by breaking up the Arab states of Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States -- in 1982.
97. Scientist Supports 9-11 Demolition Theory
November 17, 2005
Steven E. Jones of the Department of Physics and Astronomy at BrighamYoungUniversity has presented a paper with scientific evidence to support the thesis that the towers were destroyed by Thermite-type explosives.
9-11 Articles - 2006
98. Is Ariel Sharonthe Mastermind of 9-11?
January 13, 2006
The controlled media whitewashes Ariel Sharon's long history as a master of Zionist terrorism. Yet, the question remains: Is Sharon behind 9-11?
99. The Ties between Netanyahu and Silverstein
February 23, 2006
A preponderance of evidence supports the thesis that Israeli intelligence was involved in the terror attacks of 9-11.
100. The Judicial Hijacking of the 9-11 Victim Lawsuits
April 14, 2006
Not a single victim's lawsuit has been heard in a trial by jury. Why have the 9-11 families not been allowed to have their cases heard in an open trial?
101. The White Flames of Thermite
April 21, 2006
Something was burning white hot on steel columns at the 81st floor area and creating a large amount of molten iron. What was burning here - if not Thermite?
102. The Censored Evidence of Thermite
April 27, 2006
The Thermite that was evidently used to cut the core columns and pulverize the concrete of the twin towers produced large amounts of molten iron, yet the controlled media refuses to look at the evidence.
103. Why Did Iron Boil beneath the Rubble?
May 6, 2006
The bluish smoke that rose from the rubble of the WorldTradeCenter contained unprecedented amounts of ultra-fine particles which are only created when metal boils. What produced such extremely hot fires to burn beneath the rubble for months?
104. The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93
May 12, 2006
Eyewitness testimonies describe a very different fate having befallen United Flight 93 than those portrayed in the Hollywood film or the 9-11 Commission report.
105. Controlling the Message of 9-11
May 25, 2006
Rather than presenting the facts, the media message about 9-11 is carefully controlled to suppress evidence of Israeli involvement in the attacks.
106. How the Zionist Media Network Interprets 9-11
May 25, 2006
The question of who controls the media is central to understanding the criminal network behind the cover-up, and by extension – the attack itself.
107. The Suppressed Photos of Thermite Explosions
May 26, 2006
The official 9-11 report (NIST) contains data and evidence to support the thesis that Thermite was used in the destruction of the twin towers on 9-11.
108. Open Letter to NIST Investigators
May 26, 2006
The data about molten metal and pressure pulses in the NIST report raises more questions than it answers.
109. The Israeli Code on U.S. Government Computers
June 16, 2006
The most critical computer networks used by the U.S. government and military are secured by Israeli software written by a "code breaker" tied to an Israeli state-run scientific institution.
110. Ehud Olmert's Ties to 9-11
June 18, 2006
The controlled press overlooks the Israeli leader's crimes, but Ehud Olmert's ties to the convicted Israeli criminal who controlled airport security at Boston airport on 9-11 cannot be ignored.
111. The Forewarning of 9-11 & the Israeli Fugitive
August 24, 2006
Jacob "Kobi" Alexander, an Israeli military officer connected to the Odigo instant messaging system which conveyed a warning of the 9-11 attacks hours before they occurred is a fugitive from U.S. justice.
112. Who's to Blame for the Terror in London?
August 31, 2006
Blaming Moslems of Pakistani ancestry for the terror attacks of July has inflamed public opinion in Britain. The allegations remain unproven and the evidence suggests the bombing was another "false flag" operation.
113. Who is behind the Attack on Professor Jones?
September 17, 2006
Like a modern-day Galileo, the physicist who uses logic and science to explain the "collapses" of the WorldTradeCenter has been banned from teaching.
114. Rahm Emanuel's Dirty Secret
November 17, 2006
The "golden boy" of the Democrat Party, the Israeli-American Rahm Emanuel, is the son of a real-life terrorist.
115. The Zionist Network Behind 9-11
December 7, 2006
Understanding 9-11 requires knowing the key players who controlled the non-investigation and subsequent media-driven "interpretation" of the terror attacks.
9-11 Articles - 2007
116. The Occupation of Iraq is the War
January 10, 2007
The fundamental fact avoided by the Zionist-controlled press and government spokesmen is that the occupation of Iraq is the war in Iraq.
117. 9-11 Planes Flew into Secure Computer Rooms
January 11, 2007
The two airplanes that struck the WorldTradeCenter flew directly into secure computer rooms. Were the computer rooms equipped to play a role in the crime?
118. Who Put Thermate in the World Trade Center?
January 18, 2007
Photographic evidence indicates that impact areas in both towers contained forms of Thermite, pre-placed to destroy evidence and facilitate the demolition while creating a deadly pyrotechnic spectacle.
119. Is This Evidence of Exploding Thermate?
January 25, 2007
Video images show an abundance of whitish oxides and light orange flame. Is this evidence of a form of Thermate with barium nitrate added for flame effect?
120. Terror "Mastermind" is a Fake
March 16, 2007
The person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed does not appear to be the person who masterminded the attacks of 9-11. He seems to be a feeble-minded "fall guy" who has been manipulated to make these incredible claims.
121. Was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Captured?
March 16, 2007
If this man is truly the mastermind of the 9-11 attacks, why has so little attention been paid to him?
122. The Denial of Justice for 9-11 Victims
March 20, 2007
Some 6,600 lawsuits were brought against the airlines and the passenger screening companies, but not one victim's case has gone to trial.
123. Why are Honest 9-11 Researchers Targeted?
May 15, 2007
Were the attacks on Bollyn and Professor Steven Jones related? Were we attacked for asking too many questions about Thermite and 9-11?
124. Judge Forces Families to Settle Out of Court
September 9, 2007
The 9-11 relatives who went to court looking for justice and accountability for the terror attacks now realize that Judge Hellerstein is not going to let them go to trial.
125. The Court's Crass Comments about 9-11 Litigation
September 10, 2007
U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein is pushing the relatives to settle without going to trial. "Money is the universal lubricant," Hellerstein says. What he means is take the cash and forget about justice.
126. Homeland Security & the Exclusion of Evidence
September 11, 2007
The 9-11 families have been abused by a corrupt judicial process that is more concerned about covering up than delivering justice and accountability through discovery.
127. The Toxic Smoke from the Rubble
September 13, 2007
An article in the Village Voice discusses the effects of the "9-11 toxic cloud" without mentioning the toxic smoke that rose from the burning rubble for nearly four months.
128. 9-11 Judge Nominated for Attorney General
September 17, 2007
Michael [Bernard] Mukasey is appointed to serve as U.S. Attorney General. Mukasey has a long record of presiding over cases of false-flag terrorism, such as Larry Silverstein's claims against the insurers, the Jose Padilla case, and the first WTC bombing case.
129. The Conspirators' Unbreakable Bond
September 20, 2007
The nominee for Attorney General has a long history of obstructing justice, preventing discovery, and covering up the evidence of Israeli involvement in the terror attacks of 9-11.
130. An American Holocaust
September 25, 2007
Dresden, Waco, and the WorldTradeCenter were holocausts in which human lives were intentionally destroyed by fire. Who lit the fires that consumed the twin towers?
131. The Final Phase of the 9-11 Cover-Up
September 27, 2007
Six years after the worst terrorist atrocity in U.S. history, not a single victim lawsuit has gone to trial. With only 21 cases remaining, it appears likely that the book may be closed on the 9-11 litigation without a single case ever being heard in court.
132. The 9-11 Cover-Up: Italian Gangsters and Jewish Bosses
October 1, 2007
Rudolph W. Giuliani was the only child of Harold Giuliani, a man who had long-standing ties to organized crime in Brooklyn from the 1930s.
133. Mayor Giuliani, Senator D'Amato & Israeli Intelligence
October 5, 2007
Senator Alfonse M. D'Amato and the former mayor of New York City, Rudolph W. Giuliani, are on the board of an organization tied to Israeli military intelligence and Henry Kissinger: the America-Israel Friendship League (AIFL).
134. Is 9-11 Judge Working for Israel?
October 23, 2007
The judge presiding over the 9-11 tort litigation has a very serious conflict of interest: he is a dedicated Zionist with deep and long-standing family ties with the State of Israel.
135. Michael Chertoff's Childhood in Israel
October 26, 2007
A passenger manifest from an Israeli flight in 1955 proves that Michael Chertoff visited Israel as a 3-year-old with his Israeli mother, a member of the Mossad.
136. Ehud Olmert's Secret Visit to New York on Eve of 9-11
December 2, 2007
Ehud Olmert, the current prime minister of Israel, was in New York on the day before 9-11 with supporters of the Israeli terrorist gang of the Irgun (Betar).
137. Top Secret: Ehud Olmert's 9-11 Visit to NYC
December 4, 2007
Ehud Olmert made a secret visit to New York City on September 10, 2001 - the eve of the worst terror attack in U.S. history. What was this visit about and why has it been kept secret?
138. On Enduring Dictators and Darkness
December 5, 2007
9-11 Articles - 2008
139. Voxeo's Ties to 9-11 and the Israeli Military
January 5, 2008
Voxeo, the mysterious telephone-computer messaging company that tallies the Iowa caucus results is tied to the Israeli military and technology stealing companies known to have had prior knowledge of 9-11.
140. Bollyn Responds to Voxeo
January 7, 2008
Jonathan Taylor, CEO of Voxeo, was a founder of IRdg. Taylor's IRdg was acquired by MediaGate, a subsidiary of Elron Electronic Industries, the parent company of Israeli defense electronics company Elbit.
141. Fire Did Not Collapse WTC - Swedish Structural Engineer
January 8, 2008
A European structural engineer writes about the collapses of the World Trade Center.
142. The Key Players of 9-11 - Who is Jerome Hauer?
January 20, 2008
Jerome Hauer is among the key individuals suspected of playing crucial roles in setting the stage for Israeli false-flag terror attacks of 9-11.
143. The Zionist Money Behind 9-11
May 13, 2008
One of the most peculiar things about investigating 9-11 is that a whole slew of Zionist criminals, a group of people which is evidently involved in the terror attacks in one way or another, is completely ignored by the controlled media.
144. 9-11: The Florida Connection
May 21, 2008
Florida was the central networking base and staging area for the "false flag" terror attacks of 9-11. Fifteen of the nineteen Arabs allegedly involved in the hijackings, for example, lived and had their base of operations in South Florida.
9-11 Articles - 2009
145. Super-Thermite Found in World Trade Center Dust
April 5, 2009
"The evidence for active, highly energetic thermitic material in the WTC dust is compelling...All these data suggest that the thermitic material found in the WTC dust is a form of nanothermite, not ordinary (macro-) thermite."
146. Super-Thermite Demolished Twin Towers
April 15, 2009
147. An Inconvenient Witness: Sonnenfeld on WTC 6
June 24, 2009
Kurt Sonnenfeld, the FEMA videographer who, for 29 days after 9-11, filmed the crime scene at the World Trade Center, including the sub-basement levels of WTC 6 saw that the huge vault beneath WTC 6 had been emptied, evidently during the night prior to 9-11. This information is essential to understand the crater that was found in the U.S. Customs House (WTC 6) during the demolition of the South Tower.
Understanding the Use of Thermite on 9-11
July 14, 2009
Who Put Super Thermite in the Twin Towers?
July 20, 2009
Elbit - The Hellerstein Connection to 9-11
August 3, 2009
Israel's Secret Super Thermite Lab
August 26, 2009
The Exploding Floors of 9-11
September 3, 2009
Arrest, Prosecution, and Trial
149. Christopher Bollyn Arrested, August 15, 2006
150. Timeline of Events Surrounding the Police Assault
March 17, 2007
151. Was Homeland Security Behind Attack on 9-11 Investigative Journalist? August 31, 2006
152. Bollyn's Speech to the Village Board of Hoffman Estates on Martin Luther King Day, January 15, 2007
153. CNN Tries to Smear Bollyn, January 23, 2007
154. Christopher Bollyn Appears in Court, February 1, 2007
155. Bollyn Fires Attorney Jack Smeeton, February 15, 2007
156. The Bollyn Case and Police Torture in Chicago, February 19, 2007
157. Establishing the Facts of the Police Assault
February 26, 2007
158. Evidence of a Police Conspiracy
March 6, 2007
159. Bollyn Hires New Lawyer – Prepares For Trial, March 8, 2007
160. Evidence of a Conspiracy to Assault & Taser an Honest 9-11 Researcher, March 28, 2007
161. Bollyn Trial - Video Evidence Destroyed, March 29, 2007
162. Proof of the Conspiracy to Injure Bollyn, March 29, 2007
163. Malice Exposed: Bollyn Prosecuted for "anti-Israel" Writing
April 14, 2007
164. Bollyn Trial: The Destruction and Withholding of Evidence
April 24, 2007
165. Prosecution Influenced by ADL, May 22, 2007
166. Professor Steven Jones Appeals for Fairness
May 23, 2007
167. The Trial of Investigative Reporter Christopher Bollyn
June 11, 2007
Footnotes
Bibliography
Index
Foreword by Glen Stanish
Truth Marches On
By Glen Stanish
September 11, 2001, much like December 7, 1941, is a day that will live in infamy. The post 9-11 period is one of the saddest times in American history. It has, however, provided the American people a slow and painful awakening of sorts.
As an airline pilot for American Airlines, the attacks of 9-11 hit very close to home. I was in the middle of a four-day trip on a layover in downtown Fort Worth on 9-11. Like many Americans that day, I woke up to the news of the devastating attacks. And, like most Americans, for a brief period after the attacks I was in a state of shock and awe.
Very shortly after the attacks we were informed by our elected leaders and the media that we had been attacked by Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida because they didn’t like our freedoms. Simple enough, but lacking a plausible political motive. For those who think a bit further than what we’re told and deeper about the causes of war - greed in a word - this explanation was hard to accept. It was as if President George W. Bush had given us a square peg, and no matter how hard we tried, we could not make it fit into the proverbial round hole. I suspect that the author of this book, Christopher Bollyn, may have experienced this same thought process.
My own personal discovery of the truth of 9-11 began with Bollyn. I had been subscribing to a newspaper, American Free Press, where he had been a regular contributing reporter. I had enjoyed reading Bollyn’s articles, appreciating his thorough research and open and honest candor. It was shortly after 9-11, when I was reading one of Bollyn’s articles about the scene of the crash of United Airlines Flight 93 in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. He described how many eyewitnesses, including the mayor of Shanksville, reported never seeing any wreckage of a Boeing 757, saying things like there was no smoke or fire, no pieces of airframe, things along these lines. Other reports that quoted the coroner on the scene said there were no bodies or body parts. While reading these reports, I could not reconcile them with the usual scenes of airline accidents.
As an airline pilot, we have been required for several years by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to complete, during our initial and annual training, a course called Crew Resource Management (C.R.M.). This is the study of airline accidents and incidents and what we as flight crew members could have done differently to have prevented a particular accident. This study of airline accidents typically involves reviewing cockpit and air traffic control recordings, flight data recordings, and the well recorded and documented scenes of the accidents. So I have studied many airline accidents over the course of my career.
It was difficult for me to accept the reports from Shanksville about the lack of any wreckage of Flight 93 because after an airline accident, large pieces of the aircraft are normally found. There are the remains of the virtually indestructible engine cores, landing gear, and tail sections, to name just a few of the larger parts that would be found in the debris field. Other wreckage that one would normally expect to find from a well constructed Boeing 757 airframe would be several of the plug type entry and service doors, cargo doors, over wing exits, sections of fuselage and passenger seats, hydraulic tanks and pumps, and flight controls such as spoiler panels, flaps, slats, rudders, and elevators. Wreckage from inside the cabin that would have survived would include the emergency exit slides, the emergency inflatable rafts, life preserver jackets, and other emergency equipment, galley carts, lavatories, coffee pots, ovens, in-flight magazines, and catalogues. Luggage, freight, and mail would also be recovered from the immediate vicinity. These are the things eyewitnesses and first responders normally observe after a Boeing 757 collides with terrain. Temporary morgues are usually set up in nearby facilities where recovered bodies and body parts are taken and identified for the families of the deceased.
Therefore, soon after reading his article, and experiencing the difficulty of reconciling these reports with my experience and background, I contacted Bollyn and thus began my personal friendship with the author. Bollyn has continued to report breakthrough material and information about the inadequacies and the erroneous and deceptive nature of the official 9-11 reports. He has bravely pressed forward with determination, working with scientists and physics professors and other qualified professionals to show that the three World Trade Center buildings that collapsed on 9-11 were brought down by explosives in controlled demolitions. He has enlightened many to the intrigues of “false flag” operations used as pretexts for war by powerful, corrupt, and covetous politicians and bloodthirsty heads of state.
This he has done in the face of heavy resistance by those who would attempt to keep the American people in the dark, namely the mainstream press and other special interest groups. But like a small candle in a large dark room, the light shines through.
The 9-11 truth movement, as it is known, owes much to the work of Bollyn. Since his first writings about the subject, virtually thousands of scientists, professors, architects, engineers, pilots, politicians, firefighters, religious leaders, lawyers, and others with expertise and qualifications have organized to have their voices heard and refute the official explanation of the attacks of 9-11. These are our attempts to petition the government for a redress of grievances, as it were. Yet some still ask, why would the U.S. government either attack its own people or cover up for those who attacked us on 9-11?
And this is where some of Bollyn’s most important work leads. To answer difficult questions like these, observers of history and geopolitics should consider the policies that have shifted, been postponed, cancelled, changed course, or otherwise bent as a result of the attacks of 9-11. And as most observers will attest, there was and still is an ongoing and unresolved major political issue in the Middle East, one whose developments have been very much affected by 9-11 and one that apparently has our own U.S. political house divided, or at least unable to clearly define and implement its policies concerning this issue. And this unresolved political issue is the establishment of an independent and democratic Palestinian state, to co-exist with Israel with peace and justice for all.
So what is our national policy concerning the establishment of an independent and democratic Palestinian state? Is it fluid, undefined, and changing course over time with other changes in the political landscape? Or, is it solid, stable, and complete, just waiting for the ideal time to be implemented? Or, perhaps, like other major international political issues (Iran Contra comes to mind) -- is there more than one policy? Is there one policy presented to the public, which never seems to progress towards completion, and another, planned behind closed doors, that develops in opposition to and in defiance of the stated public policy?
As former President Jimmy Carter wrote in his book Palestine Peace Not Apartheid:
The unwavering official policy of the United States since Israel became a state has been that its borders, unless modified through negotiations, must coincide with the armistice lines prevailing from 1949 until 1967…
The unanimously adopted UN Resolution 242 specifies the withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from occupied territories... these include the Golan Heights, Gaza, the Sinai, and the West Bank, including Jerusalem…
U.S. policy was that Israeli settlements in the West Bank and Gaza were ‘illegal and obstacles to peace’… also, as a member of the International Quartet that includes Russia, the United Nations, and the European Union, America supports the Roadmap for Peace which espouses exactly the same requirements…and whose ultimate aim is the creation of a democratic and independent Palestinian state.
To highlight U.S. and international efforts to achieve peace in the Middle East, a brief historical review is in order.
• The Camp David Accords led directly to the 1979 Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty.
• The Madrid Conference was hosted by the government of Spain and co-sponsored by the USA and the USSR. It convened on October 30, 1991, and lasted for three days. It was an early attempt by the international community to start a peace process through negotiations involving Israel and the Palestinians as well as Arab countries including Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan.
• The Oslo Accords, agreed in Norway on August 20, 1993, and signed at a public ceremony in Washington D.C. on September 13, 1993, was a milestone in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This was the first direct, face-to-face agreement between Israel and political representatives of the Palestinians. It was intended to be a framework for the future relations between Israel and the Palestinians, when all outstanding final status issues between the two sides would be addressed and resolved in one agreement. Permanent issues such as Jerusalem, Palestinian refugees, Israeli settlements, borders, and security were deliberately left to be decided at a later stage.
• The Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, also known as Oslo 2, was signed by Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) on September 28, 1995. It became the basis and the reference point for subsequent negotiations and agreements such as the Hebron Protocol of 1997 and the Wye River Memorandum of 1998, and it is a basis for the latter Road Map for Peace which calls for the creation of a democratic independent Palestinian state, part of the two-state solution for Middle East peace.
• The Wye River Memorandum, signed on October 23, 1998, was an agreement negotiated between Israel and the Palestinian Authority to implement the earlier Interim Agreement of September 1995.
• The Sharm El Sheikh Memorandum on Implementation Timeline of Outstanding Commitments of Agreements Signed and the Resumption of Permanent Status Negotiations was signed on September 4, 1999, by Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Barak and PLO Chairman Yasir Arafat. Its purpose was to implement the Interim Agreement (Oslo II) and to implement all other agreements between the PLO and Israel since 1993. The two sides agreed to resume the Permanent Status negotiations to achieve the goal of reaching a Permanent Status Agreement. They reaffirmed that the negotiations on the Permanent Status will lead to the implementation of Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338. They agreed to make a determined effort to conclude a Framework Agreement and setting a timetable to achieve these goals. A timetable for final status talks to deal with Jerusalem, borders, refugees, and settlements, and a framework agreement on permanent status (FAPS) were to be achieved by February 2000 with a permanent agreement signed by September 2000.
• The Middle East Peace Summit at Camp David of July 2000 took place between U.S. President Bill Clinton, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, and Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasir Arafat. It was an ultimately unsuccessful attempt to negotiate a “final status settlement” to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
• The Taba Summit were talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, held during January 21-27, 2001, at Taba in the Sinai Peninsula. They were talks aimed at reaching the “final status” negotiations to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and came closer to reaching a final settlement than any previous or subsequent peace talks. The talks were discontinued due to upcoming Israeli elections.
As can be seen by the record, U.S. and international efforts to reach a comprehensive settlement for peace in the Middle East and the establishment of an independent and democratic Palestinian state were proceeding nicely until early 2001. One might consider that we, as a global community, were in the end game, late in the fourth quarter or in the bottom of the ninth inning, to use sports analogies – but perhaps ‘sudden death’ would be more apt.
To have come this far and not taken the ball into the end zone, to have failed to cross the finish line when we were so close, indicates that there must be a very determined and powerful force preventing it. There must be an opposing power, a well organized political entity whose objective is to prevent any final settlement of the crucial issues in the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. This antagonistic element is opposed to any agreement that would allow the establishment of an independent and democratic Palestinian state.
In February 2001, Ariel Sharon was elected prime minister of Israel, and according to former President Jimmy Carter, Sharon was committed to the rejection of the Oslo peace agreement.
Historically speaking, Ariel Sharon, like many other Israeli politicians, made statements and policies that indicated his intention to kill the peace process. In 1977, Menachem Begin assembled a coalition that accepted his premise that the land in Gaza and the West Bank belonged rightfully to the State of Israel and should not be exchanged in a peace agreement with the Arabs. In the early 1980s, during the presidency of Ronald Reagan, Israel announced the annexation of the Golan Heights (taken from Syria) and increased their efforts to build Israeli settlements throughout the West Bank and Gaza. As a matter of fact, since 1980, with the Likud Party in control of the government, the confiscation of Arab land has accelerated greatly with the building of illegal Jewish settlements in the West Bank being one of the government’s top priorities.
Ariel Sharon stated that the East Bank of the Jordan is “ours but not in our hands, just as East Jerusalem had been until the Six-Day War.” During the Clinton years, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a Likud hawk, promised never to exchange land for peace. Then Foreign Minister Ariel Sharon declared the Oslo Agreement to be “national suicide” saying, “Everybody has to move, run and grab as many hilltops as they can to enlarge the settlements because everything we take now will stay ours.”
In Jewish History, Jewish Religion, author Israel Shahak, an Israeli Jew critical of Israeli policies, explained the reasons behind the actions of his country’s government. Shahak wrote:
The main danger which Israel, as a ‘Jewish state’ poses to its own people, to other Jews, and to its neighbors is its ideologically motivated pursuit of territorial expansion and the inevitable series of wars resulting from this aim… In 1956, I eagerly swallowed all of Prime Minister Ben Gurion’s political and military reasons for Israel initiating the Suez War, until he pronounced in the Knesset on the third day of that war, that the real reason for it is ‘the restoration of the Kingdom of David and Solomon’ to its Biblical [Old Testament] borders…The Biblical borders of the land of Israel, “which rabbinical authorities interpret as ideally belonging to the Jewish state” include the following areas: in the south, all of Sinai and a part of northern Egypt up to the environs of Cairo; in the east, all of Jordon and a large chunk of Saudi Arabia, all of Kuwait and a part of Iraq south of the Euphrates; in the north, all of Lebanon and all of Syria together with a huge part of Turkey (up to Lake Van); and in the west, Cyprus… In May of 1993, Ariel Sharon formally proposed in the Likud Convention that Israel should adopt the ‘Biblical borders’ concept as its official policy.
Well, it sounds as if we may have identified the opponent to the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. As we can see, up until shortly before September 2001, U.S. and international efforts to achieve a final agreement and resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict were very close to their goal. Shortly before September 11, 2001, an Israeli government was elected whose stated objectives were in sharp opposition to the aims of the peace efforts of the United States and the international community.
Immediately after the 9-11 attacks, Israeli spokesman Benjamin Netanyahu stated publicly, “It is a very good thing,” because it would strengthen American support for Israel. And as if to confirm Netanyahu’s sentiments, using 9-11 as justification, Israel’s Prime Minister Ariel Sharon escalated the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, pummeling Palestinian civilian infrastructure, homes and businesses in the West Bank and Gaza on the pretext of fighting terrorism.
Shortly thereafter, Sharon’s Chief of Staff Dov Weisglass admitted that the purpose of his government's policy to expand settlements in the West Bank was to undermine peace plans, stymie the creation of a Palestinian state, and halt talks about the right of return for Palestinian refugees:
The significance of our disengagement plan is the freezing of the peace process. It supplies the formaldehyde necessary so there is no political process with the Palestinians. When you freeze the process, you prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state… Effectively, this whole package called a Palestinian state has been removed indefinitely from our agenda. All of this was done with the United States' blessing.
What? Wait a minute! This was done with the blessing of the government of the United States? What about our “unwavering official policies”? What about Israeli settlements in the West Bank being “illegal and obstacles to peace”? What about our official support of the creation of an independent and democratic Palestinian State as an integral part of a just and final resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the peace process? Do we have more than one policy here?
On March 28, 2001, at the Arab League meeting in Beirut, twenty-two nations ended a long debate by endorsing a resolution introduced by Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah. It offered Israel normal relations with all Arab states if Israel complied with UN Resolutions 194 and 242. The next day, a massive Israeli military force surrounded and destroyed Yasir Arafat’s office compound in Ramallah. Later, the United States voted for a UN Security Council resolution demanding Israeli withdrawal from Ramallah, which Israel ignored.
Arab diplomats accused Ariel Sharon of deliberately sabotaging the peace overture and Crown Prince Abdullah called the prime minister’s assault on Arafat “a brutal, despicable, savage, inhumane, and cruel action.”
In April 2003, a “Roadmap” for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was announced by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan on behalf of the U.S., the UN, the European Union, and Russia (i.e. the Quartet). Kofi Annan stated:
Such a settlement, negotiated between the parties, will result in the emergence of an independent, democratic Palestinian state living side by side in peace and security with Israel and its neighbors. The settlement will end the occupation that began in 1967, based on the Madrid Conference terms of reference and the principle of land for peace, UN Security Council Resolutions 242, 338, and 1397, agreements previously reached by the parties, and the Arab initiative proposed by Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah and endorsed by the Arab Summit in Beirut.
The Palestinians accepted the Roadmap in its entirety. The Israeli government announced several caveats and prerequisites, some of which would preclude any final peace talks. Some of the Israeli provisos were: Israeli control over Palestine, including the entry and exit of all persons and cargo, plus its airspace and electromagnetic spectrum (radio, television, etc.). No discussion of Israeli settlements in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza or the status of the Palestinian Authority and its institutions in Jerusalem. No reference to the key provisions of UN Resolution 242, and the waiver of any right of return of refugees, among others.
The practical result of all this, according to former President Jimmy Carter, is the Roadmap for Peace has become moot, with only two results: Israel has been able to use it as a delaying tactic with an endless series of preconditions that can never be met, while proceeding with plans to implement its unilateral goals; and the U.S. has been able to give the impression of positive engagement in a “peace process.”
With Ariel Sharon and George W. Bush in office, the so-called "peace process" went nowhere.
In early 2005, Jimmy Carter again arrived in Israel. In Palestine Peace Not Apartheid, he describes the “most disturbing intrusions of the great dividing wall being built by the Israelis.”
The Israeli separation wall divides the Holy Land.
Described as a ‘security fence’, Carter wrote about the Israeli wall of separation:
"…its other purpose became clear as we observed its construction and examined maps of the barrier’s ultimate path through Palestine. Including the Israeli-occupied Jordan River Valley, the wall would take in large areas of land for Israel and encircle the Palestinians who remained in their remnant of the West Bank. This would severely restrict Palestinian access to the outside world. ‘Imprisonment Wall’ is more descriptive than ‘security fence.’
Sharon’s purpose was to implement the unilateral disengagement policy and to complete building a wall to separate Palestinians from territory to be claimed by Israel, according to President Carter.
In Carter’s book, he further describes the conditions and developments that have occurred in the Middle East and that have been allowed to occur in the wake of 9-11 have taken us further from a final resolution and the creation of an independent and democratic Palestinian state as part of the two-state solution. Carter wrote:
With increasing control of East Jerusalem, with relative security from the wall surrounding what is left of the West Bank, and with thousands of remaining settlers east of the wall protected by a strong occupying force, there is a temptation for some Israelis simply to avoid any further efforts to seek a peace agreement based on the Quartet’s Roadmap or good-faith negotiations on any other basis…
In this diplomatic vacuum, Israeli leaders have embarked on a series of unilateral decisions, bypassing both Washington and the Palestinians…Utilizing their political and military dominance, they are imposing a system of partial withdrawal, encapsulation, and apartheid on the Muslim and Christian citizens of the occupied territories. The driving purpose for the forced separation of the two peoples is…the acquisition of land…
The future prospects for the West Bank are…dismal. Especially troublesome is the huge dividing wall in populated areas and an impassable fence in rural areas. The governments of Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert have built the fence and wall mainly within Palestinian territory, intruding deeply into the West Bank to encompass Israeli settlement blocs and large areas of other Palestinian land. It is projected to be at least three and a half times as long as Israel’s internationally recognized border and already cuts directly through Palestinian villages, divides families from their gardens and farmland…
One example is that the wandering wall almost completely surrounds the Palestinian city of Qalqiliya with its 45,000 inhabitants, with most of the citizens’ land and about one-third of their water supply confiscated by the Israelis. Almost the same encirclement has occurred around 170,000 citizens of Bethlehem, the birthplace of Jesus.
First, a wide swath must be bulldozed through communities before the wall can be built. In addition to the concrete and electrified fencing materials used in the construction, the barrier includes two meter deep trenches, roads for patrol vehicles, electronic ground and fence sensors, thermal imaging and video cameras, sniper towers, and razor wire – almost entirely on Palestinian land. The area between the closed segregation barrier and the Israeli border has been designated a closed military region for an indefinite period of time. Israeli directives state that every Palestinian over the age of twelve living in the closed area has to obtain a ‘permanent resident permit’ from the civil administration to enable them to live in their own homes…
To summarize, whatever territory Israel decides to confiscate will be on its side of the wall, but Israelis will still control the Palestinians who will be on the other side of the barrier…
Since 1945, the International Court of Justice has functioned essentially as the judicial arm of the United Nations system, and in July 2004 the court determined that the Israeli government’s construction of the segregation wall in the occupied West Bank was illegal…The court called on Israel to cease construction of the wall, to dismantle what has already been built in areas within the occupied Palestinian territory, and to compensate Palestinians who suffered losses as a result of the wall’s construction. The Israeli Supreme Court has chosen not to accept the International Court’s decision…
The wall ravages many places along its devious route that are important to Christians. In addition to enclosing Bethlehem in one of its most notable intrusions, an especially heartbreaking division is on the southern slope of the Mount of Olives, a favorite place for Jesus and his disciples, and very near Bethany, where they often visited Mary, Martha, and their brother, Lazarus. There is a church named for one of the sisters, Santa Marta Monastery, where Israel’s thirty-foot concrete wall cuts through the property. The house of worship is now on the Jerusalem side, and its parishioners are separated from it because they cannot get permits to enter Jerusalem. Its priest, Father Claudio Ghilardi, says, ‘For nine hundred years we have lived here under Turkish, British, Jordanian, and Israeli governments, and no one has ever stopped people coming to pray. It is scandalous. This is not a barrier. It is a border. Why don’t they speak the truth?’
Father Claudio adds a comment that describes the path of the entire barrier: ‘The wall is not separating Palestinians from Jews; rather, Palestinians from Palestinians.’ Nearby are three convents that will also be cut off from people they serve. These 2,000 Palestinian Christians have lost their place of worship and their spiritual center.
In addition to cutting off about 200,000 Palestinians in Jerusalem from their relatives, property, schools, and businesses, the wall is designed to complete the enclosure of a severely truncated Palestine, a small portion of its original size, compartmentalized, divided into cantons, occupied by Israeli security forces, and isolated from the outside world. In addition, a network of exclusive highways is being built across even these fragments of the West Bank to connect the new Greater Israel in the west with the occupied Jordan River valley in the east, where 7,000 Jews are living in twenty-one heavily protected settlements among about 50,000 Palestinians who are still permitted to stay there. The area along the Jordan River, which is now planned as the eastern leg of the encirclement of the Palestinians, is one of Palestine’s most lucrative and productive agricultural regions. Most of its inhabitants were forcibly evicted in 1967, and the Israelis have not allowed these original families to return. Israeli customs officers keep lists of their names and are careful to prohibit their crossing any international checkpoint into occupied territory, where they might lay claim to their homes and farmland.
President Carter continues to describe the rather hopeless prospects for the Palestinians, the result of developments that were allowed to occur in the Middle East political arena since the attacks of 9-11: "It is obvious that the Palestinians will be left with no territory in which to establish a viable state… The Palestinians will have a future impossible for them or any portion of the international community to accept."
So it sounds as if a two-state solution to the peace process has become null and void. Was this the real reason for 9-11? Was it carried out to create a condition of war, based on lies, deception, and fraud, that would distract and obfuscate attempts to reach a two-state settlement, which seemed within reach just before September 2001? Was it designed to allow Israel to continue its unilateral goals of further expansion, to create a Greater Israel that reaches from the Euphrates to the Nile, ethnically cleansing the land of its original inhabitants? Have we established in the Green Zone in Baghdad a base to conduct future operations to assist our Zionist ally with her future expansionist conquests? Do we have more than one policy here? As observers of history and geopolitics, it certainly makes more sense now than the ridiculous, “They attacked us because they hate our freedoms” rubbish.
Recently, on April 25, 2009, the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz reported:
New foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman said on Wednesday that Israel was changing its policies on the peace process and was not bound by commitments it made at a U.S. sponsored conference to pursue creation of a Palestinian state…
A source in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s party confirmed Wednesday that his new government intended to distance itself from U.S. sponsored understandings on working towards a Palestinian state.
“Israel’s government said Sunday that it would not halt construction of a planned housing project in east Jerusalem," USA TODAY reported on July 20, 2009. "Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told his Cabinet there would be no limits on Jewish construction anywhere in ‘unified Jerusalem’" and "declared Israeli sovereignty over the entire city ‘indisputable.’”
In September 2009, “Israel approved on Monday the building of 455 settler homes in the occupied West Bank," as reported by Reuters on September 7, 2009. "A Defense Ministry list of the first such building permits since Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu took office in March showed the homes would be erected in areas Israel intends to keep.”
As President Jimmy Carter wrote in Palestine Peace Not Apartheid:
The overriding problem is that, for more than a quarter century, the actions of some Israeli leaders have been in direct conflict with the official policies of the United States, the international community, and their own negotiated agreements… Israel’s continued control and colonization of Palestinian land have been the primary obstacles to a comprehensive peace agreement in the Holy Land. In order to perpetuate the occupation, Israeli forces have deprived their unwilling subjects of basic human rights. No objective person could personally observe existing conditions in the West Bank and dispute these statements.
Two other interrelated factors have contributed to the perpetuation of violence and regional upheaval: the condoning of illegal Israeli actions from a submissive White House and U.S. Congress during recent years, and the deference with which other international leaders permit this unofficial U. S. policy in the Middle East (emphasis added) to prevail.
In order to achieve its goals, Israel has decided to avoid any peace negotiations and to escape even the mild restraints of the United States by taking unilateral action, called ‘convergence’ or ‘realignment,’ to carve out for itself the choice portions of the West Bank, leaving Palestinians destitute within a small and fragmented remnant of their own land.
The only rational response to this continuing tragedy is to revitalize the peace process through negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians, but the United States has, in effect, abandoned this effort.
In 1796, George Washington gave his Farewell Address which contained many important parting words of advice for future generations of politicians and citizens alike, the disregard for which has helped bring us to this sad post 9-11 political world we find ourselves in. President Washington said:
Hence, likewise, they will avoid the necessity of those overgrown military establishments, which under any form of government, are inauspicious to liberty, and which are to be regarded as particularly hostile to republican liberty…
Nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and passionate attachment for others should be excluded; and in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest…
So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It also leads to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to be retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens, (who devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearance of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliance of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.
Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me fellow citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government.
Excessive partiality for one nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real Patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interest.
The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible…
It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world…
Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest.
As you read Christopher Bollyn’s Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, you will understand just exactly who and what foreign political interest actually attacked us on September 11, 2001. These foreign political interests with their traitors (George Washington referred to these types as tools and dupes) inside our U.S. political establishment attempted to deceive us in order to pursue their foreign-sponsored political will and expansionist policies in the Middle East.
As you read, the real perpetrators of the 9-11 attacks will become apparent, and they will be identified. The motive will become clear, and you will see this peg as a natural fit. You will understand that our country is filled with “ambitious, corrupted, and deluded citizens (in positions of political power, office holders, judges, the press, etc.) who devote themselves to the foreign nation, and have sacrificed the interests of their own country, with popularity, gilding, with the appearance of a virtuous sense of obligation. You may even find yourself supporting a new investigation into the attacks of 9-11.
So what else should one do when he or she finds that their government has attempted to deceive them, in order to pursue unofficial policies through the arts of lies, fraud, deception, and cover up. For Christopher Bollyn and like minded believers, the Scriptures are clear. “And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them.” (Ephesians 5:11, NKJV)
Glen Stanish is a professional pilot and the author of "Where is the Wreckage of UAL 93?" and Uncle Sam's Christian Patriots, a book about the attacks of 9-11.
Preface
"We Are Not Afraid"
We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.
- President John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962
Eight years have passed since the terror atrocities of September 11, 2001, heinous false-flag terror crimes which took the lives of thousands of innocent people and led to drastic changes in the United States and around the world. Although the terror attacks have yet to be properly investigated and prosecuted by the federal government, we now have scientific evidence that proves that the official explanation is nothing but a pack of lies, a massive deception foisted on the public by corrupt government officials and the controlled media. Most significantly, this deception was promoted by officials and media owners who knew it to be false. The U.S. Department of Justice, for example, oversaw the destruction of many tons of structural steel - crucial evidence from the crime scenes.
On one hand, the government and media have intentionally pushed a fabrication that a band of Islamic terrorists hijacked airplanes and flew them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, causing the complete destruction and pulverization of two 110-story towers and a 47-story building in lower Manhattan. Using this deception, the federal government and its agents have created a police state in the United States and forced Americans and other Western nations to participate in an utterly fraudulent "War on Terror," waging illegal wars of aggression and occupation in the Middle East, Central Asia, and Africa. Untold thousands have died in these illegal wars of aggression.
On the other hand, we have scientific evidence that the Twin Towers were blown up with an advanced form of super-thermite, chips of which were found in five different samples of the dust from the demolished towers by Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University. This crucial discovery, published as a peer-reviewed paper in March 2009 with other scientists, completely disproves the official version that the Twin Towers fell as a result of fires caused by the plane crashes. This discovery also explains the explosive destruction and pulverization of the immense steel-frame and concrete buildings. As Professor Jones says, "The data doesn't lie."
Rather than addressing the evidence that the World Trade Center was demolished with explosives, however, the new administration of President Barack Obama continues to use the 9-11 deception to increase the war effort in Afghanistan, occupying a nation that had nothing to do with the terror attacks in the United States. Neither Osama Bin Laden nor the Taliban had anything to do with the demolition of the World Trade Center, which the evidence proves was carried out using an advanced form of Thermite created using nano-technology. Nor did the airplane crashes themselves cause the towers to collapse. The plane crashes were merely part of the deception, meant to provide a plausible explanation for the pre-planned explosive demolitions that followed.
This is why 2009 is such a crucial year for 9-11 truth. A modern republic like the United States cannot continue for very long as a free nation with a government and media that lie to the people about the murder of thousands of its citizens and illegal wars supposedly waged on their behalf. This is clearly a state in the process of a revolutionary change. The American people will not tolerate a police state using such outrageous lies to rob them of their money and freedom.
"We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts," President John F. Kennedy said in 1962. "For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." So, who is really afraid of unpleasant facts and the truth of 9-11? It is not the people, but the culprits of the terror atrocity and the subsequent cover-up who fear the truth.
My work provides some of the unpleasant but essential facts about 9-11. It represents eight years of work and is dedicated to the truth and the people who died on that day. It is unacceptable that their deaths, and the suffering of their families, have been exploited to deceive the world and wage illegal wars.
Christopher Bollyn
Labor Day, 2009
I - 9/11 Through the Eyes of an American Skeptic
Chapter I
9-11 Through the Eyes of an American Skeptic
As a journalist with an independent weekly newspaper based in Washington, D.C., I became caught up in the events of 9-11 from the minute it happened and was able to write freely about the terror attacks that were exploited to start the pre-planned War on Terror.
From my position as a skeptic of the unproven official version, I have examined the facts and evidence since the day it happened and have concluded that the U.S. government and controlled media have engaged in a conspiracy to deceive the world about what really happened on that terrible day.
The Dream
The early morning hours of September 11, 2001 found me with my family driving through New York City en route to Washington, D.C. after a weekend trip to Stowe, Vermont. We had visited the Trapp family lodge and gotten a late start from Stowe on Monday afternoon. By the time we reached New York City, our two small children were fast asleep in the back seat of our rented Buick.
Because the hotels were all full or outrageously expensive, I was left with no choice but to continue driving down the highway when I should have been sleeping. To keep me awake as I drove through New York City, my wife Helje told me about a vivid dream she had had a week earlier, the night before we had left our home near Chicago.
I had heard parts of Helje's strange dream when she had first told it to our children in the backseat of the car as we set out across Indiana for Washington, D.C. Now, to help keep me awake on the busy highways of New York City, she told me her dream from the week before.
In the dream we were driving toward a city with a skyline of densely packed skyscrapers when a large airplane flew right at our car and dove into the road about 50 meters in front of us. She turned and saw the plane emerge from the ground behind us and another plane coming at us from another angle. This was a strange dream in which she felt that our family had been under attack.
Helje's dream turned out to be an eerie and uncanny premonition of what was to happen in the skies of New York City less than eight hours later.
It was about 3 a.m. on September 11 when we finally found an affordable hotel room just inside the state of Maryland on Interstate 95. The kids woke up and jumped on the beds and then we all fell asleep about a half-hour later.
I woke up about 8:30 a.m. and went down to the lobby for a cup of coffee. The television was on in the breakfast area reporting that a plane had struck the North Tower of the World Trade Center in Manhattan. I grabbed some pastries and coffee and hurried back to the room and turned the television to the news channel.
The children and I went to get more donuts and coffee and were on our way back to the room when the second plane hit the South Tower. Helje had seen it happen live on television. We were shocked by the events and realized that America was under attack. I immediately called my office in Washington, D.C. and told my boss that kamikaze airplanes had hit the World Trade Center. He thought I was joking. I said I wouldn't joke about such a thing and told him to turn on the radio. I called the office again after the Pentagon was hit and said we would not be coming to Washington but were heading home to Chicago. Having no idea what would happen next, I thought it would be best to take the country roads and stay away from big cities.
We drove through rural Lancaster County past Amish farmers harvesting a very tall corn crop. I stopped and walked into the fields to ask some of the German-speaking farmers if they knew what had happened in New York City. They said they had not heard anything about it and carried on working with their horse-drawn harvester.
Our route from Pennsylvania to Chicago took us near the site in Shanksville where Flight 93 supposedly crashed, but I had no desire to go to the scene of the disaster. We stopped for lunch in a small town. The diner was full of people but nobody was talking. The people sat quietly, as if mesmerized, listening to the news on the radio.
Indications of Israeli Involvement
We listened to the radio as we drove across Pennsylvania. It was a beautiful sunny day with a bright blue sky. About noon I heard a news report that five "Middle Eastern" men had been seen in New Jersey videotaping and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center.
"They're probably Israelis," I told Helje. For millions of Americans who automatically associate "Middle Eastern" with Arab, this news report planted the idea in their minds that Arabs from the Middle East were behind the terror attacks on New York and Washington.
This line of thinking quickly became the media's only acceptable version of events and although it has still not been proven, it has become the official version of 9-11.
The first indication that the attack on the World Trade Center was an elaborate "false flag" operation came with the arrest of the five men on the New Jersey side of the Hudson River. These men, described as "Middle Eastern" in the first media reports, were later identified as Israelis. A false flag operation is a crime which is designed and carried out so that another party or nation is blamed.
That the five jubilant Middle Eastern men, who had photographed themselves smiling and celebrating with the burning World Trade Center in the background, were indeed Israelis (namely Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari, and Yaron Schmuel) and that two of them were known to U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies as agents of Israeli intelligence, was ignored by the mass media.
The men had been observed taking video or photos of themselves with the World Trade Center burning in the background. Sivan Kurzberg told the police that the men had been driving in their van in the immediate vicinity of the towers that morning. He was photographed flicking a lighter with the burning towers behind him.
A woman who had observed the jubilant Israelis said she was struck by the expressions on the men's faces. "They were like happy, you know," she said. "They didn't look shocked to me. I thought it was very strange."
When they were arrested, Sivan, the driver of the van, told the police, "We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem."
The story of the five men celebrating the destruction of the Twin Towers was dropped from the national news when it became known that they were not Arabs or Muslims from the Middle East, but Jews from Israel.
The noteworthy fact that these men, who clearly had prior knowledge of the attacks, were in fact Israelis, and that they had been arrested at gunpoint with box cutter knives, multiple passports, and thousands of dollars in cash in a van that tested positive for explosives was only reported by Paolo Lima in a local New Jersey newspaper, the Bergen Record, the following day.
This important and timely information, however, was completely ignored by the New York Times and the other national mass media outlets based across the river in New York City.
I discussed the pertinent details with Lima by phone, and this important and suppressed story became the subject of my first article about 9-11. I realized then, during the first week after 9-11, that the mainstream news media was ignoring and covering up important information and evidence about the terrorist attacks.
There would be, for example, no reporting in the mainstream media of Israeli involvement or prior knowledge of the attacks. And this was just the beginning of the censorship the controlled media was to impose on the events of 9-11.
The possibility that these men could be Israeli intelligence agents involved in a spectacular "false flag" terror attack was discussed in my article that went to print in the American Free Press on September 20, 2001. It was the only newspaper in the United States where such thoughts could openly be expressed.
Months later, Forward, a well known New York-based Jewish newspaper, confirmed that Urban Moving Systems, the Weehawken, New Jersey-based "moving" company that the men worked for, was actually an Israeli intelligence front operation and that at least two of the men, evidently the Kurzberg brothers, were known agents of Mossad, Israel's military intelligence agency.
Dominic Suter, the Israeli "owner" of the company and a prime suspect, was somehow allowed to flee to Israel after the Federal Bureau of Investigation had initially interviewed him, but before they could interrogate him a second time. He has not been extradited to the United States since.
After being held for 10 weeks, the five Israelis were sent back to Israel on visa violations. Ellner, Marmari, and Schmuel appeared on an Israeli television show, without the Kurzberg brothers, in November 2001.
The three sheepish and suspiciously guilty looking young men admitted on Israeli television that they had prior knowledge of the terror attacks that changed America – and the world. "The fact of the matter is that we come from a country that experiences terror daily," Oded Ellner (center) said. "Our purpose was to document the event." The obvious question, "And who gave you that task?" was not asked, at least not openly.
One would think that such a revealing public admission by a suspect, claiming prior knowledge of the terror attack and saying that his purpose "was to document the event" would be extremely newsworthy information in the United States.
Sadly, this was not the case. Rather than discuss the evidence, the mainstream media has constructed and defended an unproven version of events in which the blame is assigned to nineteen Arabs with ties to Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida.
Indications of Israeli involvement in 9-11 were conspicuous from the beginning. Benjamin Netanyahu, the former Israeli prime minister and leader of the right wing Likud Party, actually said that he viewed 9-11 as a positive development. On the day of the attacks, Netanyahu was interviewed by James Bennet of the New York Times:
Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, "It's very good." Then he edited himself: "Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy."
Benjamin Netanyahu (right) and Ehud Olmert are Israeli politicians from the extreme right-wing Likud party, which grew out of the Zionist terror organization, the Irgun. Olmert, then mayor of Jerusalem, made a secret visit to New York City the day before the terror attacks. Asked what the attacks meant for U.S.-Israeli relations, Netanyahu said, "It's very good."
Netanyahu predicted that the attack would "strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror of so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror."
Prior knowledge of the 9-11 attacks clearly indicates complicity in the murder of some 3,000 people.
Journalists like me, who challenge the official version with evidence and facts are marginalized as "conspiracy nuts." I have been portrayed as an anti-Semitic writer by the leading media networks simply because I dare to investigate the evidence of Israeli involvement in the terror attacks.
The level of the personal attacks against me increased dramatically in August 2006, when a police assault by three unidentified heavily-armed men resulted in my right elbow being fractured and my being unjustifiably shocked with 50,000 volts from a police device known as a TASER. This outrageous and illegal assault occurred at my home in front of my wife and eight-year-old daughter.
I was taken to jail and subsequently charged by the police with resisting arrest and aggravated assault, both misdemeanor charges. In the Chicago system nearly everyone in such a situation is forced to plead guilty and accept the sentence meted out by the judge. I refused to plead guilty, however, and spent nearly one year trying to defend myself against the baseless charges and malicious prosecution. In early June 2007, I was found guilty of both misdemeanors after a seriously flawed four-day-trial in which the police were allowed to destroy the video evidence and then lied on the stand. My expert witness and evidence were not allowed to be presented by the Cook County judge, Hyman Riebman, a Zionist Jew. Having seen that there was no way to obtain justice in the corrupt court system, I was compelled to leave Chicago with my family before the date of sentencing. It would have been irresponsible for me to allow this criminal system to cause more harm to me and my family than it already had.
Odigo Warnings
In the first days and weeks after 9-11, I paid very close attention to the large number of Israeli terror suspects arrested, which was more than two hundred by November 2001, and investigated the published reports that an Israeli instant text message service had been used to warn Israelis of the attacks in New York, hours before they occurred. Many Israelis were evidently forewarned of the attacks through an Israeli instant messaging service called Odigo. This story, which presents the clearest evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of the attacks, was reported only very briefly in the U.S. media – and then forgotten.
According to the published reports, Israel-based employees of Odigo reported having received warnings of an imminent attack at the World Trade Center hours before the first plane hit the north tower. Odigo, an Israeli-owned company, had its U.S. headquarters two blocks from the World Trade Center, but the forewarned Odigo employees did not pass the terror warning on to the authorities in New York, an act that would have saved thousands of lives.
Two weeks after 9-11, Alex Diamandis, Odigo's vice president, said, "The messages said something big was going to happen in a certain amount of time, and it did – almost to the minute." "It was possible that the attack warning was broadcast to other Odigo members, but the company has not received reports of other recipients of the message," Diamandis said. Four thousand Israelis were expected to have been working at the World Trade Center on 9-11, yet only one was reported to have died at the complex. Based on the Israeli government figure that 4,000 Israelis were expected to have been at the World Trade Center at the time of the attacks, it seems evident that many Israeli Odigo users got the message of warning.
Odigo, which offers real-time messaging, has a feature called "People Finder" which allows a user to send an instant message to a large group based on a common characteristic, such as Israeli nationality. "People Finder" allows Odigo users to search for online "buddies," with filters like Israeli nationality, while maintaining user privacy at all times. The message was probably sent in Hebrew. The Internet address of the sender of the warning was allegedly given to the FBI. Two months later it was reported that the FBI was still investigating the matter. Since then there have been no further media reports about the Odigo warning of 9/11.
These two news stories about the fake Israeli "movers" and the Odigo messages, which clearly indicated that some Israelis had very specific prior knowledge of the attacks, were published in American and Israeli newspapers shortly after 9-11. Had the recipients of these Odigo instant messages contacted the New York police department, thousands of lives could have been saved. The question that has not been asked is, why didn't they?
Cui Bono?
There were several early indicators that Israelis were involved in 9-11 and that it was a spectacular "false flag" terror attack designed to serve as a casus belli to drag the United States into the "War on Terror." Apart from the previously mentioned evidence of Israeli prior knowledge, there were also the amazingly insensitive comments of Netanyahu about 9-11 being "very good" in his view.
Netanyahu, it should be noted, is the author of several books which call for the western nations to engage in a global "War on Terror." Since 1986, Netanyahu has urged the United States and western democracies to take up arms against the enemies of Israel in the name of "fighting terrorism," which is the title of one of his books. The "terrorists" that Netanyahu wants the West to wage war on, however, all happen to be the people and states opposed to Israel's illegal occupation of Palestinian land.
I approached the 9-11 investigation with a twenty-five year history of having lived in and followed the events of the Middle East. After many years of traveling in Europe and the Middle East, I obtained a degree in History from the University of California at Santa Cruz in 1992. My academic emphasis was on Palestine and Israel. After the first U.S. war against Iraq, which I was actively opposed to, I spent my final year of university training researching the Soviet occupation of the newly liberated Baltic republics and completing my courses at the University of Bergen in Norway.
Fate brought me into the proximity of another mass disaster on the morning of September 28, 1994, when I arrived by ship in Sweden and learned that the Baltic ferry named Estonia had sunk during the night with 852 victims lost at sea. My wife's first husband, a famous Estonian singer named Urmas Alender, was among the missing. While it was abundantly clear that something much more explosive than a "monster wave" had sunk the ferry, the Swedish government and media pretended that natural forces had caused the catastrophe. In the process of investigating what happened in the ferry disaster, I came to realize that a modern "democratic" state, like Sweden, could actually be complicit in the cover-up of the mass murder of hundreds of its own citizens.
When in the year 2000, I began working as a journalist for the Washington-based Spotlight, later to become the American Free Press, I turned my attention to the mysterious 1996 crash of TWA Flight 800 off the coast of New York. I attended the final sessions of the government agency (NTSB) involved in investigating the "crash" of Flight 800 and was appalled at the obvious cover-up of the facts. I watched how three Jewish members of the board completely dominated the NTSB final sessions and how the testimonies of more than 100 eyewitnesses, who had testified to having seen a streaking object hitting the aircraft in flight, were categorically dismissed because, according to a young Jewish member of the board, based on the time of the observations, all of the witnesses must have been drunk and hallucinating. After the two-day presentation of the NTSB findings there was no press conference or session allowing for questions from the media or public. This was clearly another cover-up.
I had also studied the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty and seen how the U.S. government and military had covered up the truth of the Israeli military attack on the unarmed Navy vessel off the coast of Egypt in 1967. With this background I approached the events of 9-11. Well aware of the history of false-flag terror, the overwhelming Zionist influence in government and media, and dishonest official investigations into recent mass disasters, I was a natural skeptic from the start.
Evidence of Explosions Ignored
The administration of George W. Bush rushed the nation and its allies into war in Afghanistan within one month of the 9-11 attacks using the unsolved crime as the casus belli for an overt act of aggression that had been planned long before. The war against the government of Afghanistan, called Operation Enduring Freedom by the government and military, began on Oct. 7, 2001.
The week before the war began I wrote an article about the immense oil and gas reserves of the Caspian Basin and the new "Great Game" to gain control of these valuable energy resources. I also wrote several articles about the long-standing business and personal ties between George W. Bush and the Bin Laden family. One month after 9-11, I wrote about how the mass media was ignoring the large number of eyewitness accounts describing explosions at the World Trade Center before the collapse of the Twin Towers and Building 7.
"Despite reports from numerous eyewitnesses and experts, including news reporters on the scene, who heard or saw explosions immediately before the collapse of the World Trade Center, there has been a virtual silence in the mainstream media," I wrote in the article titled "Some Survivors Say 'Bombs Exploded Inside WTC.'"
"After the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse," Van Romero, an explosives expert and former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center at New Mexico Tech, told the Albuquerque Journal minutes after the collapses. The collapse of the structures resembled controlled implosions used to demolish old structures and was "too methodical to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures," Romero said. Coming from a man who is an expert in the effects of explosives on structures, Romero's comments carried a lot of weight in my opinion.
"It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that," Romero said. If explosions did cause the towers to collapse, "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points."
"One of the things terrorist events are noted for is a diversionary attack and secondary device," he said. Then suddenly, ten days after the attack, without any explanation, Romero did a complete about-face in his analysis of the collapse. "Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail," he told the Albuquerque Journal on September 21.
A friend of mine from Brooklyn told me that he had been standing among a crowd of people on Church Street, about two blocks from the South Tower (WTC 2), when he saw "a number of brief light sources being emitted from inside the building between floors 10 and 15." He saw about six of these brief flashes, accompanied by "a crackling sound" immediately before the tower collapsed.
Even a veteran 51-year-old fire fighter, Louie Cacchioli, told People magazine that he had witnessed explosions in the South Tower: "I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building."
What is most peculiar about the eyewitness reports of explosions was that they were completely ignored by the mainstream news media, even when the reports came from their own reporters on the scene. Stephen Evans of the BBC, for example, was in the South Tower where he witnessed "a series of explosions" and felt a "big explosion, from much, much lower." Yet the BBC, like the rest of the mainstream media failed to investigate or even discuss the evidence of explosions in the towers.
How did the editors of the mass media networks in the United States and Britain make the decision not to discuss the evidence of explosions even when the information came from their own reporters on the scene? Eyewitness reports and images of explosions were broadcast only once and then swept under the carpet. It soon became quite clear that the mass media was censoring any discussion of the evidence of explosions in the World Trade Center.
Within a few weeks I realized that the media and government were working together to deceive the public about what really had happened on 9-11 and that there was a conspiracy to promote a false version of events in order to gain public support for a previously planned war policy in the Middle East. The mass media engaged in a comprehensive propaganda campaign to instill fear in the public. My family and I decided that it would be safer and more sane to live in Europe, so at the end of November, after the Thanksgiving holiday, we flew to Germany.
Destruction of Evidence
In Germany, I had the opportunity to interview Andreas von Bülow near Köln. Von Bülow, an author and former member of the Bundestag (the German parliament) served on the parliamentary commission which oversees the three branches of the German secret service. Von Bülow said he thought Israel's intelligence service, Mossad, was behind the 9-11 attacks. These attacks, he said, were carried out to turn public opinion against the Arabs and boost military and security spending.
"You don't get the higher echelons," von Bülow said, referring to the "architectural structure" which masterminds such terror attacks. At this level, he said, the organization doing the planning, such as Mossad, is primarily interested in affecting public opinion. The terrorists who actually commit the crimes are what von Bülow calls "the working level," such as the nineteen Arabs who allegedly hijacked the planes on September 11. "The working level is part of the deception," he said.
"Ninety-five percent of the work of the intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation," he said, which is widely propagated in the mainstream media creating an accepted version of events. "Journalists don't even raise the simplest questions," he said. "Those who differ are labeled as crazy."
Eckehardt Werthebach, the former president of the Verfassungsschutz (a branch of German intelligence), told me that "the deathly precision" and "the magnitude of planning" behind the attacks would have needed "years of planning." Such a sophisticated operation, Werthebach said, required the "fixed frame" of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a "loose group" of terrorists. Both Werthebach and von Bülow said the lack of a complete "blue ribbon" investigation, with congressional hearings, into the events of September 11 was incomprehensible. These men made more sense to me than anyone in the U.S. government or media.
As incomprehensible as it might seem, the Bush administration delayed and avoided an official investigation for as long as possible – at least until all of the evidence was destroyed. The steel from the World Trade Center was quickly shipped to Asia where it was melted down. The evidence from the crime scene was being destroyed as quickly as possible. This was clearly criminal, yet the highest authorities in the U.S. government and the Department of Justice were allowing it to happen.
Molten Metal
I consider 9-11 to be an unsolved crime and have done what I could to investigate the crime using the available evidence. In the summer of 2002, for example, I wrote an article about the seismic data that showed unexplained spikes occurring at the beginning of each collapse.
In my research into the removal of the rubble, I learned from one of the contractors and a demolition expert that molten metal had been discovered at the bottom of the rubble pile in the lower basement levels. This molten metal was described to me as "molten steel" by Peter Tully, president of Tully Construction of Flushing, New York, and Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, Maryland.
The molten steel was found "three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed," Loizeaux said. He said molten steel was also found at WTC 7, the 47-story building owned by Larry Silverstein, which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon. Loizeaux said, "If I were to bring the towers down, I would put explosives in the basement to get the weight of the building to help collapse the structure."
The molten metal found beneath the rubble was clearly important evidence that could explain how the towers were brought down. Because each tower was held up by 47 huge box core columns, there had to be an explanation for what caused these columns to fall. The official explanation that fires had caused the floor trusses to give way failed to explain what happened to the core columns. To explain the extremely quick collapse of the core columns, the seismic spikes and molten metal seemed to be very important clues.
Steven E. Jones, a professor of physics at Brigham Young University (BYU) in Utah, contacted me in the summer of 2005 and asked me what I had learned about the discovery of molten metal at the World Trade Center. I told Jones exactly what Peter Tully and Mark Loizeaux had said about the discovery of molten iron in the basements of the Twin Towers and Building 7. After studying the reports and photographs of molten metal, Jones had been able to obtain some fragments of the metal. He concluded that the fragments were primarily iron and possible evidence that Thermite had been used to demolish the buildings.
The author and Professor Steven E. Jones discuss the evidence of thermite in May 2006.
Encouraged by his research, I visited Professor Jones on the campus of Brigham Young University in the spring of 2006. From Provo, Utah, I then traveled by train to the University of California at Davis where I met with Professor Thomas A. Cahill, an expert on airborne particles. Dr. Cahill had conducted a study of the particles contained in the thin bluish smoke that rose from the rubble for nearly four months after 9-11. Cahill's air sampling began on October 2, 2001 and continued until late December, after the last fires were finally extinguished.
Asked why it took so long to begin a scientific evaluation of the air contamination that accompanied the destruction of the WTC, Dr. Cahill said he had assumed that there were scores of agencies and scientists monitoring the air quality in New York City after 9-11. "I assumed it was happening. I could not believe it was not," Cahill said. "The EPA did nothing."
Cahill's work revealed the presence of extremely small metallic aerosols in unprecedented amounts in the plumes coming from the burning WTC rubble. Most of the particles in these plumes were in the categories of ultra-fine and nano-particles: from 0.26 to 0.09 microns. The extraordinarily high level of ultra-fine aerosols was one of the most unusual aspects of the data, Cahill said. "Ultra-fine particles require extremely high temperatures," he said, "namely the boiling point of the metal."
Since the scientific data supports the theory that some form of Thermite was used to destroy the towers, the question is how it got onto the 81st floor of the south tower, where large amounts of molten metal were seen falling before the collapse?
Molten iron pours out of South Tower about one minute before the tower disintegrated.
The official final report of the fires does not explain what was on the 81st floor, which seems odd because this is the floor, leased by Fuji Bank, into which the airplane crashed. A former employee of the bank came forward and told me that the bank had reinforced the floor in 1999 to support a very heavy load of computer back-up batteries. "The whole floor was batteries," he said, "huge battery-looking things." They were "all black" and "solid, very heavy" things, which had been brought in during the night. They had been put in place during the summer prior to 9-11, he said. But were they really batteries? "It's weird," he said. "They were never turned on."
So, what really was on the 81st floor of WTC 2? What was in these heavy "battery-looking things?" Were they batteries, or were they Thermite? And is it more than a coincidence that both planes flew directly into secure computer rooms in both towers and that both spectacular explosions showed evidence of Thermate-produced white smoke?
The Cover-up Continues
Despite the legal difficulties, slander, criticism, and other setbacks, I have continued to examine the evidence from 9-11 and ask the questions that demand to be answered. The wasted lives of the thousands of victims from the terror attacks and the illegal wars that have been waged in the name of 9-11 deserve to be honored with the truth, not a pack of lies pushed by the controlled media onto a gullible public.
It would be naïve and foolish for us to expect the truth from a government that has been shown to have repeatedly lied to the media and international community in order to accomplish its dubious goals. The truth of 9-11 will certainly not be given to us on a silver platter. It is something we will have to fight for.
Finis
This chapter was originally written in February 2007 for ZeitenSchrift, a Swiss magazine.
Benjamin Netanyahu quote from New York Times article "Spilled Blood is Seen as Bond That Draws 2 Nations Closer," by James Bennet, September 12, 2001
Edited – May 24, 2009;
Final Edit – August 8, 2009
Latest Correction - February 9, 2010
II - The Planes of 9-11
Chapter II
The Planes of 9-11
A little-known and privately-held aircraft leasing company created by the Israeli military intelligence is connected to the Mossad-run airport security and passenger screening company at the center of the "false flag" terror network of 9-11.
I am not like those who claimed to be 9-11 researchers, but who now say they have "moved beyond 9-11." How can anyone abandon the pursuit of the truth about 9-11 before the crime has been solved? More than eight years after the terrorist attacks in which some 3,000 innocent people died, not one victim's lawsuit has yet gone to trial. As a nation, Americans can not allow 9-11 to go unsolved.
How can we forget the hundreds of people who were roasted alive in the burning twin towers? How can we ignore the death and destruction that we, as a result, have wrongfully inflicted on the innocent people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, and Palestine? Who can accept an irresponsible administration dragging our military from one illegal war to another in the utterly fraudulent "war on terror," which the Bush administration promised will last for generations?
Vice President Dick Cheney said the U.S. must be prepared to fight the "War on Terror" for decades.
If we, as Americans, don't demand the truth about 9-11, who and what do we really stand for? Everything this administration has done for the past six years has been based on an unproven interpretation of the events of 9-11. What does it mean to be a citizen of "the land of the free and the home of the brave" if we allow our minds and our nation to be so easily hijacked by government lies and propaganda? During the past few months, I have redoubled my efforts to solve 9-11. As the cover-up becomes more obvious and the guilty parties reveal themselves, this is the time to intensify the pressure, not give up.
ZIONIST ZEITGEIST
I cannot abide mass murder, occupation, and genocidal wars of aggression. Nor can I accept the corruption of our values and destruction of our basic American rights to suit an artificially imposed "War on Terror." With the passage of time, it is now clear that 9-11 was carried out in order to kick-start the perverse Zionist Zeitgeist called the "War on Terror" with its pre-planned wars of aggression, conquest, and occupation.
Guantanamo - An affront to American values
In December 2001, veteran German intelligence professionals told me that 9-11 had been executed by a state-sponsored criminal network and had required years of planning. Eckehardt Werthebach, the former president of Germany's domestic intelligence service, Verfassungsschutz, told me in 2001 that "the deathly precision" and "the magnitude of planning" of the 9-11 attacks would have required "years of planning." Such a sophisticated operation, Werthebach said, would require the "fixed frame" of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a "loose group" like the one allegedly led by Mohammed Atta while he studied in Hamburg.
If Werthebach's analysis is correct, and I have every reason to believe it is, the official version is nothing but a pack of lies. This would mean that the members of the criminal network are still in the highest positions of power in the U.S., Israel, and other nations. The members of this network are dedicated to preventing the evidence from being released because it would expose the real perpetrators. This is the only logical reason why the 9-11 evidence has been suppressed, the investigation controlled, and the litigation and discovery processes obstructed.
At this point, it should be clear that 9-11 will never be solved by the federal government, politically appointed investigators, law enforcement agencies, or the corrupt courts. These controlled agencies, like the Zionist-controlled media, are only interested in controlling the information and preventing the real truth from being revealed. This crime will only be solved by concerned and dedicated independent researchers.
THE ZIONIST STRATEGY
9-11 was a very sophisticated operation, as Werthebach said, which required the "fixed frame" of a state intelligence organization. It was carefully planned years in advance and carried out for one strategic purpose: to kick-start the Zionist-planned "War on Terror."
The rabid neo-con Zionists who have dominated the Bush administration pushed the "War on Terror" with its criminal wars of aggression, occupation, and Balkanization in the Middle East as the strategic response to 9-11. The Zionist media moguls, who dominate the U.S. mass media, have in turn pushed the "war on terror" into the public mind as the suitable and proper response to the attacks, which they have refused to investigate.
An Israeli official named Oded Yinon revealed the Zionist strategy to Balkanize the entire Middle East into ethnic mini-states in the early 1980s. The plan for a global "War on Terror" to accomplish this goal has been articulated since the mid-1980s ad nauseam by Benjamin Netanyahu, the former Israeli prime minister of the extreme right-wing Likud party. The Israeli military's plans to realize these strategic goals have obviously been in the works for at least three decades.
THE HOAX OF 9-11
9-11 is, in fact, a gigantic hoax. Only by exposing the terrorist masterminds behind 9-11 will we reveal the criminals behind the fraudulent "War on Terror" and the epidemic of "false flag" terrorism that plagues the world. False flag terrorism is a crime designed and committed by the architects with the intention of having it blamed on another faction, state, or organization. The media outlets, which the criminals control, facilitate the blame game by repeating the chorus as if from a script and stifling any independent investigation or analysis of the crime.
9-11, after all, remains an unsolved crime. It is, however, quite obvious who is responsible for blocking discovery and obstructing justice for the victims and their relatives. At every critical point where the events and circumstances of 9-11 should have been investigated and discussed, there has been a Zionist, a dedicated devotee of the State of Israel, occupying the key position and acting as the controller and censor of evidence - the gatekeeper of information.
I have seen this pattern in earlier cover-ups. The same pattern was used with the sinking of Estonia in the Baltic Sea (1994) and the U.S. government's (NTSB) investigation of the downing of TWA Flight 800, two of the most egregious examples of government cover-ups in modern times. In each case, the three critical phases of the cover-up: investigation and access to evidence, media interpretation of the event, and related litigation, were all tightly controlled to prevent any meaningful discovery of what had really caused the disaster.
Bernard S. Loeb, Director of Aviation Safety at the NTSB, summarized the TWA 800 investigation: "We cannot be certain that this, in fact, occurred, but of all the ignition scenarios we considered, this scenario is the most likely."
The people who are preventing the discovery of the facts in such cases are actually complicit in covering-up crimes of mass murder. Logically, there can be no reason for dedicated Zionists to obstruct the investigation of 9-11 other than to conceal the evidence of Israeli and Zionist involvement in the crimes.
Michael Chertoff, then Asst. Attorney General, oversaw the non-investigation of 9-11 and destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center - crucial evidence. Chertoff went on to head the Department of Homeland Security, where he continued to control access to the evidence through the Sensitive Security Information (SSI) program.
The FBI, for example, under the command of the Israeli dual-national Michael Chertoff, is responsible for the confiscation of the crucial evidence from 9-11, evidence which has been withheld to this day. This evidence includes video tapes of the Pentagon attack and physical pieces from the different aircraft involved. This evidence is critical to prove what happened and which aircraft were involved in the attacks - but the FBI has refused to release this evidence. Neither President George W. Bush nor the U.S. Congress has demanded that they do so. The destruction and suppression of crucial evidence from 9-11 and the lack of a real investigation indicate that a culture of corruption and lack of transparency exist at all levels of government.
The appointed federal judges Alvin K. Hellerstein and Michael B. Mukasey, and the former assistant attorney general Michael Chertoff, who now heads Homeland Security, have not worked since 9-11 to hide the critical evidence and block discovery in order to protect fanatical Arab Muslims or conspiratorial Jesuits. The efforts of these dedicated Zionists have been exerted to protect Israel, the foreign state to which they are wholeheartedly devoted.
U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein controls the 9-11 tort litigation in which not one single case has gone to trial. Hellerstein has close family ties to Israel.
The 9-11 cover-up is now full-blown, and the Zionist role in this charade is obvious. The players who are involved in obstructing justice are known. At this point, patriotic Americans must not abandon the pursuit of the truth. For those who died on 9-11 and in its aftermath, for our nation, and our posterity, we are obliged to find those who are responsible for the crimes and cover-up of 9-11.
THE EVIDENCE OF ISRAELI INVOLVEMENT
I have pursued the leads of Israeli involvement simply because the evidence indicates that the Israeli military and intelligence had prior knowledge and involvement in 9-11. The five jubilant Israeli Mossad agents who were caught celebrating and filming themselves in front of the destruction of the World Trade Center, and their subsequent public statements, clearly indicate that the Mossad had prior knowledge of 9-11.
Three of the Israeli agents arrested on 9-11 appeared on Israeli television in November 2001 and admitted that their mission had been to document the 9-11 attacks.
The text message warnings of the attacks sent over the Mossad-controlled Odigo instant messaging system several hours prior to the attacks are further evidence of Israeli prior knowledge. Furthermore, the Israelis have a long history of committing "false flag" terror attacks, particularly against American targets. The Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in 1967 and the Israeli terrorist bombings of U.S. and British civilian targets in Egypt during the 1954 Lavon Affair are the first that come to mind.
The USS Liberty after the Israeli attack that killed 34 U.S. servicemen and wounded 171. "The [Israeli] ground control station ordered the aircraft to attack and sink the target and ensure they left no survivors," Steve Forslund, a former USAF intelligence analyst told the Chicago Tribune.
If the evidence indicated that Saudis, Pakistanis, or even Jesuits were behind the attacks, I would investigate them. The evidence, however, points to Israelis being involved - so I look there. There has been no independent investigation of 9-11 done by the controlled media other than Carl Cameron's now deeply-buried four-part series on FOX News in December 2001. Think about this for a minute. The mass media in the land of the "free press" has not done any independent investigation about the crime of the century.
The evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 is too obvious, so senior editors in the controlled media don't let their journalists even approach the subject. The journalists of the "free press" in the United States are, unfortunately, confined to the same "Auschwitz of the Mind" as the American public they write for. They know very well that to touch the subject of Israeli involvement in 9-11 would be like touching a live wire. Likewise, when it comes to tracking the Israeli criminal network that has operated in the United States for decades, the U.S. media is simply a dog that won't bark - or hunt.
The extent of Zionist control over the U.S. mass media, including the Internet, is astounding. The mass media has effectively prevented most Americans from understanding who is really behind the false flag terror attacks of 9-11, and, by extension, the illegal and genocidal wars in Afghanistan, Palestine, Lebanon, and Iraq. The controlled media has also left Americans with an extremely distorted view of the Middle East, Zionism, and the history of the Zionist state, Israel.
Jews from Eastern Europe created an empire of their own in Hollywood in the early 1900s and have influenced how Americans see the world ever since.
ISRAEL - A TERRORIST STATE
Israel is a nation which was founded by terrorists, ruthless men with histories of committing genocidal crimes and false flag terror attacks. Israel was created in 1948 in Palestine on land that had been "ethnically cleansed" of its indigenous Christian and Muslim inhabitants.
Ariel Sharon, the former prime minister who has been in a coma since January 4, 2006, is a prime example of an Israeli terrorist. Sharon came to power in early 2001, about the same time as George W. Bush, some eight months before 9-11. Sharon is a well-known terrorist and génocidaire, i.e. a person who has been involved in genocide.
Sharon has supervised numerous terrorist atrocities, such as the 1982 massacre in Sabra and Shatila refugee camps, in which thousands of innocent people were massacred. Sharon is a Zionist extremist who believes that every Jew should live in Israeli-occupied Palestine. Realistically, what else besides terrorism and bloodshed should one expect from such fanatical and genocidal terrorists?
Ariel "Arik" Sharon (smiling on left) with Moshe Dayan and members of his notorious "anti-terror" Unit 101 (1953-56) which committed a number of atrocities such as the Qibya Massacre of October 1953 in which 69 Palestinians were killed, many whose houses were blown up over their heads. Forty-five houses, a school, and a mosque were destroyed. Sharon, a well known terrorist, became Israel's prime minister in 2001.
The sons and daughters of the original Zionist terrorists have occupied the highest positions of power in the Israeli government. Tzipora Malka "Tzipi" Livni, for example, the foreign minister (2006-09), is the daughter of the former terror chief of the Irgun. Born in Tel Aviv in July 1958, "Tzipi" is the daughter of Eitan Livni (born Yerucham Bzozowitch in Grodno) a Polish-born Irgun terrorist associated with the King David Hotel bombing.
Steven Erlanger, in a New York Times article about Livni entitled "Israel's Top Envoy," dated February 5, 2006, wrote:
Tzipi Livni, 47, is the first woman to serve as Israel's foreign minister since Golda Meir. Some think she may be the first since Ms. Meir to be prime minister.
She is also a deeply Israeli figure, the daughter of Zionist guerrillas - terrorists in some eyes - who met in the Irgun, the underground organization that fought the British and the Arabs, and that blew up the British headquarters in the King David Hotel in 1946, killing 91 people.
Her father, Eitan, was the Irgun's head of operations, and on his gravestone is the map of Greater Israel, extending over both sides of the Jordan River. Erlanger suggests that blowing up a hotel full of people in Jerusalem and killing 91 people is only a terrorist act "in some eyes."
Eitan Livni (born Yerucham Bzozowitch in Grodno, 1919) was head of operations for the Irgun. Livni was part of the Irgun mission sent to Britain in the 1940s to kill British political and military leaders.
The fact that the Israeli political leadership and military command decided to launch a vicious attack on a defenseless U.S. reconnaissance ship, the USS Liberty, off the coast of Gaza and kill every man on board illustrates that the Israelis are fully capable of committing such atrocities in their attempts to blame their enemies and achieve their strategic goals. Dedicated Zionists will either deny or defend these acts of Israeli false flag terrorism as the "pragmatic" thing to do and attack those who disagree as anti-Semitic.
FALSE FLAG TERROR - AN ISRAELI SPECIALTY
The Zionist-controlled media has refused to conduct its own investigation of 9-11, the crime of the century. Controlled news outlets like the New York Times promoted the "War on Terror" and pushed the illegal war of aggression against Iraq, with propaganda and false reports about weapons of mass destruction provided by Judith Miller.
False flag terror acts are an Israeli specialty, as Dr. Kaasem Khaleel points out in his book Wrongly Blamed (2007). "Public terror was invented by the Israelis," Khaleel wrote citing Christopher Sykes' book Crossroads to Israel:
To achieve their political goals, Zionists are dependent on terror. These terror acts are used as a distraction. Even though the Israelis are the sources, they effectively blame others. The fabricated terror they commit is an assault on people's intelligence. Thus people are being purposely misled regarding the real source of these crimes.
The Zionist-controlled media has purposely misled the public about 9-11 for the same reason as the Zionist judges, investigators, and commissioners: to protect the evidence of Israeli involvement from being exposed.
Judith Miller of the New York Times lied about weapons of mass destruction in order to build public opinion for the pre-planned Zionist war of aggression against Iraq.
Deception comes naturally to Judith Miller. She is the daughter of William Miller, a Jew from Pinsk, Russia. Bill Miller was a New Jersey nightclub owner who later made it big as entertainment director of the Sahara, Dunes, Flamingo, and International hotels in Las Vegas.
The controlled U.S. media works with the Zionist criminal network and allows it to flourish by failing to investigate, identify, or report on the companies and individuals involved.
THE PLANES OF 9-11
9-11 was an act of false flag terror in which four allegedly "hijacked" airplanes were used as weapons of mass destruction. There are, however, many unanswered questions about the airplanes involved. There are many observations about these planes which suggest they were not the civilian airliners they are said to have been. The plane that struck the SouthTower, for example, had unusual shapes, bulges, and holes, which have led many analysts to believe it was a Boeing 767-300 refueling tanker that had been disguised as a 767-200 United Airlines passenger jet.
Images of the plane that struck the South Tower
Durable parts from the two jets that struck the twin towers, such as landing gear and engines, landed on the streets of Manhattan. On these engines and landing gear are many numbered time-tracked parts which could prove precisely which aircraft they had been put on and when they had been serviced, but the FBI has refused to present this evidence to make its case. Why wouldn't the FBI present this evidence if it had it?
The jet engine that landed on Murray Street contains specific numbered and time-tracked parts which would identify exactly which aircraft struck the World Trade Center. Why has the U.S. government withheld this evidence?
The only possible explanation for the FBI's failure to present this evidence is that the evidence does not match the planes they claim hit the buildings or "crashed" in Pennsylvania. If the planes that were involved in the attacks on the World Trade Center were, in fact, not United Airlines Flight 175 and American Airlines Flight 11, but remotely-controlled tankers painted to look like civilian aircraft, who could have produced such disguised planes and inserted them into the NORAD anti-terrorism exercise that was taking place in the airspace of the East Coast on the morning of 9-11?
ISRAEL AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES (IAI)
Given the evidence of Israeli prior knowledge, the obvious questions are: Did the Israelis have the means to carry off such a complex operation? And if they had the means, is there a link between their capability and the events of 9-11? The answer to both questions is yes.
The Israeli military and intelligence agency have long had the capability to convert and disguise large-body aircraft in the United States, and their companies that do this kind of work are connected to ICTS, the Israeli airport security company that is a prime suspect in the "false flag" terrorism. ICTS is also a key defendant in the 9-11 litigation.
The Israeli military has spawned several aircraft leasing and maintenance companies in the United States since the late 1960s. There is, in fact, a network of Israeli-controlled aviation companies operating in the United States which were all started by Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI), now known as Israel Aerospace Industries. Israel Aircraft Industries is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Israeli Defense Ministry, which produces and maintains planes and missiles.
One of the Israeli military's aviation companies spawned in the United States is or was an aircraft leasing company named ATASCO, which began operating in the United States in the early 1970s. I began investigating ATASCO in August 2006. As a matter of fact, I spoke with Shalom Yoran, the Israeli chairman of this now defunct Israeli company, about six hours before three undercover police arrived at my house and, without cause or provocation, TASERed me and broke my elbow in front of my family on August 15, 2006.
I had come across Shalom Yoran's name while researching Amit and Naftali Yoran, the suspicious young Israelis who oversaw cyber-security for the U.S. government and military computers prior to and after 9-11.
Shalom Yoran has an extremely suspicious and unusual profile for an Israeli immigrant to the United States. He was in the original Israeli air force of 1948 and is a founder and former head of Israel Aircraft Industries. Yoran was instrumental in building the IAI into an internationally recognized company and the largest industry in Israel.
Shalom Yoran (born Selim Sznycer, Poland) wearing a fake British uniform in Palestine, 1946. Yoran became the co-founder and head of Israel Aircraft Industries and Bedek.
Before Yoran emigrated to the United States, which is very unusual for Israelis of his age and with his high-level military background, he had spent the previous ten years as senior vice president of IAI and as president of IAI's parent company, Bedek. Israelis like Yoran don't usually come to America as immigrants - they are sent there on a mission.
Israel Aircraft Industries was established in 1953 as Bedek Aviation Company, five years after the establishment of the State of Israel. Today, Bedek is the senior group of Israel Aerospace Industries and specializes in aircraft operation, conversion, maintenance, and overhaul. In 1975, when Yoran "left" Bedek and IAI at the unusually young retirement age of fifty, the corporation had 22,000 employees, of which 4,000 worked in the Bedek Division. In reality, Yoran didn't leave Bedek and IAI at all; he was sent by the Israeli military to the United States to manage one of their most important operations - ATASCO.
In his on-line biographies, Yoran says he was appointed to this position: "When he retired at the age of fifty [ca. 1975], he was appointed the President of Atasco, an American Flight company for cargo shipment and maintenance."
His 2003 biography on the website of Tel Aviv University (TAU) has a similar tale: "At the age of fifty, Shalom Yoran retired from the Israel Aircraft Industries. In 1978 he moved to the U.S. where he became chairman of ATASCO USA - a private aircraft trading and service company. ATASCO bought and leased airplanes to major airlines around the world. The company also had an aircraft maintenance and modification plant in Smyrna, Tennessee.
"Shalom Yoran continues to be chairman of ATASCO USA," the 2003 TAU entry noted. How could an Israeli be appointed to be president or chairman of an "American" company, unless that company were actually an Israeli company disguised as an American company? And why would an Israeli company doing business in the United States want to disguise the fact that it is Israeli-owned in the first place?
THE ATASCO-BEDEK CONNECTION
ATASCO USA was, of course, created and owned by the Israeli military and connected to the Mossad, but this information is not easily found. There has only been one article that I have found that mentions what ATASCO has been doing for the past 36 years in the United States, since it was first created by the Israeli Defense Ministry in 1971. That article, entitled "Ugandan Plane Deal Believed Key to Israeli Spy Operation," was published in the Washington Post of September 11, 1978.
This investigative article, which involved an international team of journalists that included an Israeli, focused on the "mysterious Israeli tycoon and the Mossad, Israeli's intelligence service," and how they had provided the Ugandan dictator Idi Amin with two Boeing 707 jetliners as part of an Israeli effort to spy on Libya. The "big winner" and tycoon in this Mossad spying operation was Shaul Nehemia Eisenberg (1921-1997), "the reclusive Israeli entrepreneur at its center."
Eisenberg was, as the Washington Post reported in 1978, the central figure in the Mossad spying operation on Libya:
The chief Eisenberg firm in these deals was Aircraft Trading and Services Inc., or Atasco. Headquartered in Asia House, Eisenberg's luxury building in Tel Aviv, Atasco also has branches in the "Eisenberg Building" in New York and in London.
Atasco was put together in 1971 by executives of Israeli Aircraft Industries, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Israeli Defense Ministry that makes planes and missiles.
Eisenberg got into Atasco as an equal partner with Israeli Aircraft for $500,000 in cash. After the 1973 Middle East War, Israeli Aircraft, staggered by scandals, sold its share in Atasco to Eisenberg, leaving him its sole owner.
The rest of Atasco's original capital, $5 million, came from the U.S. Export-Import Bank, which is supposed to make loans to promote American exports.
The Ex-Im Bank certainly found the right man in Eisenberg. He quickly turned into an eager customer for Pan American Airways' used Boeing 707s.
Atasco bought 12 or 15 of the advance series "C" 707s that Pan Am was selling and purchased six out of ten earlier series "C" 707s being sold by the airline.
At its Israeli hangars, currently jammed with 707s bearing obscure markings, Atasco remodels the interiors to suit customers, and paints on their proud colors - Iran Air, Tarom of Romania, Uganda Airlines.
In May 1976, Atasco sold the 707 that was once Pan Am's "Clipper Jupiter" to a firm in Zurich, which dealt it on to Amin.
Intelligence sources say that the head of this Zurich firm is a 15-year veteran of Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, and the firm is an agency "laundry." It exists, these sources say, to pass on Mossad funds for deals in which the Israeli secret service is interested.
The Washington Post, one of the most important newspapers in the United States, is a leading national newspaper of record. Oddly, however, the extremely important information contained in this article about ATASCO was never repeated in any of the subsequent articles in which this mysterious company was mentioned, for example, when Gerald L. Gitner, an aviation executive with Pan Am, TWA, and a host of smaller airlines, was appointed Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of ATASCO USA, Inc.
In 1986, when Gitner became CEO of the Israeli-owned company with a documented history of murky business, the company was described as a New York aircraft leasing and brokerage company. ATASCO's previously published history of involvement in Mossad operations was never mentioned. Gitner, who was CEO of Mossad's "privately held" aircraft leasing and maintenance company until 1990, was involved in the dismemberment and selling off of the assets of the once prosperous Pan Am and TWA airlines.
In October 1986, when Gitner was appointed CEO of the Mossad-run ATASCO U.S.A. Inc., he was or had been a senior executive with PanAm Corporation and TWA. He was the president of Texas Air Corporation, the holding company for Continental Airlines and New York Air, when he was appointed president and CEO of ATASCO U.S.A., "a private aviation concern involved in commercial aircraft leasing and heavy aircraft maintenance."
Gitner was also co-founder and president of People Express Airlines. The Houston Chronicle of October 3, 1986, however, only identified ATASCO as "an aircraft leasing and brokerage company."
EISENBERG - "WORLD ENTREPRENEUR"
In November 1982, when Eisenberg became involved in the Tregaron deal and tried to take over a large piece of prime real estate in Washington, D.C., the Washington Post wrote about Mossad's "world entrepreneur" and their point man in China - and Panama:
Eisenberg was profiled in a 1981 Business Week article as a businessman of enormous wealth, diversity of business interests, and a proclivity for secretiveness in his dealings. He owns a worldwide network of corporations. His largest company, United Development Inc., was set up in Panama in 1960.
Eisenberg essentially acts as a middleman, according to reports on his dealings, assembling consortiums of manufacturers, builders and banks to construct industrial facilities of all types.
Since Eisenberg was the "sole owner" of ATASCO since 1973, the Mossad's "aircraft trading and services" company naturally began its murky business on the American continent in Panama. In 1978 the Washington Post reported that there were "frequent but unsubstantiated reports that Eisenberg operates mostly from Central America." Eisenberg was the "Panamanian honorary general consul in Tel Aviv," the Post reported.
The first mention of ATASCO other than the 1978 article in the Washington Post was in the New York Times on October 29, 1981, when it reported that Emery Air Freight had purchased a Boeing 727-100 from Atasco-Panama.
IDF - ISRAELI DRUG FORCES?
Israel Aircraft Industries also has a branch, IAI Sucursal Colombia, in Bogota, Colombia. Colombia is a nation better known for the production and distribution of cocaine than aircraft. Why would IAI establish aircraft leasing and maintenance facilities in Colombia and Panama?
Is airlifting drugs a central part of the IAI operations in Latin America? Does the Mossad use IAI facilities in Colombia to run its own drug smuggling routes to fund its operations? Does Mossad drug smuggling involve American politicians (and intelligence agencies) which it controls through criminal complicity?
Israel is deeply involved in the Colombian drug trade. Here a Colombian military chief tries out Israeli weapons during a visit to Israel.
There are a number of indications that the Mossad is deeply involved in the Colombian drug trade. The horde of Mossad operatives who were disguised as Israeli art students in the years prior to 9-11 were known to have been targeting the offices and personnel of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). Why would the Mossad be seeking to penetrate the DEA if it were not involved in drug smuggling?
It is also well known that Israeli gangs are heavily involved in illicit drug smuggling. A disproportionately large number of Israelis have been arrested in Europe and the United States with large amounts of narcotics and synthetic drugs such as Ecstasy. Are these the small fry of a much larger Israeli presence in the illegal drug trade?
The rumors about the Bush and Clinton families being involved in large scale drug smuggling operations are legion. From George H.W. Bush's days in the Texas oil business and as head of the CIA to his position as a director of the Prozac giant Eli Lilly and Company, the drug trade is a central part of the Bush family legend.
The allegations about Governor Bill Clinton's involvement in the drug smuggling operation in Mena, Arkansas are also legion. Aircraft were used to smuggle drugs and weapons through the airport in Mena in the 1980s while Gov. Clinton protected the entire operation. "Given the scope and implications of the Mena story, it may be easy to understand the media's initial skepticism and reluctance," Sally Denton and Roger Morris wrote in their July 1995 article "The Crimes of Mena":
Mena, from 1981 to 1985, was indeed one of the centers for international smuggling traffic. According to official I.R.S. and D.E.A. calculations, sworn court testimony, and other corroborative records, the traffic amounted to thousands of kilos of cocaine and heroin and literally hundreds of millions of dollars in drug profits. According to a 1986 letter from the Louisiana attorney general to then U.S. attorney general Edwin Meese, [Adler Berriman Seal, or "Barry"] Seal "smuggled between $3 billion and $5 billion of drugs into the U.S."
Adler Berriman Seal had been a pilot with TWA from 1966 to 1974, according to his on-line biography. Gitner, who began his career at TWA in 1968 was a vice president when he also left TWA in 1974 to join the much smaller Texas International Airlines.
The numerous reports and allegations of involvement in drug smuggling are what the Bush and Clinton families have in common. These are the families which have dominated the executive branch of the United States government since 1981. There has been either a Bush or Clinton in the White House for the past 26 years, since January 1981. Is the illegal drug business the central criminal activity that the Bush and Clinton families have participated in with the Israeli Mossad?
If the reports, allegations, and rumors are true, the illegal drug trade is where the interests of the Bush family, the Clintons, the CIA, and the Mossad all come together. This would explain the choice to invade and occupy Afghanistan, where opium production is now at record levels after having been nearly eradicated under the Taliban regime. This would also explain the unusual pressure to medicate the 9-11 relatives. It appears that drug smuggling could very well be the illegal enterprise at the center of the criminal network behind 9-11. This is a subject that certainly deserves further investigation.
"CLIPPER JUPITER" AND ZIMEX AVIATION
In the 1978 article about Eisenberg and the Mossad the Washington Post reported that ATASCO had sold the Boeing 707, which had been Pan Am's "Clipper Jupiter," to a firm in Zurich, which had immediately transferred ownership to Idi Amin in Uganda:
Intelligence sources say that the head of this Zurich firm is a 15-year veteran of Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, and the firm is an agency 'laundry.' It exists, these sources say, to pass on Mossad funds for deals in which the Israeli secret service is interested.
Pan Am's "Clipper Jupiter," with tail registration number N766PA, was sold to a Zurich-based company called Zimex Aviation on May 12, 1976. The same day, Zimex Aviation transferred the plane with a new tail number, 5X-UAL, to Uganda Airlines.
The "15-year veteran of Mossad" would be Hans Ziegler, who headed Zimex as reported in The Oregonian on August 22, 1988:
Charles Hanner, then a Page [Airways] vice president, testified by deposition that he had been introduced to Amin by Hans Ziegler, a veteran agent of Mossad, the Israeli military intelligence service. Ziegler's Swiss company, Zimex Aviation, had sold a number of aircraft to Middle Eastern potentates and to Amin's friend Moammar Khadafy, the Libyan dictator.
ATASCO TIES TO 9-11
Gitner reportedly stayed with ATASCO from October 1986 through December 1989. In 1989, Gitner was appointed to head Presidential Airways of Herndon, Virginia. Gitner later served on the board of directors of another Mossad-run company, ICTS, which is one of the key defendants in the 9-11 litigation. Along with a handful of senior Israeli Mossad veterans, Gitner was a director of ICTS from at least 1997 through 2005. Most significantly, he was a director of the Israeli parent company which was responsible for airline security and passenger screening at Boston's Logan Airport on 9-11.
International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) International, N.V. is the Mossad-run company that owns Huntleigh USA, the airline security company that oversaw the passenger screening operation at Boston and Newark airports on September 11, 2001. How would Gitner be a director or CEO of a Mossad-run company like ATASCO or ICTS if he were not working for the Mossad? Has Gerald Gitner from Boston been working with the Israelis since he began at TWA in the late 1960s? Is this the reason he left TWA and began working for Texas International?
BOEING 767 CONVERSIONS - BEDEK'S SPECIALTY
IAI is "a world leader in aircraft conversion and modernization programs, unmanned air vehicles (UAVs), communication programs and defense electronics," according to the company's website. Shalom Yoran's company, Bedek Aviation Group, reportedly converted its first Boeing 767 from a passenger to cargo jet in early 2000. The converted passenger jet was the first of eleven 767s to be converted for Airborne-Express, according to the Jerusalem Post of April 4, 2000. "Bedek is one of the world's leaders in plane conversions," the Israeli newspaper reported.
In early 2001, Bedek delivered a refurbished Boeing 707 refueling tanker for the Israeli air force, according to the Jerusalem Post of February 22, 2001. "The number of [Israeli] refueling tankers is classified," the Post reported. "The first 707 air refueling tanker converted for the Air Force was delivered twenty years ago." This Israeli report indicates that Bedek has been converting Boeing aircraft into tankers since the early 1980s.
"The main benefit of this present aircraft is in its versatility, its quick conversion from a refueling tanker to a cargo jet. In this way, the aircraft can be used as a cargo plane in times of peace and a refueling tanker in an emergency," an IAI statement said.
A Boeing 767 refueling tanker
IAI IN MIAMI - COMMODORE AVIATION
"Boeing has been working with Israel Aircraft Industries Ltd. for 30 years," the Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported in October 1998.
Miami International Airport has long been the site of one of Bedek's maintenance stations, along with Paris, Moscow, Baku, and Baikal, according to the Jerusalem Post of January 13, 1995. The Bedek operation in Miami was known as Commodore Aviation. IAI and Bedek had "offices in Arlington, Va.; New York City; Princeton, N.J., for its Galaxy Aerospace subsidiary; and in Miami for its Commodore Aviation unit," according to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer article from 1998.
Florida Governor Jeb Bush made a four-day trade mission to Israel in November 1999 during which he appealed to the state-owned Israel Aircraft Industries to expand their business operations in Florida. IAI's Miami-based Commodore Aviation was already the largest Israeli business presence in Florida in 1999 with about 500 employees, the Stuart News (Florida) reported.
Commodore Aviation hangar at Miami airport, ca. 1992
In 2003, Commodore Aviation, "part of IAI's Bedek Aviation Group," pulled out of Miami, reportedly owing nearly a million dollars to the Miami airport, and moved to Rome, New York, where it renamed its operation the "Empire Air Center."
"Commodore has been searching for a new location since June 2002 and owes $800,000 in back rent to Miami International Airport, where it's currently based," South Florida CEO reported in May 2003, when it announced Commodore Aviation's move to New York and its name change.
Like ATASCO, Commodore has been generously funded by the U.S. taxpayer. Commodore Aviation actually made money by its move to the former Griffis Air Force Base, where it operates in a massive hangar in which B-52 bombers and tankers were once serviced. The move profited Commodore, which received some $25 million in grants and tax incentives from federal and New York sources, the Jerusalem Post reported on November 21, 2003. "The whole relocation didn't cost IAI one dollar," said Gerry Stoch, New York state's economic attache in Israel.
Finis
Sources:
Barbash, Fred; Lescaze, Lee; Elizur, Yuval; "Ugandan Plane Deal Believed Key to Israeli Spy Operation," The Washington Post, September 11, 1978
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10683
Bollyn, Christopher; "Andrew Colsky - Michael Chertoff's Censor-in-Chief," September 11, 2007
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10682
Bollyn, Christopher; " Ill-Fated Estonia Ferry Used for Weapons Transfers," ZeitenSchrift 2005
http://www.elaestonia.org/eng/index.php?module=lingid&link=162
Bollyn, Christopher; "Were Key Survivors from Estonia Catastrophe Kidnapped?" American Free Press, January 22, 2005
http://www.elaestonia.org/eng/index.php?module=lingid&link=133
Bollyn, Christopher; "NTSB Covers Up Tragedy of TWA Flight 800," The Spotlight, Washington , D.C. , September 2000
http://www.libertylobby.org/articles/2000/20000827t800.html
Bollyn, Christopher; "The Zionist Hijacking of the 9-11 Victim Lawsuits," April 14, 2006
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10667
Bollyn, Christopher; "9-11 Cover-Up: The Italian Gangsters and Their Jewish Bosses," October 1, 2007
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10653
Bollyn, Christopher; "Intel Expert Says 9-11 Looks Like A Hollywood Show," December 2001
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BOL403A.html
Bollyn, Christopher; "9-11 Through the Eyes of an American Sceptic," February 19, 2007
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10151
Cowen, Lauren; Long, James; " CIA Proprietary Kept Arizona Air Park Humming," The Oregonian, August 22, 1988
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10684
Khaleel, Kaasem; Wrongly Blamed: The Real Facts Behind 9/11 & the London Bombings, Knowledge House Publishers, 2007
Netanyahu, Benjamin; International Terrorism: Challenge and Response, Transaction Publishers, January 1982
Netanyahu, Benjamin; Terrorism: How the West Can Win, Farrar Straus and Giroux, 1986
Washington Post, "Page Airways Denies Operating Amin's Airplane," March 4, 1977
Yinon, Oded; "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties," from "The Zionist Plan for the Middle East," Israel Shahak (translator and editor), June 13, 1982
http://www.geocities.com/alabasters_archive/zionist_plan.html
Originally published - 25 October 2007
Edited - May 24, 2009
Final Edit - August 9, 2009
Latest Correction - February 9, 2010
III - America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism
Chapter III
America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism
U.S. President George W. Bush, flanked by Israeli leaders Ehud Olmert and Shimon Peres, January 2008
Why should they, the Americans, have trusted us? We were a bunch of Russians; socialist Russians.
- Isser Harel, founder of Israeli intelligence, on U.S. relations with Israel
The previous chapter explains that the Israeli military has a history of owning and operating private aircraft leasing and maintenance companies in the United States. These privately-held aviation companies, created by the Israeli military and linked to its state-owned aviation industry, clearly had the capability and advanced avionics required to convert Boeing aircraft into remote-controlled drones like those that apparently struck the World Trade Center (WTC) on 9-11.
Given the Israeli military's capability to carry out the attacks, the evidence of Israeli prior knowledge raises a fundamental question that must be asked: Would the Israeli military conduct such an outrageous act of terror?
Millions of Americans have blindly accepted, without any proof, the government and controlled media's tale that nineteen Arabs, who lacked basic piloting skills, were responsible for the coordinated precision aerial attacks and subsequent carnage and destruction of 9-11. On the other hand, the same government and media have shown absolutely no interest in probing the evidence or looking into the many unanswered questions surrounding the attacks. There can only be one logical explanation for the persistent avoidance of the evidence by the institutions that should be leading the investigation. It is because the evidence does not fit or contradicts the fictitious tale they have presented to the public.
The number of people who realize that the government and media have lied about 9-11 is significant and continues to grow all the time. The pack of lies surrounding the attacks has been thoroughly exposed and can no longer be supported. Unable to defend their fictional tale against the evidence presented by honest scientists and writers, the defenders of the lie use disinformation, defamation, and slander to try and contain the truth and prevent it from spreading like wildfire.
ISRAELI PRIOR KNOWLEDGE
While the evidence indicates that the Israelis had prior knowledge of 9-11, commonly-held misconceptions about Israel and a general lack of understanding of Zionism's brutal history of terrorism prevent most people from comprehending the Israeli connection. An ignorance of Zionist history, cultivated by the controlled media, prevents people from understanding the present reality. In order to understand 9-11, it is essential to have a grasp of the history of previous Israeli attacks on the United States. This chapter examines a few little-known, but key events in the history of Israeli false-flag terror attacks and the Zionist planners behind them. The names and events discussed in this chapter are at the center of Zionist terrorism, false-flag and otherwise.
"False-flag" terrorism means an act of terror planned and perpetrated by one party for the purpose of having the blame assigned to its enemy for political or strategic purposes. 9-11, like many of the terror attacks that have occurred in occupied-Iraq, was a textbook false-flag operation. False-flag attacks are designed to foment hostility or instigate war between groups or nations.
Only very rarely has the United States, oceans away from the conflicts of Europe and Asia, actually been attacked by foreign militaries. The British invasion during the War of 1812 and the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor in 1941 are the only two foreign attacks, prior to 9-11, that come to mind. Although 9-11 is disguised and interpreted by the government and media as an act of terrorism carried out by Islamic fanatics, the evidence indicates that it was a carefully planned false-flag attack carried out by the Israeli military after years of planning and preparation.
EVIDENCE OF ISRAELI INVOLVEMENT
This is not a hypothesis that can be easily dismissed as based on mere speculation or prejudice. There is solid evidence that Israeli intelligence agencies had prior knowledge of 9-11, which is indicative of involvement in the attacks. Public statements made by key terror suspects, the five jubilant "movers" arrested in New Jersey, for example, who were actually Israeli intelligence agents, indicate that they possessed prior knowledge of the attacks.
In November 2001, after two months in U.S. custody, three of the five agents appeared on Israeli television and admitted, in plain Hebrew, that their purpose had been to document the event. The Israeli interviewer did not ask the men who had sent them, but it is quite clear they were working for Israeli intelligence.
Three of the five Israeli agents appeared on television when they were sent back to Israel and openly admitted that their "purpose had been to document the event."
The five fake movers from Urban Moving Systems of Weehawken, New Jersey, were actually operatives of the Israeli secret services. The five Israeli agents, described in early news reports as "Middle Eastern," had been sought by the FBI and New Jersey authorities after they had been seen celebrating and photographing the destruction of the World Trade Center. The Israelis made a video of themselves with the burning towers behind them as they flicked their cigarette lighters, laughed, and celebrated as hundreds of innocent people were being roasted alive. Reportedly, they had worn Palestinian or Arab garb, which was later found in their van.
Two of the five Israelis, who were caught with multiple passports, box cutters, thousands of dollars stuffed into their socks, and driving a van that tested positive for explosives, were actually on a list of foreign intelligence agents known to U.S. law enforcement authorities at the time.
ABC News did a follow up on the Israeli agents in June 2002:
The arresting officers said they saw a lot that aroused their suspicion about the men. One of the passengers had $4,700 in cash hidden in his sock. Another was carrying two foreign passports. A box cutter was found in the van. But perhaps the biggest surprise for the officers came when the five men identified themselves as Israeli citizens.
‘We Are Not Your Problem’
According to the police report, one of the passengers told the officers they had been on the West Side Highway in Manhattan "during the incident" — referring to the World Trade Center attack. The driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers, "We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem." The other passengers were his brother Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, and Omer Marmari.
The five "movers" were evidently part of a much larger Israeli terror operation in New York City. The Urban Moving Systems company was later exposed as a Mossad "front" company, a fake agency set up to facilitate their terror operation. An American who worked with the company said he was shocked to see that the Israeli employees had openly rejoiced over the attacks.
In November 2001, the five Israeli agents and terror suspects were returned to Israel on "visa violations" although they first repeatedly refused to take, and then failed lie detector tests concerning their involvement in 9-11.
Instant messages warning of the attack at the WTC, predicting the event to the precise minute, sent via the Mossad-owned Odigo messaging system hours before the first plane hit the North Tower, are further evidence that members of Israeli intelligence agencies had very specific and accurate knowledge of the terror attacks – long before they occurred.
In a complex and elaborately planned crime of mass murder and terrorism like 9-11, possession of specific prior knowledge like that held by the fake Israeli movers and the senders of the Odigo messages is clearly evidence of involvement in the crime.
Had the recipients of the Odigo warnings contacted the responsible authorities in New York City, thousands of lives would have been saved. If these people were not complicit in the crime, why didn't they contact the authorities? Taking the evidence of Israeli prior knowledge into consideration with the Israeli military's capability to launch such a sophisticated false-flag terror attack, the obvious question has to be asked: Would Israeli military agencies commit such an atrocious act of terrorism in the United States in order to achieve a strategic goal?
The question whether Israeli strategic planners would conduct a false-flag terror attack against the United States, their most powerful ally, in order to fix the blame on the Arabs, their enemies, raises several specific questions:
1. Has the Israeli military conducted false-flag terror attacks against the United States in the past?
2. If so, are there links between the people or agencies involved in the previous terror attacks and 9-11?
3. Is there a strategic goal for which Zionist planners would conduct such an extremely dangerous and sophisticated terrorist operation?
4. If so, has that strategic goal been realized as a result of 9-11?
The answer to all four questions is yes. The Israeli military has a documented history of conducting military and false-flag terror attacks against the United States. It also has a history of withholding information from the United States about threats that it has knowledge of.
Specific Zionist extremists are, furthermore, the prime suspects with the strongest motive for having carried out 9-11. The Zionist motive was to kick-start their long-planned U.S.-led "War on Terror" with a spectacular terror attack against the United States. Like any other crime, solving 9-11 requires that we diligently investigate those suspects with strong motives and prior histories of committing similar crimes. There are a number of senior Israeli suspects who fit this description. On the other hand, there is no reasonable Arab motive to attack the World Trade Center or the Pentagon. Why would Arabs or Moslems commit such a counter-productive act? Why would any Arab organization commit a senseless crime knowing that it would invite a U.S. military invasion of their nation or another Islamic nation? The Arab/Islamic terror scenario makes very little sense.
ISRAEL'S HISTORY OF TERROR
We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.
- David Ben Gurion, first prime minister of Israel, to the General Staff, May 1948
Zionists and Israelis, on the other hand, have long employed terrorism as a tool and a tactic. Senior officials of the Israeli government, the Mossad, and Israeli military intelligence, an organization known as AMAN, have a long history of using terror as a tool. Zionist immigrants from Poland and Russia used terrorism to drive the native population of Palestine from their land, homes, and villages during the war of 1947-48. Some 400 Palestinian villages and towns were obliterated and their populations killed or sent into exile as refugees. Many of the Palestinian houses and villages were taken over by Jewish immigrants; others were razed to the ground.
The Zionists also began using terrorism as a tactic against the West in the 1940s, carrying out false-flag terror attacks against the United States and Britain as far back as the bombing of Jerusalem's King David Hotel on July 22, 1946. The bombing of the luxury hotel was ordered by Menachem Begin, the head of the Irgun, a Zionist terrorist organization during the 1930s and 1940s. Begin, a terrorist and avowed racist, later became prime minister of Israel, a position he held during the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, which was led by Ariel Sharon, then minister of defense. Begin had a Jewish supremacist view of the world, which he used to justify his crimes of terrorism and genocide. "[The Palestinians] are beasts walking on two legs," Begin, then Prime Minister Begin, said in a speech to the Knesset, as quoted by the Israeli writer Amnon Kapeliouk in his article "Begin and the Beasts" published in the New Statesman of June 25, 1982.
Menachem Begin, the Polish-born head of the terrorist gang Irgun, and the King David Hotel he ordered bombed in 1946. "Everything was coordinated with the Haganah," Prime Minister Begin later told the Israel Broadcasting Authority.
Irgun and Haganah terrorists, disguised as Arabs, set off seven large demolition bombs in the basement of the King David Hotel, which was the base for the British Secretariat and the military command in British-occupied Palestine. Ninety-one people were killed, most of them staff of the secretariat. The attack on the hotel was the deadliest attack against the British in the history of the Mandate. To this day, the Zionist bombing of the King David Hotel is the terrorist act which has caused the greatest number of casualties in the history of the Israeli-Arab conflict. Zionist extremists, however, are proud of the terrorist bombing as one of their actions that compelled the British to give up the Mandate over Palestine.
David Ben Gurion, the head of the Haganah militia who advocated the use of terror as a tool, supported the bombing. Although the Haganah publicly condemned the bombing afterwards, many researchers insist that the Haganah directly authorized the bombing. "Everything was coordinated with the Haganah," former prime minister and Irgun leader Menachem Begin declared in a film clip from the Israel Broadcasting Authority's "Scroll of Fire" series.
"We must use terror," Israel's first prime minister David Ben Gurion (on left) told the General Staff in 1948. Ben Gurion (a.k.a. David Grün), the Polish-born leader of the Haganah, authorized the terror bombing of the King David Hotel. Ben Gurion, who developed Zionist terrorism as a tool to coerce the Palestinians and the West, meets with his junior partners in terror, Shimon Peres and Moshe Dayan.
NETANYAHU'S SUPPORT FOR TERRORISTS
Members of the Irgun, which carried out scores of terror bombings in the 1930s and 40s (and its political successors in the Likud party) hold the world view that "political violence and terrorism" are "legitimate tools in the Jewish national struggle for the Land of Israel," according to Arie Perliger and Leonard Weinberg, authors of "Jewish Self Defense and Terrorist Groups Prior to the Establishment of the State of Israel: Roots and Traditions."
In July 2006, the former prime minister and leader of the Likud, Benjamin Netanyahu, attended a two-day 60th anniversary celebration of the King David Hotel bombing with former terrorists of the Irgun and Haganah. The event was organized by the Menachem Begin Heritage House, the University of Haifa, and the Association of IZL [Irgun] Fighters. The seminar was held "to mark the 60th anniversary of the bombing of the King David Hotel, Jerusalem, by members of the United Resistance Movement (Haganah and Irgun)," the Jerusalem Post noted in its pre-event notices. The Israeli newspaper specifically noted that members of the Haganah and Irgun had been involved in the terrorist bombing.
One of the terrorists even led a tour of the hotel he had bombed. The fact that the American-educated right-wing politician and terror specialist, "Bibi" Netanyahu, had participated in a two-day event celebrating the bombing of the King David Hotel was reported in the Jerusalem Post, and in leading newspapers in Britain, France, and India – but not a single word about the event was printed in the controlled press of the United States, the nation supposedly fighting a "War on Terror."
"It's very good," said Benjamin Netanyahu on 9-11 about the attacks which were thought to have killed more than 10,000 Americans.
Netanyahu's conspicuous role as the main speaker at an event celebrating an act of terrorism was not reported in any U.S. newspaper until Patrick Buchanan mentioned it in his article entitled "Moral Culpability for Qana," on August 2, 2006. Buchanan's comments, however, appeared only in independent regional newspapers in Pittsburgh, Wyoming, and Ohio:
Rubbing our noses in our own cravenness, "Bibi" Netanyahu took time out a week ago to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the terror attack on the King David Hotel by Menachem Begin's Irgun, an attack that killed 92 people, among them British nurses. This was not a terrorist act, Bibi explained, because Irgun telephoned a 15-minute warning to the hotel before the bombs went off.
Right. And those children in Qana should not have ignored Israeli leaflets warning them to clear out of southern Lebanon.
Our Israeli friends appear to be playing us for fools.
"TERRORISTS IN DISGUISE"
In 1946, The Times (U.K.) described the Irgun as "terrorists in disguise." Sarah Agassi, 80, was one of the "terrorists in disguise" involved in the bombing of the King David Hotel, it reported. She and a fellow agent had cased out the hotel. Her brother and other terrorists had disguised themselves as Arabs delivering milk and brought seven milk cans, each containing 50 kg. (110 lbs.) of explosives, into the basement of the hotel.
There were important strategic reasons for the bombing, according to the Jerusalem Post of July 27, 2006:
The bombing was a direct response to the events of the British Operation Agatha and the Black Sabbath of June 29, 1946, during which 17,000 British soldiers confiscated weapons and intelligence documents and arrested thousands of leaders of the Yishuv and Hagana activists.
The documents, brought to the King David headquarters, revealed most of the Yishuv's operational plans and incriminated the Jewish Agency in the leadership of the United Resistance, as well as the IZL and the Lehi, against the British.
The evidence would be used to try the Jewish activists and, quite possibly, to hang them.
Twenty-five fighters took part in the carefully-planned and precisely executed bombing. Six of them, dressed as Arab laborers, placed the seven milk cans filled with 350 kg. of explosives, fitted with timers set to go off in 40 minutes, around the central support beam of the hotel's southern wing. Others spread explosives along the roads leading to the hotel to prevent reinforcements and emergency medical crews from arriving at the scene.
NETANYAHU'S TERRORIST ROOTS
Netanyahu is the son of Ben Zion Netanyahu (born Mileikowsky in Warsaw, Poland). Ben Zion was the former senior aide of Vladimir "Ze'ev" Jabotinsky, the militant extremist founder of Revisionist Zionism and the Irgun. His son, Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu is also a leading advocate of the teachings of Jabotinsky. On July 8, 2007, Netanyahu was the keynote speaker at an event at the Jabotinsky Institute to mark the 67th anniversary of the death of the founder of the Irgun.
The Irgun, a Zionist terrorist organization dedicated to creating Greater Israel, is the political parent of Israel's extreme right-wing Likud party, which Benjamin Netanyahu currently heads. The Irgun was the "armed expression" of Revisionist Zionism, which was expressed by Jabotinsky as follows, according to Howard M. Sachar, author of A History of Israel from the Rise of Zionism to Our Time:
1. Every Jew has the right to enter Palestine;
2. Only active retaliation [i.e. terrorism] would deter the Arabs and the British;
3. Only Jewish armed force would ensure the Jewish state.
TERRORISM SPECIALIST
Netanyahu is also a terrorism specialist who has made a career out of promoting the Zionist agenda of a global "War on Terror" since the early 1980s.
On September 11, 2001, the New York Times asked Netanyahu what he thought of the attacks: "It's very good," Netanyahu said. Who else, but a hardened terrorist involved in the crime, would use the word "good" to describe 9-11?
As James Bennet of the New York Times reported on September 12, 2001:
Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, "It's very good." Then he edited himself: "Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy."
In 2006, the Jerusalem Post and other newspapers reported on Netanyahu's outspoken support for the terrorists who had bombed the King David Hotel in 1946. The Irgun's chief of operations at the time of the bombing was Eitan Livni, the father of the Israeli Foreign Minister "Tzipi" Livni (2006-09). The high-level political connections in Israel with the Irgun terrorists of the 1940s are an indication of the degree of terrorist influence on the Israeli political establishment, The Hindu [India] wisely noted in an article entitled "Celebrating Terror, Israeli-style" on July 24, 2006:
"We do not think that it is right for an act of terrorism, which led to the loss of many lives, to be commemorated," Britain's Ambassador to Israel, Simon McDonald, and its consul-general in Jerusalem, John Jenkins, protested weakly in a letter to the local Israeli administration in Jerusalem.
PREVIOUS ISRAELI ATTACKS ON U.S. TARGETS
Eight years after the bombing of the King David Hotel, the State of Israel carried out a series of false-flag terror bombings against U.S. and British libraries, theatres, and other government institutions in Egypt in a terror campaign designed to be blamed on Egyptian groups. This Israeli terror campaign of July 1954 is often referred to as the "Lavon Affair" after Pinhas Lavon, the Israeli defense minister at the time.
In June 1967, thirteen years after the Lavon Affair, the Israeli air force and navy deliberately strafed, bombed, napalmed, and torpedoed an unarmed U.S. vessel, the USS Liberty, and tried to kill all of the nearly three hundred crew members, simply to achieve a strategic war-time goal. Recently released documents from the National Security Agency (NSA) confirm that the United States government at the time had evidence that the Israelis had deliberately attacked the USS Liberty knowing it was a U.S. vessel. Oliver Kirby, the NSA's deputy director for operations at the time of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, confirmed the existence of the transcripts to John Crewdson of the Chicago Tribune, saying he had personally read them:
Asked whether he had personally read such transcripts, Kirby replied, "I sure did. I certainly did."
"They said, 'We've got him in the zero,'" Kirby recalled, "whatever that meant -- I guess the sights or something. And then one of them said, 'Can you see the flag?'
They said 'Yes, it's U.S, it's U.S.' They said it several times, so there wasn't any doubt in anybody's mind that they knew it."
Kirby, now 86 and retired in Texas, said the transcripts were "something that's bothered me all my life. I'm willing to swear on a stack of Bibles that we knew they knew."
The USS Liberty after being bombed, napalmed, shot, and torpedoed by the Israeli air force and navy
MORDECHAI FEIN (a.k.a. MOTI HOD)
The Israeli planes involved in the attack reported directly to the commander of the air force, Major General Mordechai Hod. Hod (a.k.a. Mordechai Fein or "Moti" Hod) was the Commander of the Israeli Air Force during the 1967 Six-Day War. Hod was from Kibbutz Degania, like Moshe Dayan, the defense minister he served under.
Major General Mordechai "Moti" Hod, IAF Commander (1966-1973)
Hod left the military in 1975 and created CAL, an Israel air cargo company. Oddly, after only two years he left the company he started and became chief executive of El Al airlines from 1977 to 1979. In 1985, he founded an un-named security company, according to his obituary in the Guardian (UK) from June 2003. From 1987 until retirement in 1993, he was the chairman of Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI).
ICTS, the Israeli airport passenger screening and security firm, is a key defendant in the 9-11 litigation. The ICTS website says this about the company: "ICTS International N.V. was founded in 1982 by a select group of security experts, former military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies."
An employee of ICTS told me in 2001 that Huntleigh USA, their wholly owned airport security subsidiary, had handled passenger screening at Boston and Newark airports on 9-11. As a matter of fact, the Mossad-owned company probably had people at every airport involved in any way on 9-11. The ICTS company website says as much: "In 1998, ICTS International N.V. made a strategic decision to focus on the US market. The following year, it acquired Huntleigh USA Corp., which provides airline passenger screening services at 47 US airports, including all the international aviation gateways in the USA."
The ICTS company developed out of El Al (the Israeli-state airlines) security. The Israeli airline security firm went through a number of name changes as it began providing "security" to European and American airports.
Moshe Dayan, defense minister during the Six-Day War, was a close associate and political ally of Shimon Peres. In 1965, former prime minister Ben Gurion and his closest followers, including Shimon Peres and Moshe Dayan, broke away from the ruling labor party, Mapai, and formed a separate minority faction, the Rafi or Workers' List.
COVER-UP
The U.S. government, military, and media all went along with the cover-up of the deliberate attack on the USS Liberty to avoid blaming Israel for the murder of 34 American servicemen, 26 of whom died from the torpedo blast, and the wounding of some 173 others. Shimon Peres, the Israeli president, certainly knows who made the decision to attack the U.S. vessel in 1967.
The Main Battle Dressing Station on the USS Liberty was described as a “bloody scene reminiscent of the American Civil War.” The Israeli torpedo and machine guns took a terrible toll on the Liberty’s crew, killing 34 and wounding 172.
The Crewdson article reveals that the Israelis knew very well that the USS Liberty was an American vessel in international waters – before they fired the torpedo that killed twenty-six U.S. servicemen in one fell swoop:
Twenty minutes later, after the Liberty had been hit repeatedly by machine guns, 30 mm cannon and napalm from the Israelis' French-built Mirage and Mystere fighter-bombers, the controller directing the attack asked his chief in Tel Aviv to which country the target vessel belonged.
"Apparently American," the chief controller replied.
Fourteen minutes later the Liberty was struck amidships by a torpedo from an Israeli boat, killing 26 of the 100 or so NSA technicians and specialists in Russian and Arabic who were working in restricted compartments below the ship's waterline.
The Israeli torpedo killed 26 U.S. servicemen and left a hole 39 feet across.
"SINK THE TARGET – NO SURVIVORS"
Lt. James M. Ennes, Jr., an officer on the bridge of the USS Liberty, wrote his first-hand account of the Israeli attack in a 1979 book entitled Assault on the Liberty. Lieutenant Ennes' book is documentary evidence that the Israeli attack was deliberate and not an accident of war. Ennes describes how Israeli torpedo boats repeatedly machine-gunned Liberty sailors fighting the napalm fires on deck and shot her life rafts in the water while an oversize U.S. flag flew from its mast.
The shooting of the life rafts indicates that the Israelis did not want anyone to survive the assault and intended sinking of the U.S. vessel. Steve Forslund, an intelligence analyst for the 544th Air Reconnaissance Technical Wing in 1967, saw the transcripts from the Israeli pilots and their ground control as they came off the teletype machine at Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha.
"The ground control station stated that the target was American and for the aircraft to confirm it," Forslund recalled. "The aircraft did confirm the identity of the target as American, by the American flag. The ground control station ordered the aircraft to attack and sink the target and ensure they left no survivors." Forslund said he clearly recalled "the obvious frustration of the controller over the inability of the pilots to sink the target quickly and completely."
"He kept insisting the mission had to sink the target, and was frustrated with the pilots' responses that it didn't sink."
Chief Petty Officer Stanley W. White, president of the Liberty Veterans Association, said, "The Israeli planes and gunboats spent more than one hour hitting us with rockets, napalm bombs, torpedoes, cannon and machine-gun fire. They machine-gunned our firefighters on deck and they shot our life rafts out of the water…I don't know of a single member of our association who believes that attack was an accident."
There are three reasons that have been given as to why the Israelis wanted to sink the U.S. electronic reconnaissance vessel:
1. To prevent the U.S. from knowing that Israel was planning to seize the Golan Heights from Syria;
2. To prevent the U.S. from obtaining evidence that Israeli troops were slaughtering some 1,000 Egyptian prisoners of war near Gaza;
3. To destroy the U.S. vessel that was capable of discerning that Israel was sending false communications to Jordan and Egypt to keep them in the war until the Israeli military achieved its territorial goals on the ground.
"U.S. intelligence documents indicate the Israelis attacked the Liberty deliberately. They feared she would monitor their plans to attack the Golan Heights in Syria - a move the United States opposed for fear of provoking Soviet military intervention," James Ennes said.
Wilber Crane Eveland, an author formerly with the CIA in the Middle East, wrote that the Liberty had intercepted messages that "made it clear that Israel had never intended to limit its attack to Egypt."
ISRAELI MASSACRE OF EGYPTIAN POWS
The Tribune article reported that the NSA's deputy director at the time, Louis Tordella, speculated in a recently declassified memo that the attack "might have been ordered by some senior commander on the Sinai Peninsula who wrongly suspected that the Liberty was monitoring his activities." The activities that needed to be hidden included the slaughter of some 1,000 Egyptian POWs.
Aryeh Yitzhaki of Bar Ilan University, who had worked in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) history department, said in an August 1995 interview with Israel Radio that a reconnaissance unit, known as Shaked (Almond), headed by Binyamin Ben-Eliezer, had killed hundreds of Egyptians who had abandoned their weapons and fled into the desert during the 1967 war.
Yitzhaki said he had investigated six or seven separate incidents, in which approximately 1,000 unarmed Egyptian prisoners of war had been killed by IDF units.
THE BOMBING OF THE U.S. MARINE BARRACKS - BEIRUT 1983
Sixteen years later, 241 U.S. Marines died when a Mercedes truck packed with explosives demolished their barracks at Beirut International Airport on October 23, 1983. A similar explosion occurred nearly simultaneously at the French military barracks a few kilometers away, killing 56 French troops.
In the wake of the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, President Ronald Reagan sent 1,800 marines to Beirut to act as "peace keepers." Ariel Sharon and the Israeli leadership, however, resented the interference and used the U.S. presence to commit a false-flag operation that killed 241 marines, according to Victor Ostrovsky in his book on the Mossad, By Way of Deception.
Ostrovsky, a former Mossad officer, reported that Nahum Admoni, the Mossad director at the time, had very specific information about the truck being prepared for the attack on the U.S. Marines, but had intentionally withheld this crucial information from the U.S. military. "No, we're not there to protect Americans. They're a big country. Send only the regular information," Admoni reportedly said.
Admoni, the son of Polish immigrants, was director of the Mossad from 1982 to 1989. In 1947-48, Admoni had served in the Shai, the Haganah intelligence branch headed by Isser Harel, and later in the newly created IDF Intelligence, Aman. After the 1948 war, Admoni studied at the University of California, Berkeley, until 1954.
The purpose of the false flag terror bombings in Lebanon was to create U.S. animosity toward the Arab world and align the U.S. with Israel, according to Ostrovsky. There had been an earlier car bomb at the U.S. Embassy in Beirut on April 18, 1983, which had killed seventeen Marines. The bombing compelled the Marines to move offshore and President Reagan ordered them to be withdrawn from Lebanon on February 7, 1984.
The Beirut bombing was the deadliest single-day death toll for the United States Marine Corps since the Battle of Iwo Jima. Israeli intelligence is suspected of having been involved in the bombings in Lebanon.
"WAR ON TERROR"
The ultimate goal of creating U.S. animosity toward the Arab world is the Zionist mega-fraud known as the "War on Terror." With its U.S.-led invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq, the "War on Terror" is the realization of an important strategic goal for Israeli military planners.
To have the armies of the U.S. and European nations occupying Iraq, the most powerful and advanced Arab nation, has always been the dream of Zionist strategic planners. Benjamin Netanyahu, for example, has explicitly called for such a global "War on Terror" since the early 1980s.
Although it is never mentioned as such in the controlled press, it needs to be understood that the "War on Terror" with its pre-planned invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, constitutes a war of aggression. To prepare for and carry out a war of aggression is a serious war crime, i.e. a Crime against Peace under the Nuremberg Principles of 1950. The United States and its allies convicted and literally strangled to death dozens of senior Nazis at the Nuremberg trials for having committed such war crimes.
In the aftermath of 9-11, the U.S. government failed to prove that the terror attacks had been planned, sponsored, or executed by members of the ruling Taliban regime prior to invading Afghanistan. Years after invading that nation, the U.S. government has yet to prove that any link existed between the Taliban regime and 9-11.
On June 5, 2006, author Ed Haas contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation headquarters to ask why, while claiming that Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 1998 bombings of US Embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, the "most wanted" poster does not indicate that Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the events of 9-11. Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI responded, “The reason why 9-11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9-11.” Tomb continued, “Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9-11.”
Likewise, there is no evidence of involvement in 9-11 by any member of the regime of the former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. Furthermore, allegations that the Iraqi regime had obtained weapons of mass destruction, trumpeted by senior officials of the Bush administration and Judith Miller of the New York Times, turned out to be lies crafted solely for the purpose of deceiving the public and provoking another illegal invasion. The passage of time does not make a war of aggression and occupation any less illegal.
DECADES OF PLANNING
There are key people involved in the 1954 Israeli terror bombings of the U.S. Information Agency libraries in Alexandria and Cairo who held high-level positions in the Israeli government of 2001. There are other Israelis, with long histories of terrorism and strategic planning, who revealed having very specific prior knowledge of 9-11 long before 2001.
The highest Israeli intelligence official at the time of the Lavon Affair, Isser Harel, was evidently aware of the long-term planning of 9-11 -- more than twenty years before it happened. In 1980, twenty-one years before September 11, 2001, Isser Harel, the former director of Haganah intelligence, the Shin Bet (internal) and the Mossad (foreign) intelligence services, predicted with uncanny accuracy the events of 9-11 to Michael D. Evans, an American supporter of Zionist extremists of the Jabotinsky sort.
On September 23, 1980, Evans visited Harel at his home in Israel and had dinner with him and Dr. Reuven Hecht, a senior adviser to then prime minister Menachem Begin.
Isser Harel, Israeli spymaster and master terrorist, discussed his knowledge of the plan to bomb the WTC -- in 1980.
"AMERICA THE TARGET"
In an editorial entitled "America the Target," published in the Jerusalem Post of September 30, 2001, Evans related what Harel had told him:
I sat with former Mossad chief Isser Harel for a conversation about Arab terrorism. As he handed me a cup of hot tea and a plate of cookies, I asked him, "Do you think terrorism will come to America, and if so, where and why?"
Harel looked at his American visitor and replied, "I fear it will come to you in America. America has the power, but not the will, to fight terrorism. The terrorists have the will, but not the power, to fight America - but all that could change with time. Arab oil money buys more than tents."
As to the where, Harel continued, "New York City is the symbol of freedom and capitalism. It's likely they will strike the Empire State Building, your tallest building [he mistakenly thought] and a symbol of your power."
In another article, entitled "Jimmy Carter: Radical Islam's Ally," Evans related the same story about Harel:
My last question was would terrorism ever come to America. “You have the power to fight it,” he said, “but not the will. They have the will, but not the power. All of that will change in time. Yes, I fear it will come to New York and your tallest building, which is a symbol of your fertility.”
Michael D. Evans is a Zionist Jew who portrays himself as a Christian. Here Evans meets with Menachem Begin, the former terrorist head of the Irgun who ordered the bombing of the King David Hotel. Evans was told by Isser Harel of the Israeli plan to bomb the World Trade Center in 1980, about the time of this photo.
In 2004, Evans published a book entitled The American Prophecies, Terrorism and Mid-East Conflict Reveal a Nation’s Destiny. In a subsequent interview, published under the title "Is America in Bible Prophecy?" with Deborah Caldwell, Evans explains what Harel meant about fertility symbols:
Caldwell: So extrapolating from the scenarios of the Bible, what do you believe is our nation's future, based on prophecy?
Evans: The story of prophecy that has to do with the Jews goes all the way through to the end of the Book of Revelation. Jesus prophesied in Matthew 24. The disciples said, "What shall be the signs of the coming of the end of the age?" And he said, "The first sign would be deception." Now, there's never been greater deception then what happened on September 11, 2001.
Caldwell: Why do you say that America's story is contained within biblical prophecies?
Evans: America stepped into the eye of a prophetic storm when it took covenant with both Ishmael and Isaac, the sons of Abraham, the Arab and the Jew…Most of the Bible talks about this battle between these two brothers, and we're right in the middle of that.
On Sept. 23, 1979, the founder of Israeli intelligence over dinner told me that America was developing a tolerance for terror. The gentleman's name was Isser Harel, the founder of Mossad Israeli intelligence -- he ran it from 1947 to 1963.
He told me that America had developed an alliance between two countries, Israel and Saudi Arabia, and that the alliance with Saudi Arabia was dangerous and would develop a tolerance for terror among Americans. He said if the tolerance continued that Islamic fundamentalists would ultimately strike America.
I said "Where?"
He said, "In Islamic theology, the phallic symbol is very important. Your biggest phallic symbol is New York City and your tallest building will be the phallic symbol they will hit." Isser Harel prophesied that the tallest building in New York would be the first building hit by Islamic fundamentalists 21 years ago.
Mike Evans with Ehud Olmert, the Likud (Irgunist) mayor of Jerusalem, who made a secret and undisclosed visit to New York City - on the very day before 9-11
The "Is America in Bible Prophecy?" interview with Evans is published on-line on Beliefnet, a Zionist propaganda network disguised as a religious website. Steven Waldman is CEO, Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Beliefnet. Previously, Waldman was National Editor of US News & World Report, National Correspondent for Newsweek and editor of the Washington Monthly. One of Beliefnet's directors is Michael S. Perlis, the former President of the Playboy Publishing Group.
Steven Waldman of Beliefnet
Think about this for a minute. The founder of Israeli intelligence tells an American Zionist in 1980 that Arab terrorism will come to America and that the terrorists will strike the tallest building in New York City. His bizarre prediction, which makes no sense, then comes to pass thirteen years later with a hapless and thoroughly fake attack in 1993, evidently set up by the FBI. The FBI-coordinated false-flag terror event is followed, eight years later, by a spectacular, well-planned, and extremely lethal attack which kills thousands. How did Isser Harel know what the Arab terrorists had planned more than two decades before 9-11?
ISSER HAREL – MOSSAD'S MASTER TERRORIST
Under David Ben Gurion, Isser Harel was the former chief of Haganah intelligence (Shai) from 1944, the Shin Bet from 1948, and the Mossad until 1963. Admoni, the Mossad director who refused to warn the U.S. Marines in 1983, had served under Harel. Given his unique position and penchant for terrorism as a means of coercion, the uncanny accuracy of Harel's prediction says more about the years of Israeli planning that went into 9-11 than it does about any criminal plots of alleged Arab origin.
After nearly two decades as the head of Israeli intelligence, Ben Gurion reportedly asked Harel to resign in 1963 because of his use of terrorism bombings as a means of coercion against the West. Harel, as director of the Mossad, had initiated "The Damocles Operation" of the early 1960s, which was a terror bombing campaign to threaten German scientists to prevent them from helping Egypt develop its defense systems.
Isser Harel, head of Israeli intelligence in 1961
Two Mossad agents were arrested and jailed in Switzerland for using terror bombs against German scientists. The wife of one scientist was killed in a mysterious explosion, a second scientist disappeared, and the secretary of a third scientist was blinded and mutilated by a mail bomb in Cairo. As Ian Black and Benny Morris, authors of Israel's Secret Wars: A History of Israel's Intelligence Services, wrote:
Dr. Heinz Krug, director of a Munich-based Egyptian front company called Intra, had disappeared mysteriously and was presumed murdered in September 1962.
On 7 October Harel [Isser Harel, Mossad head] left for Europe 'to personally supervise authorized operations and the special collection programme.'
In November, Aman [IDF intelligence] sent several letter bombs to the rocket installations in Egypt and one of them, a large parcel that had been mailed by sea from Hamburg, killed five Egyptians. Someone with a black sense of humour dubbed the campaign 'post mortem.'
It is interesting to note that Yosef Goell, a columnist with the Jerusalem Post, published an editorial entitled "Isser Harel and the German Scientists" on February 22, 1991, in which Israel's English-language newspaper delivered a thinly-veiled threat of Harel-type terrorism to European scientists and companies doing business with Arab nations:
The directors and managers of those firms and the experts who work for them should be reminded that they are playing with their lives and the welfare of their families. It would be well if they went back and studied the episode of Isser Harel and the German scientists in Nasser's missile program of the 1960s.
THE LAVON AFFAIR
The Lavon Affair, or "the shameful affair" (Esek Habish) as it is known in Hebrew, was an Israeli false-flag terror bombing campaign against the United States and Britain that was carried out in Egypt in 1954. Israeli military intelligence had set up a terror cell of sleeper agents in Egypt, which was activated in July 1954 to blow up U.S. and British targets. The Israeli operation was code-named "Susannah." The false-flag terrorist bombings were meant to be blamed on Egyptians in order to alienate the U.S. and Britain from President Gamal Abdul Nasser and prevent Egypt from nationalizing the Suez Canal.
The Lavon Affair is seldom discussed in the media or in university courses on Middle Eastern history. Strict censorship in the Israeli media even prevented the Israeli public from knowing about the affair for many years. Only in 2005, fifty-one years after the bombings, did Israel finally admit responsibility for its 1954 false-flag terrorist bombing campaign in Egypt. The false-flag terror bombings were carried out between July 2 and July 27, 1954 by a covert terror cell composed of about one dozen Egyptian Jews under the command of Israeli intelligence agents.
The Israeli-run terror cell was discovered and broken up on July 27, 1954, when one of its members was caught in Alexandria after the bomb he was carrying exploded. An Israeli terrorist cell, Unit 131, was reportedly responsible for the terror bombings. At the time of the incident, Unit 131 is said to have been the subject of a dispute between Aman and Mossad over who controlled it. How convenient.
The Egyptian operatives had been recruited several years before, when an Israeli intelligence officer named Avram Dar went to Cairo posing as John Darling, a British citizen from Gibraltar. Dar recruited Egyptian Jews, who had helped the Mossad with illegal emigration to Israel, and trained them for covert operations. The Israeli terror cell went to work in the summer of 1954. On July 2, a post office in Alexandria was firebombed. On July 14, the U.S. Information Agency libraries in Alexandria and Cairo and a British theater were bombed. The bombs contained nitroglycerine and were placed on the shelves of the libraries. After the terrorist cell was discovered, three of the Israeli terrorist commanders succeeded in fleeing Egypt and the fourth committed suicide. After the trial in Cairo, two of the accused Egyptian Jews were condemned to death and executed, and eight were condemned to long terms of imprisonment.
MOSHE SHARETT
The Israeli prime minister and foreign minister at the time, Moshe Sharett, was evidently unaware of the intrigue, which had apparently been carried out by disciples of David Ben Gurion, namely Isser Harel, Moshe Dayan, and Shimon Peres.
Sharett (born Shertok in Cherson, Ukraine) was Israel's first foreign minister (May 15, 1948 – June 18, 1956) and second prime minister (Dec. 7, 1953 – Nov. 2, 1955). Sharett held both positions at the time of the Israeli terror campaign. Sharett, who appears to have known nothing about the terror ring, only became informed of the facts afterwards.
In October 1953, shortly before Ben Gurion took a two-year hiatus in the Negev Desert leaving Sharett in charge, he appointed Pinhas Lavon, a staunch supporter of the "retaliation" [i.e. terrorism] policy, as minister of defense, and nominated Moshe Dayan as chief of staff of the armed forces. When Sharett was told of Ben Gurion's decision to nominate Dayan as chief of staff, he penned this note in his diary: "The new chief of staff's immense capacity for plotting and intrigue-making will yield many complications."
LAVON - TERRORIZE THE WEST
Pinhas Lavon, Israel's minister of defense at the time of the terror bombings, was part of a group of military leaders who advocated the use of terrorism against the Western nations, particularly Britain and the United States. This group included the Polish-born immigrants David Ben Gurion and Shimon Peres (Szymon Persky), and Moshe Dayan, the kibbutznik son of Ukrainian immigrants.
In January 1955, Sharett wrote about Lavon to Aharon Barkatt, secretary general of the Mapai party:
He [Lavon] inspired and cultivated the negative adventuristic trend in the army and preached the doctrine that not the Arab countries but the Western Powers are the enemy, and the only way to deter them from their plots is through direct actions that will terrorize them.
When the Israeli terrorist plot against Britain and the U.S. was exposed, Ben Gurion blamed Lavon, who, in turn, blamed Col. Benjamin Givli, another Ben Gurion protégé and the head of Aman, Israeli military intelligence. Lavon said that Givli had organized the covert operation behind his back.
SHARETT & ISRAEL'S TERRORISM
Prime Minister Sharett, however, had "no doubts about the guilt of the Dayan-Peres-Givli clique," according to the late Israeli historian Livia Rokach, the daughter of Israel Rokach, the former mayor of Tel Aviv and minister of internal affairs in the Sharett government:
For him [Sharett], the question of who gave the order was secondary to the necessity of pronouncing a judgment on the ideology and politics of Israel's terrorism. Therefore, while he had no doubts about the guilt of the Dayan-Peres-Givli clique; to him Lavon's political responsibility was also inescapable.
As Sharett wrote about Lavon on January 10, 1955:
[People] ask me if I am convinced that "he gave the order?"… but let us assume that Givli has acted without instructions… doesn't the moral responsibility lie all the same on Lavon, who has constantly preached for acts of madness and taught the army leadership the diabolic lesson of how to set the Middle East on fire, how to cause friction, cause bloody confrontations, sabotage targets and property of the Powers [and perform] acts of despair and suicide?"
As a "moderate Zionist," Sharett believed that Israel's survival would be impossible without the support of the West, Rokach wrote, but that Western "morality" and interests in the Middle East would not support a Jewish state which "behaves according to the laws of the jungle" and "raises terrorism to the level of a sacred principle."
SHIMON PERES: "FRIGHTEN THE WEST"
In May 1947, Ben Gurion drafted Shimon Peres into the Haganah high command, where he was initially put in charge of manpower and later became involved in arms procurement and production. Peres served as chief of the naval department in 1948 and was sent to the United States in 1950 on an arms procurement mission. Peres was instrumental in acquiring weapons for the Haganah and establishing the Israeli defense industries, especially the aircraft and avionics industries, according to his biography. He is also known as the godfather of the Israel's high-tech defense industries and illegal nuclear arsenal.
Peres built an alliance with France that secured a source of arms, and was responsible for the program to develop nuclear weapons for Israel, convincing the French to help Israel build a secret nuclear reactor at Dimona in the Negev Desert in 1957. It was Peres who acquired the French advanced Dassault Mirage III jet fighters that the Israeli air force used to attack the USS Liberty in 1967.
About Shimon Peres, whom Sharett considered to be one of the key planners of the terror bombing campaign of U.S. institutions in Egypt, he wrote this note in 1955: "Peres shares the same ideology [as Lavon]: he wants to frighten the West into supporting Israel's aims."
Two years later, in 1957, Sharett wrote even more critically about Peres:
I have stated that I totally and utterly reject Peres and consider his rise to prominence a malignant, immoral disgrace. I will rend my clothes in mourning for the State if I see him become a minister in the Israeli government.
Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Olmert, Ariel Sharon, and Shimon Peres – the senior architects of Israeli terrorism
Sharett's terrorism and violence-prone adversaries: Ben Gurion, Dayan, and Peres, however, prevailed and dealt "a crushing blow" to "the very hypothesis of moderate Zionism," Rokach concluded:
In the final analysis the West, and in particular the U.S., let itself be frightened, or blackmailed, into supporting Israel's megalomaniac ambitions, because an objective relationship of complicity already existed and because once pushed into the open this complicity proved capable of serving the cause of Western power politics in the region.
The immense profits that have flowed into the coffers of Western drug and oil cartels as a consequence of the Anglo-American control over the opium production of occupied-Afghanistan and the oil of occupied-Iraq amply illustrate Rokach's point that Israeli false-flag terror is "capable of serving the cause of Western power politics in the region."
As Rokach concluded in her study of Sharett's diary and documents:
Just as Zionism, based on the de-Palestinization and the Judaisation of Palestine, was intrinsically racist and immoral, thus the West, in reality, had no use for a Jewish state in the Middle East which did not behave according to the laws of the jungle, and whose terrorism could not be relied on as a major instrument for the oppression of the peoples of the region.
By April 1957, Sharett realized that the hard-line terrorist faction headed by Ben Gurion and his protégés Dayan and Peres had won – and that he, and his vision of moderate Zionism, had lost:
I go on repeating to myself nowadays, "Admit that you are the loser!" They showed much more daring and dynamism…they played with fire, and they won…The public, even your own public, does not share your position. On the contrary…the public now turns even against its "masters" and its bitterness against the retreat [from Sinai and Gaza] is developing into a tendency to change the political balance in this country in favor of [the former Irgun terrorist leader Menachem] Begin.
"His [Sharett's] defeat in internal Israeli politics reflected the ascendancy of the positions of Ben Gurion, Dayan and others [Peres] who were not reluctant to use force to attain their goals," Noam Chomsky wrote in his forward to Rokach's book:
His diaries give a very revealing picture of the developing conflict, as he perceived it, and offer an illuminating insight into the early history of the state of Israel, with ramifications that reach to the present, and beyond.
9-11 and the "War on Terror" are clearly two "ramifications" of the victory of the terrorist Zionists that "reach to the present."
Had Moshe Sharett, the Israeli prime minister, "spoken frankly and directly to public opinion" and torn up "the mask of secrecy" surrounding the Israeli terror bombings, he could have changed the history of the Middle East, Rokach wrote:
At this point, Sharett could have changed the history of the Middle East had he spoken frankly and directly to public opinion, which was deeply troubled by the events in Egypt: the arrests, the trial, the executions, the contradicting rumors, the climate of intrigue surrounding the "Affair." [By] tearing up the mask of secrecy, denouncing those who were responsible, exposing his true convictions in regard to Israel's terroristic ideologies and orientations, [and] proposing an alternative, he could have created for himself the conditions in which to use the formal powers that he possessed to make a radical housecleaning in the security establishment. The impact of such an act would have probably been considerable not only in Israel itself but also in the Arab world, especially in Egypt. The downfall of Lavon on one hand and of the Ben Gurionist gang, headed by Dayan and Peres, on the other hand might have blocked Ben Gurion's return to power, and in the longer range, the Sinai-Suez war. Events since then would have taken a different course.
Unfortunately, "the Ben Gurionist gang, headed by Dayan and Peres" came to power. Peres, who had served in high-level appointed positions, was elected to the Knesset in the 1959 elections. Peres, the former Director General of the Ministry of Defense under Moshe Dayan, then became the Deputy Defense Minister, a position he held until 1965 when he was implicated, with Dayan, in the Lavon affair.
On June 5, 1967, Israel started the Six-Day War when it launched a pre-emptive attack against Egypt and its air force. Yitzhak Rabin was chief of staff and Moshe Dayan was minister of defense during this crucial war that reshaped the Middle East.
Ben Gurion and his gang of Dayan and Peres formed a new party in 1965, Rafi, partly due to their involvement in the Lavon Affair. Dayan and Peres had worked closely together since their days in the Haganah.
SHIMON PERES: TERRORIST-IN-CHIEF
Shimon Peres, a most unsuitable recipient of the 1994 Nobel Peace Prize, has a long history of terrorism, which is evidently not well known in the West. Peres, the octogenarian president of the State of Israel, has a documented record of involvement in terrorist crimes over a period of more than five decades.
Condoleezza Rice visits Shimon Peres, September 2007
Peres is a survivor of the struggle among Zionists between the militant hard-liners, who promoted the use of violence and terrorism, versus the softer "moderates," who opposed terrorism and advocated the use of diplomacy. Shimon Peres is a hard-liner. Born Szymon Persky in Wiszniew, Poland, on August 2, 1923, Peres is the first cousin of Lauren Bacall, the Brooklyn-born Betty Joan Persky. This relationship between the veteran hard-line Zionist and a Hollywood movie star is a good example of how Zionist Jewish families from the Pale of Settlement often established branches in Israel and the United States in the early 1900s.
In 1947, the Polish-born Zionist leader David Ben Gurion (born David Grün) met Shimon Peres, then age twenty-three, at Haganah headquarters and made him responsible for manpower and arms purchases for the underground Zionist militia Ben Gurion commanded in Palestine.
Ben Gurion and Shimon Peres (on left), 1969
Peres became a protégé of Ben Gurion. After the bombing of the King David Hotel and other terror killings by the Haganah and other Zionist terror gangs, the British withdrew from Palestine. The armed gangs of Zionist immigrants and veterans of the Red Army then turned their terrorist skills, which some had gained during World War II, against the indigenous population of Palestine. Nearly 400 Palestinian towns and villages were completely obliterated or "ethnically cleansed" during the 1947-48 Zionist conquest of Palestine.
Peres was also the chief of the Israeli navy, whose main task at the time was the illegal smuggling of men and arms for the Zionist forces in Palestine. When the war of 1947-1948 ended, Peres "assumed the position of Director of the Defense Ministry's procurement delegation in the United States," according to his biography. As director of arms procurement in the United States, Peres was responsible for organizing illegal arms smuggling. Transfers of weapons and planes to Zionist forces violated the U.S. Neutrality Act. Much of the Haganah arms smuggling activity was run from an office above the "syndicate-owned" Copacabana Club in New York City, where Peres and Teddy Kollek, the Hungarian-born son of the director of the Rothschild bank in Vienna, worked closely with the "crime syndicate" headed by the leading Jewish gangsters of the time.
After World War II, Kollek had been sent to New York, where he worked as the Haganah representative and head of its weapons purchasing team in New York. Kollek worked from an office above the Copacabana nightclub in the Haganah's Hotel Fourteen to arm the Zionist forces in British-occupied Palestine.
Ben Gurion and Haganah gun-runner Teddy Kollek
Also deeply involved in this criminal arms smuggling activities were the American Jews, Adolph "Al" Schwimmer and Hank Greenspun. Greenspun, the Las Vegas-based publicist for mobster Benjamin "Bugsy" Siegel, was eventually pardoned for his crimes by President Bill Clinton, a close friend of the Greenspun family. In 1951, at the request of Ben Gurion, Schwimmer and Peres founded Bedek, the military's aviation firm that became Israel's largest company, Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI).
Adolph W. Schwimmer, Zionist arms smuggler, and Ben Gurion
In 1952, the same year Ben Gurion made Isser Harel the head of the Mossad, he appointed Peres to be Deputy Director General of the Ministry of Defense. The next year, at the age of twenty-nine, Peres became the youngest ever Director General of the Defense Ministry, a position he held until 1959. It is interesting to note that Peres never attended university or served in the army, according to Ha'aretz (Israel) of June 14, 2007.
As Director General, Peres was a founder of Israel's military and its subsidiary, Israel Aircraft Industries. Ben Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, put Peres in charge of the establishment of the Israel's unlawful nuclear program and secret reactor at Dimona in the Negev Desert.
Peres has never been very popular with Israeli voters. Although he served twice as prime minister, he was never elected to that position. In 2000, he even lost a parliamentary election for the presidency to Moshe Katsav, an Iranian Jewish immigrant. Peres served as Israel's foreign minister under the Likud right-wing Ariel Sharon from early 2001 until November 2002. In July 2007, at nearly 84 years of age, Peres finally won the presidency, but only after Katsav was forced to leave office under a storm of allegations of rape and sexual misconduct.
One might wonder why an eighty-four-year-old man would even want to be president. Is this an example of the maxim, "no rest for the wicked?" Is Peres still working because he needs to protect the critical secrets about 9-11 and the war agenda it launched? Oddly, prior to 9-11, Peres, a politician from the left, held the most powerful positions of Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister in a government led by a prime minister from the extreme right, Ariel Sharon. Sharon, reportedly comatose since January 2006, is a well known terrorist, war monger, and war criminal with a long record of committing atrocities in Palestine and Lebanon. Peres held these highest level positions in the Israeli government from March 3, 2001 until November 2, 2002.
Peres, godfather and chief architect of Israel's high tech military and unlawful nuclear arsenal, is a person who has always supported the use of terror to coerce the West to support Israel's strategic goals. He has been involved, at the highest level, in numerous covert false-flag terrorist operations, such as the Lavon Affair, which was even kept secret from the Israeli prime minister at the time.
Ariel Sharon and Shimon Peres, who both have long histories of terrorism, headed the Israeli government in 2001-2002
Did Peres use his senior position in a government of like-minded war-mongering terrorists to launch the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 in order to coerce the United States and the West into the Zionist planned "War on Terror?"
Shimon Peres has the credentials of a Zionist arch-terrorist. Furthermore, he has the record, the worldview, and the capability to be an architectural level planner of 9-11. Is Peres one of the masterminds behind the terrorist crime of the century? Were Isser Harel and Mordechai Hod also involved in the planning of 9-11?
To determine the identity of the architectural level planners of 9-11 we will need a better understanding of how the terrorist attacks were carried out during and within the context of U.S. and international military anti-terrorist exercises and drills that included the exact scenario of a passenger plane crashing into a military building near the Pentagon.
10,439 words
Sources:
ABC News, "The White Van: Were Israelis Detained on Sept. 11 Spies?" June 22, 2002
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0622-05.htm
Bar Zohar, Michael, Ben Gurion, A Biography, Delacorte, New York, 1978
Bennet, James, "A Day of Terror: The Israelis," New York Times, September 12, 2001
Crewdson, John, "Special Report: New revelations in attack on American spy ship," Chicago Tribune, October 2, 2007
Evans, Michael D., "Is America in Bible Prophecy?" Deborah Caldwell interview with Michael D. Evans, August 2004
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/151/story_15136.html
Joffe, Lawrence, Obituary: "Mordechai Hod: Israeli air force mastermind behind the six day war," Guardian (London, England), July 2, 2003
Kapeliouk, Amnon, "Begin and the 'Beasts'", New Statesman, June 25, 1982
Melman, Yossi, "Israeli communications said to prove IAF knew Liberty was U.S. ship," Ha'aretz, October 4, 2007
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/909552.html
Ostrovsky, Victor, and Hoy, Claire, By Way of Deception: The making and unmaking of a Mossad Officer, St. Martin's Press, 1990
Perliger, Arie and Weinberg, Leonard, "Jewish Self Defense and Terrorist Groups Prior to the Establishment of the State of Israel: Roots and Traditions," Totalitarian Movements & Political Religions, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2003) pp. 91-118
Prince-Gibson, Eetta, "Reflective truth," Jerusalem Post (Israel), July 27, 2006
Rokach, Livia, Israel's Sacred Terrorism, 1980
http://www.chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/essays/rokach.html
Sachar, Howard M., A History of Israel from the Rise of Zionism to Our Time History of Israel, New York: Knopf, 1976 (3rd Edition, 2007)
Smyth, David, Associated Press, "Americans Rebut Israeli Version of 1967 Attack on U.S. Ship," Lexington Herald-Leader (KY), October 29, 1984
Suroor, Hasan, "Celebrating Terror, Israeli-style," The Hindu (Madras, India), July 24, 2006
Originally published - January 14, 2008
Edited - May 24, 2009
Final Edit - August 10, 2009
Latest Correction - February 22, 2010
IV - The Terror Drills That Became Real: 9-11, the London Bombings & the Sinking of Estonia
Chapter IV
The Terror Drills That Became Real:
9-11, the London Bombings & the Sinking of Estonia
The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack you want to carry out.
- Captain Eric H. May, former U.S. Army military intelligence officer
The past two decades have been marked by a large number of man-made terror events which remain unsolved to this day. Several of these events, which involve heinous crimes of mass murder, are similar in a most remarkable way. These are the disasters which occurred during security drills or military exercises in which the scenario was incredibly similar, if not identical to the real-life terror attack. Understanding the nature of the exercises that created the background and framework for these attacks is essential to understanding how the attacks were carried out. The fact that these real-life terror events occurred within the context of virtually identical terrorism/security exercises has been completely ignored by the media -- as if the exercises had never happened. Of the major terror events that occurred during such exercises, we will look at three specific examples: the aerial attacks of 9-11, the bombings of the London Underground and a bus in 2005, and the sinking of the Baltic ferry Estonia in 1994.
While there certainly have been other major disasters that occurred within the context of military exercises, the sinking of the Russian submarine Kursk in 2000, for example, and the 1988 downing of Iran Air Flight 655 by the USS Vincennes in the Persian Gulf, the three events being discussed here involved attacks on civilian transportation systems far from any war zone. The three disasters were all handled in the same way by their respective governments and media. In each case, before a real investigation could begin to establish the facts and examine the evidence, a politically acceptable explanation was put forward by government officials and repeated, without question, by the mass media. Evidence and facts that contradict the "official" version of events have been confiscated, destroyed, or simply ignored.
The extremely hasty and improper sale of the steel from the World Trade Center to distant Asian smelters, for example, must rank as the most egregious case of destruction of evidence from a crime scene in American history. In late September 2001, officials uncovered a criminal scheme to divert metal to dumps in Long Island and New Jersey. Some 250 tons of scrap metal were found at unofficial dump sites. In November 2001 every truck carrying steel from the World Trade Center was outfitted with a GPS (Global Positioning System) device monitored by an Israeli named Yoram Shalmon of PowerLoc Technologies of Toronto, Ontario, a subcontractor on the clean-up project. Shalmon tracked nearly 200 trucks in New York City in real time using PowerLoc's Vehicle Location Device (VLD). Each VLD unit costs about $1,000.
“We were able to start identifying patterns of behavior. If a driver arrived late, the traffic analyst would look at why. Maybe the driver stopped for lunch, or maybe he ran into traffic,” Shalmon told Jacqueline Emigh of SecuritySolutions.com. “Ninety-nine percent of the drivers were extremely driven to do their jobs. But there were big concerns, because the loads consisted of highly sensitive material. One driver, for example, took an extended lunch break of an hour and a half. There was nothing criminal about that, but he was dismissed. There were also cases where trucks did little detours from their routes,” Shalmon says.
SELLING THE EVIDENCE - The steel from the WTC, critical evidence of what caused the towers to collapse, was quickly destroyed after being sold to Asian smelters. Alan D. Ratner of Metal Management and the New York-based Hugo Neu Schnitzer East profited from this criminal destruction of evidence. Ratner sold the WTC steel to Chinese companies, reportedly selling more than 50,000 tons of steel to a Shanghai steel company for $120 per ton. Ratner paid about $70 per ton for the steel. (See Bollyn article "Seismic Evidence of Underground Explosions" for details.)
Likewise, during the official dive for evidence to the wreck of Estonia, on which more than 852 people are known to have died, the crucial locking bolt from the bow visor, which officials blame for having caused the catastrophe, was thrown back into the sea. The bolt had been removed by divers and brought to the surface for investigation only to be thrown back by Börje Stenström, the Swedish navy commander who was the head of the technical group of the international investigation commission. According to German investigators, Stenström threw away the bolt, which according to his own scenario of the sinking, was "one of the most important pieces of evidence."
Estonia's bow visor was blamed by corrupt investigators for causing the sinking. The crucial evidence, however, was thrown back into the sea. The Swedish government's effort to support the "official lie" with a computer simulation of the sinking failed because the vessel won't sink without a hole below the waterline.
The first rule in maintaining a cover-up is to control access to the evidence. The second rule is to destroy any and all evidence that contradicts the official version of events.
The fact that these three disasters occurred during very similar terror scenarios being staged as part of an exercise has been ignored by the mass media, which has treated these extremely uncanny coincidences as complete non-issues.
Information about the exercises has been kept hidden from the public. The government cover-ups have been greatly facilitated by the compliant mass media which has consistently ignored the fact that several mega-disasters occurred within the context of strikingly similar terrorism exercises.
The terrorist attacks, for example, that struck New York and Washington on 9-11, and the London bombings of July 7, 2005, were the realization (i.e. the making real) of computer-based scenarios that were being staged in the same place at the same time. Would a truly free press ignore the conspicuous fact that both events occurred within the context of very similar terror exercises?
"The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack you want to carry out," Captain Eric H. May, a former military intelligence officer from the U.S. Army wrote in a recent article entitled "False Flag Prospects, 2008 - Top Three U.S. Target Cities."
"This is exactly how government perpetrators in the US and UK handled the 9-11 and 7/7 'terror' attacks," May writes, "which were in reality government attacks blamed on 'terrorists'."
THE 9-11 FAIRY TALE – The alleged hijackers, according to the government and media version. But why has the mass media shown no interest in interviewing the families of these men in order to document and support the official story? How can it be than several of them are even reported to be alive and the media doesn't investigate?
False flag terror attacks are designed and carried out with the intention of having a targeted foe wrongly blamed in order to manipulate public opinion and foment war.
Captain May, a Texan from Houston, certainly knows what he is talking about. He is an expert in military exercises involving simulations. May completed advanced courses at the U.S. Army's school for military intelligence officers at Fort Huachuca, Arizona, and served five years with the U.S. Army's 75th Division as an Opposing Forces Controller, where he ran "contrarian scenarios."
May's aim, he says, as a former military intelligence officer who spent five years conducting war games, is to warn the public that the "'next 9-11' -- constantly promised by officials and the media -- is likely to be carried out under the guise of future military exercises.
"If the American people are aware of pending exercises and the danger they represent," May says, "then the exercises cannot 'go live' and effect the very terror events that they are supposed to be rehearsing against."
9-11 and the July 7, 2005 bombings in London "have smoking guns proving that the mass murderers were not foreign terrorists but domestic tyrants," May writes. The "smoking guns," he says, are the terror exercises that simulated the attacks that actually occurred.
While the terrorism/security drills created the "contrarian scenario" framework within which the real terror attacks occurred, it does not necessarily follow that the agency running the exercise is the actual terrorist. The true culprit is much more likely to be a foreign agency, who is covertly, but intimately aware of the planning of the exercise. By having access to the critical computer networks involved in the exercise this outside agency has the ability to hijack the drill and make it "go live."
While the real terrorists could be from any agency that is involved in the drill, they could also be from a foreign intelligence organization that has gained "back door" access to the computer networks on which the exercise is planned and carried out.
Israeli military intelligence, for example, which has long been engaged in supplying enterprise software, such as Ptech, and network security personnel and programs to the U.S. government and military, undoubtedly has "back door" access to these most sensitive computer networks.
As May says, the "smoking gun" terror drills disprove the official fairy tale that "Islamic terrorists" are responsible for these false flag terror attacks. The Arabs and Muslims who have been wrongly blamed for 9-11 and the London bombings have simply been framed, like Lee Harvey Oswald, as part of the deception.
KILLING THE PATSY – Jacob Rubinstein, a.k.a. Jack Ruby, a violent Jew from Chicago with close ties to the Jewish organized crime network, shoots the patsy of the Kennedy assassination, Lee Harvey Oswald, in Dallas. Ruby's father, an alcoholic carpenter and deserter from the Russian army, came to America from Sokolov, a Zionist hotbed near Warsaw with his brother, Abraham. Rubinstein's mother, Fannie, was a Yiddish-speaking illiterate who was unable to learn to even sign her own name after 35 years in the United States. The Rubinstein children spent time in foster homes due to neglect, while Fannie spent time in the mental hospital in Elgin, Illinois.
THE CHICAGO CONNECTION
Itzhak Rabin, a senior Israeli military officer and ally of Shimon Peres, also happened to be in Dallas on the day President John F. Kennedy was killed. The question might be asked, what business did Itzhak Rabin of the Israeli military have in Dallas on November 22, 1963? On January 1, 1964, Rabin was promoted to Chief of Staff after returning from Dallas.
Rabin's father, Nehemiah, had lived some thirteen years in Chicago's Yiddish-speaking Jewish community on the West Side, some of that time at 2734 Crystal Street with a Solomon Turovlin of the Jewish Daily Forward, the Yiddish language paper. The elder Rabin (reportedly born Rubitzov) was involved in Chicago's Yiddish-speaking Zionist community, of which the Rubinstein family was also a part, before migrating to Palestine as a member of the Jewish Legion sometime after September 1918. Rabin's father from Chicago became one of the founders of the underground Zionist militia, the Haganah, in Jerusalem in 1920. Why has the U.S. media ignored Jack Ruby's extensive ties to the world of Jewish organized crime?
LONDON - JULY 7, 2005
At the exact time of the terror bombings of the London Underground and a bus at Tavistock Square, a man named Peter Power was, with his crisis management company, Visor Consultants Ltd., conducting a terrorism drill for a mysterious un-named client. The Visor exercise was precisely identical to the bombings that occurred. Just how likely is such a coincidence?
Peter Power had previously worked at Scotland Yard, the Anti Terrorist Branch, and as a police superintendent in West Dorset, England. In 1993, Power was himself the subject of a criminal investigation which, in April 1993, led to his suspension and retirement from the police.
Superintendent Power was suspended following an internal police inquiry, which resulted in a file being submitted to the Director of Public Prosecution. Oddly, the details of the Power investigation have been kept classified. After a five-month investigation, Power retired from the police force in September 1993, at the age of forty-two, "on health grounds."
PETER POWER - The July Seventh Truth Campaign in Britain has revealed Power's troubled past and his links with previous terror incidents in Britain. But the details of the criminal investigation into Peter Power have been kept secret since 1993. What did he do in Dorset and who was the mysterious un-named company with whom he planned and conducted the terror exercise on July 7?
"THIS IS THE REAL ONE"
Just hours after the London bombings, Power explained the incredible coincidences with the drill his company was conducting in a radio interview with Peter Allen on BBC 5:
Power: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.
Peter Allen: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?
Power: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers, for the first time they'd met, and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision, "this is the real one" and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.
"WE CHOSE A SCENARIO"
Later, on day of the bombings, Power also appeared in a television interview on ITV News in which he revealed more about the nature of the operation:
Power: Today we were running an exercise for a company - bearing in mind I'm now in the private sector - and we sat everybody down, in the city - 1,000 people involved in the whole organization - but the crisis team. And the most peculiar thing was we based our scenario on the simultaneous attacks on an underground and mainline station. So we had to suddenly switch an exercise from 'fictional' to 'real'. And one of the first things is, get that bureau number, when you have a list of people missing, tell them. And it took a long time.
ITV Host: Just to get this right, you were actually working today on an exercise that envisioned virtually this scenario?
Power: Er, almost precisely. I was up to 2 o'clock this morning, because it's our job, my own company Visor Consultants, we specialize in helping people to get their crisis management response. How do you jump from 'slow time' thinking to 'quick time' doing? And we chose a scenario - with their assistance - which is based on a terrorist attack because they're very close to, er, a property occupied by Jewish businessmen, they're in the city, and there are more American banks in the city than there are in the whole of New York - a logical thing to do. And it, I've still got the hair....
One would think that such astounding revelations of a British terrorism expert about how the terror bombings were "almost precisely" like the exercise he had been conducting for a mysterious company would be of great interest to the media. That has, however, not been the case.
There has been virtually no discussion in the "mainstream" media that the London bombings, or other terror atrocities and disasters like 9-11 and the sinking of Estonia, occurred within the context of security drills that were very similar to what actually happened. Why has this crucial background information been censored?
Astonishing first-hand accounts, like Peter Power's, from people engaged in these exercises were reported shortly after the events occurred, yet these important stories were confined to local news outlets and not reported in the major national and international news outlets, in newspapers like the New York Times, for example, whose motto is: "All the news that's fit to print."
Power's comments about the amazing coincidences with his security drill were censored by the BBC in the same way as the eyewitness report of Stephen Evans, their reporter at the World Trade Center on 9-11.
Evans was on the ground floor of the South Tower when planes struck the complex. When he appeared on BBC World television shortly after the collapse of the twin towers, Evans repeatedly described a "series of explosions" he had seen and felt at the base of the tower before it was demolished.
STEPHEN EVANS - The BBC reporter and eyewitness to the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9-11. When Evans went on BBC television shortly after the collapses all he talked about was the "series of explosions" he had witnessed. The producers in London were clearly not interested in discussing that subject. How did the BBC editors know that explosions were something that should not be discussed? Why did they censor Evans' eyewitness account?
From the first minute Evans spoke, however, it was quite obvious that his eyewitness report was being censored by the higher powers at the BBC. When the BBC revisited the events of 9-11 with Evans, there was absolutely no mention of the "series of explosions" he had witnessed on the morning of the attacks. How can that be? Such blatant and intentional omissions are properly defined as censorship. Evans' astonishing eyewitness account from 9-11 was evidently dropped into the "memory hole" at the BBC. Peter Power's revealing comments about the London bombings met the same fate.
The BBC has a very peculiar history regarding the events of 9-11. Not only did the British network censor Evans' reports of explosions at the World Trade Center, but it also reported that the building known as WTC 7 collapsed about 30 minutes before the 47-story tower fell straight down into its foundation. Jane Standley, a BBC World television reporter in New York City on 9-11 reported at about 4:54 p.m. (21:54 GMT) that the Salomon Brother's building owned by Larry Silverstein (WTC 7) had collapsed. Silverstein's building, however (which he later admitted had been "pulled"), did not collapse until 5:20 p.m. (22:20 GMT). BBC news editor Richard Porter subsequently wrote on the BBC website in February 2007: "We no longer have the original tapes of our 9-11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy)." But, why would the BBC destroy its original tapes of 9-11? (This is exactly the same excuse provided by the Hoffman Estates (Illinois) police who said they had destroyed the video tapes they had made of their three-man undercover tactical squad arresting me at my house in August 2006.)
The BBC's Jane Standley reported that Larry Silverstein's Salomon Brothers building (WTC 7) had collapsed 30 minutes before it fell straight into its foundation. The BBC later said it had destroyed all of its original tapes of 9-11 broadcasts.
For independent journalists to question the controlled-media's version of events, from which such significant first-hand accounts have been censored, is to risk being branded a "conspiracy theorist."
The public is now told that eyewitness accounts cannot be trusted – at least when they differ from the official version. Eyewitness reports from people who were in the disaster or who saw it with their own eyes can not be considered as reliable testimony, we are told. How very odd.
Such was the case with the downing of TWA Flight 800 off Long Island, New York in 1996, when more than a hundred eyewitnesses reported seeing what appeared to be a missile streak from the surface of the ocean, strike the aircraft, and cause an explosive fireball.
I attended the final presentation of the official TWA 800 report by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in 2000, when David Mayer, whose only credential as a panel member was a Ph.D. in Applied Experimental Psychology from Rice University, audaciously dismissed the reports of more than one hundred eyewitnesses as the collective hallucinations of intoxicated New Yorkers, based solely on the fact that it was a summer evening!
At that point, it was abundantly clear that there was something seriously wrong with the NTSB and their investigation of the downing of TWA 800. The cover-up could hardly have been more obvious.
THE "PLANE-INTO-BUILDING" DRILL OF 9-11
On 9-11, an agency of the Department of Defense and the CIA was conducting a terror scenario in which an imaginary airplane from Washington's Dulles International Airport was to crash into one of the four towers of the suburban campus of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) in Chantilly, Virginia, just a few miles from the Pentagon. The plane that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon, American Airlines Flight 77, departed from the same airport at 8:20 a.m. on 9-11.
When the terror scenario became real in New York and at the Pentagon, the NRO exercise was cancelled and nearly all its three thousand employees, the people who operate the nation's "eye in the sky," were sent home.
"BIZARRE COINCIDENCE"
The government said it was a "bizarre coincidence" that the NRO, a military intelligence agency working under the Department of Defense and the CIA, had planned a simulated exercise with a mock "plane-into-building" crash on the morning of 9-11. "It was just an incredible coincidence that this happened to involve an aircraft crashing into our facility," spokesman Art Haubold told the Associated Press in August 2002. "As soon as the real world events began, we canceled the exercise."
As the agency that operates many of the nation's spy satellites, the NRO personnel come from the military and the CIA. When the attacks occurred, however, most of the three thousand people who work at the agency were sent home. Why would they do that?
The fact that the spy agency had planned such a drill was casually leaked in an announcement for a Homeland Security conference in Chicago in 2002. In a promotion for speaker John Fulton, a CIA officer assigned as chief of NRO's strategic gaming division, the announcement said:
On the morning of September 11, 2001, Mr. Fulton and his team ... were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building. Little did they know that the scenario would come true in a dramatic way that day.
CRITICAL FAILURES
The most pressing questions about why the U.S. military air defense system failed to intercept the four hijacked planes on 9-11 are obviously of crucial importance. Captain May writes that "even official apologists call [9-11] the greatest defense failure in American history." How could the most modern and expensive air force in the world fail to intercept four airliners, three of which roamed wild for hundreds of miles before striking landmark buildings in New York and Washington? Why was the U.S. air defense system unable to intercept several large, slow-moving planes before they struck the nation's largest city and its capital? If the U.S. Air Force couldn't intercept lumbering civilian planes, how could they possibly stop a hostile invasion of fighter jets or missiles?
These crucial questions have never been raised by the government-appointed commissions or the media, which have all avoided discussing the military exercises of 9-11. It's not that these drills were not reported, but rather that their connection to the disasters has not been openly discussed and investigated.
Four months after 9-11, the Post-Standard of Syracuse, New York, published an article by Hart Seely that featured first-hand accounts of the military radar operators of the Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) at the former Griffiss Air Force Base in Rome, New York. These radar operators were the eyes of the U.S. air defense system for the eastern part of the nation on 9-11. In Seely's article, the NEADS personnel explained how a North American Aerospace Defense (NORAD) exercise called Vigilant Guardian, which they were participating in, had caused systemic confusion which prevented an effective military response to the real emergency.
The confusion at NEADS was evident from the moment Boston Flight Control informed them that a plane had been hijacked. At 8:38 a.m. an air traffic controller telephoned Sergeant Jeremy Powell at NEADS to inform him that one of their planes had been hijacked and was headed to New York:
"Is this real-world or exercise?" Powell asked.
"No. This is not an exercise; not a test," Powell was told, according to the transcripts of the 9-11 Commission report.
"IT MUST BE PART OF THE EXERCISE"
Seely's article described the context -- and the confusion -- at NEADS:
6 a.m.: WAR GAMES
Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins figured it would be a long day.
Sept. 11 was Day 2 of "Vigilant Guardian," an exercise that would pose an imaginary crisis to North American Air Defense outposts nationwide. The simulation would run all week, and Deskins, starting her 12-hour shift in the Operations Center as the NORAD unit's airborne control and warning officer, might find herself on the spot. Day 1 of the simulation had moved slowly. She hoped the exercise gathered steam. It made a long day go faster.
8:40 a.m.: REAL WORLD
In the Ops Center, three rows of radar scopes face a high wall of wide-screen monitors. Supervisors pace behind technicians who peer at the instruments. Here it is always quiet, always dark, except for the green radar glow. At 8:40, Deskins noticed senior technician Jeremy Powell waving his hand. Boston Center was on the line, he said. It had a hijacked airplane. "It must be part of the exercise," Deskins thought. At first, everybody did. Then Deskins saw the glowing direct phone line to the Federal Aviation Administration. On the phone she heard the voice of a military liaison for the FAA's Boston Center. "I have a hijacked aircraft," he told her. American Airlines Flight 11, headed to Los Angeles, had veered off course, apparently toward New York. The liaison said to get "some F-16s or something" airborne.
Forty-one minutes earlier, Flight 11 had left Logan Airport with 81 passengers. For the last 27 minutes, it had not responded to ground control. Deskins requested Flight 11's latest position, which an operator put up on the screen. Flight 11 wasn't there. Someone had turned off its transponder, the device that identifies the plane to ground control. Boston Center could still track it on primary radar, but the operators in Rome would be hard-pressed to find it amid the jumble of blips on their screens. We'll direct the intercept, the liaison told Deskins. Just get something up there. Deskins ran up a short flight of stairs to the Battle Cab and reported the hijacked plane - real world, not a simulation.
NEADS RADAR OPERATORS – These were the military radar systems and personnel who were confused on 9-11 because of the Vigilant Guardian simulation. Did Osama bin Laden, in a cave in Afghanistan, and the nineteen flight school drop outs know about the simulation and hack into the military's computer systems and manipulate the radar systems in order to increase the confusion? The real perpetrators of 9-11 did.
NOT A SIMULATION
What is most peculiar is that Seely's informative article about the confusion among the critical military radar operators at NEADS was never published or referenced by any national newspaper in the United States. The New York Times, for example, has never even mentioned "Vigilant Guardian," the air defense exercise that contributed to the confusion behind the military's failure to protect New York City on 9-11.
Oddly, among the national newspapers and news magazines of the United States, Vigilant Guardian was only mentioned once, very briefly, in a Washington Post book review of the 9-11 Commission report. The review began: "If the 9-11 report had been written as a novel, nobody would believe it. The story is too far-fetched."
The Post mentioned Vigilant Guardian when it quoted "a little-noticed footnote" from the report:
When FAA officials realize (late) that planes are being hijacked, they can't monitor them - or decide what to do. The vice president thinks he has issued orders to shoot down civilian planes, but the pilots in the air don't get the word. The military's air-defense command isn't sure whether it's dealing with an exercise or a real event. Incredibly, according to a little-noticed footnote in the report, "On 9-11, NORAD was scheduled to conduct a military exercise, Vigilant Guardian, which postulated a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union."
Vigilant Guardian obviously confused the military because simulated hijackings and false "injects," which are radar indications of non-existent planes, were reportedly part of the exercise. This is why Deskins and others were initially uncertain whether the reports of hijacked planes were "real world" or simulation.
"First thing that went through my mind was, 'Is this part of the exercise?" Air Force Maj. Gen. Larry Arnold, who was at a command center at the Tyndall Air Force Base in Florida, told ABC News. "Is this some kind of a screw-up?'"
The military's inability to respond effectively to the rogue aircraft of 9-11 was evidently caused, at least in part, by the NORAD exercise. The fact that a similar exercise, involving a plane striking a military facility near the Pentagon, was being staged on the morning of 9-11, indicates that the computer-based exercises played key roles in the actual terror attacks that occurred.
What role the military exercises played in the 9-11 terror attacks and how they could have been hijacked, and by whom, are all questions that need to be answered, but these are questions that will be addressed in a subsequent chapter.
THE ESTONIA CATASTROPHE
The unexplained sinking of the Baltic ferry Estonia on its way to Stockholm from Tallinn in late September 1994 is the third mega-disaster (not chronologically) that occurred within the framework of a military exercise. The day before it sank, Estonia had also been the scene of a terrorism exercise in which the scenario was a terror bombing of the ferry. Looking at the NATO military assets that were assembled nearby and the terrorism drill that had just been conducted on the ship, the stage was set and the actors were in place for what turned out to be a real disaster. The Estonia catastrophe is Europe's worst maritime disaster since World War II.
Tragically, 852 people are known to have died when Estonia sank in the early hours of September 28, 1994, but more than 1,000 may have perished, if, as reported, some 150 Iraqi Kurds were being smuggled to Sweden in one of the trucks on its car deck. Scores of people died in the frigid water of the Baltic Sea waiting for rescue boats and helicopters that came too late. More than ninety bodies were retrieved from the life rafts.
THE TOLL - The bodies of some of the Estonia victims retrieved from the Baltic Sea.
NATO'S "SEARCH & RESCUE" EXERCISE
Although it is seldom mentioned, the Estonia catastrophe occurred on the first day of a 10-day NATO naval exercise called Cooperative Venture 94, in which more than fifteen ships and "a number of maritime aircraft" were prepared to conduct "humanitarian and search and rescue operations" in nearby waters. The NATO exercise, which involved ten NATO member states and the Baltic "partner" nations of Russia, Sweden, Poland, and Lithuania, was to be staged in the Skagerrak, between Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, and the Norwegian Sea, according to the NATO press release about the exercise from September 16, 1994.
The NATO nations who participated in the exercise were Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, United Kingdom, and the United States. Many other allies and partners sent observers to the exercise, according to the NATO press release.
The fact that Estonia sank as the submarines, ships, planes, personnel, and satellites from the navies of fourteen nations were preparing to begin their ten-day "search and rescue operations" exercise off the coast of Sweden raises several obvious questions that deserve to be answered:
If NATO had fifteen ships and a number of aircraft assembled and prepared to conduct "search and rescue operations," why didn't NATO assist in the early morning rescue operation for the victims from the Estonia catastrophe? The Swedish rescue helicopters were ill-prepared and ill-equipped, which resulted in a fatal delay for those waiting to be rescued.
Many Estonia victims died of exposure due to the delayed rescue. Of the 852 lives lost only 94 bodies were recovered. A complete list of the dead is here.
"Were there specially-equipped rescue helicopters or other aircraft that could have assisted?" Drew Wilson, author of The Hole (2006), a book about the Estonia catastrophe, wrote. "Survivors who didn't die from hypothermia while floating on upturned boats or flotsam in the biting water waited four-six hours for rescue. NATO search-and-rescue personnel and equipment could have saved some lives. Flying time was under 1 hour. Why didn't they respond to the distress traffic? What happened?"
The evidence also indicates that the Mayday signals from Estonia had been jammed, as were all radio communications in the area. "A series of comprehensive malfunctions in regional communication systems all at once, and all at the exact time the ferry had sunk suggest involvement by a military or intelligence services," Wilson writes in The Hole. "Was a distress call intentionally blocked? If so, why?
"Communications throughout the Northern Baltic Sea were disrupted during the time of the accident." As Wilson documents, VHF Channel 16, the international Mayday channel, and Channel 2182 were blocked. "Signal jamming of all radio communications apparently occurred on the Southern coastline of Finland as the accident unfolded.
"Werner Hummel, the German investigator, said that his Group had documentation showing that the regional telephone network servicing the catastrophe site failed just as it was needed most. The malfunction was truly a startling coincidence. The telephone company stated its entire radio communications network, for unknown reasons, had been down from 1:03 to 1:58 a.m. – almost exactly the time the Estonia first encountered trouble until the time it disappeared from radar."
Didn't the NATO communications units prepared for the "search and rescue" exercise overhear the distress calls coming from Estonia? NATO, with state-of-the-art satellite and airborne surveillance assets in place over the Baltic Sea certainly must know who was blocking the SOS calls. Why has this information been kept secret since 1994?
Blocking SOS calls and jamming distress signals is a violation of international law. Why has this crime not been investigated? The intentional blocking of the Mayday signals from Estonia points to complicity in mass murder.
"Naval exercises are meant to be as realistic as possible," Olivier Schmidt, author of The Intelligence Files: Today's Secrets, Tomorrow's Scandals, writes. What was the "search and rescue" scenario of NATO's Cooperative Venture 94 exercise, which was commanded at sea by the Dutch submarine commander Gijsbert Goofert Hooft?
I sent a series of pertinent questions to Robert Pszczel, NATO's press officer for Baltic issues, about NATO's response to the Estonia catastrophe:
Did NATO have any naval assets in the Baltic Sea on the night of September 27-28, 1994 and what actions did NATO take in the immediate aftermath of the Estonia disaster?
Did NATO pick up the Mayday signals being sent (and jammed) from Estonia?
Why didn't NATO assist, given the urgent need to retrieve hundreds of freezing people from life rafts?
What was the scenario of NATO's search and recovery exercise?
Despite telephone calls and email exchanges with the press office at NATO headquarters, Robert Pszczel failed to respond to a single question about NATO's response to the Estonia catastrophe for this article. Drew Wilson met the same wall of silence at NATO when he asked questions about Estonia for his book The Hole. If NATO has a reasonable explanation for its failure to respond to Europe's worst maritime disaster since World War II, why is it unwilling to provide it?
NATO AWAC Planes in Norway
NATO had fourteen ships, submarines, aircraft, and personnel from the United States, Europe, Sweden, and Russia assembled near the scene of the sinking of Estonia, Europe's worst maritime disaster since World War II. The purpose of the NATO exercise included "search and rescue" operations, yet when disaster struck, NATO did nothing to help. Why? What was NATO doing that was more important than saving the lives of their citizens? Why won't they talk about it?
ESTONIA'S BOMB DRILLS
The Estonia ferry had been the object of bomb threats and had participated in at least two terror bomb exercises in 1994, one in February and another just the day before it sank.
On February 2, 1994, Estonia was the subject of a major mock bomb exercise conducted with RITS, Sweden's maritime fire and rescue agency, and the Stockholm police. The Stockholm police had requested to take part in the exercise and used bomb-sniffing dogs to find explosives. The terror simulation involved a scenario in which "bombs" had been placed in the sauna and swimming pool area on the lowest deck, below the waterline in the bow of the ship. A second "bomb" was placed in the sleeping quarters on the first deck, also below the waterline.
In the Estonia terror scenario, the explosives in the sauna were to be found by the dogs, while the second "bomb" was to explode. The purpose of this terrorism drill was to train with the ship's crew and include shore-based terrorism experts and police with bomb-sniffing dogs, brought to the ship by helicopter. In the simulation, the "bombs" were set to explode about halfway between the Estonian and Swedish coasts, which is where the ship actually sank in September 1994 after a similar mock bomb threat exercise.
When Estonia sank, another mock bomb exercise on the ship had just been concluded. Survivors from the sinking actually reported hearing two huge explosions immediately before the ship listed to starboard. Several crew members testified to having heard the coded fire alarm "Mr. Skylight to No. 1 and 2" over the ferry's public address system at about 1:02 a.m. after the vessel had listed severely. This is the message for the crew that was used during the previous bomb drill in February 1994. "Mr. Skylight" was a signal for the fire fighters to proceed to their fire stations 1 and 2 and prepare for damage control. The fact that this coded alarm was given indicates that there was damage caused by a fire or explosion that required immediate attention. The ferry sank within thirty minutes.
Eyewitness testimony from survivors plus the fact that the ship sank extremely quickly strongly suggest that explosives were used to tear a large hole in the hull below the waterline. Swedish policemen who had just conducted training involving a mock bomb threat on the ferry were returning home when Estonia sank. Of the seventy policemen, only seven survived.
The trans-Baltic ferry Estonia sank in less than 30 minutes after two explosions rocked the ship in the middle of the night. A mock terror drill of a bombing scenario had just been completed on the ship the day before. The passenger ferry was being used to transport Soviet military contraband when she sank. The highest officials in Swedish customs, the government, and military were aware of the sensitive and illegal shipments that put the ferry at risk. Is this why they are so dedicated to protecting the lies about the sinking?
Sources and Recommended Reading
ABC News, "Terror Hits the Towers: How Government Officials Reacted to Sept. 11 Attacks," September 14, 2002.
http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/2002/abcnews091402.html
Bollyn, Christopher, "Mysterious Middle Eastern Connection with Weapons Smuggling on Estonia," December 2, 2005
Bollyn, Christopher, "Seismic Evidence of Underground Explosions Causing WTC Collapse," August 28, 2002
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10095
Bollyn, Christopher, "Was the NRO's 9-11 Drill Just a Coincidence?" November 1, 2002
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=25255
Emigh, Jacqueline, "GPS on the Job in Massive World Trade Center Clean-Up," July 1, 2002, SecuritySolutions.com
http://securitysolutions.com/ar/security_gps_job_massive/index1.html
Holtappels, Dr. Peter and Hummel, Capt. Werner, The Group of German Experts Estonia Investigation Report, Chapter 27, "The Diving Investigation," 1999
http://www.estonia.xprimo.de/estonia%20final%20report/chapter27.htm
Holtappels and Hummel, Section 7.3, "Safety Organisation," especially 7.3.4, "Training and Drills" and the summary of the RITS Exercise on Estonia, February 2, 1994
http://www.estonia.xprimo.de/estonia%20final%20report/7.3.htm
J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign, "Peter Power Dorset Police Suspension & the DPP File," February 7, 2008
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/j7-exclusive-peter-power-dorset-police-suspension.html
J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign, "The 7/7 Terror Rehearsal"
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-terror-rehearsal.html
Kaskel, Helje, M/S Estonia - List of the Dead and Missing, Estonia Litigation Association
http://elaestonia.org/sea/index.php
May, Capt. Eric H., "False Flag Prospects, 2008 - Top Three US Target Cities," February 23, 2008
http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/08/02/25/may.htm
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, 9-11 Commission Staff Statement No. 17, June 17, 2004
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5233007
NATO Press Release (94)82, "Exercise Cooperative Venture 94," September 16, 1994
http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/1994/p94-082.htm
Schmidt, Olivier, The Intelligence Files: Today's Secrets, Tomorrow's Scandals, Chapter 9, "The Sinking of the Kursk and 'Retired' US Navy Spy Edmond Pope," ADI, 2005
Seely, Hart, "Untold Stories: 'We were suddenly no kidding under attack,'" Post-Standard, Syracuse, NY, January 20, 2002 and The Patriot-News, Harrisburg, Penn., February 3, 2002
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?noframes;read=117242
Wilson, Drew, The Hole – Another Look at the Sinking of the Estonia Ferry on September 28, 1994, Diggory Press, Cornwall, UK, 2006
The Terror Drills That Became Real: 9-11, the London Bombings & the Sinking of Estonia, 11 March 2008
6077 words
Final Edit – August 20, 2009
Latest Correction - February 16, 2010
V - How Did Spy Software Get Onto FAA Computers?
Chapter V
How Did Spy Software Get Onto FAA Computers?
The deathly precision of the attacks and the magnitude of planning would have required years of planning. Such a sophisticated operation would require the fixed frame of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a loose group, like the one led by the student Mohammed Atta in Hamburg.
- Eckehardt Werthebach, former president of Germany's Verfassungsschutz intelligence service, to Christopher Bollyn, December 2001
The Deputy Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) at the time of 9-11 and the former Managing Director of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the man who oversaw the federal investigation of TWA 800, Egypt Air 990, and the downing of John F. Kennedy's plane, are linked with a captain of Israeli army intelligence and his system to remotely control aircraft.
The relationship between these appointed officials of the federal agencies responsible for aviation safety with a senior officer of a foreign military intelligence raises serious questions about the degree of Israeli influence at the FAA and NTSB.
THE COMPUTER CRIMES BEHIND 9-11
The dependence of the U.S. government and military on computer systems, which run on software provided by outside vendors, is the Achilles' heel of the world's most powerful nation. 9-11 was clear proof of that fundamental weakness and vulnerability.
9-11 was a computer crime. Apart from being a monstrous crime of mass murder and false flag terrorism, 9-11 was also a sophisticated computer crime, carried out through long-term foreign infiltration of the most sensitive U.S. military and government computer networks. This infiltration, carried out by a foreign intelligence agency, gave the perpetrators of 9-11 "real-time" access to all the data on the computers of the U.S. government and military. On 9-11, this "super-user" access to the data of the most critical government computer networks gave the terrorists the ability to thwart the military response to the emergency as it developed.
Most importantly, the terrorists who committed 9-11 through their "super-user" access to the most critical computer networks of the U.S. government still have that access. The evidence indicates that this infiltration was carried out by the military intelligence agency of the State of Israel.
PTECH & 9-11
The subject of computer sabotage in relation to the aerial attacks of 9-11 was brought to the fore by Indira Singh, who spoke at early 9-11 truth events organized by Kyle Hence. During these early 9-11 "truth" events, a small Massachusetts-based software company called Ptech was brought up by Singh, who sought to link it to Arab terrorists. Ptech was said to be a start-up company from Quincy, Massachusetts, whose software was loaded onto the most sensitive computer systems across the U.S. government, including those of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the U.S. Air Force, two agencies whose systems failed miserably on 9-11.
Indira Singh
Singh, a senior risk and IT consultant with JP Morgan Chase on 9-11, is described as a "whistle-blower" because of her revelations about Ptech's involvement with the critical computer systems that failed on 9-11. "Ptech was with MITRE Corporation in the basement of the FAA for two years prior to 9/11," Singh said. "Their specific job is to look at interoperability issues the FAA had with NORAD and the Air Force in the case of an emergency. If anyone was in a position to know that the FAA -- that there was a window of opportunity or to insert software or to change anything -- it would have been Ptech along with MITRE."
Singh has spoken extensively about Ptech's alleged connections with Saudi Arabia, for example, with Pacifica Radio in 2005:
Maybe those organizations don’t fully know who their masters are. And Ptech is the one thread, the one golden thread you pull on and all of this is unraveled, because it goes into the corporations, it goes into these government entities, it goes into the terrorism financing entities that were, that none of which have been, by the way, taken to task. There are just so many questions about what does this all mean. And as we investigated, as I investigated further, we found that the origins of Ptech were very interesting – where did this company come from obviously is the first question. And how did they get to be so powerful, who were the people, who were the organizations that brought them in, who knew, who gave them the power?
Ptech software "is utilized at the highest levels of almost every government and military and defense organization in this country," Singh said, "including the Secret Service, the FBI, the Department of Defense, the House of Representatives, the Treasury Department, the IRS, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Air Force, and, last but not least, the Federal Aviation Administration."
I found it hard to believe that the most sensitive government and military computers would run enterprise software from a Lebanese-owned start-up company called Ptech from Quincy, Massachusetts. All the talk about the Saudi-financier behind Ptech being linked to Osama Bin Laden smelled like a "cut out" to me. It simply did not make sense that the most secure computer systems of the U.S. government would be running software written by a Lebanese Muslim financed by a Saudi who happened to be on the most-wanted list of global terrorists.
When I turned my attention to Ptech, I soon discovered that the real key person involved in the development of the company was a Zionist Jewish lawyer named Michael Goff from Worcester, Massachusetts. Goff also worked for an Israeli-run computer security company called Guardium. This confirmed my suspicion that Ptech was probably an Arab "cut out" controlled by the Mossad, and that Goff was their point man in Ptech.
Michael S. Goff, Mossad's Man at Ptech
Goff's father and grandfather had been high-level Masons in the Worcester lodge of B'nai B'rith, a secret Jewish Masonic group formed in New York City in 1843. Goff obviously lied to me about how he had gotten involved with Ptech in 1994 when he said that he had wound up becoming the manager of the company through a temporary agency. It seemed to me that the Ptech cut-out had been exposed. My revelations about Ptech's Zionist roots were published in a newspaper based in Washington, D.C. Singh, however, ignored the evidence of Israeli involvement with the creation of Ptech and continued to accuse the company of being linked to Saudi sponsors of terror. Meanwhile, Ptech software is still running on U.S. government and military computers.
Singh and I were asking the same questions: How did Ptech get to be so powerful? Who were the people, who were the organizations that brought them in? Who knew? Who gave them the power?
After 9-11, the crucial question was how did Ptech's software get loaded onto the critical U.S. government networks – particularly those of the FAA, the U.S. Air Force, and NORAD? Who, in their right mind, would have allowed Ptech personnel and software anywhere near the FAA's core air traffic control system computers in Herndon, Virginia?
During my research about the military exercises that were on-going when 9-11 occurred, I read documents about how the FAA and NEADS computer systems failed. The FAA in particular was extremely slow to contact the military about the rogue aircraft of 9-11. In one case, one of the rogue aircraft had been allowed to fly without communication for nearly thirty minutes before the military was notified.
"THE HEART OF THE MATTER"
The flawed and delayed FAA procedures and communications with the military are at "the heart of the matter," as 9-11 relative Kristen Breitweiser said:
You know, it is very upsetting that the 9/11 Commission had to subpoena the Federal Aviation Administration [FAA]. According to news reports, there are 150,000 documents that were left out of what the FAA sent to the commission. Those documents went toward the time line of when the FAA notified the North American Aerospace Defense Command [NORAD], when the fighter jets were scrambled and the communications between air-traffic control and the pilots. These are threshold issues that go to the heart of the matter. How did the FAA overlook 150,000 documents pertaining to these issues? It is more than mildly upsetting that they would leave out these documents.
MONTE BELGER – FAA DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR
In the documents about the FAA failures on 9-11, I came across the name of a Monte R. Belger, acting deputy administrator of the FAA at the time. A long-term FAA official who began his career with the FAA in Chicago, Monte Belger was the senior official who oversaw the upgrading of the FAA air traffic computer systems that began in the late 1990s and which was on-going in 2001.
Monte Belger, Acting Deputy of the FAA from 1997-2002, was the official responsible for the computerized air traffic control system upgrade that allowed MITRE and Ptech to infiltrate critical computer systems with Israeli spyware.
Belger, as the Acting Deputy Administrator for Air Traffic Services and System Operations, was the key man at the FAA making the executive decisions about these upgrades. As the New York Times of June 7, 2001, reported:
The aviation agency is installing a computer system that controllers can use to determine whether airplanes can depart from established traffic lanes and fly long distances, and whether they will conflict with other airplanes by doing so.
Belger was the key decision maker at the Federal Aviation Administration, responsible for the software and computer upgrades that involved Ptech, the suspicious upgrades which were being done during the years prior to 9-11. Documents and reports from the MITRE Center for Advanced Aviation System Development in McLean, Virginia, show that Ptech was working with MITRE on FAA computer systems.
As his on-line biography says, Belger, a thirty-year veteran of the FAA, was Acting Deputy Administrator for the FAA for five years, from 1997-2002, leading the 49,000-person team and in charge of operating the world's safest aviation system.
During his tenure with the FAA, Belger was the Associate Administrator for Air Traffic Services, responsible for day-to-day operations of the nation's airspace system, and supervised the FAA's modernization plan aimed at improving aviation capacity, safety and service to airlines. Belger played a pivotal role in assisting in the transition of aviation security responsibilities from the FAA to the new Transportation Security Administration, and he co-chaired the FAA's successful efforts to adopt acquisition and personnel reform. Belger retired from the FAA in September 2002.
U.S. AVIATION TECHNOLOGY LLC
After he left the FAA, Belger became the "Vice President, Government Connection" of a small Israeli-run company based in the Fort Lauderdale area called U.S. Aviation Technology. The company was founded by Ehud "Udi" Mendelson, who described himself as "a captain in the prestigious Army Intelligence Unit of the Israel Defense Force."
"Ehud received his BS Degree in Business and Economics from the Bar-Elan [sic] University in Tel-Aviv, Israel. He holds a computer Network Engineer certification from Microsoft and Novel," according to his webpage.
Company documents and information from the Israel Venture Capital Research Center website specifically name Monte Belger of Centreville, Virginia, as a Vice President and Government Connection of U.S. Aviation Technology LLC.
Mendelson, age 51, was also the Chief Technology Officer of U.S. Aviation Technology, which was based in his apartment in Parkland, Florida. Mendelson's company promoted a remote-control system that allows a "ground pilot" to monitor and adjust the computer flight systems on aircraft. As he says in his presentations, "We put the ground 'pilot' in the cockpit."
His software and design was promoted as a system to obtain real-time data from the aircraft's computer recorders (black box, FDR) in order to monitor flight systems – and make corrections – if necessary. The possibility to remotely hijack a plane with Mendelson's system is obvious. Mendelson also promoted a Flight Data Animator, which he said gives the ground pilot all of the data and the visuals that the pilot in the aircraft has. In the two on-line presentations of this equipment it is implied that corrections can be made by the ground pilot to avoid an accident or situation.
The data is sent via satellite to the satellite antenna on the top of the aircraft. This software and equipment clearly would allow the ground "pilot" to fly the aircraft. Mendelson was promoting his software and system before 9-11 and hoped to have it on the market in November 2001, according to a document in his company presentation.
I called Monte Belger to ask him about his relationship with Ehud Mendelson, an officer in Israel's military intelligence agency, and his remote-control aviation company. I found it very disturbing that an administrator with the FAA would be associated with such a business project, especially after 9-11.
I called Mr. Belger at his home on Eagle Tavern Lane in Centreville, Virginia at about 9 a.m. on January 24, 2008. I asked him about his relationship with U.S. Aviation Technology and Ehud Mendelson. He denied knowing or having anything to do with either and asked me to call him later at his office at Lockheed Martin Corporation where he is a Vice President responsible for Transportation Systems Security.
When I called his office, he put me on speaker phone, he said, in order to try and access the websites where he was named as a Vice President of U.S. Aviation Technology. He continued to deny knowing anything about the company or its founder, a member of Israel's Army Intelligence Unit.
PETER GOELZ – NTSB
Peter Goelz, the former managing director of the NTSB, the federal investigative body that oversees air crashes, is also named, along with Monte Belger and others, as a Vice President, Corporate Strategy, in U.S. Aviation Technology.
Goelz, at the NTSB from 1995 until 1999, personally supervised the investigations of TWA Flight 800, Egypt Air 990, the ValuJet crash in Miami, and the mysterious crash of the young John F. Kennedy's plane off the coast of Cape Cod. There are many outstanding questions about what really happened to the aircraft involved in several of the high-profile cases that Goelz was involved in.
Peter Goelz
Peter Goelz, former managing director of NTSB, oversaw the seriously flawed TWA 800 and Egypt Air 990 investigations. The New York-born Goelz was a lobbyist for gambling interests in Kansas City prior to coming to the NTSB. A political advisor and lobbyist, Goelz lacks any real expertise in accident investigation. Prior to being appointed to the NTSB during the Clinton administration, Goelz was a political advisor in New Hampshire and a lobbyist for gambling interests in Kansas City. I have not found anything in his resume that would make him a suitable candidate to oversee aviation accident investigations.
I called Peter Goelz at his home on January 25, 2008, and asked him about his relationship with Ehud Mendelson and U.S. Aviation Technology. Goelz immediately recalled Mendelson, saying that he had been based in Miami, and said he had met with the Israeli captain from Israeli military intelligence "two or three" times in Washington, D.C.
When asked if his relationship with Mendelson had begun before or after 9-11, Goelz said that he did not remember. He did, however, have a very clear recall what Mendelson's company was all about: real-time access to all the data from the computer system on an aircraft.
Goelz said he had a hard time understanding what was proprietary about Mendelson's U.S. Aviation Technology. He asked me to send him an email with my questions and the scope of my article.
In my email, I explained that he was listed as a Vice President of U.S. Aviation Technology on the company's website and on that of Israel Venture Capital, and asked how and when he had gotten involved with Mr. Mendelson.
He wrote back on January 26 and asked me to "enlighten" him "a little more on the focus of [my] work in this matter." It is worth noting that Goelz did not deny being a Vice President of Mendelson's company.
If Goelz was confused about Mendelson's system, he certainly does not show it in his comments that are found on the testimonial page of U.S. Aviation Technology, where he wrote (as found on the website, with corrections in brackets):
I have reviewed your proposed integrated aircraft early warning system and believe it has considerable technical merit. During my years at the National Transportation Safety Board we were greatly concerned about the increasing complexity of airplane accidents. Advance in safety (ground proximity warning devices, TCAS, etc.) have virtually eliminated certain type[s] of accidents and have forced a greater reliance on the flight data recorder (FDR). In a number of accidents, particular[ly] those over open water (TWA Flight 800, Egypt Air, Swiss Air) the investigations were seriously hindered until the boxes were recovered. In the tragic events of September 11th, three of the four FDR’s were destroyed so no data (or voice recordings) was recovered.
Your system of real time downloading of aircraft data meets a very real and pressing problem. Not only is it important from a safety and security standpoint it also has applicability for navigation and flight management. A robust two-way data pipe from the aircraft to the ground and back could revolutionize the industry.
The key to your system is it[s] initial simplicity, relying on tested, almost off the shelf, components. That your concept is well on the way to securing a patent further strengthens your proposal.
I look forward to working with you on this project and believe that with the appropriate backing it will be successful.
Peter Goelz, Former NTSB Managing director.
Finis
Sources and Recommended Reading:
Important Note – After contacting Belger and Goelz, the incriminating documents were immediately taken down from the Internet. This was evident from the quick deletions of the U.S. Aviation Technology documents. A warning message appeared when you try to access these documents. Some of these links are no longer available and can be found using the Internet Archive tool (Way Back Machine).
"Ground Zero 911, Blueprint for Terror, Part Two" Indira Singh Interview with Pacifica, July 20, 2005
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x142316
Bollyn, Christopher, "How Mossad Deceived the U.S. Military on 9-11" April 1, 2005
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10761
O'Meara, Kelly Patricia, "A Historical Whitewash? - The ' 9/11 Commission' runs into resistance from official Washington as it investigates the attacks on New York City and the Pentagon," Insight, The Washington Times, December 22, 2003
MITRE Technical Report, FAA Data Registry (FDR) Concepts of Use and Implementation, September 2000
MITRE Working Note, Adapting Information Engineering for the National Airspace System and Its Application to Flight Planning, September 1999
Mendelson, Udi, U.S. Aviation Technology documents:
http://us-aviation-technology.com/bplan325.pdf
http://www.bollyn.info/pdf/us.aviation.pdf
(See pp. 44 -50 regarding the key personnel)
Mendelson, Udi, U.S. Aviation Technology, Aircraft Security & Safety Enhancement:
http://bollyn.info/pdf/us.aviation.tech.pres.pdf
U.S. Aviation Technology LLC on Israel Venture Capital website:
http://www.ivc-online.com/G_info.asp?fObjectID=5387&ObjectType=1
Monte Belger on Israel Venture Capital website:
http://www.ivc-online.com/G_info.asp?objectType=9&fObjectID=7244&CameFrom=GoogleSearch
Peter Goelz on Israel Venture Capital website:
http://www.ivc-online.com/G_info.asp?objectType=9&fObjectID=7243&CameFrom=GoogleSearch
Related files for Christopher Bollyn's 9-11 research:
http://www.matrixfiles.com/CB/CB.html
Solving 9-11: How Did Israeli Spy Software Get Onto Critical FAA Computers?, January 28, 2008
Final Edit – August 20, 2009
Latest Correction - February 16, 2010
VI - Who Controls Our Elections?
Chapter VI
Who Controls Our Elections?
Computer Crimes: Understanding the Deception Behind 9-11 and Election Fraud
The stealing of American elections is primarily a computer crime, as was the false flag terror attack of 9-11. These crimes are carried out by criminals who produce malicious computer code and enterprise software.
I know Americans who watch television every night. I actually know people who spend virtually every non-working minute of the day in front of a television, bathing in the absolutely fake and utterly non-intellectual "reality" of TV. Millions of Americans, in fact, receive the bulk of their news and information about the world from the television. That means that a very large segment of the American population has a worldview that has been shaped primarily by what they have seen on TV. For many people, the artificial and contrived "reality" of the two-dimensional television screen largely defines and informs their view of the real world.
This is why so many Americans know so little about the Middle East. The most obvious symptom of this television-induced ignorance is that most Americans know nothing about the real history of Zionism and the State of Israel. They are completely unaware, for example, of the long history of Zionist terrorism against Palestinians, Americans, Jews, and even Israelis. Raised on Hollywood television and movies, many Americans don't have the slightest clue about the real nature of Zionism.
Think about this for a minute: When was the last time you saw a movie in which the bad guys were Israelis speaking a guttural Slavic-based language called Yiddish or "Ivreet"? Can you recall even one television program in which the criminals or terrorists were Israelis? Apart from The Little Drummer Girl by John Le Carre, I have never seen a film in which Israelis were anything but heroes or victims, usually both. The Little Drummer Girl, which is a film worth watching, shows how false flag terror attacks are frequently committed by Israeli intelligence agents to be blamed on their enemies. Such false flag Zionist terror attacks were carried out against synagogues in Europe in the movie, and in Baghdad in real life during the late 1940s.
In the usual Hollywood films about terrorists, such as the Die Hard films and others produced by Zionist media moguls, the bad guys are always Arabs, Germans, or corrupt members of the U.S. military. For many decades the Zionists who control Hollywood have defined who the "bad guys" are for most Americans. Israelis and their fellow Zionists are, therefore, never the "bad guys" in Hollywood films, although Israelis and Zionists play a very major role, if not the leading role, in the real world of organized crime.
Kobi Alexander, one of the high-level Israeli criminals involved in Comverse, Odigo, and 9-11. After stealing hundreds of millions of dollars, Alexander fled to Israel and Namibia seeking refuge from U.S. justice. Israeli criminals like Alexander are seldom portrayed in Hollywood films.
For the people in the U.S. military whose job it is to protect and defend the United States, reality is largely defined by the information they receive on their computer monitors. These people spend most of their workdays sitting in front of screens that provide the data to which they respond, often in life-or-death situations.
But who really controls the information that the average American and the specialists in the U.S. military receive on their screens? You may be surprised to discover that the man behind the curtain is an Israeli with a thick guttural accent and a foreign and extremely racist view of the world.
ACCEPTING VIRTUAL REALITY
Having observed the counting of the votes in the elections in many countries, I found this essential process of democratic elections to be the most bizarre in Chicago, where there is absolutely no interest by the public or the media in how the votes are actually counted. So far gone is the democratic franchise in Chicago that it can be said that it no longer exists in any meaningful way.
An electronic voting machine: a device for stealing elections and controlling nations.
When I was at Election Headquarters at the office of the Clerk of Cook County in downtown Chicago to observe the "vote count," I was told to wait at a counter and simply watch the television screens overhead. I inquired, “But where is the vote count happening? I was informed by Scott Burnham that I could observe the counting of the votes.”
The vote count, I was then told, was being done in a back room by the employees of a private company, and there I could not go. When I monitored the election in Chicago in March 2006, the back room "counting of the votes" process was being run by a bunch of Venezuelans working for a mysterious company called Sequoia Voting Systems. This privately-owned and foreign company was running the elections for Chicago and Cook County, that shining beacon of democracy.
Sequoia's website says this:
Sequoia is a leading American-owned election technology provider with major offices in California, Colorado and New York and an unsurpassed 100-year-plus history of providing accurate, reliable, accessible and innovative voting solutions dating back to the nation's first lever-based mechanical voting equipment in the 1890s.
Nobody in Chicago had the slightest clue who really owned Sequoia, nor did anybody even care. All I could find was that it was a shell company registered in the Dutch Antilles registered to another shell company in The Netherlands. The two young Venezuelans who were running the company were apparently Sephardic Jews whose fathers were film producers in the movie business in South America.
The election results for Cook County, produced by our Venezuelan friends, were displayed on television monitors, and the members of the press simply recorded the results and called it an election. They could not have cared less about how the votes were being counted. When I told a Chicago television person that I was there to see how the votes were counted, and commented that they did a better job counting votes in Serbia, she responded that she was glad she was not in Serbia.
That is how elections are done in Chicago, one of the most corrupt cities in the world, and it is very much the same in every other city and state in the United States. The counting of the votes in American elections, you see, has been completely removed from the oversight of the American people and has been turned over to private foreign-owned companies, who own the equipment and control the software that runs the voting equipment and counts the votes for most American voters.
Some of these companies involved in U.S. elections, such as Voxeo, which processed the tally of the Iowa caucus in 2004 giving John Forbes Kerry an undeserved boost, are owned or controlled by Israeli military intelligence. Again in 2008, the Voxeo results of the Iowa caucus gave Barack Obama an unexpected victory. In many cases, the election software is controlled by the Israelis, and through back doors they are able to manipulate the results.
The controlled media ignores the fundamental problem that there is no transparency in American elections. The theft of American elections by privately owned election and software companies tied to Israeli intelligence is an absolute non-issue in the Zionist-controlled media in the United States. So, who really controls American elections? Ask Shimon Peres or Ehud Olmert or the director of Mossad, but don't expect the Zionist-controlled media in the United States to tell you.
The stealing of American elections is primarily a computer crime, as was the false flag terror attack of 9-11. These crimes are carried out by criminals who produce malicious computer code and enterprise software. The part of the crime done through the computer systems is very difficult to detect and trace, which gives the perpetrators a false sense of invulnerability, not unlike the bad guys in a James Bond film. There is, however, an agent who leaves a record of producing and distributing the software that is used in these computer crimes. This is the starting point from which we can determine who is really behind these computer crimes.
PTECH & 9-11 – The "Arab" Disguise Fails
During the first 9-11 "truth" events, there was a great deal of discussion about a Massachusetts-based software company called Ptech, which had been involved with the computer systems of the FAA and NORAD, two agencies whose systems completely failed on 9-11.
"Ptech was with Mitre Corporation in the basement of the FAA for two years prior to 9-11 and their specific job was to look at interoperability issues the FAA had with NORAD and the Air Force, in case of an emergency," the former risk and software specialist Indira Singh told the 9-11 Citizens' Commission hearings.
So this mysterious little company from Quincy, Massachusetts, whose software was on all the critical computer networks of the U.S. government and military, we were told, was Arab-owned, financed, and linked to terrorists. This, however, was quite false; Ptech was simply an Arab "cut out."
As I quickly discovered, Ptech's Arab identity was fake; it was nothing but an Arab "cut out." Ptech was, in fact, an Israeli-controlled Mossad front company, made to look like an Arab-owned company. When a company goes to such lengths to mask its true identity, you can be sure there is a very important reason.
In an article of January 2005, entitled "Ptech, 9-11, and USA-Saudi Terror, Part II," an author named Michael Kane wrote on Michael Ruppert's website From The Wilderness:
January 27, 2005 (FTW) - Ptech - the software company whose major investors and directors are strongly linked to the Muslim Brotherhood - produced software that derived from PROMIS, had an artificial intelligence core, and was installed on virtually every computer system of the U.S. government and its military agencies on September 11, 2001. This included the White House, Treasury Department (Secret Service), Air Force, FAA, CIA, FBI, both houses of Congress, Navy, Department of Energy, IRS, Booz Allen Hamilton, IBM, Enron and more.
Whoever plotted 9/11 definitely viewed the FAA as an enemy that morning. Overriding FAA systems would be the most effective way to ensure the attacks were successful. To do this, the FAA needed an evolution of PROMIS software installed on their systems and Ptech was just that; the White House & Secret Service had the same software on their systems - likely a superior modified version capable of "surveillance and intervention" functions.
Ptech is enterprise architecture software, which Indira planned on customizing to use as "risk architecture" software.
Enterprise architecture software is designed with the express purpose of knowing everything that is going on throughout the entirety of the enterprise in real-time. In the case of Ptech software installed on White House, Secret Service, Air Force and FAA systems, the enterprise included all of the data produced by those agencies in real-time.
How odd. What was so telling about these early reports by Kane and others about Ptech in the 9-11 "truth" movement is that these people seemed to know a great deal about how the Ptech software works, while they were completely blind about the Israeli connection to the company. They all stressed that Ptech was an Arab-owned and financed company from Quincy, Massachusetts. Either they don't know anything about who Ptech is -- or they are supporting the lie that it is an Arab company. I suspect the latter.
I never accepted the notion that 9-11 had been carried out by Muslims in Pakistan or terrorists based in the caves of Afghanistan. This always seemed preposterous and it didn't take me very long to find that Ptech was an Arab cut-out controlled by an agent of Israeli intelligence. It made no sense that Arab terrorists, who could barely fly, could deceive the U.S. Air Force, NORAD, and the FAA, and that the extremely sophisticated 9-11 operation was directed from a cave in Afghanistan. I'm sorry, but that is just not believable.
Ptech, as I discovered, was from the beginning controlled by a Jewish lawyer from Worcester, Massachusetts, named Michael S. Goff. It is very clear that Goff worked for Mossad, because the prize client of his PR firm was a Mossad-owned company named Guardium.
Michael S. Goff, the son of B'nai B'rith and Worcester lawyer who quit his law practice to market Ptech software to the U.S. government. (Photo from Goff website)
This is how I reported this discovery in my article of April 2005 entitled "How Mossad Deceived the U.S. Military on 9-11":
Joe Bergantino, a reporter for WBZ-TV's investigative team, was torn. He could risk breaking a story based on months of work investigating a software firm linked to terrorism, or heed the government's demand to hold the story for national security reasons. In mid-June, Bergantino received a tip from a woman in New York who suspected that Ptech, a computer software company in Quincy, Mass., had ties to terrorists. Ptech specialized in developing software that manages information contained in computer networks.
Bergantino's investigation revealed that Ptech's clients included many federal governmental agencies, including the U.S. Army, the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Naval Air Command, Congress, the Department of Energy, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Internal Revenue Service, NATO, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service, and even the White House.
"Ptech was doing business with every federal government in defense and had access to key government data," Bergantino said.
The Mossad handler at Ptech was, in my opinion, an American named Michael S. Goff, who is disingenuous about what he did, when he worked at, and when he left, Ptech. It should be noted that Ptech "got on its feet in 1994." Goff implies that he left Ptech when Goff Communications began in 1994; certainly not true.
Here is what Michael Goff's website says about his work there:
Michael was marketing manager at Ptech, Inc., a leading provider of business process modeling, design and development software. In this capacity, Michael managed various marketing programs and activities including public relations, direct mail, Web development, collateral, trade shows and seminars. Additionally, Michael worked closely with the Ptech sales organization to perform competitive analysis as well as manage lead tracking and fulfillment activities.
When Michael first joined Ptech, he shared responsibilities between marketing and information systems for the company. As information systems manager, Michael handled design, deployment and management of its Windows and Macintosh, data, and voice networks. As part of this effort, Michael developed Lotus Notes-based systems for sales and marketing lead tracking and IS service and support requests. Michael also performed employee training and handled all procurement for software, systems and peripherals.
From Goff Communications website, you will notice that one of his current prize clients is an Israeli company known as Guardium. This company is located less than 5 miles from Hanscom AFB, site of MIT's Lincoln Labs and about the same distance from Boston's Logan Airport. The Israeli presence can be seen all over MIT and Boston.
Guardium, a "database security" firm, is clearly a Mossad operation working in a critical area - the same area that the two planes that hit the World Trade Center originated - Boston's Logan Airport.
Don't take my word for it, look at who finances Guardium. Three firms, all Israeli, and all manned by Mossad agents. It should be noted that Mossad's headquarters are in Herzliya. It is clear that the three firms, Cedar Fund, Veritas Venture Partners, and Stage One, are all Mossad funding outfits.
Ari Bronshtein, currently a director of Elron Electronic, the Israeli defense company behind Voxeo and the stealing of the Iowa caucus in 2004, was the manager of business analysis at Comverse Technologies, Inc. (See: Kobi Alexander and Odigo on 9-11) from 1999 to 2000. Bronshtein was also chairman of the investment committee of Stage One, one of the Mossad investors of Guardium. Do you see the links between the Israeli military intelligence and the computer crimes of 9-11 and the theft of elections in the United States? This is, however, just the tip of the iceberg.
When I exposed the Israeli players behind Ptech, it should have changed everything, at least for those who follow what happened on 9-11. Ptech, whose "enterprise architecture software is designed with the express purpose of knowing everything that is going on throughout the entirety of the enterprise in real-time," was not an evil Arab company after all. It was an Israeli-run company disguised as an Arab company.
Do you really think that the most critical computer networks in the U.S. government would accept and run enterprise software from a Lebanese Muslim immigrant from Massachusetts? Of course not, but there were agents on the inside, and then there was the Jewish lawyer for Worcester, Michael Goff.
Another "Arab" cut-out company tied to 9-11 surfaced when I got a tip from a reader in the Fort Lauderdale area of Florida. It concerned a graphics company called Next Graphics, a firm my source had done business with and which he even thought was Palestinian-owned.
The facade of being a Muslim-owned firm at Next Graphics was entirely fake, like the bogus religious shrine they had in the entry. The principal owners of Next Graphics were Israelis and they are very closely tied to the Israelis who met with Ehud Olmert in New York on the day before September 11, 2001.
Finis
Sources and Recommended Reading:
Bollyn, Christopher, "How Mossad Deceived the U.S. Military on 9/11," April 2005
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10761
Bollyn, Christopher, "Is MITRE Corp. The Trojan Horse of 9/11?" April 2005
http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Bollyn-MITRE.html
Bollyn, Christopher, "How a Private Company Counts our Votes"
http://www.votefraud.org/how_a_private_company_counts_our_votes.htm
"Michael Chertoff and the sabotage of the Ptech investigation"
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/01/michael-chertoff-and-sabotage-of-ptech.html
Goff Communications (Michael's image disappeared after my 2005 article appeared.)
http://web.archive.org/web/20050403162911/http://www.goffpr.com/about.asp
Solving 9-11: How Israeli Military Intelligence Controls Our Elections, Government and Military, January 2, 2008
Final Edit – August 20, 2009
Latest Correction - February 16, 2010
VII - The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11
Chapter VII
The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11
These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered.
- Thomas Paine, "The American Crisis", 1776
This chapter examines an extensive Zionist criminal network, which the evidence indicates is behind the crime of the century. The information in this chapter, which comes from material in the public domain, strongly supports the thesis that senior officers from Israeli military intelligence agencies were the chief architects of the false-flag terror of 9-11.
The spectacular explosions that accompanied the crashes (WTC 2) produced light orange flame and whitish smoke (seen on left; impact area), indicative of pre-set Thermate explosives in the two computer rooms struck.
The explosions that shot out of the east and north side of WTC 1 came from the computer room of Marsh Kroll, a Greenberg-owned (A.I.G.) company that profited from the "War on Terror." Note the white plume from the southeast corner.
Thomas Paine was the most popular and inspirational writer of the American Revolution. "The cause of America," Paine wrote in Common Sense (1776), "is in a great measure the cause of all mankind." In 1787, having "stood out the storm of one revolution" (i.e. the American) and with "no wish to embark in another," Paine returned to Europe and wound up playing a role in the French Revolution – and nearly losing his head.
"To the Citizens of the United States" is a series of letters written by Paine in 1802-03, when he returned to America after an absence of almost fifteen years. In the first letter, Paine wrote:
"But while I beheld with pleasure the dawn of liberty rising in Europe, I saw with regret the lustre of it fading in America. In less than two years from the time of my departure some distant symptoms painfully suggested the idea that the principles of the Revolution were expiring on the soil that produced them."
"A faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles," Paine wrote. "They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property."
Two hundred years later, as an American student of history, I made the same observation: A faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America. This faction also viewed government as a profitable monopoly, which they sought to control. The rising faction I noticed taking control in the 1980s was primarily Jewish by ethnicity, and Zionist by ideology.
LIVING IN JEWISH TIMES
Ariel Sharon with the kabbalistic hexagram, symbol of the Zionist state of Israel. Sharon, a known terrorist and war criminal, became prime minister of Israel in March 2001, six months before 9-11.
"I want to tell you something very clear. Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America and the Americans know it."
- Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, October 2001
After spending several years in Europe, Israel, and the Middle East, I returned to the United States in the late 1970s and found the discourse in the media about Zionism to be extremely one-sided and distorted. Zionism, a racist ideology if ever there was one, was grossly misrepresented in the U.S. mass media as being a progressive and democratic movement of national liberation, while the state of Israel was depicted as being a kosher slice of America in the Middle East. It was very clear that the people distorting the view of the Middle East were themselves Jews devoted to the very un-American political and racial agenda called Zionism, the violent and chauvinistic nationalism of Eastern European Jews which has brutally occupied Palestine since 1948.
Honest and unbiased coverage of Israel and the Middle East became increasingly difficult to find in the U.S. during the 1980s and 1990s. The sale of Ted Turner's progressive Cable News Network (CNN) to Gerald Levine of AOL Time Warner and the transformation of the informative Christian Science Monitor marked the end of the last independent and unbiased news outlets covering the Middle East. An ethnic minority group with a foreign agenda – Zionism – had gained monopoly control over the U.S. mass media. The Jewish monopoly of the U.S. media coincided with the United States being drawn more deeply into the Arab-Israeli conflict as the primary supporter, financier, and political ally of the Zionists. This combination has been extremely detrimental for America and disastrous for the people of the region, as the criminal Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982 clearly showed.
U.S. Marines removing the dead from their bombed barracks in Beirut, 1983. The U.S. intervention in Lebanon following the Israeli invasion was disastrous for Americans, Lebanese, and Palestinians.
Aware of the increasing prevalence and dominance of Zionist Jews in the political, financial, and academic sectors, I came to the conclusion that I was living in Jewish times. As an American raised with traditional Christian values, I realized that the culture I had grown up in was under attack and being reduced to a sub-culture. Through the Jewish-controlled media, a distinctly foreign and anti-Christian culture of pornography, perversion, and violence was being pushed. The producers of this "new culture" were primarily Jews of Eastern European origin. Through their control of the mass media, film, radio, and television networks, a diet of perverse entertainment and un-American values was being force-fed to the unsuspecting American people.
Concurrent with the rise of the Jewish-Zionist faction in the U.S. media was the significant increase in Jewish power in the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. Their influence could be seen in the way the U.S. government and federal courts unfairly prosecuted innocent people, including the president of Austria, on unfounded allegations of crimes having been committed decades ago against Jews in distant countries. Meanwhile, there was a noticeable increase in the number and magnitude of crimes committed by Jews in the United States and the international arena that went completely unpunished.
As in the Soviet Union, Jewish criminals in America used the "holocaust" and the slanderous charge of anti-Semitism as a shield to protect their criminal network and extortion rackets by intimidating and silencing those who would dare to expose the monstrous crimes they were involved in. A secret "combination" or Zionist network was clearly at work pulling the strings at the highest level behind the scenes.
THE ISRAELI ARCHITECTS OF 9-11
Benjamin Netanyahu, leader of Israel's extreme right-wing Likud party founded by Irgun terrorists, at the Ron Lauder School of Mossad U. (IDC), Herzliya, January 2008. (AFP/Getty)
The Twin Towers were demolished with a extremely powerful explosive called super-thermite.
"It's very good."
- Benjamin Netanyahu, on 9-11 when asked what the bombings meant for U.S.-Israeli relations;
New York Times, September 12, 2001
"We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the TwinTowers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq."
- Benjamin Netanyahu, as quoted in Ma'ariv, April 16, 2008
The "false-flag" terrorism of 9-11 is a monstrous Jewish-Zionist crime of our time. The true culprits of this heinous crime are clearly being protected by a gang of like-minded Jewish Zionists in the highest positions of the U.S. government, particularly at the U.S. Department of Justice and in the federal court system where justice for the victims of 9-11 has been obstructed.
The lies and deception about 9-11 spread by the Zionist-controlled media have been accepted as truth by millions of Americans. Based on the media fairy tale about the outrageous terror spectacle, the fraudulent "War on Terror" has been waged with illegal wars of aggression in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Somalia. An untold number of lives have been lost and hundreds of billions of dollars wasted on this criminal enterprise yet there is still no end in sight to the madness. The "War on Terror" has also been accompanied by a massive assault on our American liberties.
The controlled media has completely ignored the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 and refused to investigate any of the unanswered questions about what really happened that day. Likewise, the media has avoided doing any serious investigation of the official version of events, which is simply not believable due to the large number of inconsistencies and complete lack of supporting evidence. As a result, the public has been left with a confusing mixture of fact, fiction, and disinformation from which the truth is very hard to discern. It is unacceptable for a baseless fairy tale to pass for truth while the real history is suppressed and muddled. Solving 9-11, this book, is my attempt to clarify this muddled history by discovering and exposing the true culprits.
"But let them go on," Paine wrote about the rising faction of his time, "give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic." Paine was, however, writing long before television became the most pervasive and powerful thought-control device on the planet. Given the fact that the majority of Americans now rely on television for their news and understanding of world events, I am not so sure that America will not continue to be deceived and manipulated by the Zionist faction that controls the mass media.
The Jewish faction controlling the media and government has done immense and irreparable damage to our republic and national prestige. Today, our once great nation is in dire straits economically, politically, and morally. Absent a revolution or sea change in political thinking, I am not optimistic that there will be any justice for the victims and relatives of 9-11 or that the real culprits will ever be held accountable in a U.S. court. I am, however, convinced that the truth of 9-11 is of the utmost importance and that the guilty must be exposed. We all need to know who did it and how they did it. The reasons why it was done have become increasingly obvious from the criminal wars of aggression and oppressive "homeland security" apparatus that have followed in its wake.
9-11 - THE ISRAELI THESIS
"Consistency is close to being the mark of a set of true beliefs; it is at least rationally compelling."
- Robin Waterfield on the Socratic dialectic, Gorgias, 1994
"The worst thing in the world," Socrates said, "the supreme curse, is to do wrong and not pay the penalty for it." I firmly believe that the available evidence and facts are sufficient to disprove the official version and that the truth of 9-11 is within our reach. The guilty must be found. The tragedy of 9-11 is an unsolved crime; the fairy tale promoted by the government and controlled media has not been proven for one reason: it is not provable. Finding the truth about 9-11 requires using the Socratic method to ask questions and develop a thesis from what can be proven to be true.
Since the day it happened, I have been asking questions about Israeli involvement in 9-11 because of the early and clear evidence, made public, of prior knowledge by the five dancing Israelis and members of an Israeli instant messaging network called Odigo. From the beginning, therefore, I considered the possibility that 9-11 was an Israeli-produced false-flag terror spectacle. The Zionists, after all, have a long history of doing these kinds of things. I investigated and researched to see if the evidence supported this thesis. I found a great deal of evidence consistent with the Israeli thesis, which I have examined since the day of the crime. I have discovered that agents of Israeli military intelligence or people devoted to the Zionist cause occupied every key position in the 9-11 cover-up. This consistency has led me to believe that the Israeli thesis is correct.
"THE MAGNITUDE OF PLANNING"
Some day, perhaps, if it's decided that the stories can be told, you'll see that the state [Israel] has been involved in acts which are a thousand times more dirty than anything going on in Colombia. But these things were decided by the government, in cabinet meetings. As long as the government decides to do something, something that the national interest demanded, then it is legitimate. But if an individual wants to do the same thing, it isn't. That's just the way it is. It's very simple.
- Lieut. Gen. Rafael Eitan, Israeli Chief of Staff, 1978-83
"The Colombia Connection," Jerusalem Post, September 1, 1989
In December 2001, I spoke with Eckehardt Werthebach, the former head of the Verfassungsschutz, the domestic branch of German intelligence, about the terror attacks of 9-11. "The deathly precision" and "the magnitude of planning" behind the attacks would have required "years of planning," Werthebach said. Such a sophisticated operation, he said, would have required the "fixed frame" of a state intelligence organization, something not found in the "loose group" like the one allegedly led by Mohammed Atta while he studied in Hamburg. The nebulous Al Qaida and the Taliban of Afghanistan clearly lacked the "fixed frame" of a state intelligence organization. Many people would have been involved in the planning of such an operation and the absence of leaks was a further indication that the attacks were "state organized actions," Werthebach said.
Andreas von Buelow, the former head of the parliamentary commission that oversaw the German intelligence agencies, told me that a sophisticated false-flag operation like 9-11 has an organizational structure with three basic levels: architectural, operational, and working. Atta and the nineteen Arabs blamed as the "hijackers" of 9-11 were part of the working level, von Buelow said, and were simply part of the deception. That is, after all, how false-flag terror works. Von Buelow said that he believed that the Mossad, Israel's foreign intelligence service, was behind the terror attacks of 9-11. These attacks, he said, were designed to turn public opinion against the Arabs, and to boost military and security spending.
Six years later, with more than one thousand billion U.S. taxpayer dollars wasted on the fraudulent "war on terror" and the disastrous and costly wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, there is no question that 9-11 has been crassly exploited to push military and security spending through the roof.
"You don't get the higher echelons," von Buelow said, referring to the "architectural structure," which masterminds such false-flag terror attacks. At this level, he said, the organization doing the planning, such as Mossad, is primarily interested in affecting public opinion. It goes without saying that the mass media must be tightly controlled in order for such large-scale deception to succeed.
"Ninety-five percent of the work of the intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation," von Buelow said, which is widely propagated in the mainstream media creating an accepted version of events. "Journalists don't even raise the simplest questions," he said, adding, "Those who differ are labeled as crazy."
TERROR AS DECEPTION
"Terror is theatre."
- John Le Carré, The Little Drummer Girl, 1983
"Terror is theatre and theatre is illusion" is the theme of The Little Drummer Girl, the realistic novel about Israeli false-flag operations in Europe written by the late John Le Carré. "On the old reality we impose the new fiction," said Joseph, the Israeli agent in the book engaged in creating a false history for a Palestinian "terrorist" in the same way false histories were created for the 9-11 "hijackers". "Terror is theatre," another character says. "We inspire, we frighten, we awaken indignation, anger…The guerrilla is the great actor of the world." Illusion is what theatre is all about, the main character, a British actress, says: "Theatre's a con trick. Do you know what that means? Con trick? You've been deceived."
Le Carré gave a "sincere thanks" to "certain past and serving officers" of Israeli intelligence in his forward to the book. He expressed "special gratitude" to General Shlomo Gazit, the former chief of Israeli military intelligence. The Israeli characters in The Little Drummer Girl come through without a scratch while Palestinians and Europeans are blown to bits in engineered false-flag terrorism. In one scene, a kidnapped Palestinian is put into the trunk of a car, which is then exploded at a rest area on the German Autobahn.
Similar Israeli techniques have long been used in "suicide bombs" in occupied Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan to kill and maim thousands of innocent people and foment sectarian violence. The controlled media routinely blames these terrorist bombings on "suicide bombers" – without any examination of the evidence.
"Of the Palestinians," whose real-life stories informed the plot of The Little Drummer Girl, "some are dead, others are taken prisoner, the rest presumably are for the most part homeless or dispersed," Le Carré wrote in July 1982, as the Israeli military, led by the Zionist terrorist and war criminal Ariel Sharon, carried out new atrocities on a daily basis in Lebanon.
Thousands of Palestinian refugees, driven from thier homes and villages by Zionist terrorism in 1947-48, were slain in the Israeli-orchestrated massacre of Sabra and Shatila camps in September 1982. An Israeli commission found Sharon personally responsible and he was judged unfit to serve in government, yet 18 years later, as a war criminal and genocidaire, he became prime minister of Israel.
Sharon, a well-known genocidaire from the extreme right-wing Likud party became prime minister of Israel in early 2001 as George W. Bush entered the White House as an un-elected president, creating the same dangerous political and ideological conjunction that had produced the illegal invasion of Lebanon in 1982.
THE "FIXED FRAME" OF 9-11
If one accepts Werthebach's expert judgment that "the magnitude of planning" behind 9-11 required the "fixed frame" of a state intelligence organization, then there should be evidence of such an organization connecting the key players of the operational network behind the crime. If we can only discern some elements or identify some of the key people in this network, we should be able to discover other key people involved in the organization through their mutual connections.
In order to carry out the sophisticated terror attacks of 9-11, the architects would have had to create an organizational structure in the United States over a period of years, or even decades. This structure is needed to connect the key individuals and crucial points of the crime, including those involved in the on-going non-investigation and cover-up. All the bases have to be covered.
The organizational structure is required to provide secure channels or "pipelines" for the criminal organization, the conduits through which the terror operation is set up and carried out. A secure conduit could be a company, a group of people, or even a single individual. The most important thing is that it be wholeheartedly devoted to the organization. When the 9-11 structure was complete and the wiring in place, the switch was thrown and the long-planned terror atrocity became real.
There is simply no evidence whatsoever that any such "Al Qaida" or Islamic terrorist structure ever existed in the United States or that any Muslim or Arab organization was interested in or capable of carrying out such a sophisticated attack. There is, on the other hand, a great deal of evidence that an Israeli military structure, which employs Arab disguises when necessary, is behind 9-11. This network connects the highest officers and veterans of Israeli military intelligence with all the key players, companies, and funding entities involved in setting up the 9-11 attacks.
There is evidence of an Israeli military intelligence matrix connecting every key player and entity behind 9-11. At the most crucial position in U.S. law enforcement, for example, where executive decisions were made concerning the federal non-investigation, sat Michael Chertoff, an Israeli whose mother was one of the first agents of Israeli intelligence. Having the devoted Zionist Michael Chertoff in the key position as Assistant Attorney General controlling the criminal division of the Department of Justice gave the Israelis the operational security to carry out this massive crime without fear of exposure or prosecution. It should be noted that Chertoff played a key role in the prosecution of the 1993 false-flag terror bombing at the World Trade Center.
Michael Chertoff, son of a Mossad agent and an orthodox rabbi, is an Israeli national. As Asst. Attorney General running the Criminal Division at the Dept. of Justice in 2001, he supervised the "non-investigation" of 9-11.
Likewise, two dedicated Zionists-cum-federal judges named Alvin K. Hellerstein and Michael B. Mukasey have overseen virtually all the litigation from the massive death and destruction of 9-11 as well as the 1993 false-flag incident at the WTC. Small wonder there has yet to be a single trial for any of the ninety-six families who chose to seek justice through the courts rather than accept the government pay-out for the loss of their loved ones. By the 7th anniversary of 9-11, fewer than seven of the original ninety-six cases remained to be settled and no trial was forthcoming for any of the victims of 9-11. A year later, there were only three cases left to be settled. This can hardly be called justice for the relatives. As they say, "Justice delayed is justice denied."
The appalling absence of any significant investigation or discovery, the egregious acts of confiscation and criminal destruction of evidence, the escape or removal of all Israeli suspects, and the use of unwarranted secrecy measures to block discovery in the federal investigation and litigation processes of the worst terror attack in U.S. history, all indicate the presence of an Israeli-based terror structure being protected from exposure.
It stands to reason that the terror network being protected by high-level Zionist agents is itself a Zionist structure. If it were truly an Arabic, Islamic, or even American criminal network, it would have been exposed long ago. The fact that the terror network behind 9-11 has been protected from the beginning by Zionist agents and the controlled media strongly suggests it is an organization to which they are highly dedicated and devoted.
There were certainly early and clear indications of Israeli involvement, particularly in the form of the five dancing Israelis and the instant messages conveyed, presumably in Hebrew, on the Israeli-owned Odigo text messaging system which warned recipients of an imminent terror attack at the World Trade Center.
MICHAEL GOFF, THE PTECH "CUT-OUT" & GUARDIUM
"The Ptech story is a crucial piece of 9/11 because the software was used to simultaneously coordinate the FAA with NORAD and the Secret Service."
- Jamey Hecht, "Ptech, 9/11, and USA-Saudi Terror," FTW Publications
"Ptech was with MITRE Corporation in the basement of the FAA for two years prior to 9/11. Their specific job is to look at interoperability issues the FAA had with NORAD and the Air Force in the case of an emergency. If anyone was in a position to know that the FAA -- that there was a window of opportunity or to insert software or to change anything -- it would have been Ptech along with MITRE."
- Indira Singh, "Risk Architect" at 9/11 Citizens’ Commission, September 9, 2004
My discovery in 2005 that the Ptech software company from Quincy, Massachusetts, was actually a disguised Israeli intelligence operation is key to understanding the role of Israeli military intelligence in the crimes of 9-11. This is a discovery that has helped reveal other key people in the Israeli network behind the crime. Michael Goff was the key person at Ptech when it was founded in 1994. Goff, a young Zionist lawyer from Worchester, Massachusetts, subsequently worked for Guardium, an Israeli software company tied to military intelligence. This is the crucial connection that has helped expose the larger Israeli military intelligence network working behind the 9-11 scene.
Through Goff's connection to Guardium, we can see how a nexus of senior officers of Israeli military intelligence agencies links all the key elements of 9-11. This connection also explains how dodgy Israeli enterprise spy software wound up on critical U.S. government and military computer networks. Ptech is the allegedly Arab-owned and Saudi-financed company whose enterprise software found its way onto the most critical computer networks of the U.S. government and military. By 2002, Ptech reportedly provided software to more than eighteen federal agencies, including the FBI, U.S. Treasury, Customs Service, Secret Service, Department of Energy, Army, Navy, Air Force, Federal Aviation Administration, the U.S. Postal Service – and even NATO.
Investigators from the U.S. Customs Service searched Ptech's office on December 6, 2002. Federal authorities were reportedly concerned about Ptech's ties to a Saudi named Yassin Al-Qadi (a.k.a. Al-Kadi). Qadi's name had been added to the UN blacklist on October 19, 2001. Daniel Glaser, a Jewish deputy assistant secretary for Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes at the U.S. Treasury, described Al-Qadi in Congressional testimony in 2004 as a "key terrorist financier and facilitator."
In December 2007, after an investigation that lasted six years and two months, Yassin Abdullah Al-Qadi was exonerated of all charges by judicial authorities in Switzerland. Al-Qadi's funds had been unfairly frozen for six years based merely on the reckless accusations of Daniel Glaser, an irresponsible Zionist at the U.S. Treasury who went on to negotiate the freezing and thawing of North Korean funds.
Daniel Glaser, Deputy Asst. Secretary of Treasury, in Beijing in December 2006; In 2001, Glaser supervised the Department of Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes.
How a Lebanese Muslim immigrant funded by a Saudi suspected of being "a sponsor of terrorism" ever sold enterprise software to the entire U.S. government is never addressed by those, like Indira Singh, who promoted the post 9-11 myth that Ptech was a central part of the Arab nexus of terror. Singh is a bit of a mystery. Why did she promote the Arab terrorism story without any evidence other than baseless accusations provided by Jewish insiders?
The discovery that Goff was actually the key person at Ptech, that he was Ptech's original marketing director, and that he was the person responsible for "procuring" software for Ptech should have demolished the Arab myth. My revelation that Goff was working for Guardium, a software company run by Israeli military intelligence officers, was ignored by the "whistle blowers" who had pushed the Arab myth, as well as by supposedly non-partisan investigators of 9-11. The Ptech-Guardium connection through Michael Goff, however, is a key link to the terror structure behind 9-11. Ptech enterprise software, which has spy, surveillance, and intervention capabilities - according to "experts" like Singh - was running on nearly all of U.S. government computer networks at the time of 9-11.
Goff, who had procured all software for the "Arab-owned" Ptech and who had been responsible for marketing Ptech's enterprise software, went on to work for Guardium, a company that is a branch of the research and development department of the Israeli Air Force. What's the connection?
WHO IS GUARDIUM?
Guardium is a spin-off of Log-On Software, an Israeli military intelligence company based in Ramat Gan, Israel. Log-On Software was founded by Major Gil Migdan and Joseph Segev, the former head programmer and telecommunications officer for the Israeli Navy. The vice president of the company is Danny Zeitouny, the head of logistics programming for the Israeli military, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).
One of the directors of Guardium is Gill Zaphrir (a.k.a. Zafrir), an Israeli colonel who "headed the research and development department of the Israel Air Force." In its "Executive Profile" about Col. Zaphrir, Business Week says:
Mr. Gill Zaphrir is a Partner at Veritas Venture Partners. He joined Veritas in 1999 and has been actively managing the funds of Veritas. Mr. Zaphrir has research and development and management experience in Israel's air force and aerospace industry. Prior to joining Veritas in 1999, he headed the research and development department of the Israel Air Force. In 1987, Mr. Zaphrir served as System Engineer on the first Israeli satellite project, under the auspices of IAI-MBT.
Mr. Zaphrir is a Director of Bamboo Mediacasting Inc., and Guardium Inc. He was a Director of eShip-4u Inc. He was born and raised in Israel, served as a military navigator in the Israel Air Force and is a Colonel (reserve). Mr. Zaphrir holds a B.Sc. in Aeronautical Engineering from the Technion in Haifa and an M.B.A. from Bar-Ilan Business School in Israel.
Col. Gil Zafrir of Guardium headed the department of research and development for the Israeli Air Force.
Another founder and director of Guardium is Amit Yoran, the Israeli who went to West Point and became the manager of computer network security for the Pentagon and Secretary of Defense. Yoran went on to serve as the "czar" of cyber security for the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security. Business Week says the following about "Dr. Yoran":
Dr. [Amit] Yoran is a Co-Founder of Guardium, Inc. and also served as the Chief Executive Officer and President. He was the President and Chief Executive Officer at Riptech Inc., which Dr. Yoran co-founded in 1998.
He was appointed by George W. Bush as the administration's Cyber Chief, responsible for coordinating the nation's activities in cyber security. Prior to this, Dr. Yoran served as a Vice President for worldwide-managed security services at Symantec Corp. and was primarily responsible for managing security infrastructure in 40 countries.
Before working in the private sector, he served as a Network Security Manager at the Department of Defense and [was] responsible for maintaining operations of the Pentagon's network. Dr. Yoran also served as an officer in the United States Air Force [as the Director of Vulnerability Programs for Dept. of Defense's Computer Emergency Response Team]. He designed security architecture for the Pentagon and Office of the Secretary of Defense networks' backbones.
Dr. Yoran served as a Director at Guardium, Inc. and Director of the Vulnerability Assessment and Assistance Program for the U.S. Department of Defense Computer Emergency Response Team. As a Director, he worked with national and international law enforcement and intelligence organizations to prevent and respond to security breaches of national infrastructure networks.
He serves as a Member of the Adjunct Faculty at George Washington University. Dr. Yoran has conducted a Doctoral research in the area of Intrusion Detection Technologies.
Amit Yoran, a high-level "hacker" tied to Israeli military intelligence, designed computer security for the Pentagon, Air Force, and U.S. government.
Michael Goff's working relationship with Amit Yoran and the Israeli intelligence operation known as Guardium, Inc. is an excellent example of a high-level Israeli military intelligence "channel" in the United States. I don't have specific information about exactly when Goff's relationship with Israeli military intelligence began, but I would assume it began sometime prior to 1994 when he suddenly left his law practice and began working "for the Arabs" at Ptech. Goff's father and grandfather were both highest-level Freemasons in the International (Jewish) Order of the B'nai B'rith (a.k.a. Benai Berith), an exclusive Jewish-Zionist (i.e. closed to non-Jews) order of Freemasons founded in New York City in 1843.
A SON OF B'NAI B'RITH
The B'nai B'rith is a secretive, but extremely powerful and influential order of Freemasonry. It is, for example, the parent organization of the Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith (ADL), which has a great deal of influence with legislators and law enforcement agencies across America. It is also the parent of Hillel, an organization for Jewish students found on virtually every college campus in the United States. The New York Times can be called a B'nai B'rith newspaper due to its ownership by the Sulzberger family, one of the leading families of B'nai B'rith Lodge No. 1 in New York City.
Goff's relationship with the Israelis who created Guardium appears to have been the channel through which Israeli spy software was provided to Ptech. The resulting Israeli-Ptech enterprise spy software was then installed onto the most critical computer networks of the U.S. government in the years prior to 9-11.
"The boy's job in this operation is to play cut-out," the Mossadnik in The Little Drummer Girl says. "That's all he does. He breaks the circuit." In real life, Goff played the "cut-out" at Ptech; he was the American connection between the Israeli military programmers and the crucial computer networks of the U.S. military.
At the time that Goff worked for Ptech, Yoran was Network Security Manager at the Department of Defense designing computer security for the Pentagon. In this position, Yoran was ideally situated to arrange the installment of Ptech software onto the critical computer systems of the U.S. military. The Israeli nexus between Michael Goff, Ptech, Guardium, and Amit Yoran provides a logical explanation for how Israeli Ptech enterprise "spy" software wound up on the critical computer networks of the U.S. government and military.
Guardium is closely connected with other companies of the Israeli military intelligence network in the United States. Some of the key Israeli-run companies linked to Guardium are Amdocs, ViryaNet, Nice Systems, and CreoScitex. Like Guardium, these companies are all run by senior officers of Israeli military intelligence. Amdocs and Nice Systems are especially noteworthy because these two companies were involved in the espionage network of computer programmers and demolition experts from the Israeli military who posed as art students as they tried to infiltrate offices of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) in 2000 and 2001, according to a leaked DEA document from the summer of 2001 concerning this spying activity.
The "most activity" of the Israeli operation aimed at infiltrating offices of the DEA was "reported in the state of Florida," according to the report. "The Hollywood, Florida area seems to be a central point for these individuals with several having addresses in this area," the DEA report said. Hollywood is also the area which connected fifteen of the nineteen Arab "hijackers" of 9-11. If the "art student" operation is connected to 9-11, as it seems to be, then Amdocs and Nice Systems are also involved.
"A majority of those [Israeli "art students"] questioned has stated they served in military intelligence, electronic signal intercept, or explosive ordinance units. Some have been linked to high-ranking officials in the Israeli military. One was the son of a two-star general, one served as the bodyguard to the head of the Israeli Army, one served in a Patriot missile unit. That these people are now travelling in the U.S. selling art seems not to fit their background," the U.S. DEA investigators concluded.
One of the Israeli agents was 27-year-old Lt. Peer Segalovitz, a platoon leader with Israeli special forces 605 Battalion in the Golan Heights. Segalovitz and the eighty-man platoon he commanded specialized in demolition. "Segalovitz acknowledged he could blow up buildings, bridges, cars and anything else that he needed too," according to the report.
If the Israeli "art student" intelligence operation is connected to 9-11, then the prevalence of military computer programmers and demolition experts among the agents would make sense given the evidence that the terror attacks of 9-11 required a great deal of expertise with computer networks and explosives.
NICE SYSTEMS
Nice Systems, Inc., the wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of an Israeli company with the same name, was headed by Brigadier General Shlomo Shamir from April 2001 when he became President and Chief Executive Officer. This is the precisely the time when Israeli employees of Nice Systems and Amdocs were caught trying to infiltrate Drug Enforcement Agency and other U.S. government buildings posing as art students. General Shamir certainly must have been aware that his employees had been sent to the United States where they were arrested for illegal spying activity prior to 9-11.
Israeli Brigadier General Shlomo Shamir
General Shamir "built and led the planning division in the IDF [Israeli military] headquarters and served as Israel’s military attaché to Germany" until 1994, when he began working at Scitex America Corp., which he headed from 1997, and which later became CreoScitex America, Inc.
Avinoam Naor Aharonovich, one of the founders of Amdocs, was President and CEO of Amdocs Management Ltd., the company's management group from 1995 to 2002. As Chief Executive Officer of Amdocs Management Limited, Naor had overall coordination responsibility for the operations and activities of the company's operating subsidiaries. A number of senior corporate officers of Amdocs, all Israelis, moved between Nice Systems, ViryaNet Ltd., and Guardium. Sometimes a person would go to a company for a while and then return to the previous company. In some cases, such as with Gill Zaphrir, a person would be involved in an Israeli "venture capital" fund supporting a company while serving as a director of the company he is funding.
Avinoam Naor Aharonovich of Amdocs
Elad Yoran [a.k.a. Naftali Yoran], Amit's older brother, held similar dual positions at Broadview International and Riptech, his brother's company that specialized in hacking into corporate computer networks while selling them Riptech's "security" software.
Elad Yoran
AMIT YORAN'S "ETHICAL HACKERS"
"Mr. [Amit] Yoran is chief executive of Riptech, a U.S. company that employs 'ethical hackers' to test vulnerability of networks, including those of utility companies," the Irish Times reported on October 5, 2001. "He [Yoran] says his teams have had success in disrupting utilities' power networks, in Europe particularly," according to the article, which was aptly titled, "Welcome to the Art of Electronic Warfare." The Yorans' company hacked into the computer networks of dozens of energy companies, the Los Angeles Times reported on August 20, 2001:
Riptech Inc., a security company in Alexandria, Va., has tested security for dozens of energy-industry clients. In every case, the firm penetrated Internet-connected corporate networks and often hopped from those networks into supposedly sealed grid-control systems, according to Riptech's president, Amit Yoran.
In February 2001, Amit Yoran, then chief executive of Riptech, told the Associated Press that hackers often break into a system through a computer that runs a Web site. "Once you break in (to the Web server), there are fewer protections between it and other parts of the network," Yoran said.
Elad Yoran, Tim Belcher, and Amit Yoran, the senior hackers of Riptech
Riptech "was founded by Elad and Amit Yoran, two Israeli West Point graduates who claim years of security experience, and Tim Belcher, a Desert Storm veteran who serves as the company's chief technology officer," the Washington Times reported on December 11, 2000. "Amit Yoran reportedly helped design the Pentagon's computer security architecture," the Times reported.
"The threat changes every day. There has always been and always will be a criminal element out there. [The crooks] are not going away," said Elad Yoran, the company's chief financial officer. He should know. He was Riptech's chief marketing officer and vice president for business development at the time of 9-11.
"Riptech's specialty is in security management and monitoring of corporate computer networks," the Washington Times reported on October 23, 2000, when the Yoran brothers' private company of "ethical hackers" announced an infusion of $23 million in venture capital. Oddly, the Washington Times reported that Elad Yoran had "joined" Riptech in August 2001, when he had already been the company's vice president for two years:
"Elad Yoran joined Riptech as executive vice president for corporate development and chief marketing officer. Mr. Yoran was a vice president with Broadview International," the Times reported on August 6, 2001.
But, nearly two years earlier, on October 25, 1999, the Washington Times reported:
"Elad Yoran has joined RipTech Inc., an information security application service provider in Alexandria, as executive vice president. Before joining RipTech, Mr. Yoran was a senior associate with Broadview, an investment bank that specializes in mergers and acquisitions for information technology and media companies."
In both cases it was reported that Yoran had been a vice president with Broadview, one of the mysterious funding entities of Riptech, prior to joining Riptech. Elad Yoran was clearly performing two functions for Riptech: funding the company through his position as "vice president at Broadview International," an unknown source of funds that poured millions of dollars into Riptech, and as "executive vice president" of Riptech, the privately-held recipient company he co-founded with his brother in 1998. It is through such secretive "venture capital" funding entities like Broadview and Veritas Venture Partners that the hand of Israeli military intelligence can be clearly seen running the computer network "security" companies they have spawned, like Guardium. Before becoming a director of Guardium, for example, Col. Gil Zafrir was "actively managing the funds of Veritas," and funding Guardium. Prior to joining Veritas in 1999, Col. Zaphrir "headed the research and development department of the Israel Air Force."
SECURITY GROWTH PARTNERS
Elad Yoran is also the CEO and founder of a similar funding company called Security Growth Partners (SGP). The SGP website says this about the company's mission:
Security Growth Partners’ (SGP) mission is to support companies that provide security solutions for the security market. SGP serves a large and diverse industry including, among others, information technology (IT) security, Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP), homeland security and their related markets.
SGP is more than a fund or typical venture capital organization. We identify desirable opportunities and become extensively involved in the strategy and operations of each company with which we work.
Rather than simply invest, we capitalize on both our extensive expertise and experience in the security sector and our strong network of contacts to help management grow their businesses.
The founder of SGP, Elad Yoran, "advises leading companies in the security market and helps guide emerging companies with innovative technology to rapid growth. Mr. Yoran also advises government and infrastructure organizations on security and business risk matters."
The list of Elad Yoran's advisors and partners at SGP is very interesting. It includes his brother Amit Yoran, of course, and previously included another Israeli named Ilan Juran, which is another spelling of the Israeli name Yoran. Ilan Juran works at the Polytechnic University in Brooklyn, New York. Juran is director of the US-Israel Civil Infrastructure Security Program, an initiative of the Urban Utility Center, of which he is "executive director." Juran's program is, "designed to foster collaboration, as well as knowledge and technology sharing, between the U.S. and Israel governments and critical infrastructure organizations."
Ilan Juran
Tim Belcher, a co-founder of Riptech, the company of "ethical hackers," is another advisor at SGP. As Belcher's biographical sketch says:
Mr. Belcher has also conducted security assessments of some of the nation’s most critical infrastructure components, including the Federal Aviation Administration’s Air Traffic Control Network. He has also worked with government organizations such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Reconnaissance Office, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and Space and Naval Warfare Command.
THE KROLL CONNECTION
It is interesting to note that Jeremy M. Kroll, the Managing Director of Marsh Kroll, is also on the "advisory board" of Elad Yoran's Security Growth Partners. This is a crucial connection in the Zionist network behind 9-11; this is where we hit the mainline. Kroll, the son of Jules B. Kroll, has been an executive at Marsh Kroll, a division of Marsh & McLennan Co. (MMC), since 1996. Jeremy Kroll's connection with Elad and Amit Yoran through SGP reveals a key link between the American Zionist network and Israeli military intelligence.
Jeremy Kroll of Marsh Kroll
MMC is headed by Jeffrey Greenberg, the son of Maurice Raymond Greenberg (a.k.a. "Hank"). Maurice Greenberg, the former CEO of A.I.G., has been a business partner with Jules B. Kroll since 1993 when he reportedly bought twenty-three percent of Kroll Inc. for $15 million. In 2004, MMC acquired the rest of Kroll for the hugely inflated price of $1.9 billion. Jules Kroll reportedly retired in July 2008.
Jeffrey Greenberg, is CEO of MMC. The first plane flew directly into his company's computer room.
What an amazing coincidence - or was it?
KROLL SECURITY AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER
Kroll Associates was responsible for "revamping security at the World Trade Center after the 1993 terrorist bombing," Douglas Frantz of the New York Times reported in 1994. This is a crucial point because those who controlled security at the WTC are prime suspects in the demolition of the Twin Towers. It was directly into the computer room of Marsh (Kroll) USA in the North Tower that the first plane struck, or was precision-guided, on 9-11. The light orange flame and whitish smoke that exploded out of burning computer room of Marsh USA are indicative of a Thermite reaction. Burning jet fuel produces darker orange flames and blackish smoke.
John O'Neill, the former chief of counterterrorism with the FBI, who had investigated Al Qaida, was the head of security for the World Trade Center complex, and was reportedly killed on his first day of work on 9-11. O'Neill had been appointed to this position by the managing director of the Kroll security company, Jerome M. Hauer. Evidently, Kroll continued to manage security for the WTC complex from 1993 until 9-11.
Jerome Hauer (left), the first director of Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management and the person who chose to locate the command bunker in Larry Silverstein's WTC 7.
Prior to joining Kroll, Hauer, a Zionist Jew, had been the director of Mayor Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management (OEM), where he had been the driving force to have the OEM command bunker built in Larry Silverstein's 47-story WTC 7, the tower which fell into its footprint at 5:21 p.m. on 9-11. Testimony from Larry Silverstein and physical evidence strongly suggest that WTC 7 was demolished with explosives and Thermite.
HISTORY OF ISRAELI "SECURITY" AT PORT AUTHORITY
There is a very significant but little-known history of senior Israeli intelligence officers seeking to gain control of security of New York airports, ports, bridges, tunnels, and the World Trade Center in the 1980s. Being in charge of security at the twin towers was obviously crucial to the 9-11 operation. The explosive charges and Thermite that evidently demolished the three towers could not have possibly been placed in the buildings without the perpetrators having complete control of security. Getting control of security at the WTC was something senior officers of Israeli military intelligence had actively sought since at least 1987. This was clearly part of the Israeli master plan for 9-11, a plan first articulated in 1979 by Isser Harel, the former head of Israeli intelligence (Director Shin Bet, 1948–1952; Director Mossad, 1947-1963).
Harel, formerly the director of Haganah intelligence in the 1940s, is seen as the founder of Israeli intelligence. The Haganah and Irgun were the largest Zionist militia/terrorist organizations in Palestine prior to the creation of Israel in 1948. Both organizations were involved in the terror bombing of the King David Hotel and other acts of terrorism.
Harel was evidently involved in the long-term planning of 9-11. More than twenty years earlier he had told Michael D. Evans, an American Zionist, that terrorism would "come to America." Arab terrorists would strike the tallest building in New York City, "a symbol of your fertility," Harel said.
Evans, a Jewish Zionist who has long had close ties to Israeli officials, wrote about Harel's prediction of 9-11 in several newspaper articles and talked about it in an interview that followed the publication of his 2004 book entitled The American Prophecies, Terrorism and the Mid-East Conflict Reveal a Nation's Destiny.
Michael D. Evans is a hard-line Zionist Jew who poses as a Christian. Here Evans embraces Menachem Begin, the former terrorist head of the Irgun who ordered the bombing of the King David Hotel. Evans was informed of the Israeli plan to bomb the World Trade Center in 1979, about the time of this photo.
Harel had dinner with Evans on September 23, 1979, according to Evans, and told him that America's alliance with Saudi Arabia "was dangerous and would develop a tolerance for terror among Americans." Harel went on to say that "Islamic fundamentalists would ultimately strike America."
HAREL'S AMAZING PREDICTION OF 9-11
When Evans asked where the Arab terrorists would strike, Harel said: "In Islamic theology, the phallic symbol is very important. Your biggest phallic symbol is New York City and your tallest building will be the phallic symbol they will hit."
Now, how could Harel know in 1979 that "Islamic fundamentalists" would attack the World Trade Center in 1993 and 2001 if he was not part of the planning? "Isser Harel prophesied that the tallest building in New York would be the first building hit by Islamic fundamentalists twenty-one years ago," Evans said in the 2004 interview. How amazingly prescient – or telling.
Isser Harel, founder of Israeli intelligence
Seven years after Harel's bizarre prediction, a team of senior Israeli intelligence agents, men who had worked directly under Isser Harel for decades, obtained the security contract for the Port Authority of New York, the agency that owned and operated the World Trade Center. The Israeli false-flag terror of 9-11, designed to create the "War on Terror" and drag the United States into the Israeli-Arab conflict on the side of Israel, was evidently planned decades in advance.
A team of senior Israeli intelligence veterans, men who had worked under Harel since the founding of Israeli intelligence, received the security contract for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PA) in 1987, according to a Washington Post article from April 12, 1987. The Port Authority manages operations at New York's airports, as it did at the World Trade Center prior to the complex being leased to Larry Silverstein in late July 2001.
The contract with an Israeli "security" company called Atwell Security of Tel Aviv was cancelled after the PA learned that the firm was headed by Avraham Shalom Ben-Dor, the former head of the Israel's General Security Service (GSS), a.k.a. Shabak or Shin Bet. The Atwell company appears to have been created only for the purpose of obtaining the security contract for the Port Authority and the World Trade Center.
Avraham Shalom Ben-Dor
Avraham Bendor, or Ben-Dor (a.k.a. Abe, Avrum, or Avram Shalom) had been forced to resign as head of the GSS, which he ran from 1980 to 1986, following the disclosure that he had ordered the execution of two detained Palestinian bus hijackers by having their skulls smashed with stones, and then lied about it. "Avrum lied and kept lying," a senior security official involved in the Bus 300 affair told the Jerusalem Post in 1995. "He failed because he was too sure of himself and too used to hearing how great he was."
Shalom, the head of the GSS, was identified by an Israeli Justice Ministry report in December 1986 as having ordered the murder and subsequent cover-up of the two Palestinian bus hijackers captured in 1984. Shalom and ten other Shin Bet agents were forced to resign, although President Chaim Hertzog subsequently granted them all pardons.
Shalom corrupted the GSS, as well: "Some of the vices of the Shalom regime still plague the GSS," the Post reported in 1995. "One problem…is the lack of parliamentary control over the GSS." This is a very important observation because it indicates that the Shin Bet under Shalom had become a rogue agency and had a history of being out of control. "The most disturbing trend is the recurring episodes in which GSS agents provide misleading information to officials and the courts," the Post reported.
"The head of Shabak [GSS] has an unusual personal relationship with Prime Minister Shamir, partly perhaps because of Shamir's own past in the espionage business," the Jerusalem Post wrote in June 1991.
Shalom had ordered the murders but tried to blame a senior army officer at the scene and later claimed that Shamir had given him a free hand. The former Irgun and Lehi terrorist Yitzhak Shamir (born Jaziernicki in Belarus) was the prime minister responsible for Shin Bet at the time.
Yitzhak Shamir was a leader from the extreme right-wing Likud. After joining the Irgun terrorist group in 1935, he joined its most militant faction, Lehi, in 1940. He personally authorized the assassination of the UN representative in the Middle East, the Swedish Count Folke Bernadotte, in September 1948. Inset is Shamir's son, Yair.
Edward J. O'Sullivan, director of the office of special plans at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, simply said that the contract with Atwell Security of Tel Aviv had been terminated because "we are no longer satisfied with the agreement," the Washington Post reported in April 1987. O'Sullivan said the port authority's legal office told him not to comment on why he was killing the contract. O'Sullivan said he acted after a reporter inquired about the contract and Atwell's president, Avraham Bendor, acknowledged that he was also known as Avraham Shalom. Atwell, a subsidiary of the Eisenberg Group [Shaul Eisenberg of the Mossad], had been chosen "largely on the basis of Bendor's credentials," O'Sullivan said. Use of such aliases in Israeli intelligence is common, the Washington Post reported. "One intelligence expert said that even Bendor may not be the former Shin Bet chief's real name."
A New York-based senior Israeli intelligence officer, Peter [Zvi] Malkin, had acted as a New York representative for Atwell Security of Tel Aviv in the negotiations with the PA, O'Sullivan said. Malkin is famous for being the Mossad agent who grabbed Adolf Eichmann during the Israeli kidnapping in Argentina in 1960.
The executives running the Port Authority in 1987, the mayor, and his first deputy, all Zionist Jews, certainly must have been aware of the PA decision to hire a company run by a senior Mossad agent to provide security for New York's airports, ports, commuter trains, and World Trade Center under its authority. The people who made the decision to give the security contract to Avraham Bendor's Atwell Security of Tel Aviv must have known that Zvi Malkin was a senior Mossad agent; they had negotiated with him, after all.
The executive director of the Port Authority in 1987 was Stephen Berger (1985-1990). As executive director of the PA, one of the world's largest transportation agencies, Berger was described by Thomas J. Lueck of the New York Times in August 1987 as, "a man at the center of New York City's economy, deftly pulling strings in business and government alike." Today, Berger is Chairman of Odyssey Investment Partners, a private New York investment firm that specializes in private corporate transactions. Berger, a Jew, is a member of the board of New York's Citizens Budget Commission (CBC) with fellow Zionist Jews Larry Silverstein and Felix Rohatyn.
Stephen Berger was director of the Port Authority, the owner of the World Trade Center, when Atwell Security, a Mossad company, received the security contract in 1987.
Prior to becoming director of the Port Authority, Berger was a principal with Odyssey Partners (1983-85) with Leon Levy and Jack Nash, both Zionist Jews. Before joining Odyssey Partners, Berger had been Director of Corporate Development at Oppenheimer & Co., where Nash and Levy had been "senior-most partners." Levy was "a hedge fund pioneer" who founded Odyssey Partners LP with Jack Nash in 1982. "Odyssey's leverage buyouts (LBOs) and other investments reveal a pattern of slash-and-burn management and financial opportunism," Brooks Bitterman, Research Director for Local 100 of the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Union in New York, wrote in September 1995. "And with Stephen Berger's return to Odyssey Partners in July of 1993, the firm has been reinvigorating its LBO investing business," Bitterman wrote.
Philip D. Kaltenbacher, a former running mate of Governor Thomas H. Kean of New Jersey, was the chairman of the Port Authority's Board of Commissioners from 1985 to 1990. Prior to becoming a PA commissioner in 1983, Kaltenbacher had been Chairman of the New Jersey Republican State Committee. Kaltenbacher's father, Joseph, was a founder of the New Jersey Chapter of the American Jewish Committee and a former member of the national board of governors of the AJC, a major Zionist organization.
Stanley Brezenoff, who later became executive director of the PA in 1990, was Deputy Mayor for Operations and First Deputy Mayor under Mayor Edward Irving Koch (1978-89) at the time the Port Authority's security contract was being negotiated with Zvi Malkin, a well known senior Mossad agent. Brezenoff was "the second most powerful official in the Koch administration and was the government's chief operating officer, often serving as acting Mayor in Mr. Koch's absence," according to the New York Times. Brezenoff directed the day-to-day operations of city agencies, including police, fire, and transportation. It is hard to imagine that Brezenoff, whose Yiddish-speaking grandparents had immigrated to the United States in the early 1900s from Russia and Austria, was unaware of the deal to give the PA security contract to Atwell Security of Tel Aviv. Malkin was, after all, a legendary figure among Zionist Jews.
Malkin was one of the Israeli intelligence agents involved in the kidnapping of Adolf Eichmann in Buenos Aires in 1960. Malkin later wrote a book entitled Eichmann In My Hands about his role in the kidnapping. It was none other than Isser Harel, then head of the Mossad, who had sent Malkin and six others on the mission to find Eichmann, where previous agents had failed. Harel had worked closely with Shimon Peres and Teddy Kollek in the pre-state Haganah militia of the 1940s when they had been responsible for procuring weapons and smuggling them to Zionist forces.
MOSSAD: AMERICA IS THE ENEMY
Other agents on the seven-person Mossad team involved in the Eichmann kidnapping were Avraham Shalom Ben-Dor and Rafael "Dirty Rafi" Eitan, the senior Mossadnik [not the Chief of Staff with the same name], who ran the Jonathan Pollard espionage operation against the United States in the 1980s. Eitan later told the Israeli press that he had been made a scapegoat to cover for Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Shamir, senior Israeli politicians who knew about Eitan's espionage network in America, but defended themselves - and the state of Israel - by saying it was "a rogue operation."
Eitan headed a special spying unit known as the Scientific Liaison Office and directed a team of agents working out of the Israeli Embassy in Washington when the Pollard spy operation was exposed in 1985. For Eitan, a minister in the current Israeli government and member of the cabinet, the United States has always been considered "the enemy."
Rafi Eitan, Mossad spymaster, advisor to Fidel Castro, and Israeli cabinet minister
That Eitan, a senior Israeli intelligence officer and member of the Israeli cabinet, would say to one of Israel's largest daily newspapers in 1997 that the United States is an enemy of Israel, and that his position would not be challenged, is something that, unfortunately, very few Americans understand.
"I failed in the Pollard affair, just as I failed in other intelligence operations beyond enemy lines," Eitan told the newspaper Yediot Aharonot in June 1997. "That is the lot of an intelligence officer who runs complex intelligence operations. When you work a lot and do a lot, especially in the intelligence field, you win some and you lose some," he said. "Nobody knows either about your successes or your failures. It doesn't cause a fuss. But this was a big fuss. You take such a possibility into consideration, but there is nothing you can do about it."
"I'm surprised he would admit this," Joseph diGenova, the U.S. attorney who prosecuted the case, said. "But this is basically all stuff that the evidence in the case shows." DiGenova said Eitan's statement was unusual in that it contradicted the "official Israeli position" that the Pollard case had been an unauthorized "rogue" operation, and in that Eitan "does not refer to the United States as an ally, which is regrettable." Eitan's statement about the Pollard operation being an operation "beyond enemy lines" reveals how Israeli intelligence veterans view the Israeli-U.S. relationship, something DiGenova seems unable or unwilling to grasp or articulate.
Eitan said he has close relations with senior Cuban leaders, including Fidel Castro, and has helped develop Cuba's agricultural infrastructure with Israeli irrigation equipment, chemicals, pesticides and fertilizers, along with agricultural advisers. According to Eitan, the ten Israelis actively doing business in Cuba for the past five years [1992-97] "have more influence than Russia had in the last thirty years." The business has developed Cuba's corn, citrus fruit and tomato farming for export, and Eitan represented "a long list of Israeli companies in Cuba."
"We are changing agriculture in Cuba," Eitan said, adding that his business violated the U.S. embargo and had made U.S. officials "very angry." He declined to identify his business partners in Cuba, citing a U.S. law that penalizes foreigners doing business in Cuba who use confiscated American property. Eitan's revealing comments were published in the Washington Times of June 22, 1997.
WHO IS ZVI MALKIN?
Peter Malkin (a.k.a. Zvi Malchin or Milchman) was born in Poland in 1928 and raised in British-occupied Palestine during the mandate period. At age twelve, Malkin joined the Haganah, the Zionist underground militia. In 1950, he joined the Shin Bet, the Israeli security agency. He became an explosives specialist and was known as a master of disguises. Malkin preferred international work and became chief of operations for the Israeli intelligence agency, the Mossad. "During foreign postings, Malkin posed as an artist," his March 3, 2005, obituary in the New York Sun said.
A very young Malkin "retired" as head of operations of the Mossad in 1976 and moved to New York, where he worked as "a security consultant" and "posed as an artist." His "security consultant" work clearly involved brokering the security contract for the Port Authority and the World Trade Center - for the Mossad. Malkin had not retired from the Mossad; he'd gone undercover. Malkin's artist disguise is probably the inspiration for the "art student" operation to infiltrate DEA offices in 2001. It is interesting to note that Michael Chertoff's mother, Livia Eisen, one of the first Mossad agents, owned an art gallery in Elizabeth, New Jersey, when Malkin was posing as a painter in nearby New York. These "retired" Mossadniks probably spent a great deal of time together.
Mossad chief Peter Zvi Malkin brokered a deal in 1987 giving the security contract for the Port Authority to fellow Mossadnik Avraham Shalom Ben-Dor. The contract was cancelled when the PA discovered Ben-Dor's criminal past, forcing Malkin and Ben-Dor to change tack and use American partners.
Malkin, supposedly "retired" from the Mossad in 1976 – at the very young age of forty-eight. This is a very similar profile to that of Shalom Yoran, the former head of the I.A.I., Israel's aircraft industry, who retired at age fifty and moved to New York to write and speak about his days as a Zionist soldier. Malkin moved to New York, where he wrote, painted, and helped his friend, Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau, "on investigations." Morgenthau helped Malkin get a "green card" and to become a U.S. citizen.
Zvi Malkin, the Israeli intelligence agent who "will forever be known as the man who captured Adolf Eichmann," continued to work as "a security expert" in the United States. "I'm out of the secret service business for sure," he told Ralph Blumenthal of the New York Times in May 2003. "But I help."
Peter Zvi Malkin, smuggler of plutonium for Israeli bombs
PLUTONIUM SMUGGLERS
The Washington Post revealed the serious nature of the crimes Malkin, Shalom, and Eitan had been involved in when it reported in 1986 that Rafi Eitan, posing as a chemist, had travelled, in 1968, to the Pennsylvania nuclear processing plant that secretly diverted several hundred kilograms of weapons-grade uranium to Israel. A declassified FBI document shows that another Israeli, "Abraham Bendor, department of electronics," accompanied Eitan on that trip.
Malkin and the same Avraham Bendor were later named as the senior Israeli intelligence agents who obtained the security contract for the World Trade Center in 1987, only to lose the contract when Bendor's criminal past was discovered. Rafi Eitan, Zvi Malkin, and Avraham Ben-Dor had been working together on super-secret Israeli missions from 1960 through 1987, when they obtained the security contract with the Port Authority, the owner of the World Trade Center. For the Mossad and the WTC, however, 1987 was just the beginning.
Rafi Eitan (top) senior Mossadnik, snoozes during a cabinet meeting on January 20, 2007
KROLL, GREENBERG & THE ISRAELIS
Rebuffed in 1987, the Mossad team of Malkin and Shalom didn't give up on Isser Harel's prophecy of 9-11, which meant getting the Port Authority security contract. They simply changed tack and decided to work in a less obvious manner, through dedicated and corrupt American Zionists like Jules Kroll and Maurice Greenberg. Shalom went to work for Kroll, according to the online 9/11 Encyclopedia entry for Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, the CEO of the American International Group (A.I.G.) insurance company.
Messrs Malkin, Eitan, and Abe Shalom/Ben-Dor crop up frequently in Miami in the 1980s and 1990s: "Israeli intelligence agent, author and artist Peter Z. Malkin" addressed the Young Leadership Council of the Greater Miami Jewish Federation, for example, on October 8, 1991, at the Hyatt Regency in Miami, according to the Miami Herald.
Defense Minister Ehud Barak (left) talks with Rafi Eitan before a cabinet meeting, May 25, 2008.
Amazingly, a "Rafi Eitan" and "Abe Shalom" even shared the same address in Miami in the 1990s. An "Abe Shalom" also shared a Miami address at 19707 Turnberry Way with a Morris (and Lillian) Saffati, a name very similar to that of the Miami-based Israeli agent who sold weapons to the Medellin drug cartel, Maurice (and Ilana) Sarfati, a.k.a. Moshe Tzorfati. "Abe Shalom" also lived in Deal, New Jersey, near Lillian Saffati, the wife of Morris. Are these the tracks of the culprits or mere coincidences?
Through Avraham Shalom Ben-Dor, Kroll Associates bought Palumbo Partners, the Miami-based international security firm in August 1992, reportedly "to expand in key Latin American markets."
"According to sources in the industry, Palumbo brought with him a personal history of involvement with the Medellin and other South American narcotics cartels; his business included helping relocate some of the capabilities of these cartels out of Colombia," the 9/11 Encyclopedia says. "The deal to bring Palumbo into Kroll was worked out by Avram Shalom, the former head of Israel's Shin Bet secret police," the 9/11 Encyclopedia says, without documenting the claim.
In 1993, Maurice Greenberg became a partner and co-owner of Jules Kroll's company when A.I.G. bought twenty percent of Kroll. Greenberg is very close to Henry Kissinger, who became chairman of A.I.G.'s International Advisory Board in 1987.
Jules Kroll of Kroll Security
Maurice Greenberg of A.I.G.
Greenberg was deeply involved in China in the 1980s, where Henry Kissinger represented A.I.G. Through the China trade, Greenberg became close to Shaul Eisenberg, the leader of the Asian section of the Israeli intelligence service Mossad, and agent for the sales of sophisticated military equipment to the Chinese military, it reports. Eisenberg was also the owner of Atwell Security of Tel Aviv.
Greenberg also has a joint venture with the founder of Amdocs. Greenberg's insurance subsidiary in Israel, called A.I.G. Golden, is a joint venture with Morris Kahn's Aurec Group (the parent company of Amdocs), an Israeli private equity firm with cable and telecom investments. Kahn was an original investor in Amdocs Ltd., of which his Aurec Group is the parent company. Aurec is meant to signify "golden" from the Latin, hence the gilded name of the A.I.G. subsidiary.
Morris Kahn, Israeli founder of Amdocs, and partner of Maurice Greenberg
Jules Kroll is connected with the 9-11 players Kenneth Bialkin and Larry Silverstein through the Citizens Budget Commission of New York. Kroll's wife, Lynn Korda Kroll, the Vice Chairman of the United Jewish Appeal (UJA) Federation of New York, is likewise connected to Silverstein, a national chairman of the UJA, the biggest fund-raising organization for the State of Israel.
Maurice Greenberg and Jules Kroll are connected to the key players of 9-11 in so many ways that their connections would fill a book. For the purpose of this chapter, however, there are a few key connections that need to be underlined:
- Maurice Greenberg and Jules Kroll became partners in 1993, the same year Kroll Associates "was chosen over three other companies to advise the Port Authority on a redesign of its security procedures." "We have such confidence in them that I have followed every one of their recommendations," Stanley Brezenoff, the Port Authority executive director, told the New York Times in 1994.
- Kroll controlled security at the World Trade Center complex in 2001 and was responsible for hiring John O'Neill, the former chief of counterterrorism for the FBI, who died on 9-11, reportedly his first day on the new job.
- Greenberg's son, Jeffrey W. Greenberg, became CEO of Marsh & McLennan (MMC) in 1999 and chairman in 2000. The first plane of 9-11 flew directly into the secure computer room of Marsh (Kroll) USA, part of Greenberg's company. Mark Wood, an eyewitness, said: "It looked like a mid-sized executive jet and the way it turned suggested it was being aimed deliberately at a target."
- Lewis "Jerry" Bremer, the U.S. proconsul who ran occupied Iraq until the end of June 2004, joined Marsh Kroll's crisis group shortly after 9-11. Bremer had worked closely with Kissinger since the 1970s and was managing director at Kissinger Associates in 2001.
- Jerome M. Hauer, the former director of Mayor Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management, was responsible for having the command bunker built in Larry Silverstein's WTC 7. Hauer was a managing director for Kroll in 2001.
- Kroll revamped security at the World Trade Center after the 1993 terrorist bombing. Kroll was reportedly responsible for security at the World Trade Center on 9-11. "Over the last two years, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey has paid Kroll $2.5 million to overhaul security at the World Trade Center and evaluate procedures at the agency's bridges, tunnels and airports," the New York Times reported on September 1, 1994.
- Kroll was hired by Kuwait in October 1990 to find the hidden wealth of Saddam Hussein.
- Kroll began profiting from the war in Iraq in April 2003 when it received contracts to provide protection and security for government agencies and companies in Iraq.
- Kroll's son, Jeremy M. Kroll, is the Managing Director at Marsh Kroll and has served as General Manager at Kroll's Information Security Group (i.e. computer security). He is responsible for business and strategic development, business intelligence, investigations, forensic accounting, and security services, such as those Kroll provided to the Port Authority and the World Trade Center prior to 9-11.
- Jeremy Kroll serves on the board of the Israel-based Challenge Fund with Israeli government officials from the highest level, including Israel's National Security Advisor and Head of the National Security Council, a former head of Shin Bet, former Directors General of the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Defense, former Commanders of the Israel Air Force, Central Command, and the Technology and Logistic Branch of the IDF, as well as the head of Boeing (Israel) and the son of Yitzhak Shamir. The Challenge Fund uses money raised through the Bronfman and Andreas (ADM) families to fund Israeli companies, like ViryaNet.
KROLL & THE CHALLENGE FUND
The Challenge Fund is an Israeli intelligence funding operation, based in Israel and also known as Etgar, which means "challenge" in Hebrew. This limited partnership involves the biggest players in the Zionist funding network in North America with the most senior officers in Israeli military intelligence. This is one of the key funding entities for Israeli intelligence operations in the United States. The operation describes itself as, "two Delaware limited partnerships focused on equity investments in Israel-related privately held and publicly traded companies."
The Challenge Fund was founded in July 1995. A second fund, The Challenge Fund - Etgar II L.P., was established in 1999. The funds claim to have a capital base in excess of $200 million, "making them one of Israel's leading sources of private investment capital." Challenge Fund investors include "a highly distinguished group of American and European investors," primarily members of the extended Bronfman and Andreas families. Charles de Gunzburg, for example, a Bronfman cousin, is on the funds' "investment committee." Bronfman, which means distiller in Yiddish, is the family behind Seagram's, the Canadian whisky company.
Andreas is the family behind the grain broker Archer Daniels Midland (ADM). The funds are managed by the "Challenge Partners," a small team of "experienced professionals," all Israelis of course, headed by Joseph Ciechanover, the president of the funds and member of the "Investment Committee". Ciechanover is a former chairman of state-owned El Al Israel Airlines. Living in New York, he is also a member of the NASDAQ Advisory Board. He previously served as President of PEC Israel Economic Corporation [P for Palestine], which was later merged into I.D.B. Holding [Israel Discount Bank], a private investment and holding company.
Israelis Joseph Ciechanover (left) and his brother Aaron (center) talk to Elie Wiesel at a meeting of Nobel Laureates in Petra, Jordan, May 18, 2005. The meeting was sponsored by Wiesel and the King of Jordan. (Photo by Salah Malkawi/Getty)
Ciechanover served as Chairman of the Board of Israel Discount Bank, Israel's third largest commercial bank, and was a member of the Bank of Israel Advisory Committee. He also served as Director General of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Head of Israel's Defense Mission to the United States and Canada, and General Counsel to the Israel Ministries of Defense and Agriculture. Ciechanover's daughter, Tamar, is a "managing partner" of the funds.
Tamar Ciechanover
Another partner of the Challenge Funds is Maj. General Ilan Biran, the Chairman of the Board of Rafael Armament Development Authority Ltd. (since June 2007), former Director General of the Israeli Ministry of Defense, and president and CEO of Bezeq, the Israel Telecommunication Corp. During his military service, Biran served as Commander of the Central Command and the Technology and Logistic Branch of the IDF.
Maj. General Ilan Biran, former Director General of the Israeli Ministry of Defense, is Chairman of Rafael Armament Development Authority Ltd.
On the "advisory board" with Jeremy Kroll sit some of the most interesting people involved in the Challenge Funds. One is David Ivry, president of Boeing [Israel]. Ivry has held several senior military and diplomatic related positions, including Commander of the Israel Air Force (1977-82), an unprecedented ten-year period as Director General of the Ministry of Defense (1986-96), and Israel's chief representative to the U.S.-Israel Strategic Dialogue. Ivry moved from the highest position in the Ministry of Defense to become the Minister of Strategic Affairs at the Prime Minister's office from 1996 to 1999, and Ambassador to the U.S. from January 2000 through 2002. Ivry has twice served as Chairman of the Board of Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI).
Maj. Gen. David Ivry (right) with Shimon Peres (left) and Rona Ramon at 3rd Ramon Annual Int. Space Conference, January 30, 2008
From October 1977 to the end of 1982 [i.e. during the period of Israel's most egregious criminal aerial bombings on Lebanon], Ivry commanded the Israel Air Force (IAF). Ivry also directed the IAF's criminal destruction of the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq. Ivry has a history of directing criminal actions using aircraft.
In 1962, David Ivry became the commander of the first Israeli squadron of the French Dassault Mirage fighter jet. During the six-day war of 1967, Ivry served as a Mirage pilot and the commander of the Mystère squadron. Ivry was either personally involved in the criminal Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty with Mirage fighters or commanded those who were. Thirty-four American servicemen lost their lives in the Israeli attack. In any case, Ivry has clearly been involved in numerous war crimes and has shown very little regard for American lives.
Yaakov Peri (a.k.a. Jacob Perry) Director of Shin Bet 1988-94
Another member of the Challenge Fund advisory board is Jacob Perry (a.k.a. Yaacov Peri). Perry is another former head of the Shin Bet (Director GSS, 1988-94). In 1995, Perry left the secret service and "joined the business sector" with his appointment as president and CEO of Cellcom Israel Ltd., Israel's largest wireless telephone service provider.
Avi Naor (Aharonovich) of the Aurec Group and president and CEO of Amdocs is another member of the Challenge Fund's advisory board.
In addition to Ciechanover, the Challenge Fund has been managed by Yair Shamir, the son of Yitzhak Shamir, the Zionist terrorist who was involved in numerous assassinations, including the 1947 murder of the U.N. envoy to Palestine, Folke Bernadotte, a member of the Swedish royal family. Shamir is also suspected of being involved in the murder of President John F. Kennedy.
Yair Shamir
During his term in the Air Force, Yair Shamir, "attained the rank of colonel and served as head of the electronics department, the highest professional electronics position within the Air Force," according to his biography.
These are the kind of high-level Israeli intelligence agents that work with Jeremy Kroll on the "advisory board" of the Challenge Fund. Kroll brings a degree in fine arts (French and Italian) from Georgetown and his executive position with Kroll to the table. Who do you think makes the strategic decisions in this group? It was, I submit, through these connections with Kroll and Greenberg that agents of Israeli military intelligence gained control of security of the World Trade Center and were able to carry out 9-11.
Finis
Schematic Diagrams of Zionist Terror Network:
Ptech and Computer Network
Funding Network
WTC Security Network
Sources and Recommended Reading
9-11 Encyclopedia (Wiki "encyclopedia" at www.911review.org), "Maurice Greenberg,"
http://911review.org/Sept11Wiki/Greenberg,Maurice.shtml
Babcock, Charles R., "Israeli Firm Loses N.Y.Airport Award – Official Involved in Killings of Hijackers," Washington Post, April 12, 1987
Bennet, James, 'Spilled Blood is Seen as Bond That Draws 2 Nations Closer', New York Times, September 12, 2001
Bollyn, Christoper, "Euro Intel Experts Dismiss 'War On Terrorism' As Deception," American Free Press, December 4, 2001
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/911deception.html
Bollyn, C., "Intel Experts Say 9-11 Looks Like A Hollywood Show," December 2001
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BOL403A.html
Bollyn, C., "How Did Israeli Spy Software Get Onto Critical FAA Computers?" 28 January 2008
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10797
Bollyn, C., " Mossad: The Israeli Connection to 9/11," April 8, 2005
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=68985
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3007
Bollyn, C., "How Mossad Deceived the U.S. Military on 9/11," 1 April 2005
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10761
Bollyn, C., "9-11 Mossad Agents Admit Mission: 'Our Purpose Was To Document The Event'," June 28, 2002
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10372
Bollyn, C., "Israelis Hold Keys To NSA/US Military Computer Networks," June 16, 2006
http://www.rense.com/general72/sisi.htm
Bollyn, C., "9-11 Planes Flew Directly into Secure Computer Rooms in Both Towers," January 2007
http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Bollyn-Fuji-WTC.html
Bollyn, C., "The Planes of 9-11," October 15, 2007
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10708
Bollyn, C., "America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's Use of Terrorism to Coerce the West," January 2008
http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10769
Bollyn, C., "When Terror Drills Turned Real: 9-11, the London Bombings & the Sinking of Estonia," March 11, 2008
http://www.bollyn.info/home/articles/911/solving911ch3/
Bollyn, C., "The Key Players of 9-11 - Who is Jerome Hauer?" January 20, 2008
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=117351
Bollyn, C., "How Did Jerome Hauer Wind Up in Indiana?" January 22, 2008
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=117445
Buelow, Andreas von, (interview) "Former Top German Minister Rejects Official Story Of 911 Attacks," Tagesspiegel, January 13, 2002
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.html
Delevan, Richard, "Welcome to the Art of Electronic Warfare," The Irish Times, October 5, 2001
Evans, Michael D., "Is America in Bible Prophecy?" August 2004
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/151/story_15136_1.html
Frantz, Douglas, "A Midlife Crisis at Kroll Associates," New York Times, September 1, 1994
Hecht, Jamey, "Ptech, 9-11, and USA-Saudi Terror," From The Wilderness Publications, 2005
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/012005_ptech_pt1.shtml http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/012705_ptech_pt2.shtml
James, George, "Ex-Koch Deputy Favored As Head of Port Authority," New York Times, August 2, 1990
Kaplan, Kenneth, "The Colombia Connection," Jerusalem Post, September 1, 1989
Le Carré, John, The Little Drummer Girl, Hodder & Stoughten Ltd., London, 1984
Lueck, Thomas J., "Port Authority Powerhouse: Stephen Berger; Revving Up the 'Economic Engine'," New York Times, August 2, 1987
O'Sullivan, Arieh, "GSS Agent 'Proud' To Have Murdered Terrorists," Jerusalem Post, July 24, 1996
Piller, Charles, "Electric power grids vulnerable to hackers", Los Angeles Times (also published in Milwaukee Journal Sentinel), August 20, 2001
Singh, Indira, Speaking about Ptech, 9-11 Citizens' Commission, September 9, 2004
Part 1: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4861158466699324733
Part 2: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-368745798563225089
"Suspicious Activities Involving Israeli Art Students at DEA Facilities," U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Security Programs, Summer 2001 http://cryptome.org/dea-il-spy.htm
The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11, July 25, 2008
Final Edit – August 21, 2009
Latest Correction - February 17, 2010
VIII - The Mass Media & the 9-11 Cover-Up
Chapter VIII
The Mass Media & the 9-11 Cover-Up
The government and controlled media have lied to the public about 9-11 since the day it occurred. Those who have discerned and exposed the lies about the "false flag" terror attacks and the fraudulent "War on Terror" have been treated like madmen and criminals. It's time for this criminal nightmare to end.
Who controls the "hidden hand" in the U.S. mass media that censors and suppresses the crucial 9-11 evidence? What is the nexus connecting the architects of 9-11 with the mass media moguls who are covering up the truth?
Rupert Murdoch, a Jew, is a supporter of Zionism and a friend of Israeli president Shimon Peres.
The on-going cover-up of the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 and explosions in the World Trade Center by the U.S. mass media is indicative of a high-level connection between the architects of the "false flag" terror attacks and the media moguls who control the major news networks in the United States.
As a longtime observer of Israel and the Middle East, I have watched how the U.S. mass media has increasingly become an instrument of Israeli propaganda. As Zionists have extended their grip on American media networks, the major television, radio, film and print media outlets have effectively become propaganda tools of a foreign state - Israel - and are used to manipulate U.S. public opinion to support the Zionist agenda. The painfully obvious anti-Arab and anti-Islamic bias of Hollywood films and news-related programs has become ever more extreme as pro-Israel Zionists have achieved near total control of the U.S. mass media.
It needs to be understood that the Zionist conquest of the U.S. mass media did not simply happen by chance or as a result of natural market forces. It is the planned result of a long-term covert strategy put into effect decades ago by the government of Israel to control the news and entertainment networks that inform how Americans view Zionism, Israel, and the Middle East. The Zionists realized that if they could control what Americans read, see, and hear about Zionism and the Middle East, they would be able to control how Americans think about these subjects. Controlling U.S. public opinion is crucial to realizing the Zionist agenda.
Rupert Murdoch's media empire acts as a Zionist propaganda network.
Zionist control of the major media networks has resulted in Americans getting an extremely distorted and biased view of the world, particularly of the Middle East, and of such significant events as 9-11 and the "War on Terror." Understanding the strategy and the people behind the Zionist conquest of the American mass media is an essential step to recovering our national sovereignty.
As an independent journalist and researcher of 9-11, I have seen how Zionist-controlled media outlets are actively engaged in covering up the evidence of Israeli involvement in the "false flag" attacks of 9-11 and the Zionist-planned "War on Terror." I have personally been subjected to slander and defamation from a host of Zionist-controlled news outlets, including CNN and FOX News, simply because I have investigated and written about the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11.
Today, the United States of America is by all appearances an Israeli-occupied state. The U.S. Congress dutifully authorizes the annual payment of an immense tribute to Israel, some three thousand million dollars a year. Like a subservient colony, the United States provides hundreds of thousands of young men and women to fight and die as mercenaries in Zionist-planned wars in the Middle East. The tens of thousands of American and European Christian soldiers and mercenaries fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan are very similar to the former Mamluks of Baghdad - captured "male white slaves" serving their Zionist rulers.
This dismal situation is, of course, not new. It has only become more obvious and extreme. The United States has provided more than $108 billion in direct aid to the state of Israel since 1949 (Washington Report, July 2006) and the U.S. State Department recently promised the Israeli military another $30 billion over the next ten years - a twenty-five percent increase.
Hundreds, if not thousands, of U.S. soldiers have died as a result of serving on or near the front lines in Israel's wars. The 241 American marines killed in the Beirut bombing of 1983 and the 34 servicemen killed during the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty are the first that come to mind.
More than 4,000 American men and women have died during the current phase, the occupation stage, of the nearly two-decade-long war against Iraq. The U.S.-led invasion and occupation of Iraq, an illegal war of aggression, is clearly a Zionist-planned war in which Americans and other mercenaries actually do the fighting -- and dying.
WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?
The obvious question is where is the outrage? Where is the spiritual, intellectual, and political resistance to this blatant exploitation of Americans and their national resources by a tiny foreign state with a militant and racist ideology? Why do patriotic Americans tolerate this abuse of the "land of the free and the home of the brave?"
While the power of the Israeli lobby (and an occasional murder) may explain the lack of any significant political resistance in the U.S. Congress to Zionist demands, it cannot explain how the American population has come to accept this extremely bizarre and abusive relationship with a foreign state. How has Zionist control of the United States been foisted onto the American people?
ZIONIST DECEPTIONS
Many Americans willingly accept the extremely one-sided and abusive relationship with Israel because they have internalized three fundamental Zionist deceptions, which have been forced into their brains by the controlled mass media.
The first deception is the religious hoax that equates the modern state of Israel with the Israel of the Bible. This religious fraud elevates modern-day Israelis, regardless of their actual ethnicity, to being the rightful heirs of the Promised Land. Although this hoax is quickly revealed to anyone who actually reads Zionist history, it has been successfully foisted onto millions of extremely naïve and gullible Christians. These misled and abused people are often referred to as Christian Zionists.
The second fundamental Zionist deception is that Israel is a "sister democracy" of the United States and that Israelis and Americans share the same "democratic" values. This lie is also quickly exposed by reading Israeli history or visiting Israeli-occupied Palestine. The only Americans who could possibly share Israeli values are those who believe in Jewish racism and supremacism -- the central pillar of the Zionist worldview that is completely un-American.
The third Zionist deception is that nineteen Arab Muslims under the leadership of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Osama Bin Laden were behind the 9-11 attacks at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. This deception has been used to usher in the Zionist-planned "War on Terror," which has brought U.S. and European troops into an extensive long-term Middle Eastern war.
Why hasn't the media interviewed the families of the nineteen suspected hijackers? Why does the media not demand an open trial for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged "mastermind" of 9-11, currently held by the U.S. in Guantanamo? Why is the media treatment of these people only as deep as their photos?
While the first two deceptions are primarily philosophical in nature and rather pointless to argue, the 9-11 deception is painfully real and something we accept and allow to continue at our own peril.
"AUSCHWITZ OF THE MIND"
These Zionist deceptions, which are all demonstrably false, have been carefully planted and cultivated in the minds of millions of people through the devices of the Zionist-controlled media. Zionist domination of the mass media and academia in the United States is so pervasive that Americans are subjected, like Truman Burbank in the film The Truman Show, to a constant barrage of multi-level deception, as if the entire population were living in a false construction -- an "Auschwitz of the mind."
Like the false world of Truman Burbank, the Zionist-created worldview is so overwhelming that it prevents many people from ever realizing that they are being held mentally captive. Even when we peel away the layers of deception and expose the fraud, somehow the show goes on. For the criminals in high places, the show must go on.
The first deception, the religious hoax of the Zionist state's connection to the biblical Israel, is doctrine to television evangelists like Pat Robertson and his Christian Coalition, while the second and third have become "conventional wisdom" for the U.S. news and entertainment media. Because millions of Americans have accepted and internalized these Zionist-created falsehoods, they are unable to understand the actual realities of the Middle East or the massive fraud of the "War on Terror." The controlled media is careful to censor any information that might disturb the perverse worldview of America's Christian and Jewish Zionists who are kept in the darkness like children locked in a closet.
ZIONISM - "THE REAL ENEMY OF THE JEWS"
When, for example, the highly-regarded Israeli historian Avi Shlaim wrote his 2005 editorial entitled "Is Zionism today the real enemy of the Jews?" his comments were published in the International Herald Tribune (IHT), which is read in 180 nations, but kept out of the pages of the New York Times, the domestic newspaper of its parent company.
Now, why would the New York Times, whose motto is "All The News That's Fit to Print," censor the viewpoint of a renowned Israeli historian writing on the causes of modern anti-Semitism? What did Shlaim say that the editors at the Times thought was unfit for Americans to read?
"Israel's image today is negative not because it is a Jewish state but because it habitually transgresses the norms of acceptable international behavior. Indeed, Israel is increasingly perceived as a rogue state, as an international pariah, and as a threat to world peace," Shlaim, an Iraqi Jew who was born in Baghdad, wrote. "This perception of Israel is a major factor in the recent resurgence of anti-Semitism in Europe and in the rest of the world. In this sense, Zionism today is the real enemy of the Jews."
When one understands that the primary function of the Zionist-controlled media is to keep Americans in the dark about the Middle East and Zionism, it becomes clear why Shlaim's article was published in the international publication owned by the New York Times but kept from their U.S. readership. Shlaim's comments would have greatly disturbed the carefully cultivated Zionist worldview of millions of Americans - both Jews and Gentiles - an audience that is both protected and held captive.
THE MEDIA COVER-UP OF 9-11
As an independent journalist I have seen how many important stories have been covered-up or ignored by the controlled media. I have written about many of these suppressed stories, such as the sinking of the Estonia, the downing of Flight TWA 800, and the dangers of depleted uranium. At the top of my list is the most egregious and criminal cover-up of the evidence of 9-11.
"Ninety-five percent of the work of the intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation," German intelligence expert Andreas von Bülow told me in December 2001. This deception is widely propagated in the mainstream media creating an accepted version of events. "Journalists don't even raise the simplest questions," he said. "Those who differ are labeled as crazy."
After the London press conference during Jimmy Walter's 2005 European 9-11 Truth tour, two reporters from the BBC were eager to interview me. "Why are you the only journalist who does not believe the official explanation of what happened on 9-11?" was their first question.
The BBC interviewing the author in London
"If that is the case," I told them, "it is probably due to the fact that others who have questioned the official version have lost their jobs as a result." The van was leaving for the hotel so I decided to cut the interview short. I could see where the interview was heading.
When FOX News and CNN interviewed me on the pretense that they were interested in my 9-11 research and evidence, all they really wanted to do was to smear me as an anti-Semite. In both cases the interviewers were clearly not at all interested in the 9-11 evidence or my research.
Alan Samuel Colmes, a Jewish talking head for Fox News, was not interested in discussing the evidence of 9-11 but only in trying to smear the author as an anti-Semite.
"WOE BETIDE HIM..."
"The dissident cannot be taken seriously," the veteran British journalist Roland Huntford wrote about the mass media in his book The New Totalitarians. "There is a range of tolerated opinions, and a narrow one it is: woe betide him who departs from it." While Huntford was writing about the controlled media of Sweden in the 1970s, his comments hold true for the Zionist-controlled mass media in the United States today, particularly when the subject is 9-11 or Israel.
I, for example, have paid a very high price for investigating and writing about the evidence that contradicts the government's version of what happened on 9-11. The first attack came from the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (ADL) in November 2001. The ADL, a private organization dedicated to supporting Zionist and Israeli interests, first smeared the American Free Press, the newspaper I wrote for, as a "conspiratorial and anti-Semitic weekly newspaper," which it said had "repeatedly turned to the subject of the 9-11 attacks as grist for its mill."
The ADL then singled me out for my article, "Some Survivors Say Bombs Exploded Inside WTC" in which, the ADL said, "Bollyn suggests that the 'mainstream media' is ignoring eyewitness accounts of bombs that exploded inside the World Trade Center before the collapse of the Twin Towers."
Indeed, the first line of my article from September 2001 said exactly that:
Despite reports from numerous eyewitnesses and experts, including news reporters on the scene, who heard or saw explosions immediately before the collapse of the World Trade Center, there has been virtual silence in the mainstream media.
But, I asked, why would an organization dedicated to Israeli and Jewish interests attack me, as a journalist, for writing about eyewitness reports of explosions in the World Trade Center? What did my writing about this extremely newsworthy subject have to do with Israel or Jews?
Had my BBC interview gone on, I might have asked why the BBC editors had ignored and censored the comments of their own reporter, Steve Evans, who had been in the South Tower (WTC 2) when it was hit and who reported having observed a "series of explosions." Shortly after the destruction of the WTC, the BBC interviewed Evans on their television news program based in London. Because Evans' observations were ignored by the BBC and not followed up, I wrote about his report of the explosions he felt in the South Tower:
Evans was asked what he had seen: "It's more what I felt really," Evans said. "I was at the base of the second tower - the second tower that was hit. There was an explosion – I didn’t think it was an explosion – but the base of the building shook. I felt it shake … then when we were outside, the second explosion happened and then there was a series of explosions…" [At this point the London news anchor cut Evans off in mid-sentence rather than listen to Evans continue to describe the "series of explosions" that he saw and felt. Evans' microphone was turned down.] But in a minute Evans returns to the "series of explosions" that he witnessed: "We can only wonder at the kind of damage – the kind of human damage – which was caused by those explosions – those series of explosions," Evans said.
Evans is a professional journalist and his observations of explosions in the South Tower need to be taken into account by anybody looking into the cause of the catastrophe of September 11. Many eyewitnesses reported similar explosions, but these reports, and what they suggest, are intentionally being censored and avoided by the very people who are supposed to be investigating the cause of the collapses. The same kind of censorship occurred with FOX News, CNN, and the leading U.S. news networks that had reporters at the World Trade Center. First-hand reports of explosions at the WTC from professional reporters were broadcast only once -- and never picked up again, except by the much-despised "conspiracy theorists."
The news reports that five Middle Eastern men were being sought or had been captured in New Jersey after they had videotaped themselves celebrating in front of the burning towers were treated in the same way. The arrest of the five men, all Israelis, two of whom were known Mossad agents, was only reported in the Bergen Record (New Jersey) on September 12, 2001 -- but never discussed or investigated by the national news networks.
ISRAELIS FOREWARNED
Likewise, the story of the Odigo text message warning of the attacks - before they occurred - was dropped into the media's memory hole. The instant text messages, which were precise to the minute, had been sent via the Israeli-owned Odigo instant messaging service and had even been received by Odigo employees in Israel, but the story of Israelis having prior knowledge of the attacks was never discussed in the U.S. mass media.
How did the news editors at the BBC, FOX News, CNN, and the leading networks decide to censor their own reporters and avoid discussing certain aspects of 9-11?
Let's look at this logically. The 9-11 event was the biggest story these news editors had ever handled. Suffice it to say that the editorial decisions about how to cover 9-11 must have been made by the boss at the top. Any decision to omit or censor reports about explosions at the World Trade Center or indications of Israeli involvement would have been made by the senior executive of each network. In the case of CNN it would have been Gerald M. Levin, the CEO of Time Warner, who acquired Turner Broadcasting in 1997. (Levin unexpectedly announced his resignation in December 2001, less than three months after 9-11.)
At FOX News the top decision maker would have been Rupert Murdoch, CEO of News Corporation. At ABC News it would have been Michael D. Eisner, CEO of Disney, the network's parent company. Were the media moguls Murdoch, Levin, and Eisner involved in 9-11? How else could they know that certain aspects of the event needed to be suppressed by their news networks? Their networks have been suppressing important information about 9-11 since the day of the event. They have also been actively involved in a conspiracy to cover-up the truth. How can that be? Who is behind this cover-up? What occult power, what hidden hand, would be able to communicate with these men and influence them to suppress important reports and evidence from the terror attacks of 9-11?
ARNON MILCHAN - MOSSAD'S MAN IN THE MIDDLE
If one considers the known evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of 9-11, the Odigo text messages and the five arrested Mossad agents, for example, as indicative of Israeli state involvement in the crime, the identity of the occult power behind the cover-up is rather obvious. The "hidden hand" suppressing the information about 9-11 would have to be a high-level person in the Israeli political-military intelligence establishment who also has very close relations with media kingpins like Murdoch, Levin, and Eisner. Arnon Milchan (a.k.a. Milchen) is such a person.
While millions of Americans have watched his films, such as Pretty Woman and JFK, very few know that Arnon Milchan is a "best friend" of Shimon Peres (born Szymon Perski in Wiszniewo, Poland) the current Israeli president and godfather of Israel's nuclear arsenal.
The Israeli movie producer Arnon Milchan (between Peres and Netanyahu) is a close friend of Israel's president Shimon Peres ("his first letter he wrote as president went to me"), Defense Minister Ehud Barak, and Likud Party leader Binyamin ("Bibi") Netanyahu. Milchan, who began his career with the fertilizer/chemical company Milchan Brothers, reportedly owns 30 companies in 17 countries involved in plastics, electronics, communications, and pharmaceuticals.
Milchan's 40-year friendship with Peres, the man who oversaw the illegal development of Israel's nuclear weapon program is key to understanding Milchan's career as an undercover operative, weapons procurer, and film producer. The fact that Milchan, the Hollywood producer, has been Israel's "foremost weapons procurer" for decades, brokering deals for "everything from nuclear triggers to rocket fuel to guidance systems," is seldom mentioned in the U.S. news media.
This is probably due to the fact that Milchan is also a "best friend" and business partner of Rupert Murdoch. He is also a friend a business partner with Levin (Warner Brothers) and Eisner. "I consider him one of my best friends," Milchan said about Murdoch, "and I think vice versa. We're having a ball. He's a very cool guy."
"Kingpins like Warner Brothers' Gerald Levin and Disney's Michael Eisner are quick to return his calls," the American Jewish journalist Ann Louise Bardach wrote about Milchan in her article "The Last Tycoon" in April 2000.
In 1997, after a six-year relationship with Warner Brothers, Milchan became a partner with Murdoch, selling him twenty percent of his film company, New Regency Productions, for $200 million. Murdoch also invested another $30 million in Regency Television. Today, Murdoch's equity partnership with Milchan is close to fifty percent. "Milchan's deal with Fox also assures him a level of financial security," Bardach wrote. "With Murdoch's $200 million investment and a subsequent $600 million line of credit from a team of banks led by Chase Manhattan, Milchan is well into mogul territory. "Milchan's tony offices occupy most of Building 12, right next door to the Executive Building on the Fox lot," Bardach wrote. "And it is from this seat of power that Milchan is building an entertainment empire that could one day rival Murdoch's."
Peter Chernin, president and chief operating officer of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, left, presents Arnon Milchan with a lifetime achievement award at an event celebrating the 60th Anniversary of the state of Israel in Los Angeles on September 18, 2008. Chernin, Murdoch, and Milchan have worked together for many years.
THE MILCHAN INFLUENCE
The Israeli influence in films and news media has profoundly affected the quality of news reporting and entertainment. Israeli attitudes and ideas are now disseminated through national media outlets which reach the entire U.S. population on a daily basis. Israeli-made films often reveal hints or clues about actual crimes or criminal plots the Israeli producers are aware of.
One such project, The Lone Gunmen, produced by Milchan's "best friend" Rupert Murdoch, had an uncanny resemblance to the 9-11 attacks on the World Trade Center. Was this Milchan's influence? The Milchan-Murdoch partnership in television production may be key to understanding the genesis of the plot of the pilot episode of this short-lived television series. In the first episode a passenger airliner is hijacked by remote control and flown toward the World Trade Center. Disaster is averted at the last minute by over-riding the computer program that has hijacked the plane.
The Lone Gunmen, produced by Rupert Murdoch in 2000, revealed an extremely uncanny prescience of 9-11. During the same year it was made, Milchan was producing two television series in collaboration with Fox Television: Roswell, which aired on Warner Brothers network, and Malcolm in the Middle, which was aired on Fox. The Lone Gunmen pilot episode aired on FOX Television in March 2001.
Given the long, close, and extensive collaboration between Murdoch and Milchan, it seems fair to ask: Was Arnon Milchan the original source of the plotline for The Lone Gunmen? Why were the people involved in the production of this episode not investigated by the media? Why did the media ignore its own uncanny prescience, The Lone Gunmen episode, which mirrored reality six months later? Was the similarity between the Murdoch-produced show and reality too close for comfort? Was it too uncomfortable to discuss the origin of the idea for the show? Apparently so.
Was the Israeli chemical magnate Arnon Milchan the author of the plotline for The Lone Gunmen pilot episode in which a passenger airplane was remotely hijacked and flown into the World Trade Center?
In Milchan's highly-controversial film JFK (1991), directed by Oliver Stone, the assassination of President John F. Kennedy is ascribed to conspirators within the U.S. military-industrial complex. Whose idea was this? Why is Arnon Milchan's own connection with Itzhak Rabin, who was in Dallas on the day Kennedy was shot, not an issue here?
In his futuristic film Brazil (1985), directed by Terry Gilliam, terrorist explosions go off in cafes for no apparent reason, very much like the seemingly senseless terrorism that plagues occupied Iraq. Is this Milchan's influence?
"Anyone closely associated with Peres pretty well must be satanic," Barry Chamish, a Canadian-Israeli wrote, "but Milchan produced a film that shows he has insider information." Chamish advises his readers to watch The Devil's Advocate with Al Pacino to "understand the implication."
"Milchan runs his company like a family business. Heading up New Regency Productions for him is his childhood friend David Matalon, whose parents were best friends with Milchan's," Bardach wrote. "Daughter Alexandra [Milchan-Lambert] is vice president of production in Los Angeles." Matalon has served as president and CEO of New Regency Productions since 1995.
In 1986, Matalon, an Israeli co-founder of Tri-Star pictures, released a film entitled Iron Eagle, in which the aerial combat scenes were filmed entirely with the Israeli Air Force. The plot of this film is about how a few teenagers are able to steal U.S. military codes, aircraft, and information from under the noses of the military brass and run an entire military operation in which they bomb Libya without the knowledge of the military command. This film gives some indication of the kind of projects and ideas the Israeli military has collaborated on with their fellow Israelis in Hollywood.
THE SECRETIVE MOGUL
"Averse to publicity and little known outside Hollywood" is how Arnon Milchan's biography begins. "My idea of a good profile is no profile," Milchan told Bardach. Murdoch, Levin, and Eisner have obviously respected the Israeli's wish, but why would a Hollywood mogul not want to be known to the public? "Arnon Milchan has kept his secrets to himself," Bardach wrote.
Arnon Milchan with Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie
Indeed, very little is known about Milchan, Israel's super weapons agent, except that he spends more time in Tel Aviv and France than he does in his office on the 20th Century Fox lot in Los Angeles, according to Bardach. Now, why would a Hollywood movie producer spend more time in Tel Aviv, where no movies are being made, than in Hollywood?
POLISH ZIONIST ROOTS
Milchan was born on December 6, 1944, on the Zionist settlement of Rehovot, in what was then Palestine, according to his biography in Current Biography (2000). Rehovot, one of the earliest Zionist settlements, was founded in 1890 by Polish and Russian Jews, one of whom was Milchan's paternal grandfather. Rehovot has a street and a neighborhood named "Milchen", no doubt in memory of his grandfather.
"My family's been there for 500 years," Milchan told Bardach. "My grandfather was a very close friend of President [Chaim] Weizmann." Oddly, Bardach does not provide the name of his grandfather who was "a very close friend" of Israel's first president. Nor does she give the name of the ancestors Milchan proudly claims have lived in Palestine for five hundred years. "Milchan's father was an enviable success story himself, having laid the sprinklers that irrigated Israel," Bardach wrote. "Later, he would handle some of Israel's lucrative military contracts, according to his son."
Bardach continues:
However, it was young Milchan who put the company on the map internationally, after his father's sudden death. Following a spot of schooling in London and Geneva, where he excelled in soccer and tennis, Milchan dropped out and returned to Israel. Soon, he struck gold. By marketing a newly discovered nutrient that quadrupled citrus production, he brought his company stratospheric sales throughout the world.
"This is a man who made his fortune by screwing with nature," says screenwriter Shawn Slovo, who began her career as Milchan's secretary in 1977. "He's the Israeli who made the desert bloom. Amazing when you think about it. He could have retired at the age of 22."
Instead, like a kid racing around the Monopoly board, Milchan gobbled up another half dozen businesses--including electronics, chemicals, aerospace and plastics. Still in his early twenties, he met the Shah of Iran and reportedly talked the wily Persian into dozens of contracts, one to build much of Tehran's airport.
When one considers that Arnon Milchan, in his early twenties, was among the founders of Israel's Labor Party in the 1960s with Shimon Peres, Moshe Dayan, and Teddy Kolleck, then one can appreciate that his contracts in Iran and his career in arms dealing and Hollywood have been done with the active collaboration of the Mossad.
"I'M AN AGENT"
Milchan is a "go-between for American weapons manufacturers and the Israeli government, thus playing a major role in the strengthening of the Israeli military," according to Current Biography (2000). "Throughout the 1970s, 1980s, and even up until the Gulf War in 1991, Milchan was Israel's foremost weapons procurer, brokering deals for such prized superweapons as the Hawk missile and the famous Scud-foil of the Gulf War, the Patriot," Bardach wrote.
"At different times in his career, his Israeli company, Milchan Brothers, has represented arms manufacturers such as Raytheon, North American Rockwell, Beechcraft, Bell Helicopter and Magnavox. Or, as Milchan downplays it, 'there were a bunch of them.' Nevertheless, he bristles at being called an arms dealer. 'I'm their rep in Israel,' he says emphatically. 'I get a fee, a commission. I'm not even the buyer. I'm an agent.'
"What we do is send my people to the United States," Milchan told Bardach, "so we know what these guys are talking about, and you go back and say to the buyer, 'I think this guy has some interesting stuff. Would you meet with him?' And then you arrange a meeting with the head of the [Israeli] air force and the head of this and the head of that."
In 1992, Milchan was described by the Jerusalem Post as being "among the handful of Hollywood moguls with the muscle and money to single-handedly give the go-ahead for a new movie project. The Mossad is undoubtedly the source of much of Milchan's "muscle and money."
Who pays Milchan's commissions? Whether the commission is paid by the weapon's vendor or by the state of Israel, the money going to Milchan is American money. He is paid either by the company or from the billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars provided to Israel for weapons every year. In this way, Milchan, Mossad's man in the middle, has been greatly enriched by U.S. weapons sales to Israel.
"BIG STAR" TO RAYTHEON
In 1975, for example, Milchan reportedly received an improper $300,000 commission paid by a Raytheon subsidiary for the sale of Hawk missiles. Raytheon makes the Patriot and Hawk missile systems and key components of the Global Hawk. Of particular interest is Raytheon's Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) which allow remote operators to pilot the Global Hawk from "thousands of miles away." This is the kind of technology that is thought to have been used in the terror attacks of 9-11.
Terry Gilliam told Bardach that he'll never forget a visit to the Paris Air Show with Milchan during the filming of Baron Munchausen. "It was wonderful to see how the whole arms business worked," Gilliam said. "Arnon was very psyched about the video games. He brought his son with him, who was then a teenager, to play the games, which can replicate the destruction of the planet. He took me to the Raytheon booth, and it was all showmanship. He was obviously a big star to Raytheon."
"Growing up, I would read that he was an arms dealer; he was in the Mossad, and he was a movie producer," his daughter Alexandra told Bardach. She is married to a Scott Lambert, an agent with William Morris in Beverley Hills and graduate of American University in Washington, D.C. (Lambert happens to share the same name of a former Director of Manufacturing Systems at Raytheon.)
MODUS OPERANDI
When one looks at Milchan's career as an Israeli agent who bought media outlets with dirty money one should consider that this may be the modus operandi he has employed to gain influence and outlets in the U.S. media market. Money laundering could explain his ability to make huge deals and control media networks - and his desire for secrecy.
"He's extremely powerful because he brings money to the table," journalist Anita Busch wrote. "He's unique in that way. He's got a credit line that's astronomical, like, you know, almost a billion dollars." Terry Gilliam, the director of Brazil, wondered where the money came from. "Arnon can be great, but when it comes to money there's something - I don't know - bits just don't seem to connect."
Charles McKeown, a film writer, had a hard time getting paid by the billion-dollar Israeli. "You just never know whether he was telling the truth or not," McKeown said. "The kind of deals he was in, the level of finance and the way he operated, seemed to me like a world upside down. I felt we were dealing with a sort of dangerous, shady quality."
MONEY LAUNDERER
In 1975, the Israeli government headed by Yitzhak Rabin and Defense Minister Shimon Peres recruited Milchan to launder money from South Africa. Milchan "has admitted laundering some of the more than $100 million spent by the South Africans during the 1970s in an attempt to improve the white government's image abroad," according to the authors of The Iran-Contra Connection. Because both Israel and South Africa were ostracized in the 1970s, "The money laundering was part of the two countries' plan to buy newspapers and other media in various parts of the world," his biography reads. "The Rabin government recruited ... Milchan to launder cash ... to purchase influential publications," Andrew and Leslie Cockburn wrote in their book Dangerous Liaison.
THE MIDDLEMAN
Milchan told Bardach he was asked by "prominent Israelis if 'we can use your companies to make deals to buy newspapers.' I said, 'Sure. It sounds like fun.' Basically, I was used as a middleman." A citizen of both Israel and Monaco, he is said to control thirty companies in seventeen countries, profiting in everything from film production to the weapons trade.
But how does one man control thirty companies in seventeen countries? Clearly there must be an entire team behind these businesses. Milchan's team could be called Team Mossad. "I'll say it in my own words," Milchan told Bardach. "I love Israel, and any way I can help Israel, I will. I'll do it again and again. If you say I'm an arms dealer, that's your problem. In Israel, there is practically no business that does not have something to do with defense."
Milchan also funds Christian Zionist movements. Milchan has reportedly contributed significantly to the Christian Coalition, an organization started by the Reverend Pat Robertson, a staunch supporter of Israel. He also underwrites the Israeli Network which transmits Israeli television programs to the United States and Canada via cable and satellite.
Milchan is also an owner of the Israeli television station known as Channel 10. The other owners are Ronald Lauder, who like Milchan owned about twenty-five percent, and Josef (Yossi) Maiman, who owns fifty-one percent and who has been with Channel 10 since it was founded in 2003. Rupert Murdoch bought nine percent of Channel 10 stock from Milchan and Lauder in 2006. Maiman, a Mossad agent, owns and controls a great deal of the gas fields of Turkmenistan. One of the main goals of the occupation of Afghanistan is to build a pipeline to bring the Israeli-owned gas of Turkmenistan to India and China. (Maiman and Lauder are both linked to the Mossad and 9-11. For more on Maiman read my article, "The Great Game: The War For Caspian Oil And Gas." Information about Lauder can be found in "Mossad -The Israeli Connection To 9-11")
SMUGGLING NUCLEAR TRIGGERS
Milchan should have been busted in 1985 for smuggling triggers for nuclear bombs, when a business associate, Richard Kelly Smyth, was indicted by a federal grand jury in Los Angeles on charges of smuggling 810 krytrons to Israel. Because krytrons are used as detonators or triggers for nuclear weapons, their export is tightly regulated.
In 1973, Smyth started a company called Milco International, Inc., financed, according to the Washington Post, by Milchan, hence its name. Up to eighty percent of Milco's business was reportedly with Milchan and Israel. In 1980, the federal indictment asserted, Smyth and Milco sent 610 krytrons to Israel without the necessary licenses, plus another 200 in 1982.
The 1985 indictment identified the Israeli buyers of the nuclear triggers as Heli Trading Ltd. and Milchan Brothers, two of Milchan's Israel-based companies. Federal authorities told NBC News in 1993 that Milchan also shared in the profits derived from the sales.
Announcement of the indictments came four days after the Israeli Defense Ministry, reacting to news of the grand jury probe, admitted that it had the devices, known as krytrons. The krytrons were shipped between 1979 and 1983 to an Israeli firm under contract to the government for defense work. The Israeli Ministry of Defense returned only 469 of the krytrons, and Smyth vanished a week before he was to appear for trial.
PROTECTING ISRAEL
Robert C. Bonner, the U.S. attorney in Los Angeles, refused to comment on questions about whether the Israeli government had been involved in the illegal actions. State Department spokesman Edward Djerejian said, "I can only note that the indictment does not mention any Israeli citizen."
Djerejian added that the United States "has expressed its serious concern to the Israeli government about this alleged violation of U.S. law" and had been assured that Israel would cooperate with the continuing U.S. investigation "to the full extent permitted under Israeli law."
"Smyth's disappearance, and the unwillingness of Israeli officials to cooperate with U.S. investigators on the case, left federal authorities unable to proceed," Robert Windrem of NBC News reported in July 2001. Although Milchan is not mentioned in the indictment, a Milco employe, Gretel Siler, who identified herself as corporate treasurer of Milco, told the Washington Post that Milchan had been associated with Milco in various export transactions and had been involved in purchasing the krytrons from the manufacturer, EG&G, of Wellesley, Massachusetts.
Milchan denied being involved in the $60,000 krytron deal, but told "60 Minutes" (CBS) that he had allowed the Israeli government to use his companies as conduits for trading with the United States. "I'm not saying I'm an innocent person - but in this specific case, I knew nothing about it," Milchan told Frank Rose of Premiere magazine. In any case, Milchan was never charged in the case.
Robert Mainhardt, a nuclear scientist and former director of Milco, told "60 Minutes" that he had resigned after Milchan had asked him to obtain advanced nuclear reactor designs and a supply of uranium hexachloride, which is used in the enrichment of bomb-grade uranium. Mainhardt's fellow directors at Milco, Arthur Biehl and Ivan Getting began to feel uneasy sometime in 1982, the Washington Post reported. The Washington Post did a series of articles about this smuggling. The most important excerpts are the following:
When they joined the board of directors of Milco International in 1980, Biehl and Getting recalled, they thought the company's primary business was developing aerospace software for U.S. military and space programs. They had been recruited by the company's owner, Richard K. Smyth, while serving with him on an influential panel that advises the U.S. Air Force on advanced technologies, work that required them to have top-secret clearances.
But they soon realized that Smyth, a California-based computer expert, spent most of his time trying to buy equipment with military applications, including a uranium byproduct known as "green salt" that can be processed into weapons-grade uranium, for the government of Israel. Often, they said, the sales were made through an Israeli middleman, Arnon Milchan, a flamboyant businessman who sold arms before becoming a producer of such popular movies as the recent Brazil.
"I didn't have any evidence there was anything improper," Biehl said. "I just thought it was a strange way to do business . . . . I wondered why the Israelis were paying fees to (Milco and Milchan) when they could get the same equipment directly" using U.S. foreign aid.
In late 1982, Biehl and Getting resigned from Milco's board of directors, in part because of their misgivings about Smyth's dealings with Milchan and Israel.
Asked why Israel didn't buy the krytrons through its 200-member procurement staff in New York, which buys military equipment with $1.8 billion in annual U.S. aid, Yossi Gal, spokesman with the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C., told the Post that Israel occasionally used "independent agents" to make purchases.
Under U.S. laws, Smyth needed a munitions license from the State Department to ship the krytrons overseas. If he had tried to obtain one, according to a knowledgeable State Department source, he would have been turned down because Israel has not signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
Smyth's relations with Israel began in the early 1970s when he was working for North American Rockwell as a chief engineer in its avionics division and traveled to Israel to help set up a subsidiary. There, he met Milchan, who was Rockwell's representative and "point man" with the Israeli government, according to an associate of Smyth from that period.
In January 1973, Smyth founded Milco while still working at Rockwell. His associate recalled Smyth once saying that Milchan provided money to start Milco; this associate said he believes that the name Milco was derived from Milchan.
At the time that Milco was founded, former U.S. intelligence officials said, the Central Intelligence Agency knew that Israel was working to perfect a solid-fuel tactical missile, known as the Jericho, that could carry nuclear warheads. In late 1973, Smyth's associate recalled, he saw Milco order forms for several barrels of a butyl compound used to bind explosive powders into solid rocket fuel. Smyth said he was shipping the butyl to Milchan through another company he owned in Houston, the associate recalled.
Smyth's next known contact with Israel occurred in 1975, about a year after he left Rockwell to run Milco full time. On Oct. 30 of that year, Smyth applied for a munitions license to ship 400 krytrons to Heli Trading Inc., Milchan's company in Israel.
The application, which is filed in court records in Los Angeles, said that the "end user" would be Rehovot Instruments Ltd. and that the krytrons would be used as "remotely located intrusion detectors."
Smyth filed the application after being told by an official from an unnamed U.S. intelligence agency that a license was required, according to court records. Smyth met with the official and told him that "Arnon Milchan [had] requested that a certain number of krytrons be shipped to Israel," according to a letter filed by William Fahey, the prosecutor in the current case.
Internal Milco records, provided by former Smyth associates, show that the company struggled financially from 1975 to 1980. It landed several small contracts for less than $25,000 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Air Force for studies on computer software for avionics systems in advanced aircraft, the MX missile and a small ship defense missile called the Patriot.
It was also in 1980, the federal indictment alleged, that Milco sent 610 krytrons to Israel in 11 shipments without obtaining the needed licenses. Smyth bought them from EG&G in Salem, Mass., the sole producer of the switches in the United States.
In mid-1981, Smyth listed several contracts with Heli Trading to acquire training simulators for Hawk air defense missiles, a voice scrambler and lasers. He also cited "probable" contracts for a computerized flight control system for Israel's Lavi fighter plane, and thermal batteries and gyroscopes.
James Russell, vice president of Incosym Inc., a maker of gyroscopes in Thousand Oaks, Calif., said he sold Milco several $10,000 gyroscopes in that period. Smyth told him the navigation aids would be used on Israeli navy patrol boats. Milco also won a flight control contract for the Lavi in 1983, according to a listing in Aviation Week magazine.
Smyth's world started to crumble in early 1983 after someone broke into Milco's offices and took several thousand dollars worth of computer and software equipment. Because he was doing some classified U.S. government work and feared some records of it might have been stolen, Smyth wrote a lengthy report about the theft for the Pentagon and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, then-company attorney Brian R. Carter said.
Milco company records revealed that Milchan's companies had ordered large quantities of missile-related equipment and materials between 1977 and 1982. Among the nuclear items listed were the 810 krytrons, plus neutron generators, high-speed oscilloscopes and high-voltage condensers, according to a 1996 paper on Israel's Nuclear Weapon Capability by the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control.
In August 1985, U.S. Customs subpoenaed the financial records linking Smyth and Milchan. The records were neither turned over nor found. Smyth and his wife disappeared just days before his scheduled trial, which almost certainly would have involved Milchan. "There were so many...indictments that they probably decided just to get out," Mainhardt, who operates a security business in Dublin, California, said. "If I had to make a guess, I'd say they're in Israel."
"Let's assume that there's nothing that Israel and the United States do separately," Milchan told Bardach. "Smyth, a U.S. fugitive for more than a decade, was last seen in Herzliya Pituach, an affluent suburb of Tel Aviv, where Milchan owns a home," Bardach wrote in 2000. In July 2001, Smyth was arrested in Malaga, Spain. Smyth pleaded guilty in December to one count of violating the Arms Export Control Act and one count of making a false statement to Customs agents. Proscutors dropped twenty-eight other counts.
On April 29, 2002 Smyth was sentenced to forty months in federal prison and fined $20,000 for illegally exporting to Israel the devices that are used as triggers for nuclear weapons. Smyth, 72, was immediately made eligible for parole at his sentencing.
MILCHAN AND PERES
"In Israel, Milchan spends much of his time with best friend Shimon Peres," Bardach wrote. She continued, "Milchan's political connections would prove to be the foundation of his future empire. In addition to agriculture, there would be biotechnology, advertising, aerospace, and the biggest jackpot of them all -- arms."
Arnon Milchan is deeply engaged in chemicals and helped build Israel's nuclear arsenal, which was developed by his good friend Shimon Peres. What does he know about the super-thermite that demolished the World Trade Center?
In 1953, at age thirty, Shimon Peres was appointed by Israel's first prime minister, David Ben Gurion, to become Director-General of the Ministry of Defense. Within three years, Peres had laid the foundation for Israel's nuclear weapon program, according to the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control. Peres started Israel's program to develop nuclear power and nuclear weapons by convincing the French to help Israel build a secret nuclear reactor beginning about 1957. He chose France as the major supplier, arranged the sale of a nuclear reactor, and spent the next decade overseeing the construction of the Dimona nuclear weapon production complex.
Peres is the one who came up with Israel's most often repeated nuclear declaration. At an April 1963 meeting in the White House, Peres responded to President John F. Kennedy's questions about Israel's nuclear program by saying: "Israel will not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons to the Middle East." Two years later, Prime Minister Levi Eshkol elevated Peres's words to Israel's official nuclear line.
Finis
Sources & Recommended Reading
Bardach, Ann Louise, "The Last Tycoon" Los Angeles Magazine, April 2000
http://www.bardachreports.com/articles/oa_20000400.html
Bollyn, Christopher, "Intel Expert Says 9-11 Looks Like A Hollywood Show" December 2001
Bollyn, "9/11: What Did Rupert Murdoch Know?" October 3, 2003
Bollyn, "Mossad - The Israeli Connection To 9-11" April 14, 2005
Bollyn, "Some Survivors Say Bombs Exploded in WTC" September 2001
Bollyn, "'Series of Explosions' in WTC - BBC" June 28, 2002
Bollyn, "9-11 Mossad Agents Admit Mission: 'Our Purpose Was to Document the Event'" June 28, 2002
Bollyn, "Why was Kobi Alexander Allowed to Flee? The Israeli Fugitive, Odigo, and the Forewarning of 9/11" August 24, 2006
Bollyn, "The Great Game: The War For Caspian Oil And Gas" October 14, 2001
Lima, Paolo, "Five men detained as suspected conspirators," Bergen Record, September 12, 2001
http://web.archive.org/web.../2bombvan200109125.htm
McArthur, Shirl, "A Conservative Estimate of Total Direct U.S. Aid to Israel: $108 Billion" Washington Report, July 2006
http://www.wrmea.com/archives/July_2006/0607016.html
Washington Post, "Computer Expert Used Firm to Feed Israel Technology" October 31, 1986
Washington Post, "L.A. Man Indicted in Export of Potential Nuclear Bomb Component to Israel" by John M. Goshko, May 17, 1985
Washington Post, "U.S. Asks to Inspect Israeli Atom Sites To Verify Use of Restricted Device" by John M. Goshko, May 15, 1985
Washington Post, "Israel Got U.S.-Made Devices" by John M. Goshko, May 14, 1985
Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control, "Israeli Nuclear Program Pioneered by Shimon Peres," The Risk Report, Volume 2 Number 4, July-August 1996
http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/israel/Israel-nuclear-peres.html
Israel Control of the Mass Media & the 9-11 Cover-Up, September 2, 2007
Final Edit – August 23, 2009
Latest Correction - February 22, 2010
IX - Who Really Controls Our Political Parties?
Chapter IX
Who Really Controls Our Political Parties?
Man was born free, and everywhere he is in chains. There are some who may believe themselves masters of others, and are no less enslaved than they. How has this change come about?
- Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract
Zionist Political Control
Politicians in the United States and Britain are made to pass under the yoke of their Zionist masters who control our leading political parties. By forcing our political leaders to accept the Zionist yoke our nations have become subjugated and the pro-Israel agenda has been forced upon the American and British people. Zionist control of Britain's prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown is explained in this chapter.
As the $700 billion bail-out of Zionist fraudsters was being debated in the U.S. Congress a supporter wrote to me saying, "I think we are out of time. If only more good people knew what you know!" I would say that it's not so much what I know, but rather my perspective and the directions I pursue in my investigations that are not found in the media. Because my anti-Zionist perspective is taboo, my views are censored by the Zionist-controlled media. Hence, most people are simply unaware of my research.
Having spent several years in Israel and the Middle East and having studied the history of Zionism (i.e. Jewish nationalism), I know something about the many crimes committed by Zionists during the past century. From this perspective I approach the evidence of Israeli and Zionist involvement in the major crimes of our time, such as 9-11. My investigations have uncovered a great deal of evidence of Israeli involvement in the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 and other crimes.
For journalists working in the controlled media, pursuing such investigations would be "career suicide," as many learned after 9-11. I have also paid a very high price for my research and writing. I learned that Jewish Zionists control even small so-called nationalist newspapers. Most journalists, lawyers, and politicians are primarily interested in advancing their own careers and learn early on to accept the yoke of their Zionist masters -- or sacrifice their careers. Ambitious people put their self interest first and agree to go along with lies and corruption rather than stand up for the truth. I've seen it many times.
I am not like that. During the past thirty years, I have witnessed first-hand the extremely brutal Israeli occupation of Palestine and seen how Zionists operate to subjugate entire nations. My years in Palestine/Israel were my political awakening. Zionist control of the mass media and Holocaust propaganda serve to protect and promote their criminal agenda. I have watched how the people of America and Europe are deceived and forced to bear the yoke of the ruthless Zionists who control their political systems and media. Thousands of young Americans and Europeans have been maimed or lost their lives in fraudulent wars for Israel in Middle Eastern nations about which they know nothing. Naïve Americans have become merciless mercenaries of Zionism.
As an American, I can't support either presidential candidate because both are clearly Zionist puppets who espouse positions to which I am strongly opposed. American voters aren't even given a real choice about important things – like the ongoing wars in the Middle East, for example. Both candidates eagerly support the Zionist "War on Terror" and both lobbied hard for the $700 billion "bail-out," which gave enormous sums of taxpayer money to Jewish investment bankers and A.I.G., headed by the financial criminal Maurice R. Greenberg.
Senators Obama and McCain are both solidly in the Zionist camp.
(Graphic - JewsforJesus.org)
I could only support a true anti-war candidate who promised a proper investigation of 9-11 and who supported investing in American infrastructure, such as providing comfortable and efficient passenger trains between our cities. Why are we bailing out investment bankers with taxpayers' money while our cities and infrastructure are crumbling?
Unfortunately, both presidential candidates are pro-war and pro-Israel. These are the only candidates from which to choose because both parties in the United States are political machines financed and run by Zionists. Third parties, such as the erstwhile Reform Party, are likewise controlled -- and run off the tracks. Zionist control of our political parties compels candidates from both parties to support Zionism, an utterly racist and un-American ideology based on a false and dangerous notion of Jewish supremacy. What kind of patriotic American could support that?
NO PARTIAL SOCIETY
Jean-Jacques Rousseau wrote in The Social Contract: "It is therefore important, if the general will is to be properly ascertained, that there should be no partial society within the state, and that each citizen should decide according to his own opinion. When one of the associations is big enough to triumph over all the others the outcome is no longer the sum total of small differences, but a single difference, then there is no longer any general will, and the opinion that prevails is only a particular opinion."
The "partial society" that triumphs over all the others in American politics today is Zionism -- no other. In the United States, the pro-Israeli position is the only "opinion that prevails" in academia, the mass media, and the political parties -- with absolutely no consideration for the expense, injustice, and violence that it causes. American support for Zionism has clearly been extremely detrimental for the United States of America, yet the support continues without question. How does this happen?
MOSSAD SPIED ON HAIDER
Israel and the international Zionists control the political parties and news outlets not only in the United States, but Europe as well, as the recent death of Austria's Jörg Haider reveals. Oddly, Haider, the leader of Austria's Freedom Party, allowed Peter Sichrovsky, a Jew, to serve as "secretary-general" of his supposedly anti-Zionist party. In 2005, The Times (UK) reported that Sichrovsky, the managing director of the party, had served as a spy for Israel's Mossad for five years. Three years later, after his party won parliamentary elections, Haider was suddenly killed in a very suspicious car accident.
“I wanted to help Israel and certainly did not do anything wrong,” Sichrovsky said. “It’s true, though, that I co-operated with Mossad until my withdrawal from politics in 2002.” Sichrovsky admitted that he had spied for Mossad, a foreign intelligence agency, because he "wanted to help Israel." At the same time he maintained that he did nothing wrong. This is exactly how a great many Jews feel about supporting Israel, even when their actions involve breaking the laws of the nations they reside in.
Facing a criminal investigation and charges of spying for a foreign power, Sichrovsky quickly fled to the United States where he began a new career as "a businessman concerned with military co-operation between Israel and China." Sichrovsky's career with Mossad evidently continued after he left Austria.
If Mossad infiltrates "third party" movements in small nations like Austria, imagine what they do to control the two political parties in the United States. How much control does Israeli intelligence have over the major political parties in Britain and the United States? Let's look at the most obvious connections.
MOSSAD CONTROLS BRITAIN
The evidence indicates that Israeli intelligence has near complete control of the leading political parties in Britain and the United States. While the Zionist political controllers in London and Washington are well known to the owners of the mass media, discussion of the subject of Zionist or Israeli control of the parties is censored in the media outlets they control. This censorship illustrates how Zionist control of the media serves to deceive the people and cause extreme harm to both nations.
Specific examples of the current pro-Israel bias in the mass media would include the media's unquestioning support of the 9-11 cover-up, the costly and disastrous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the trillion dollar "bail-out." The complete lack of transparency in U.S. elections and the secretive private companies that run our elections are also censored subjects.
The Zionist conspiracy called the "War on Terror" and the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have all been designed and forced onto the American and British nations by Zionists who control the political systems of London, New York, and Washington. In Britain, the two political leaders who have promoted and supported the Zionist agenda and wars of aggression are Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. Their Zionist paymasters and handlers are not hard to discern, although they are never discussed in the media in such terms.
"LORD CASHPOINT"
Michael Abraham Levy, or "Lord Levy," was known as "Lord Cashpoint" when he was the leading fundraiser for the Labour Party from 1994 to 2007. Described as "a long-standing friend of Tony Blair," Levy served as Blair's special envoy to the Middle East from 1998 until 2007, when he was replaced by Gordon Brown's appointee, Michael Williams.
Tony Blair with his Zionist handler, Michael Levy, a.k.a. "Lord Cashpoint"
Levy's son, Daniel, is an Israeli citizen (immigrated in 1991) who has held high-level positions in Israeli governments since 1995. While his father was bankrolling and managing Tony Blair, the younger Levy was a member of the Israeli negotiating team to the "Oslo 2" agreement during the summer of 1995 under Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. He was also a member of the Israeli delegation to the Palestinian summit at Taba in January 2001.
The younger Levy also served as senior policy adviser to former Israeli Minister of Justice, Yossi Beilin, from March 2000 to March 2001. Under Ehud Barak, Levy served as the prime minister's special adviser and head of the Jerusalem Affairs unit. The Levy link was obviously the connection that gave Israeli intelligence control over the head of the British government - Tony Blair.
Daniel Levy, Michael Levy's Israeli son
"WE HAVE TO DO IRAQ"
Before the Anglo-American occupation of Iraq turned sour, Blair was fond of recalling what he, the first foreign leader to meet George W. Bush, told the newly installed president when they met in early 2001. "We have to do Iraq," is the first thing Blair told Bush, according to his own statements.
Marching orders: "We have to do Iraq," is the first thing Tony Blair told Bush when they met in February 2001.
Only by understanding that Blair and his New Labour Party were financed and controlled by Israeli interests can one understand how Blair was manipulated to support such a reckless and criminal scheme. Similar Zionist forces were at work on Bush.
When Tony Blair and his Zionist handler "Lord Cashpoint" fell from power in June 2007, Gordon Brown, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, assumed the office of prime minister, upon the approval of Queen Elizabeth II. Prior to becoming prime minister, Brown had served ten years as Chancellor of the Exchequer, the minister responsible for economic and financial matters in Britain.
Prime Minister Brown, in turn, is bankrolled and controlled by Lord Ronald Cohen, who has replaced the beleaguered and disgraced Lord Levy. The Egyptian-born Cohen is described as "Sir Ronald Cohen, the daddy of England’s private equity industry and a bosom buddy of Prime Minister Gordon Brown."
Ronald Cohen with Gordon Brown at a Jewish Policy Research (JPR) reception at 11 Downing Street in June 2001. Lord Rothschild is president of Jewish Policy Research.
In the British press Cohen is portrayed as a wealthy Jewish supporter of Brown and New Labour. Cohen's third wife, the Los Angeles-born Sharon Harel-Cohen, is usually described as a film producer whose father, Yossi Harel, commanded the Jewish refugee ship that became known as Exodus in 1947. Her Israeli nationality is seldom discussed.
What the controlled media doesn't tell us about Sharon Harel-Cohen is that she is an Israeli-American whose father was one of the founding chiefs of the Mossad and Israeli military intelligence until his death in April 2008. This means the daughter of one of the founders of Israeli intelligence is part of the team controlling the British prime minister. This is how Mossad has controlled the political leadership of Britain since the 1990s and taken the United States and Britain into two costly and disastrous wars in the Middle East.
Sharon Harel-Cohen, daughter of Yossi Harel, a.k.a. Joseph Hamburger, chief of Israeli intelligence chief
Sharon Ruth Harel was born in Los Angeles on March 6, 1952. Her mother, a "Julie Berez" married Mossad officer Joseph Hamburger (a.k.a. Yossi Harel) in 1950 while he was stationed in Los Angeles. Harel was, most likely, engaged in the illegal procurement of weapons, ships, planes, and military technology for the Israeli military. The reports that Harel, one of the highest Mossad agents, was studying at UCLA or M.I.T. are neither substantiated nor credible; this was only his cover. Harel also had two sons, whose names are not known to the author.
(Whether Boaz and Ezra Harel, the two Israeli brothers who ran ICTS, the Mossad-run Israeli airport "security" company involved in the 9-11 attacks, are related to Yossi Harel is an open question.)
The Mossad ("agency") actually came into existence in the 1940s as the clandestine agency known as Ha'Mossad Le'Aliya Bet, the secret Zionist agency engaged in bringing Jewish refugees to British-occupied Palestine to swell the Jewish population prior to creating the "Jewish state." In 1946, Joseph Hamburger was sent on a secret mission to provide Mossad agents in Greece with gold to bribe European governments to facilitate the transit of Jews to Palestine, which was then illegal. Some Mossad tactics have not changed at all during the past sixty years -- they still buy politicians with gold.
Joe Hamburger (a.k.a. Yossi Harel) commanded four refugee ships and sailed to Israel with an estimated 25,000 immigrants during the period of the British Mandate. U.S. immigration records indicate that Mr. Hamburger used both his real name, Hamburger, and his Israeli name, Harel, during the 1950s, which is typical of Mossad agents.
Yossi Harel was a lifelong chief of Israeli intelligence.
His 2008 obituaries say that "Yosef" Hamburger was born, with a twin brother, in Jerusalem, British-occupied Palestine, in 1918. At age fifteen he joined the Haganah, the Zionist militia/terrorist group. Five years later he joined the Special Night Squad, an anti-Palestinian terrorist unit. In 1941, Harel joined the Palmach, the "strike force" of the Haganah before transferring to the Palyam, its naval unit.
During the 1948 Zionist war to conquer Palestine, Harel served as the liaison officer to the army’s chief of staff, Yaakov Dori, and played an important role in co-ordinating the Zionist campaign. He was also the personal body guard for Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizmann.
In 1954, Moshe Dayan, chief of staff of the Israeli Defense Forces, called Harel back to Israel to head Unit 131, a secret group that had agents in Arab countries. Harel's immediate task was to cover up the Lavon Affair, the Israeli false-flag terrorism plot designed to turn Britain and the United States against Egypt. David Ben-Gurion, the first Israeli prime minister, assigned Harel to rebuild military intelligence from the ground up. Ben-Gurion, Dayan, and Shimon Peres were actually part of the group that supported the use of false-flag terrorism, such as the Lavon bombings, to achieve their goals. Given this context, Harel must have seen eye-to-eye with Ben-Gurion about deploying Israeli agents in foreign nations. Shiploads of Israelis were sent on missions to America and Europe in the 1950s, often disguised as students.
Joseph Hamburger/Yossi Harel with David Ben Gurion
Harel went on to pursue a successful business career, the Telegraph reported, "which served as a cover for his work for Israeli intelligence."
Like the Democrat "turncoat" Lewis M. Eisenberg, the current head of finance for the Republican National Committee, Cohen changed political parties in order to bankroll the Labour Party of Tony Blair. Cohen was a candidate in the Liberal party in the 1970s and only converted to Blair's New Labour in 1996. Since then he has reportedly given Labour an estimated $5 million and bankrolled Gordon Brown's career.
At their home in London the Cohens reportedly give lavish parties for the likes of the Rothschilds, the Rausing billionaires, and Cohen’s old mentor, Sir Clive Sinclair. At their home in New York they entertain their friends the Clintons. They also have a villa at Mougins, near Cannes.
"Cohen moved into Brown’s orbit in 2000, when the chancellor appointed him chairman of a Treasury fund set up to encourage investment in deprived areas of the country. The next year he was rewarded with a knighthood," according to the Times 2005 profile entitled, "Sir Ronald Cohen: Midas with a mission - to make Gordon king."
Cohen began to replace Levy as Britain's liaison in the Middle East. In 2004, along with Blair and Brown, Cohen met Ehud Olmert, deputy to Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon.
As Brown replaced Blair, Cohen, the multimillionaire venture capitalist, replaced Levy as chief fundraiser for the ruling Labour party. About his connections to Israel, Cohen told the Times: "If you look at my history: born in Egypt, a refugee, married to the daughter of the commander of the Exodus who's an Israeli, there's an obvious connection between me and the region." Obvious, perhaps, but definitely not discussed in the media.
Cohen, who is called the prime minister's 'private banker', "clearly has influence over Gordon Brown," the Jewish Chronicle wrote in their 2007 interview: "So what exactly is his relationship with Brown? There is a seven-second pause. 'I would classify myself as a friend of the Prime Minister, just as I was a friend of Tony Blair,' he says carefully."
In 2006, Cohen "started to take over the role of government emissary from Lord Levy by meeting Israeli leaders, including the prime minister, Ehud Olmert," the Guardian reported.
Finis
Sources:
Painting - The Romans Passing Under the Yoke (1858) by Charles Gleyre (1808-1874)
Ashkenazi, Eli, "Commander of legendary Jewish immigrant ship Exodus dies at 90," Ha'aretz and Associated Press
Boyes, Roger, "Mossad spied on far-right Austrian," The Times (U.K.), June 2, 2005
Leppard, David and Robert Winnett, "Brown picks tycoon to back power bid," Sunday Times, January 16, 2005
Martin, Douglas, "Yossi Harel," New York Times, May 1, 2008
Martinson, Jane, "Sir Ronald Cohen: Financier who is hoping for a peace dividend," The Guardian, July 7, 2006
"Mossad spied on Austria's Haidar," United Press International, June 2, 2005
"Profile: Sir Ronald Cohen: Midas with a mission - to make Gordon king," The Sunday Times, January 23, 2005
Rowan, David, "Interview: Sir Ronald Cohen," Jewish Chronicle, September 22, 2007
Yossi Harel, The Times, April 30, 2008
How Mossad Controls Our Political Parties, October 25, 2008
Final Edit – August 24, 2009
Latest Correction - February 22, 2010
X - Who Runs the Obama White House?
Chapter X
Who Runs the Obama White House?
The day after Barack Obama was elected president, the Israeli press proudly proclaimed that the new president had chosen an Israeli, Rahm Emanuel, to manage the new administration. "Obama's first pick: Israeli Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff" was the Ha'aretz headline of November 6, 2008. The controlled press in the United States, however, keeps the American public unaware that Obama's new chief of staff is an Israeli, with terrorist roots and a sworn loyalty to the state of Israel.
Rahm Emanuel of Chicago, Chief of Staff of the Obama White House, served in the Israeli army in 1991 and is the son of a real Zionist terrorist. The late Sherman Skolnick of Chicago called Emanuel the "Acting Deputy Chief for North America of the Mossad - Israeli Intelligence." Skolnick reported that Emanuel's father Benjamin had been "part of the Israeli assassin team that murdered Sweden's Count [Folke] Bernadotte" in 1948. Bernadotte was the envoy of the United Nations in Palestine who sought to find a solution to the UN Partition Plan that gave Palestinian land to Jews from Poland and Russia.
Here are the key extracts from the Ha'aretz article:
A day after his historic election to become the first black American president, Barack Obama stepped into the role of president-elect yesterday, inviting Rahm Emanuel to join his administration as White House chief of staff, Democratic officials said.
Emanuel, a former Bill Clinton adviser, is the son of a Jerusalem-born pediatrician who was a member of the Irgun (Etzel or IZL), a militant Zionist group that operated in Palestine between 1931 and 1948…
Rahm Emanuel's father, Benjamin, yesterday refused to comment on the report that his son was appointed White House chief of staff. He told Ha'aretz that he would only comment after speaking to his son.
"Obama is a pro-Israeli leader and will be a friend to Israel ," he said, adding that he was pleased with Obama's election. He also said his son is the namesake of Rahamim, a Lehi combatant who was killed.
Rahm Emanuel is named after a Zionist fighter who belonged to the Stern Gang, which was a terrorist organization linked with the Nazis. Before moving to Chicago, his father was an active member of this terrorist group of assassins and bombers, which was also known as LEHI. This information is not discussed on CNN. The controlled media censors these disturbing, but important facts.
Emanuel's father, Benjamin, told Ma'ariv, a Hebrew-language Israeli paper, that his son's appointment would be good for Israel. "Obviously he will influence the president to be pro-Israel," the Jerusalem Post reported. "Why wouldn't he be? What is he, an Arab? He's not going to clean the floors of the White House."
Rahm Emanuel with his brothers and father, a Zionist terrorist from the Irgun and LEHI
The Obama White House chief of staff speaks Hebrew and spends most summers in Tel Aviv, his Israeli father proudly told Ma'ariv. After Emanuel was named chief of staff, none of the Zionist-controlled media outlets in the United States mentioned the Emanuel family roots with the Nazi-linked terror gangs in Palestine in the 1930s and 40s. Naftali Bendavid of the Zionist-owned Chicago Tribune, for example, wrote a book about Emanuel and spent a great deal of time with him, but completely avoided Rahm's Israeli roots in the Tribune article he wrote on November 6.
"POLITICAL ASSASSIN"
Bendavid wrote that Emanuel "is best known as something of a Democratic political assassin" who "might not appear to be the obvious choice for White House chief of staff for a president-elect who speaks eloquently of setting aside partisan differences and bringing the country together."
Emanuel is known for using gangster tactics to threaten people. He once mailed a rotting dead fish to a campaign pollster who had not produced results to Emanuel's liking. Sending a dead fish to a person is a well-known Mafia message, which warns the recipient that he will "sleep with the fishes" unless he heeds the warning.
Rolling Stone magazine revealed more of Emanuel's gangster behavior in an article entitled "The Enforcer" on October 20, 2005:
"The night after Clinton was elected, Emanuel was so angry at the president's enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers, shouting "Dead! . . . Dead! . . . Dead!" and plunging the knife into the table after every name. "When he was done, the table looked like a lunar landscape," one campaign veteran recalls. "It was like something out of The Godfather. But that's Rahm for you."
"Republicans are 'bad people who deserve a two-by-four upside their heads.'"
- Rahm Emanuel, New York Times, January 24, 2009
Emanuel certainly seems to have a penchant for violence, which might not seem so unusual for a person named after two Irgun terrorists: one named Rahamim (Rahm), and the other an uncle named Emanuel. Bendavid's book was cited by the New York Times of January 24, 2009, as being the source of the Emanuel quote that Republicans are "bad people who deserve a two-by-four upside their heads." Once again, the Times article, entitled "Obama's Partisan, Profane Confidant Reins It In", conspicuously failed to mention Emanuel's Israeli roots. Obviously, the New York Times clearly considers this information that it would prefer the reader not know. This is a perfect example how the Zionist-controlled media controls public opinion by omitting important information.
It should come as no surprise that the New York Times article chooses not to mention Emanuel's Israeli roots -- or the fact that his father was a member of the Irgun, the most murderous terrorist group in Palestine in the 1930s and 40s. The New York Times is the leading Zionist-controlled newspaper in the United States by virtue of the fact that it has been controlled by the Sulzberger family, founding members of B'nai B'rith (secret organization of Jewish Freemasons) Lodge No. 1 of New York, for more than one hundred years. Likewise, the Chicago Tribune and Los Angeles Times are both owned by a Chicago Zionist named Samuel Zell.
Sam Zell's parents, named Zielonka, left Poland in 1939.
The Zionist controlled media also failed to investigate the evidence of Emanual's involvement with the impeached Illinois governor, Rod Blagojevich, and his role in the activity that led to Blagojevich being removed from office. Blagojevich specifically told CNN's Larry King that he wanted the tapes of his conversations with Rahm Emanuel released. So, why weren't they? Why is Emanuel being protected?
Impeached Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich and Rahm Emanuel
Emanuel's brother, Ariel, is film-maker Michael Moore's agent. The day after the election, Moore joked about Emanuel's appointment on the Larry King Show. Moore made a film about 9-11, produced by the Weinstein brothers, which completely avoided mentioning the many Israeli connections to the terror attacks. This is a good example of how the so-called "alternative" media is just as controlled as is the "mainstream" media – by Zionist Jews.
Rahm and Ariel, Michael Moore's Hollywood agent
Americans should be aware that this violent and uncouth Israeli is running the White House under Barack Obama. The chief of staff controls the people around the president - he decides who sees the president, what he hears, and what he knows. The people surrounding the president report to the chief of staff. Emanuel is the intellectual handler of President Obama (a continuation of the role he has played for years) and the controller of the White House. How do you think having an Israeli gangster with terrorist roots running the White House will affect U.S. relations with Iran, Russia, the Palestinians - and the rest of the world?
Emanuel actually left the United States to serve in the Israeli army in 1991. A person from any other nation would lose his U.S. citizenship for serving in a foreign military. Why are Israelis running the U.S. government? The Zionists are in the process of accumulating power and not afraid of showing it or using it. This is a very dangerous development.
NAMED AFTER LEHI TERRORIST
Emanuel's father said Rahm is "the namesake of Rahamim, a Lehi combatant." LEHI, a.k.a. the Stern Gang, was the most radical Zionist terrorist group in the 1940s. The Stern Gang killed scores of British soldiers and assassinated both Lord Moyne and Count Folke Bernadotte (the United Nations envoy from Sweden). They also killed hundreds of innocent Palestinians, such as the civilian population of Deir Yassin. This Zionist terror group was allied with the Nazis in their war against the British. Both of Emanuel's parents, Benjamin Emanuel (formerly Auerbach) and Marsha Smulevitz, lived in Israel and are related to Lehi fighters. This is to say that Emanuel's father, a Jew, fought with the Nazis.
Why would a dedicated Zionist, born in Jerusalem, and a dedicated member of a Zionist terrorist organization, move to Chicago after the creation of the state of Israel? Had he given up on the Zionist state? Not at all, Benjamin Emanuel had embarked on a new mission for Israel – a mission for life.
After the failed "Lavon Affair," a series of failed Zionist false-flag terror attacks in Egypt, Israeli intelligence was revamped by Yossi Harel, a.k.a. Joseph Hamburger. Israel sent scores of high-level agents to the United States, often with an American spouse. The Emanuel family of Chicago is one of them; the Chertoff family of New Jersey is another; Yossi Harel went to Los Angeles. There are many more.
Rahm Emanuel is the same Israeli who ran the White House under Bill Clinton, as one of Clinton's senior advisors. Emanuel is the person who pushed through the disastrous NAFTA legislation, a bill that devastated the U.S. manufacturing sector. It should be remembered that it was during the Clinton administration, while the president dallied with his chunky Jewish girlfriend, that the foundation of the Zionist terror network that pulled off 9-11 was laid. Now, Rahm Emanuel, the son of a terrorist, is back in the Oval Office.
Emanuel is part of the Chicago-based team of political Zionists with David Axelrod, Obama's chief campaign strategist. Obama thanked Axelrod by name during his victory speech in Chicago's Grant Park. Axelrod's father, Joseph, a Jewish immigrant from someplace near the Black Sea, hanged himself in 1974 when David was a nineteen-year-old student at the University of Chicago. His mother was a communist journalist in New York.
David Axelrod - Obama's chief political strategist and handler
Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod have been working together since 1984 when they teamed up to help Paul Simon defeat Sen. Charles Percy (R-Ill.). These hard-core Zionists were not working for reform in Illinois; their only agenda was to defeat the incumbent Sen. Percy because he was the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee and was pushing for a settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. These Zionist agents went on to manage the Chicago mayoral campaign of Richard M. Daley, the son of Richard J. Daley. Finally, these two Zionists spearheaded the campaign to put Barack Obama into the White House. Axelrod and Emanuel, however, were sponsored by a much higher Zionist -- Bettylu Saltzman, the daughter of Chicago's super-Zionist, Philip M. Klutznick.
Bettylu Saltzman - daughter of Chicago's Philip M. Klutznick
Axelrod has been creating and shaping Candidate Obama since 1992. "Axelrod met Obama when the senator was 30 years old and coordinating a voter-registration drive in Chicago and Betty Lou Saltzman, a doyenne of progressive politics in Chicago, suggested that the two get to know each other," the New York Times reported in early 2007. "In the 15 years since, Axelrod has worked through Obama's life story again and again, scouring it for usable political material."
Bettylu Saltzman has been supporting and financing Obama's political career since 1992, long before he ran for office. Saltzman is the only daughter of the Zionist leader, Philip Morris Klutznick. In 1992, when Obama was thirty years old, Saltzman told Axelrod and others, "He will be our first black president.'' Saltzman then commissioned Axelrod to create Obama, the presidential candidate.
Philip M. Klutznick
Saltzman's father, Philip M. Klutznick, was Israel's biggest supporter in Chicago. Klutznick, who passed away in August 1999, was the former president of B'nai B'rith International (1953-59), president of the World Jewish Congress, general chairman of the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), president of the American Friends of the Hebrew University, vice-president of the Jewish Welfare Board, a founder of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, president of the Memorial Foundation for Jewish Culture, and vice president of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, among other things.
Axelrod and Emanuel have been creating the Obama image since 2003. "For four years Axelrod has had camera crews tracking virtually everything Obama has done in public -- chatting up World War II vets in southern Illinois, visiting his father's ancestral village in western Kenya -- and there were days when the camera crews have outnumbered the civilians," Ben Wallace-Wells reported in the New York Times article of April 1, 2007.
Obama, the politician, was created by David Axelrod, who writes his speeches and guides his political strategy.
CHANGE?
In October 2008 I warned readers that the Obama ticket was really a hard-core Zionist ticket in disguise. In my article "Colin Powell: Liar & War Criminal Endorses Obama," I advised my readers of the Israeli gangsters behind Obama:
Powell's endorsement of Obama, a puppet of the Israeli Rahm Emanuel, has less to do with Obama's African roots than with getting Emanuel and his Zionist gangsters back into control of the Oval Office. Emanuel, the real boss of the Democratic party, is the son of a real Israeli terrorist (Irgun and Lehi) and thug-in-chief of the party.
What can we expect from the Obama presidency? Elected on a platform of "Change" after eight years of a very unpopular and dictatorial Bush regime, we would expect a substantial change from the disastrous policies of the previous administration. So what changes will we see? Will we see an end to the costly and illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Will the senior officials of the Bush administration who willfully lied to start these wars of aggression be held accountable for their war crimes? Will we finally have a proper and independent investigation of 9-11? Will the oppressive Department of Homeland Security be dismantled?
If the war criminals are not held accountable and the most egregious criminal policies of the Bush administration are not changed and reversed – what exactly does the Obama "Change" slogan mean? Changing the curtains? Changing the Israelis in the White House?
Change of Zionist Jewish "investment bankers" at the White House: Joshua Bolten, the son of a C.I.A. agent and second Jewish chief of staff in U.S. history, greets Rahm Emanuel, Obama's chief of staff, erstwhile investment banker, and son of an Israeli terrorist. Bolten served in the administration of George H. W. Bush (1989-93) before becoming executive director of legal and governmental affairs at Goldman Sachs (London, 1994-1999). He left Goldman Sachs to serve as policy director for the presidential campaign of George W. Bush (March 1999 to November 2000). Bolten became Deputy Chief of Staff for George W. Bush in January 2001 and Chief of Staff in April 2006. Bolten is credited with recruiting Henry Paulson - CEO of Goldman Sachs - to serve as Treasury Secretary in July 2006. Paulson crafted the disastrous A.I.G. bailout in which Goldman Sachs became the largest single recipient of taxpayer funds ($12.9 billion), an immense financial scam in which the profits went to private banks -- and the costs to the U.S. public.
WHO IS PETER ORSZAG?
One of the key players in the Obama administration's $900 billion economic stimulus package is Obama's new budget director Peter R. Orszag. The forty-year-old Orszag is the director of the Office of Management and Budget, the arm of the White House responsible for crafting the federal budget and overseeing the effectiveness of federal programs. He worked closely with Rahm Emanuel in the Clinton administration - when the disastrous NAFTA legislation was passed - and was one of the first Obama appointees to be approved.
Peter R. Orszag
"In the coming years, no bureaucrat will be as decisive as Peter Orszag," Ezra Klein wrote recently in The American Prospect. So, who is Peter Richard Orszag and what kind of decisions will he make with the budget he controls? Based on his background one would be well advised to prepare for a financial train wreck.
Peter Orszag has an interesting resume. He has played key roles in some of the biggest financial scandals of our time. Orszag was, for example, an advisor to the Russian Finance Ministry during the reign of the Jewish oligarchs as they plundered the wealth of Russia. He was an advisor to the Central Bank of Iceland before it crashed in 2008. During the Clinton administration, Orszag was an advisor to Rahm Emanuel and Bill Clinton on the disastrous NAFTA bill that has devastated the U.S. manufacturing sector.
Oddly, Orszag's background has received virtually no attention in the media. He has a troubling background, which deserves to be looked at very carefully. Orszag, for example, should start by explaining exactly what happened to the Icelandic economy. Orszag was, after all, the founder and president of the economic consultancy firm which advised the Central Bank of Iceland - before it went bankrupt. How did Icelandic banks become so indebted? Ask Peter Orszag.
Orszag is an economist who served six years in the Clinton administration (1993-98) under Robert E. Rubin, the former treasury secretary who recently resigned from his senior position at the woefully mismanaged and nearly bankrupt Citigroup. The fact that Orszag was a protégé of the now disgraced Rubin certainly does not bode well for the Obama administration. Rubin strongly opposed the regulation of derivatives when such regulation was proposed in 1997. Credit derivatives of mortgage-backed securities were the key reason for the recent failure of a number of large financial institutions, including AIG and Citigroup.
In 1999, Rubin joined Citigroup as a board member and a participant "in strategic managerial and operational matters of the company." The Wall Street Journal noted that Citigroup shareholders suffered losses of more than 70 percent since Rubin joined the firm and that he encouraged changes that led the firm to the brink of collapse. In December 2008, investors filed a lawsuit contending that Citigroup executives, including Rubin, sold shares at inflated prices while concealing the firm's risks.
Orszag, a Jew, served on the president's Council of Economic Advisers in 1993, under Rubin, when the Israeli Rahm Emanuel, Clinton's senior adviser, was pushing the disastrous NAFTA legislation through Congress. Prior to joining the Clinton team, Orszag was an economic adviser for the Russian Ministry of Finance in Moscow from 1992-93. This was a period of rampant financial criminality during which many Russian mineral assets came under the control of the so-called Jewish oligarchs who became instant billionaires. Most of these oligarchs fled Russia when their crimes were exposed and now live in Britain or Israel, where they obtained citizenship.
Born in Boston on December 16, 1968, Orszag graduated from Princeton University in 1991. He then attended the London School of Economics, where he earned a degree in 1992 and where he obtained his PhD in 1997. The London School of Economics was established by members of the Fabian Society, who believed in advancing socialism through gradual reforms. The Fabian Society is a British socialist movement, whose purpose is to advance the principles of social democracy via gradualist and reformist, rather than revolutionary means. The ideology of the Fabians is said to be described in the quote, "Fabianism feeds on Capitalism, but excretes Communism."
In 1998, after serving in the Clinton administration, Orszag co-founded an economic consulting group company with his brother and Joseph Stiglitz called Sebago Associates, where he served as president through 2007. The firm's clients have included the World Bank, the Nordic Council of Ministers, and most notably, the Central Bank of Iceland. The once prosperous economy of Iceland has been devastated by the current economic crisis, which its citizens say was carried out by a gang of financial criminals who followed disastrous policies and advice - provided by Peter Orszag and Company.
Americans would be well advised to be extremely vigilant with dangerous "Young Turks" like Peter Orszag and Rahm Emanuel running the Obama White House and the U.S. budget.
The United States government today is not unlike the oil tanker Sirius Star, hijacked by Somali pirates, except that the ship of state has been taken over by an organized gang of Zionist pirates, an organization most people don't even know exists. This organization was created by members of the Zionist terror groups, the Hagana, Irgun, Lehi, and their Mossad network. Members of these groups were sent to the United States in the 1950s to raise dedicated Zionist agents that would look and sound like Americans - but think like Israelis. In this way Zionists have gained control over our government and media without the passengers even noticing. The only thing that most Americans notice is that the voyage is not as smooth as they had expected and the ship seems to be sinking. The Zionist-controlled media assures us, however, that all is well. Dream on.
Israeli intelligence is like the criminal organization, Quantum, in the latest James Bond film. They are everywhere, supporting politicians on both sides of the aisle, creating and running governments from the left and the right, yet you don't even know they exist. Over the past six decades, Israeli agents have infiltrated every agency of the U.S. government and gained access to the most critical computer networks.
In order to understand what the Obama administration will mean for America and the world, it is essential to understand the Zionist agents behind Obama.
Finis
Sources and Recommended Reading
Bendavid, Naftali, "Rahm Emanuel mulls chief of staff role in Barack Obama's administration," Chicago Tribune, November 6, 2008
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-rahm6nov06,0,2553769.story
Bollyn, Christopher, "Son of a Zionist Terrorist: Rahm Emanuel's Dirty Secret," November 17, 2006
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/read/95806
Bollyn, Christopher, "Colin Powell: Liar & War Criminal Endorses Obama," October 16, 2008
Bollyn, Christopher, "ELRON - VOXEO: The Israeli Defense Firm That Tallies the Iowa Caucus," December 31, 2007
Bumiller, Elisabeth, "The Brothers Emanuel," New York Times, June 15, 1997
"Emanuel to be Obama's chief of staff," Jerusalem Post, November 6, 2008
Green, Joshua, "The Enforcer," Rolling Stone, October 20, 2005
Klutznick, Philip M., Biography from Biographical Directory of the United States Executive Branch, 1774-1989 (1990), edited by Robert Sobel, Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CT
"Obama's first pick: Israeli Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff," November 6, 2008, Ha'aretz
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1034855.html
Wallace-Wells, Ben, "Obama's Narrator," New York Times, April 1, 2007
The Israeli Who Runs the Obama White House, November 6, 2008
Final Edit – August 24, 2009
Latest Correction - February 22, 2010
XI - The Fleecing of America: 9-11 and the Crisis on Wall Street
Chapter XI
The Fleecing of America: 9-11 and the Crisis on Wall Street
Maurice R. Greenberg, chief fraudster of A.I.G. and 9-11 conspiracy suspect. Greenberg's fraudulent company received more than $180 billion from the U.S. Treasury in the Bush-Obama bail-out.
"[The bail-out plan] does nothing basically for the stressed mortgage payer. It does a lot for three or four or five banks… "
- Sen. Richard Shelby, (R-Alabama)
"I've never seen people so angry. Our calls are a hundred to one against this bail-out. They don't trust the government."
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina)
American Taxpayers Forced to Bail Out financial Gangsters
The current financial crisis in the United States involves some of the very same Zionist criminals and entities discussed in the earlier chapter, "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11."
The collapse of their criminal scams on Wall Street could very well expose more clandestine intrigues involving the Zionist gangsters behind 9-11, if it were allowed to happen. Such outrageous criminal scams cannot be kept hidden for long. The criminals behind this latest financial scam need to be brought down – not propped up. If anyone should be in Guantanamo facing harsh interrogation for answers about 9-11, it is people like Maurice Greenberg and Michael Chertoff.
The government loan of $85 thousand millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars ($85 billion) to keep afloat Maurice Greenberg's criminal operation, American International Group (A.I.G.), brings into the spotlight one of the key individuals in the Zionist criminal network behind 9-11.
Maurice Greenberg and his fraudulent company A.I.G. have paid fines of more than $1 billion for various financial crimes. Greenberg was personally fined more than $130 million in 2009. Why was Greenberg's criminal racket bailed out?
CRIME PAYS: $85 BILLION FOR GREENBERG
Where's the outrage? If George W. Bush is not directly related to Isadore Bush, the Jewish wine merchant who headed the B'nai B'rith lodge in St. Louis in the late 1800s, he just as well ought to be. As president, George W. Bush has done more to advance the agenda of the secretive Jewish brotherhood of Freemasons, the real Elders of Zion, than any other political leader in living memory. The proposed plan to use $700 billion taxpayer dollars to bail out the Zionist gangsters of Wall Street is Bush's coup de grâce, the final thrust of the dagger of a treasonous president into the bleeding body politic.
The Zionist plan to bail out A.I.G. and its criminal boss, Maurice R. Greenberg, with a government loan of $85 billion dollars should have all American taxpayers up in arms. This is, after all, taxpayer money they are stealing. The $700 billion bail-out is described by the New York Times as "an ambitious effort to transfer the bad debts of Wall Street into the obligations of American taxpayers." Make no mistake about it, this is a massive transfer of American wealth to Zionist criminals - a huge "rip-off" in plain English.
On Friday, September 26, 2008, President Bush scrambled to bring rebellious members of his own party behind a $700 billion dollar taxpayer bail-out of Wall St. banks amid bitter political recriminations from both Democrats and Republicans over collapsed negotiations, the AP reported. Sen. Richard Shelby, an Alabama Republican, said many GOP lawmakers dislike the proposal that has been pushed on the administration's behalf principally by Henry Paulson. "Basically, I believe the Paulson proposal is badly structured," he said. "It does nothing basically for the stressed mortgage payer. It does a lot for three or four or five banks."
USING FEAR TO SOFTEN RESISTANCE
Like all dictators, President Bush employed fear and deception to accomplish his criminal agenda. His prime-time speech to the nation on Wednesday, September 24, is a classic example of how an un-elected president used fear to soften public resistance to the $700 billion bail-out of criminal enterprises like A.I.G. His speech was short on facts and long on fear. It should be noted that Bush is the same man who lied to the world about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, and who recklessly started two illegal wars of aggression after 9-11, which he and his vice president Dick Cheney refused to investigate.
The keystone to the Bush-Bernanke $700 billion bail-out is the $85 billion being made available to Maurice Greenberg's A.I.G. As I point out in this article, A.I.G. is a criminal operation, which engaged in illegal conduct for many years. American taxpayer money should never be used to support criminal operations like A.I.G.
Here is the key paragraph from Bush's prime time televised speech, which was clearly meant to put fear in American hearts:
The government's top economic experts warn that without immediate action by Congress, America could slip into a financial panic, and a distressing scenario would unfold: More banks could fail, including some in your community. The stock market would drop even more, which would reduce the value of your retirement account. The value of your home could plummet. Foreclosures would rise dramatically. And if you own a business or a farm, you would find it harder and more expensive to get credit. More businesses would close their doors, and millions of Americans could lose their jobs. Even if you have good credit history, it would be more difficult for you to get the loans you need to buy a car or send your children to college. And ultimately, our country could experience a long and painful recession.
A $700 billion expenditure on distressed mortgage-related assets would be roughly what the country has spent in direct costs on the Iraq war and more than the Pentagon's total yearly budget appropriation. The bail-out would cost every man, woman and child in the United States more than $2,000 — before interest.
Fed chairman Ben Shalom Bernanke held a series of conference calls with members of Congress to push the bail-out. No wonder hard-working Americans despise Jewish crooks like Maurice Greenberg and Ben Bernanke. I don't understand why the public is not protesting and burning tires in the streets of American cities. It is certainly no secret that A.I.G. is a criminal operation; this is known to anyone who reads the newspapers. Doesn't anybody read the papers?
Why are Americans not massively protesting this proposed bail-out? To my mind, it can only be because the news coverage of the huge bail-out never mentions Greenberg's long history of criminal activity. The bail-out, now proposed at $700 billion, is portrayed as something that is necessary to save the economy of Main Street -- not a bail-out for Zionist criminals of the highest magnitude.
"IF WE WERE LEGAL, WE WOULDN'T BE IN BUSINESS"
It should be noted that my accusations about Greenberg's criminality are well documented, in the New York Times, for example. The following article entitled "Excerpts from Complaint Against A.I.G. by New York," dated May 27, 2005, reveals that Greenberg was aware of the criminal nature of A.I.G.'s business — and that he wanted to keep it that way:
Following are excerpts from the complaint filed yesterday against American International Group (A.I.G.); its former chief executive, Maurice R. Greenberg (M.R.G.); and its former chief financial officer, Howard I. Smith, by the New York attorney general and the New York superintendent of insurance:
Both Greenberg and Smith had a direct personal interest in A.I.G.'s stock price; both held hundreds of thousands of shares of A.I.G. stock. For example, the value of Greenbergs's holdings increased or decreased approximately $65 billion for every dollar A.I.G. stock moved.
For over a decade, A.I.G. engaged in a scheme to mischaracterize premiums paid on the workers' compensation line of insurance…
In 1991, A.I.G.'s general counsel, newly arrived from a law firm, undertook a review of the practice… In his interviews, the general counsel learned about the cost that the company would have to incur to 'get legal.' It would have to hire about 40 new people to do filings properly, charge clients more and pay 'much higher' assessment fees.
Indeed, the general counsel's notes reflect that at one stage, an employee went to A.I.G.'s president and was told 'that M.R.G. [Maurice R. Greenberg] did not want him to change things to make it legal – he wants to continue as is.'
In another interview, a witness recounted a meeting that he and others had with Greenberg. According to the notes, M.R.G. asked, 'Are we legal?' When an employee responded, 'If we were legal, we wouldn't be in business,' then M.R.G. began laughing and that was the end of it.
Maurice Greenberg's son, Jeffrey, headed Marsh & McLennan Companies, the nation's largest insurance broker, which took kickbacks and colluded with A.I.G. to rig bids, artificially jacking up the premiums companies pay for liability insurance, according to a civil fraud complaint filed by New York Attorney General Eliot L. Spitzer in 2004.
The civil fraud complaint named A.I.G., Hartford Financial Services Group Inc., ACE Ltd. (another Greenberg company), and a division of Munich Re as active participants in the scheme. Jeffrey Greenberg, resigned in October 2004, less than two weeks after Marsh & McLennan was accused of cheating customers. Oddly, as a result, Eliot Spitzer said that he would not bring criminal charges against Marsh. Although Maurice Greenberg was also forced to resign as CEO of A.I.G, he maintained a great deal of control of the company through his ownership of stock and managing companies such as Starr International and C.V. Starr.
Jeffrey Greenberg resigned from Marsh & McLennan after being accused of serious financial crimes. The first plane of 9-11 flew directly into his company's secure computer room in the North Tower. Coincidence or conspiracy?
A.I.G. GUILTY OF CRIMINAL FRAUD
At least two senior A.I.G. executives pleaded guilty to criminal fraud, acknowledging that they had schemed with Marsh and submitted uncompetitive bids to help the broker steer clients to other companies. While it was under investigation in 2005, A.I.G. disclosed "extensive accounting irregularities." The company's earnings for the past five years were adjusted by some $4 billion. In 2004, Greenberg was paid at least $20 million from Starr International, his private company in Panama, and A.I.G.
Why is the U.S. government bailing out known criminals rather than arresting them? Are we laughing as President Bush and his Zionist advisers and appointees award Greenberg's criminal conduct with an $85 billion bail-out? Is this another major piece of evidence that the U.S. government is a "crimocracy"? Could this bail-out of criminals be stopped if Americans protested loudly enough?
The key person in the Zionist crimocracy behind the bail-out is Ben Shalom Bernanke, the "head of the Fed." [Here Ben does not stand for Benjamin, it is Hebrew for "son," in this case meaning "son of peace."]
Ben Shalom Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve, and Henry Paulson, Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, crafted the bail-out program that robbed U.S. taxpayers to benefit A.I.G. and private bankers.
EARLY WARNINGS IGNORED
A.I.G. was already deemed to be a "shaky insurance company" in a 1990 report conducted by Ralph Nader's Public Citizen. Despite protests and threats from the criminal Greenberg, Public Citizen maintained its "critical assessment" of A.I.G. Greenberg threatened to sue Public Citizen if the consumer group didn't retract its comments on the company "in the next several days."
"I'm angry," Greenberg said, adding like a street thug, "First learn the facts before you shoot your mouth off." Joan Claybrook, Public Citizen president, responded to Greenberg's threats in a letter. Public Citizen "remains fully satisfied with the report's conclusions concerning A.I.G.," Claybrook wrote. After a re-examination of the facts, Claybrook stood by her critical assessment of A.I.G. The company had indeed failed four of the six tests that show whether an insurance company could withstand a severe economic slump. Public Citizen was right, yet some 18 years later American taxpayers were forced to bail out Greenberg's fraudulent operation.
Where's the outrage? If such a huge bail-out were to be demanded from the citizens of any other country, you can be sure that the key players would be scrutinized before one cent of public funds were made available. In America, however, the controlled media censors all information about who is really responsible for this immense transfer of wealth – from the people to the criminals.
THE DEVOTED ZIONIST BEHIND THE A.I.G. BAIL-OUT
It should come as no surprise that the key person behind this unprecedented government bail-out of A.I.G., a Zionist criminal operation, is himself a devoted Zionist. Ben Shalom Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve System, is another Hebrew-speaking scion of the Jewish Theological Seminary of New York City, like Michael Chertoff and Alvin K. Hellerstein.
How can it be that the sons of a very small group of uneducated Jews from Eastern Europe, who immigrated to the Bronx in the 1900s, now largely control a nation of 250 million non-Jews? If you were to ask a Zionist Jew from the Jewish Theological Seminary why they seek to control America, they would probably say: "Because we can."
Growing up, Bernanke attended the extremist Zionist summer camp (Ramah) of the Jewish Theological Seminary (JTS) where he was immersed for months in Zionist ideology – in Hebrew. During college in the early 1970s, Bernanke worked for a Jewish political crime boss in South Carolina.
BERNANKE'S YEARS WITH THE CRIME BOSS OF DILLON
Ben Bernanke went to Harvard University and graduated with a B.A. in economics in 1975. Throughout college Bernanke had a rather odd summer job for an Ivy League student of economics. Every summer he returned to Dillon, South Carolina, to work for Alan Heller Schafer, the well-known Jewish criminal and political boss who ran a sprawling roadside gambling and drinking establishment called "South of the Border." The adjacent counties in North Carolina had been "dry counties" when Schafer originally started his drinking and gambling establishment. Such was Schafer's clout that he was able to have the route of Interstate 95 changed so it passed his saloon and gambling operation.
Alan Schafer was, after all, the long-standing chairman of the Democratic Party in Dillon County, where, since 1966, he ran the "state's smoothest-running political machine" by buying votes. Schafer's political machine maintained power, said Craig C. Donsanto, director of the Justice Department's Election Crimes Branch, through a "carefully controlled and sophisticated system of rigging elections," the New York Times reported in 1982. This is the crime boss that Bernanke worked for, every summer, while he studied at Harvard.
Alan H. Schafer, criminal political boss of Dillon, South Carolina
"Alan didn't want any more stump meetings because they threatened his candidates," said A.W. (Red) Bethea, 66, who was defeated four times in Statehouse races by Schafer-backed candidates. "If you were running against the Schafer machine without his wanting you to, you were just wasting your time."
Mr. Donsanto said more than 1,000 Dillon County voters were paid $5 to $10 to sign their names to absentee ballots in 1980. In the 1980 primary, 1,500 of the 7,000 votes cast in Dillon County were absentee ballots. Two days after the primary, agents from the U.S. Justice Dept. "swooped down on Dillon County and seized the ballot boxes, touching off the largest voting fraud investigation ever conducted in the Southeast," the Times reported.
After an eighteen-month investigation, thirty residents of Dillon County were indicted on charges of violating federal election laws, most of them for buying votes. As the head of the election corruption and vote-buying machine, Schafer was sentenced to three and a half years in federal prison. The joint state and federal investigation, which finally busted Schafer's political machine, "broke up the county's leadership elite, men who had controlled and manipulated Dillon's political process since the mid-1960s," the Times reported.
This was the well-known Jewish criminal that Ben Shalom Bernanke, a student of economics at Harvard, worked for every summer. It is simply not believable that Bernanke was unaware of Schafer's wide-scale criminal activities, which were legendary in the state. Bernanke is now behind the $85 billion taxpayer-funded bail-out of another Zionist criminal, Maurice R. Greenberg, who ran A.I.G. for decades and who owned some $15 billion worth of A.I.G. stock --before it fell some ninety-four percent in value.
After college, Bernanke earned a doctorate at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where his adviser was Stanley “Stan” Fischer, who was born in Rhodesia. Fischer also happens to be the current Governor of the Bank of Israel. If one looks at Bernanke's biography one will find that he has spent his entire life engaged in Zionist activities.
Stanley Fischer with Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert, April 1, 2008
The A.I.G. scam is much more than insurance fraud. Greenberg's criminal enterprise is immense and even includes a company (ILFC) that leases and finances aircraft for the airlines and covert government kidnapping missions such as "enforced renditions." One of Greenberg's aircraft, for example, a Gulfstream 4 with tail number N971L, was evidently involved in the abduction of crew members who survived the Estonia catastrophe in September 1994. Greenberg's plane left Stockholm's Arlanda airport with half a dozen "unregistered passengers" and took them to Bangor, Maine, the day eleven surviving crew members disappeared from Stockholm's Huddinge hospital.
This is just a fragment of the criminal activity in which Greenberg’s A.I.G. is involved. As I wrote in a earlier chapter, Greenberg and A.I.G. are involved in the 9-11 false flag terror attacks:
KROLL, GREENBERG & THE ISRAELIS
Rebuffed in 1987, the Mossad team of Malkin and Shalom didn't give up on Isser Harel's prophecy of 9-11, which meant getting the Port Authority security contract. They simply changed tack and decided to work in a less obvious manner, through dedicated and corrupt American Zionists like Jules Kroll and Maurice Greenberg. Shalom went to work for Kroll, according to the online 9/11 Encyclopedia entry for Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, the CEO of the American International Group (A.I.G.) insurance company…
In 1993, Maurice Greenberg became a partner and co-owner of Jules Kroll's company when A.I.G. bought twenty-three percent of Kroll. Greenberg is very close to Henry Kissinger, who became chairman of A.I.G.'s International Advisory Board in 1987.
Henry Kissinger and Maurice Greenberg have worked together for decades.
Greenberg was deeply involved in China in the 80s, where Henry Kissinger was one of his representatives, according to the 9-11 Encyclopedia. Through the China trade Greenberg became close to Shaul Eisenberg, the leader of the Asian section of the Israeli intelligence service Mossad, and agent for the sales of sophisticated military equipment to the Chinese military, it reports. Eisenberg was also the owner of Atwell Security of Tel Aviv…
Maurice Greenberg and Jules Kroll became partners in 1993, the same year Kroll Associates "was chosen over three other companies to advise the Port Authority on a redesign of its security procedures." "We have such confidence in them that I have followed every one of their recommendations," Stanley Brezenoff, the Port Authority executive director, told the New York Times in 1994.
Kroll controlled security at the World Trade Center complex in 2001 and was responsible for hiring John O'Neill, the former chief of counterterrorism for the FBI, who died on 9-11, reportedly his first day on the new job.
Greenberg's son, Jeffrey W. Greenberg, became CEO of Marsh & McLennan (MMC) in 1999 and chairman in 2000. The first plane of 9-11 flew directly into the secure computer room of Marsh (Kroll) USA, part of Greenberg's company. Mark Wood, an eyewitness, said: "It looked like a mid-sized executive jet and the way it turned suggested it was being aimed deliberately at a target."
THE RIP-OFF CONTINUES
By April 2009, A.I.G. had received more than $180 billion in loans from the U.S. government. Goldman Sachs, the former employer of Hank Paulson, Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, was the largest single recipient of this money receiving nearly $13 billion in U.S. taxpayer funds. While A.I.G. owed this money to Goldman Sachs and other private investment banks, members of Congress and some voices in the media expressed outrage that taxpayer money was going to the banks.
Had the corrupt and fraudulent A.I.G. been allowed to fail in a controlled manner through bankruptcy, bondholders and derivative counterparties (major banks) would have suffered significant losses, limiting the amount of taxpayer funds directly used. Ben Bernanke argued: "If a federal agency had [appropriate authority] on September 16 [2008], they could have been used to put A.I.G. into conservatorship or receivership, unwind it slowly, protect policyholders, and impose haircuts on creditors and counterparties as appropriate. That outcome would have been far preferable to the situation we find ourselves in now."
The "situation" Bernanke means is that the claims of bondholders and counterparties were paid in full - at 100 cents on the dollar - with taxpayer funds without giving taxpayers the rights to the future profits of these institutions. In other words, the benefits went to the banks while the taxpayers pay the costs.
Joshua B. Bolten, former executive director of legal and governmental affairs at Goldman Sachs, became Chief of Staff for President George W. Bush in April 2006. Bolten is credited with recruiting Henry Paulson, CEO of Goldman Sachs, to become Treasury Secretary in July 2006. Paulson crafted the A.I.G. bailout in which Goldman Sachs was the largest single recipient of this money ($12.9 billion). Paulson spoke with the CEO of Goldman Sachs at least dozen times during the week of the bailout, according to the New York Times.
Finis
Sources and Recommended Reading:
Bollyn, Christopher, "Were Key Survivors from Estonia Catastrophe Kidnapped?" January 2005
http://www.elaestonia.org/eng/index.php?module=lingid&link=133
Bollyn, Christopher, "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11," July 24, 2008
Bollyn, Christopher, " 'Ghost Planes' Make Suspects Disappear: Pentagon has new secret weapon in 'War on Terror' " American Free Press, January 2004
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/ghost_planes.html
Bush, George W., "President's Address to the Nation," Office of the Press Secretary, September 24, 2008
www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/09/20080924-10.html
Herszenhorn, David M., "Administration Is Seeking $700 Billion for Wall Street Bailout," New York Times, September 20, 2008
Morgenson, Gretchen, "A.I.G. Provides Details of Executive Compensation," New York Times, June 28, 2005
New York Times, "Carolina Revives its Stump Meetings," May 23, 1982 (Article about Alan Schafer's criminal activities in Dillon County elections, S.C.)
New York Times, "Excerpts from Complaint Against A.I.G. by New York," May 27, 2005 (pg. C6)
Treaster, Joseph B., "Insurance Chief Quits in Inq uiry Led by Spitzer," New York Times, October 26, 2004
Wikipedia entry for American International Group (A.I.G.), August 25, 2009
9-11 and the Crisis on Wall Street - The Fleecing of America, September 26, 2008
Final Edit – August 25, 2009
Latest Correction - February 24, 2010
XII - The Nexus Linking 9-11 and the Financial Crisis
Chapter XII
The Nexus Linking 9-11 and the Financial Crisis
The financial crisis of 2008, like 9-11, did not simply fall out of the sky. Both 9-11 and the financial melt-down are the results of decades of planning and preparation. President Clinton's denial of responsibility for the economic crisis notwithstanding, it was his administration, indeed, his special adviser, the Israeli son-of-a-terrorist Rahm Emanuel, who took credit for single-handedly pushing the economically treasonous NAFTA bill through Congress. That a president from the pro-labor Democrat party would support a bill designed to destroy the jobs of millions of working Americans as it devastated the U.S. manufacturing sector is something that the mainstream media has never addressed.
Rahm Emanuel is credited with getting the unpopular and disastrous NAFTA bill passed.
What America is reaping in 2009 are the real economic consequences of that "giant sucking sound" that the anti-NAFTA candidate Ross Perot warned of during the presidential debates of 1992. Seventeen years later, however, no one is laughing about Perot's phrase that he used to describe what NAFTA and other free trade agreements would do to the American economy. Americans are now suffering from having accepted the big lie about NAFTA and "free trade" with China. Ross Perot was right about how NAFTA and other "free-trade" policies would destroy America's prosperity by devastating our manufacturing sector.
Millions of U.S. jobs were lost as American companies moved their factories to Mexico, China, and elsewhere as a result of the disastrous free trade policies enacted during the Clinton administrations. The "Made in America" label, a symbol of quality and pride, is seldom found on clothing, shoes, and other products in American stores. Original American products like blue jeans and Converse sneakers are no longer even made in the United States.
Since the passage of NAFTA, the "Made in the USA" label is no longer seen on clothes and shoes sold in American stores.
As an anti-NAFTA independent candidate, H. Ross Perot ran a valiant campaign to protect American jobs, the U.S. manufacturing sector, and our national prosperity. Bill Clinton, however, won the election -- and the American people lost. The ever increasing trade deficits suffered since the early 90's are the clearest evidence that America's wealth has been sucked out of the nation at an incredible rate. Ross Perot was right: the U.S. dream could not be sustained solely by the service sector. I wonder if they still teach that lie in American universities. Perhaps they will rediscover the wisdom of the writings of the founding fathers, such as Alexander Hamilton on the importance of manufacturing and the economic causes of the American Revolution.
H. Ross Perot
Behind such massive criminal hoaxes as the "false-flag" terror attacks of 9-11 and the current financial crises and government bail-outs are years of planning and preparation by high-level criminal organizations. Such immense crimes are designed to steal huge amounts of money, shape public opinion, and facilitate drastic changes in society and government. The so-called "War on Terror," the PATRIOT ACT, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the trillion-dollar bail-outs and stimulus bills are all examples of such pre-planned responses. Fear is the primary tool used by the controlled-media and politicians to force these pre-planned radical changes onto the skeptical and patriotic public.
THE TYRANNY OF LIES
Maurice Greenberg, who is tied to 9-11, is the head of the criminal insurance company A.I.G., which has received more than $180 billion of U.S. taxpayer funds. The first plane that struck the World Trade Center flew straight into the secure computer room of Marsh, a company run by his son Jeffrey. Is this just a coincidence?
Who is behind such huge lies and massive hoaxes? While some of the key culprits behind the current financial crisis are known, for example Bernard Madoff and Maurice Greenberg of A.I.G., there has been no investigation by the mainstream media of the criminal networks they operate within. On the other hand, there has been a great deal of discussion by the media about the alleged Islamic network behind 9-11. The official - but unproven - version of events, which has been promoted without question by the media, is that Al Qaida, a non-state entity supposedly headed by Osama Bin Laden, with the support of some state actors, such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, planned and carried out the 9-11 terror attacks for some reason which has yet to be articulated by the perpetrators - or explained by the U.S. government.
Osama Bin Laden said he had nothing to do with 9-11. The discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center proves that the culprits were high-tech wizards with nano-technology - not Islamic fighters from Afghanistan.
From the day of 9-11, President George W. Bush told the world that Al Qaida had destroyed the World Trade Center and attacked the Pentagon because it hated America's democratic freedoms, as if that makes any sense. According to the unproven claims made by the Bush administration and distributed by the controlled media, an anti-democratic Islamic faction from poor and undemocratic lands had committed the 9-11 terror atrocity in order to start a war between the Islamic world and the western democracies, headed by the United States.
President George W. Bush learned of the terror attacks while reading in a Florida classroom. He spent the next 7 years promoting the fairy tale that Muslim terrorists had attacked the United States because they hated American freedoms.
Incredibly hot fires, hotter than the boiling point of iron, inexplicably raged beneath the rubble of the World Trade Center for more than three months as the physical evidence of demolition was furtively being removed and destroyed with the connivance of the U.S. government (specifically the criminal division of the Department of Justice headed by the Israeli-American Michael Chertoff). The Bush administration showed a callous disregard for starting an independent blue ribbon investigation of the worst terror attack in U.S. history as it eagerly took up the gauntlet against Afghanistan, governed by the Islamic Taliban. The pre-planned U.S. military response, the so-called "War on Terror," began long before the fires were even extinguished at the World Trade Center.
Extremely persistent fires -- hotter than the boiling point of iron -- burned beneath the rubble for nearly 4 months after 9-11. The thermitic reactions that produced these fires created smoke particles in the nano-size range, creating a serious health hazard for people in New York City.
The "War on Terror" is actually a long-planned Zionist war plan to dominate the Middle East first articulated by the right-wing Israeli politician Benjamin Netanyahu (Likud) in the mid-1980s. This radical Zionist plan became U.S. policy in the aftermath of 9-11 and provided the excuse for at least four on-going wars and/or military occupations in the region: Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, and Pakistan.
President Obama recently ordered some 17,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan, whence the terrorists of 9-11 supposedly came, at least according to the government's fabricated fairy tale about Bin Laden and the twenty hijackers. Obama's strategy to expand and prolong this disastrous military campaign is extremely ill-advised. The Soviet Union had a land border with Afghanistan, more troops in the country, and killed more than a million people — and still lost the war. How, or what, does Obama possibly expect to win?
The fundamental question remains: who really carried out 9-11? This is the key point where the official story diverges from the path of the evidence. It is also the basic question of culpability where "truth seekers" disagree. The U.S. government, which confiscated and destroyed tons of evidence, is actually holding the person alleged to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the "mastermind of 9-11," but refuses to put him on trial in the United States. How very odd. At the same time, grieving 9-11 relatives have been denied an open trial for more than eight years in their tort litigation against the airlines and passenger screening companies who allowed nineteen Arabs with weapons on the aircraft.
The person said to be the "mastermind of 9-11" has been denied due process in a gulag in Cuba.
Meanwhile, very real evidence of Israeli involvement in the events of 9-11 has been completely ignored by the government and media, as if it did not exist and has absolutely no meaning. I, on the other hand, have examined and investigated these leads since September 2001. This investigation has revealed a complex corporate and financial network in which high-level Zionists and Israeli intelligence agents have long operated in the United States and beyond.
Within this network, the connections of Zionists and Israelis to both 9-11 and the current financial crisis can be seen. In the earlier chapter, "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11," some of the key individuals and companies in this corporate network and their connection to the events of 9-11 are discussed.
The first plane flew directly into the secure computer room of Marsh, a company run by the son of Maurice Greenberg. The white cloud coming from the Marsh computer room on the east side of the tower is strongly indicative of a thermitic explosion. Lewis "Jerry" Bremer, a long-standing associate of Henry Kissinger and Marsh employee became the first head of U.S.-occupied and oil-rich Iraq. It is highly unlikely that these connections are all merely coincidental.
While the huge U.S. government bail-out was being considered and planned in the fall of 2008, I saw that some of the same individuals and entities (such as Maurice Greenberg of A.I.G.) were involved in the financial crisis at the highest level. A.I.G., for example, a dodgy insurance company that has long engaged in criminal practices, has received more than $180 billion of U.S. tax-payer funds. As I pointed out in the chapter and articles about the bail-out, some of the key people behind the bail-out - Ben Shalom Bernanke, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, for example - are themselves dedicated Zionists with histories of working with and for criminals. In Bernanke's case, he had worked for Alan Heller Schafer, the well-known Jewish criminal and political boss who ran a sprawling roadside gambling and drinking establishment called South of the Border.
Bernanke's boss Schafer was later convicted of rigging elections in South Carolina and sentenced to three and a half years in federal prison. As I concluded in my article about Bernanke's ties to Schafer, it is simply not credible that Bernanke, a student at Harvard, was unaware of Schafer's legendary criminality.
The so-called "mainstream media," outlets such as the New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, CNN, and FOX News, however, will never investigate the connections of the Zionist corporate network with 9-11 or the financial crisis because they are part of the same network. This is how the Zionist-controlled media works: they shield Zionist crooks by blaming others. This is also why CNN and FOX sought to smear me as an anti-Semite rather than discuss the evidence of 9-11.
The situation with the Zionist bankers and corrupt Israeli banks like Israel Discount Bank of New York is exactly like that depicted in The International, the film about a corrupt bank which profits from Middle East weapons deals and war debt. As the Italian weapons dealer turned politician said: "It's not about the profits from the weapon deals; it's about control." Debt is the banker's instrument of control.
It is a fairly daunting undertaking for an independent journalist to investigate the sprawling criminal network behind such huge crimes. Apart from the very real dangers it presents, it requires a great deal of research. I have paid a very high price for my 9-11 research and activism and seen the lives and careers of fellow truth seekers destroyed because they dared to challenge the audacious lies imposed on the public mind.
Christopher Bollyn, the author, was attacked by undercover police in front of his wife and child at his home in August 2006. He suffered a broken elbow and a 50,000 volt "drive stun" TASER shock applied directly to his lower back while handcuffed and held down by two men - one kneeling on the temple of his head. The Hoffman Estates police destroyed the videos (despite a FOIA request and their obvious importance as evidence) of the attack and maliciously prosecuted Bollyn for attacking three heavily armed men wearing body armor - on his property. A Zionist judge named Hyman I. Riebman oversaw the flawed trial in which the police and the witness for the prosecution gave testimony that was clearly contradictory. Bollyn's expert witness and evidence was not admitted. Found guilty of two misdemeanors and facing sentencing by the same judge, Bollyn left the United States in June 2007.
Although there is more research to be done, I want to present a facet of the corporate nexus behind 9-11 and the financial crisis to illustrate the high-level Zionist network involved in both crises. This network is not simple; it is rather complex and spans a period of several decades. To help introduce this fairly complicated subject, I am presenting it as I discovered it.
SINGH: THE PTECH WHISTLEBLOWER
Shortly after 9-11 a woman named Indira Singh came forward with claims that a Massachusetts-based enterprise software company called Ptech had played a key role in the events of 9-11. In 2002, Singh was described in the Boston press as "a former Ptech consultant."
Indira Singh began her career at First Boston in the mid-1970s when mortgage-based securities were first developed by Laurence D. Fink, now CEO of BlackRock.
Singh, said to be a risk architect and Information Technology (IT) professional with JP Morgan, certainly knew a great deal about Ptech and its dodgy spy software, which had reportedly been loaded onto the most critical computer networks in the U.S. government prior to 9-11. A Boston Globe article from 7 December 2002 described Singh as "a former Ptech consultant," citing an interview she had done with WBZ-TV:
Singh said last night in an interview on WBZ that she told the FBI "in no uncertain terms" about the connection between Ptech and [Yasin al] Qadi. She said that weeks after talking to the Boston FBI, she was ‘'shocked" and "frustrated" to learn that the FBI still had not alerted any of the government agencies using Ptech software that there were questions about the company's ties to suspected terrorist fund-raisers.
Indira Singh, the former Ptech consultant turned whistleblower, sought to put the blame on Arabs and the CIA. The essence of Singh's 9-11 presentation was that the people behind Ptech were Arab Moslems tied to Saudi financiers of terrorism and a rogue element within the CIA, which included Vice President Dick Cheney. Singh later did a series of interviews with Jamey A. Hecht, editor of From the Wilderness (FTW), a website that featured material written by Mike Ruppert. In these interviews Singh discussed Ptech's enterprise software, how it could have been used to manipulate data on critical government computer networks such as the FAA, NORAD, and U.S. Air Force, and who she thought was behind the company:
Hecht: You said at the 9-11 Citizens' Commission hearings, you mentioned - its on page 139 of transcript - that Ptech was with Mitre Corporation in the basement of the FAA for two years prior to 9-11 and their specific job was to look at interoperability issues the FAA had with NORAD and the Air Force, in case of an emergency.
Singh: Yes, I have a good diagram for that…
Jamey Hecht: And that relationship had been going on mediated by Ptech for two years prior to 9-11. You elsewhere say that the Secret Service is among the government entities that had a contract with Ptech. Mike Ruppert's thesis in Crossing the Rubicon, as you know, is that the software that was running information between FAA and NORAD was superseded by a parallel subsuming version of itself that was being run by the Secret Service on state of the art parallel equipment in the PEOC with a nucleus of Secret Service personnel around Cheney.
Singh claimed that Ptech was connected to the CIA and Saudi millionaires, using terminology like "blowback," a term that is not commonly used: "Ptech had all the markings," said Indira Singh. All the markings of a CIA front company. "I think there is a CIA within the CIA," Indira told FTW. "I think there is a Shadow CIA that does the Iran-Contra type of things — they get funding from illicit methods–and that the Saudis are in on it. They might have trained some operatives, and later it backfired - it was blowback within blowback, perhaps."
In one of the FTW articles about Ptech by Michael Kane, a list of three suspect groups is presented: the Muslim Brotherhood, Christian Cultists, and Nazis. Kane describes Ptech as "the Alpha dog" in a relationship with Mitre, but the ownership of Mitre is never discussed. Elsewhere, Vice President Dick Cheney is named as a suspect, depicted as the mastermind single-handedly running the whole show:
Ptech was working with Mitre Corp. in the FAA and, according to Indira, Ptech was the Alpha dog in that relationship. Mitre has provided simulation & testing technologies for the Navy. They provide multiple FAA technologies and boast in their annual reports that their two biggest clients are DOD & FAA. Mitre knew the FAA's technological enterprise inside and out, including any simulation-and-testing (war game) technology operated by the FAA.
This was the perfect marriage to ensure that the capacity to covertly intervene in FAA operations on 9/11 existed - in the middle of simulated war games. It is also the perfect marriage to ensure that the command and control of these capabilities was readily available to Dick Cheney via Secret Service Ptech software in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center, the bunker to which Cheney was "rushed" by the Secret Service. As already pointed out in Part 1 of this series, Ptech does what Total Information Awareness (TIA, the DARPA program to monitor all electronic transactions in real-time) is supposed to do. There are an undetermined number of other software programs in the hands of an undetermined number of corporations also capable of this. Again, enterprise architecture software is designed with the express purpose of knowing everything that is going on throughout the entirety of the "enterprise" in real-time.
In the case of Ptech software, installed on White House, Secret Service, Air Force and FAA systems (as well as most American military agencies), the enterprise included all of the real-time data of the above mentioned agencies.
Jamey Hecht, senior editor of From the Wilderness
Hecht, senior editor of the FTW website, described Ptech as a den of thieves and murderers in the introduction to "Ptech, 9-11, and USA-Saudi Terror" (2005):
The human side of Ptech is where the thievery and murder come in: among the financiers and programmers of Ptech are apparent members of an international network of organized criminals involved in decades of narcotraffic, gunrunning, money laundering, and terrorism. Their personal and professional connections reach up into the highest levels of the American government, and their activities are still underway.
But who are these financiers and programmers of Ptech? Who are the "apparent members of an international network of organized criminals involved in decades of narcotraffic, gunrunning, money laundering, and terrorism?"
What Hecht, Kane, and Singh overlooked in their investigation of Ptech was the conspicuous role played by Michael Goff, a Zionist Jewish lawyer from Worcester, Massachusetts, who had suddenly left his law practice to manage Ptech, a start-up company headed by a Lebanese Muslim. How much sense does that make? Not much, unless of course one considers the idea that Ptech was an Israeli-controlled cut-out operation from the beginning.
Michael Goff of Ptech went on to work for the Mossad.
Michael Goff was the first marketing and general manager of Ptech. He went on to work for Guardium, an enterprise software company owned and operated by Israeli military intelligence. Goff wore many hats at the new company whose software found its way onto the most critical networks of the U.S. government. Goff, who was Ptech's first marketing manager, was also responsible for the procurement of all software for a company that supposedly wrote enterprise software. He was also responsible for the hiring and training of personnel. As I pointed out in my 2005 exposé about Ptech, Goff went on to represent Guardium, an Israeli software company founded and run by members of Israeli military intelligence.
Goff was clearly not just a simple Jewish lawyer who wanted to help a Lebanese immigrant promote his software company. This is probably why Goff could not tell me the name of the agency which had placed him with Ptech; the agency was most likely a branch of Israeli military intelligence. In that case, how do Hecht and Singh fit in? Who are they and who do they really work for in their apparent disinformation campaign?
The evidence indicates that Ptech was a cut-out, a company disguised to look Arab-owned but which was actually run by Israeli intelligence. Goff was Israel's point man within the company and the person who hired the right people and through whom the Israeli-manipulated software became Ptech enterprise software. Goff appears to have been the instrument through which malicious Israeli spyware was loaded onto U.S. government computers. Hecht, Ruppert, and Singh were spin-masters to pin the blame on Arabs and a nebulous cabal at the CIA - and distract the investigators from the Israeli connection to Ptech.
How else could it be that Singh, Hecht, and Kane only saw Arabs and rogue CIA agents running Ptech without noticing Mike Goff, the Jewish lawyer from Worchester, Massachusetts, who played so many key roles running Ptech from the beginning? How is it that Singh knew so much about Ptech – but absolutely nothing about Michael Goff? Goff's name was on Ptech documents, after all. Were Singh, Hecht, Kane, and Ruppert intentionally spreading disinformation about Ptech? This appears to have been the case. But who were they working for?
Jamey Hecht (on left) with Michael Ruppert and the FTW crew in New York, May 2006. Hecht was Assistant Managing Editor and Senior Staff Writer of the FTW website from 2003-2006. Mike Ruppert is kneeling; Michael Kane is fifth from left. Jenna Orkin (in pink) is the daughter of a Jewish Hollywood producer known as "The Mighty Ork". She lobbied unsuccessfully to keep the author off Jimmy Walter's 9-11 Truth Tour and then used fear tactics to prevent him from speaking in Vienna. Who were these disinfo agents really working for?
Finis
Sources and recommended reading:
Imran Khan interview with Fareed Zakaria, February 22, 2009
Bollyn, Christopher, "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11," July 24, 2008
Bollyn, Christopher, "Why are Honest 9-11 Researchers Targeted?" May 15, 2007 (and linked articles)
Bollyn, Christopher, "Why Did Iron Boil in the Rubble of the World Trade Center?" Rumor Mill News, May 6, 2006
Bollyn, Christopher, "9-11 and the Crisis on Wall Street," September 17, 2008
Bollyn, Christopher, "How Mossad Deceived the U.S. Military on 9/11," April 1, 2005
Kane, Michael, "PTECH, 9/11, and USA-SAUDI TERROR - PART II," From the Wilderness, 2005
Ranalli, Ralph, "FBI Reportedly Didn't Act on Ptech Tips," Boston Globe, December 7, 2002
The Zionist Nexus Linking 9-11 and the Financial Crisis, March 2, 2009
Final Edit – August 26, 2009
Latest Correction - March 1, 2010
XIII - Ptech, 9-11, and the Financial Collapse
Chapter XIII
Ptech, 9-11, and the Financial Collapse
P-Tech is the one thread, the one golden thread you pull on, and all of this is unraveled. ... All of this stuff took money to fund. And it was funded through major financial crimes, money laundering, and looting, looting of the S&L’s, looting of the banking system...it’s all being done systematically to keep the slush funds up for the game at play.
– Indira R. Singh
On 9-11, the world witnessed a horrific terror spectacle when the World Trade Center (WTC) was attacked, bombed, and demolished into a pile of rubble in broad daylight. The demolition of the twin towers is an unprecedented event in world history. The terror attacks of 9-11 and the financial crisis that exploded in September 2008 are similar and connected. The similarity between the two events that occurred almost exactly seven years apart reveals the criminal thinking behind both events – and the method.
The terror bombings of 9-11 are related to the financial collapse of 2008 and involve the same criminal elements.
What we know about the destroyed towers is that they had recently come under the control of two Zionist Jews -- Larry Silverstein and the former Israeli commando fighter, Frank Lowy. With the connivance of fellow Zionist Jews, these two active and dedicated Zionists obtained the leases, with borrowed funds, for the WTC properties at the end of July 2001 and immediately insured them to the hilt – including anticipated future earnings – against a terror attack precisely like the one that occurred six weeks later on 9-11, when they hit the jackpot, blood and all.
All three towers that were demolished on 9-11 were owned or leased by Larry Silverstein, a dedicated Zionist and strip club owner-cum-real estate mogul.
Frank Lowy (right), a former Israeli commando, and his son are close friends of Rupert Murdoch, a fellow Australian Zionist Jew and owner of FOX News and News Corporation. Lowy is Silverstein's business partner in leasing the World Trade Center, a lease that was funded by the Zionist-run -- and now bankrupt -- GMAC, the financial branch of General Motors. Silverstein and Lowy obtained the lease six weeks before 9-11 and made several billion dollars on the destruction of the World Trade Center.
The security of the Twin Towers was also in the hands of a Zionist firm and had been since 1993. That company was under the control of Maurice Greenberg and Jules Kroll. The first plane that struck the World Trade Center homed in on a secure computer room in the northeast section of the North Tower. The plane went directly into the computer room of a company named Marsh that was run by Greenberg's son. What a coincidence.
Michael Chertoff, an Israeli-American orthodox Jew and devoted Zionist, headed the criminal division of the Department of Justice from 2001 to 2003. From this position, Chertoff -- whose mother was an Israeli intelligence agent -- supervised and controlled the non-investigation and destruction of evidence of 9-11.
Michael Chertoff, an Israeli citizen and son of the Mossad, oversaw the destruction of the evidence from the demolition of the World Trade Center as the head of the criminal division of the U.S. Dept. of Justice.
The Zionist-controlled media promoted the preposterous and unproven theory that Osama Bin Laden and his twenty hijackers had carried out the attack from their headquarters in Afghanistan. The United States went to war against the Taliban regime in Afghanistan based on unproven allegations and false evidence as the real evidence of mass murder was furtively being shipped to various Asian ports where it was destroyed in smelters.
Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy received huge pay-outs from the insurance companies. The American people and U.S. taxpayers were left with a pile of incredibly hot rubble and an immense price tag which continues to grow with the passage of time. Seven years later, to the exact day, two immense pillars of the financial world collapsed in a strikingly similar fashion. These two columns were Lehman Brothers bank and the American International Group (A.I.G.), managed and controlled for decades by the very same Maurice R. Greenberg.
Like the twin towers, both companies were thought to be too large and powerful to simply collapse, but collapse they did. By September 11, 2008, these companies seemed to have lost both their foundations and core columns and were in a state of free fall. Investors pulled their money, and global panic ensued. Like the Twin Towers, both Lehman and A.I.G. were Zionist-controlled organizations.
The systems of corporate financial security, enforcement, and investigation were also under Zionist control. Despite repeated warnings, indictments, and violations of the law by A.I.G., the heads of the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve Bank called for the U.S. taxpayer to bail-out these corrupt and criminal enterprises. The key player in this huge and historic bail-out was Ben Shalom Bernanke, a dedicated Zionist who spent summers working for a well-known Jewish criminal who controlled elections in Dillon, South Carolina.
Maurice Greenberg, the disgraced head of the criminal A.I.G. and chairman and CEO of C.V. Starr & Co., Inc., testifies before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on "The Collapse and Federal Rescue of A.I.G. and What It Means for the U.S. Economy" in Washington, D.C. on April 2, 2009. The Securities and Exchange Commission accused Greenberg of numerous improper accounting moves between 2000 and 2005. The false accounting amounted to more than $5 billion and resulted in A.I.G. paying more than $1 billion in fines. Greenberg was personally fined more than $130 million in August 2009 from the SEC case and a lawsuit filed on behalf of defrauded workers in Ohio. Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, a devoted Zionist, will certainly go down as one of the greatest criminals in history. (UPI Photo)
An immense amount of taxpayer money, some $180 billion, has been poured into the financial black hole known as A.I.G. This is roughly equivalent to taking $600 from every man, woman, and child in the United States and using it to prop up (or absorb the losses of) the criminal and fraudulent financial/insurance structure built by Maurice Greenberg.
The profits made by Lehman Brothers and A.I.G. have gone into private off-shore accounts, while the debts and obligations have been passed on to the U.S. taxpayer. These companies were looted and plundered and then allowed to collapse. Once again, the rubble and costs were forced upon the American people against their will. The American public was shown to be 1,000-to-1 against the Zionist bail-out.
The fact that the first plane that hit the World Trade Center flew directly into the secure computer room of Marsh, a company run by Maurice Greenberg's son Jeffrey, is just one of the most obvious connections between these two catastrophic events. Ptech's dodgy enterprise software is another.
The first plane nosed right into the secure computer room of Marsh, a Greenberg-run company. The unusual bursts of white smoke and light orange flame that accompanied the explosions came from the Marsh computer room on the north and east sides of the tower and suggest that the room had been loaded with Thermate and equipped with a homing device that guided the plane into the tower.
In the first part of this chapter, the key role of Ptech enterprise software in 9-11 was discussed. The person who first brought public awareness to the Ptech problem is a "risk architect" named Indira R. Singh, who lived near the World Trade Center and was working with JP Morgan Chase on 9-11. Singh is very knowledgeable about Ptech and what such enterprise software can do in situations like 9-11 -- and the financial crisis that gripped Wall Street in September 2008.
My research found that one of the key people involved in the founding of Ptech was a Jewish lawyer from Worcester, Massachusetts, named Michael S. Goff. Goff's father and grandfather had both been highest level Freemasons in the Zionist secret society of B'nai B'rith. Michael was Ptech's first marketing manager and all-around general director in 1994, according to his own published statements about his role with the company. He was responsible for all hiring, training, and procurement for the company.
Goff went on to work for Guardium, an Israeli enterprise software company founded and headed by individuals from Israeli military intelligence. As I explain in "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11," one of the founders and directors of Guardium is Gill Zaphrir (a.k.a. Zafrir), an Israeli colonel who "headed the research and development department of the Israel Air Force." Goff was working for Zaphrir's Guardium in 2005 when I discovered his role in founding Ptech.
Col. Gill Zaphrir headed the R&D Department of the Israel Air Force.
Singh doesn't say anything about Goff at Ptech, but that is understandable. This Israeli connection is something I discovered in 2005 and it has not been discussed in any of the mainstream media. It is unlikely that anybody else would have told Singh about Goff's key role in building Ptech in the mid-1990s. Furthermore, Israelis are generally seen as allies of the United States.
Understanding the role of Ptech's dodgy enterprise software and the connection between Ptech and Israeli military intelligence requires reading my articles about Ptech and Mitre. With this Israeli conection to Ptech in mind, I recommend reading "The Story of Indira Singh" from an interview she did in April 2005. This is one of the most informative and least biased interviews she has done. It's rather long, but well worth reading for anyone interested in understanding 9-11 and the financial crisis. This interview also has extremely interesting testimony about the downing of Flight 93 and extremely mysterious demolition of the forty-seven-story WTC 7, which was the third tower owned by Larry Silverstein.
Singh's comments about Ptech and her work at JP Morgan shed a great deal of light on how this Ptech enterprise software may have played a role in both 9-11 and the financial meltdown. I recommend reading the entire interview. To give an idea of what Singh discusses, I have provided some of the most interesting extracts below.
Extracts from "The Story of Indira Singh" from Our World in Balance, April 27, 2005:
Indira Singh has been working on Wall Street since 1975. On 9-11 she was working as a senior consultant for JP Morgan Chase. She was tasked with developing a next-generation, operational, risk-blueprint. Which would proactively identify exposures, including money laundering, rogue trading, and illicit financing patterns. It was in this capacity nine months later, [that] she became aware of the biggest threat to our country, a trans-nationally protected terrorist cartel that brought us 9-11. Indira Singh is a private pilot and a climber. Prior to 9-11, she volunteered as a civilian emergency medical technician, until she was injured at ground zero.
They [the Twin Towers] were mysterious international structures that were the center and the heart of our Western Civilization, basically.
- Indira Singh
Singh: September 11th I was a senior consultant for JP Morgan Chase and Risk. I had cycled through several of their Risk areas as an enterprise architect, or an information architect, technology architect… which basically means that you take a look at the entire enterprise and come up with a blueprint, make sure that all the systems, not just one system, but all the systems, the blueprints for all the systems that are developed to support the business, are in-line, in tune with the business goals and the business architecture and the business processes and where the business is going. So it’s pretty high-level, we call it the CXO level, or the Chief Information Officer, Chief Technology Officer levels and there are disciplines and methodologies and very esoteric software that’s used to manage this. I did that at JP Morgan Chase and I also worked for a small company in Washington, D.C. that was doing some very innovative work regarding technology interoperability, they were developing some inference engines to think about how to put technology architectures together and I wanted to use that for my risk work, basically. …we were seeking funding from In-Q-Tel, which was the CIA’s information technology seeking arm, I had been spending pretty much every Friday, Thursday-Friday down in D.C. trying to get that project off the ground, and trying to get it funded ...
Singh: P-Tech is the one thread, the one golden thread you pull on, and all of this is unraveled. Because it goes into the corporations, it goes into these government entities, it goes into the terrorism financing entities… none of which have been taken to task… there are just so many questions about what does this all mean? And as I investigated further, we found that the origins of P-Tech were very interesting. Where did this company come from? Obviously, that is the first question. And how did they get to be so powerful? Who were the people, who were the organizations that brought them in who knew, who gave them the power? ...
Singh: BMI was identified as being involved with terror financing, but this is just not going to be, ‘The Muslims Hate America!’, that’s not what it is, there is something else going on here, they’re being used as a tool, just as the good people of the U.S. are being used, are being misled, and frightened and terrorized into, ‘if we don’t wage these horrific wars, our way of life will be over’. Who benefits? ...
Singh: The FBI. In fact, this has to be made very clear, there are some extraordinarily real patriotic Americans, and good people in the FBI, as has been said by Colleen Rowley, one of the FBI whistleblowers, there’s a wall in the FBI. And this has been validated to me by various in Houston who are very close to the power bases and are pretty ticked off at what’s happening in this country and are speaking out. As are many CIA agents who are very concerned that it has gone too far, as are many NSA agents who are concerned that it has gone too far, and FBI agents. So we have a lot of people who are speaking out, they have kept quiet too long, they’re afraid, they are afraid of what’s happening to this country …
Singh: Ari Fleischer spun it to find sugar that day. He said, ‘There’s nothing wrong. Nothing to see here, everything’s fine.’ So they did a token raid and that was basically it. But everything that I have done since that time has been for one reason and one reason only, that there may come a time, that people will find the trail to P-Tech, and it won’t be hidden or buried, I’ve kept it alive, whether they’ve renamed their company and moved on I want to keep the names, the details, everything alive, no matter what I have to do, so that, should there come a time for justice and accounting for 9-11, and for what’s happening in the world today, it makes it easier for other people to unravel the truth… Whatever you’re political inclinations, this is wrong. This is criminal, this is murder, this is worldwide atrocity. And I have reached some very good people on the left and on the right, who are willing to speak out about P-Tech. ...
Singh: It was possible that there was an alternate command and control system. Could you technically use P-Tech software to do the surveillance and intervention? Well, gosh, yes, that’s exactly what I was planning on using it for in one of the largest banks in the world. ...
Singh: The Towers came down, 3,000 people were killed, and what I know is the characters behind the funding of it, were totally in bed with characters in the U.S. And not only just for 9-11, but going on through our nation’s history, and the big question is, “Why?” What are they up to?
Question: Could you describe the relationship of P-Tech with the FAA? P-Tech worked with the FAA for several years, didn’t they?
Singh: It was a joint project between P-Tech and Mitre, and they were looking at holes, basically in the FAA’s interoperability, responding with other agencies, law enforcement, in the case of an emergency such as hijacking. So they were looking for… what people would do, how they would respond in case of an emergency, and find the holes, and make recommendations to fix it. Now, if anyone was in a position to know where the holes were, P-Tech was. And that’s exactly the point. If anybody was in a position to write software to take advantage of those holes, it would have been P-Tech. ...
Singh: Now, with the FAA in particular, if something goes wrong, and there is an emergency with a particular flight, and the DOD needs to be notified, well that’s a really major interoperability thing, a signal has to be sent in some way, shape or form, either mediated by a human in most cases, or automatically, or even if its mediated by a human something needs to be initiated on a separate computer to start a whole other sequence of events, interventions, scrambling a jet, notification up and downstream with many other organizations, such as NORAD, such as other terminal radar areas, such as local law enforcement, you name it. So, this all has to be blueprinted, mapped out, and that’s where Enterprise Architecture comes in, you need some kind of blueprint to keep all of this together and that’s what P-Tech was so good at.
Question: Now was there a reference to P-Tech having operated in the basement, out of the FAA?
Singh: Yes. Now, typically, because the scope of such projects are so overarching and so wide-ranging, when you are doing an enterprise architecture project, you pretty much have access to how anything in the organization is being done, where it’s being done, on what systems, what the information is, and you pretty much have carte blanche. Now if it’s a major project that spans several years, the team that comes in has literally access to almost anything they want because you’re operating on a blueprint level, on a massive scale. So, yes, they were everywhere, and I was told that they were in places that required clearances, I was told they had log-on access to FAA flight control computers, I was told that they had passwords to many computers that you may not on the surface… let’s say you… isolated part of a notification process that was mediated by a computer, and you wanted to investigate it further, then you typically get log-on access to that computer, and from that back upstream or downstream, so, who knows? In my experience, I could have access to almost anything I wanted to in JP Morgan Chase… and didn’t, for the reason if anything went wrong, I didn’t wanna have the access. But if you were up to no good, as an enterprise architect, with such a mandate, you typically could have anything you wanted. Access to anything. ...
Singh: But there were 4 war games, 4 simulations going on the morning of 9-11, and I just want people to remember that the whole nature of what Mitre, they also developed software for intelligence, which includes the CIA, Mitre and P-Tech would have, if they were going to test whether they had fixed these holes, would have probably run a simulation. I don’t know that they did, but that’s how we do things, but there were 4 of them going on. So was there room for confusion? I don’t think these people were stupid, I think they were deliberately confused, if anything.
Q. Well we know very well that there was a simulation of the very event taking place during the event.
Singh: And I believe there is proof there was more than one. Just in case the first one didn’t confuse people enough. So what does this say? I can be very objective about this and say, “Well, the terrorists knew that there were war games scheduled for this day and they took advantage of it and called 9-11 a particular day, however, we do know that 9-11 had been selected prior… ok, so maybe the war games were set many weeks prior for 9-11…” and you can play this game over and over and over. Yes, it was the perfect day, and yes, you needed inside knowledge, and yes, P-Tech with all its myriad associations would have had the inside knowledge, and yes, P-Tech was a CIA front, and yes, P-Tech was protected. ...
Singh: Interestingly enough, I did not let people know that it was P-Tech until maybe August, 2002 at ICH… we had pretty much moved on and uh, I accidentally let slip to one of my colleagues there that the name of the company that was being investigated was P-Tech. And she was horrified… she said, “They’re everywhere.” And I said, “Yeah, fancy that. Wonder who put them there.” ...
Singh: Before P-Tech was ever raided, before it ever became public, I took it all the way up to the top of the FBI. I took it everywhere. The reality of the situation is proven by the response I got there. More telling than the actual deed itself. Their response to that is really what indicts them all.
Q. What was their response?
Singh: Uhm, “Shut up and go away, or you will be killed.” Basically.
Q. Now, you got that response from all different levels in government …
Singh: I got that response from JP Morgan. I got that response from P-Tech. I got that warning from people within the FBI. Mostly the FBI …
Q. And what kind of response did you get from JP Morgan Chase, your employers at the time when you went to them with what you had found out about P-Tech?
Singh: Well, they had told me that I should be killed for getting all this evidence… I was intimidated. I wrote a letter to my boss saying that I had been intimidated, and the person who had intimidated me, the 3rd highest ranking person in the bank, the General Auditor, so this has gone all the way up to the top, they were very aware of it, and that they were going to deny using P-Tech at JP Morgan Chase. In fact they would even explicitly deny the URL to the website, so that no one could even look into them. Now the name has changed, so you wonder what is going on there, but, when he asked me, ‘where did you get this from and that from?’, I was basically thoroughly intimidated. They treated me as though I was the bad guy. That’s what happened. They treated me as if I was the bad guy for having dug up all of this stuff.
Q. And you were told by the Chief Auditor at JP Morgan Chase that the different individuals that you had gotten this information from should have been killed?
Singh: Yeah… I pointed down the street, I said, “I lost people there.” And he said, “I lost people there, too. Look, look, this is about 9-11… I put it in a folder named 9-11…” and it got pretty ugly from that point on. Basically he said that, “He needed to be sure that I would never mention P-Tech again.” And I said, “Here’s the problem. I’m a senior consultant, I consult with a lot of people… you may deny P-Tech business here… what happens to Citibank, what happens to Goldman-Sachs, what happens to the rest?” He said, “That’s not my problem.” And I said, “That’s why we have that hole in the ground up the street. It is everyone’s problem.” ...
Singh: All of this stuff took money to fund. And it was funded through major financial crimes, money laundering, and looting, looting of the SNL’s, looting of the banking system, what we’re in the middle of now which is the looting of Social Security. And this is all being done, the looting of HUD, it’s all being done systematically to keep the slush funds up for the game at play.
Q. Where do you think this is headed?
Singh: Not any place good for people. And it isn’t just going to be America, it is going to be global.
Finis
Sources and Recommended Reading
"The Story of Indira Singh", Our World In Balance, April 27, 2005
http://ourworldinbalance.blogspot.com/2005/04/story-of-indira-singh.html
Ptech, 9-11, and the Financial Collapse of 2008, March 13, 2009
Final Edit – August 27, 2009
Latest Correction - February 24, 2010
XIV - Game Over: Evidence of Super-Thermite in the Rubble
Chapter XIV
Game Over: Evidence of Super-Thermite in the Rubble
The red-gray chips of super-thermite found in the dust of the pulverized World Trade Center.
"The evidence for active, highly energetic thermitic material in the WTC dust is compelling...these data suggest that the thermitic material found in the WTC dust is a form of nanothermite, not ordinary (macro-) thermite."
- "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," Dr. Steven E. Jones, et al, March 2009
One of the most significant events in the search for the truth of 9-11 was the publication in March 2009 of a peer-reviewed scientific paper, written by nine scientists, about the discovery of "active thermitic material" in dust samples from the collapsed towers of the World Trade Center. A twenty-five-page scientific paper entitled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9-11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" presents physical evidence that an extremely powerful form of super-thermite was used to demolish the twin towers.
The research paper written by nine scientists, including Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University, analyzes red-gray chips of a highly-explosive thermitic material, "characterized as nano-thermite or super-thermite," found in five dust samples from the collapsed towers. The paper was published in the Open Chemical Physics Journal and marks a historic breakthrough in the scientific investigation of the explosive collapses of the Twin Towers, although it has not been covered by the media outside of Salt Lake City. If we had a truly free press in the United States this discovery would be front page news and a subject of discussion on every news outlet in the nation.
Super-thermite is a highly energetic form of thermite (iron oxide and aluminum) in which at least one component is in the extremely fine or nano-size range with particles 100 nanometers (1 nm = 1 billionth of a meter) or smaller, often along with silicon and carbon. Super-thermite is an extremely powerful explosive that releases much more energy per gram than any other conventional explosive used in demolition. The chips found in the World Trade Center dust were an extremely powerful form of super-thermite.
The pyroclastic dust clouds of 9-11 were created by the super-thermite that was combined with an organic compound to create the intense gas pressure that propelled the clouds over lower Manhattan.
Two of the four chips tested released more energy by mass (kJ/g) than HMX, TNT, TATB explosives, and normal thermite. These chips released between 50 to nearly 100 percent more energy that the four conventional explosives. One of the chips released twice as much energy per gram than Xerogel, a similar super-thermite nanocomposite, and the chips all ignited at 430 degrees C., 100 degrees lower than the ignition temperature for Xerogel.
This paper proves that the official explanation for the explosive destruction of the Twin Towers is false. For 9-11 truth seekers, this paper is crucial because it means we can no longer be dismissed as "conspiracy theorists." We now have solid evidence of the advanced super-thermite that was used to demolish the twin towers. For the criminals of 9-11 and their supporters, the writing on the wall is now clear. It says, "Game Over!"
The discovery of this active thermitic material is critical to understanding what really happened on 9-11. This scientific discovery reveals that sophisticated demolition explosives had been applied to the interiors of the Twin Towers long before the two planes struck them on 9-11. Although we already had evidence that the towers were demolished with thermitic explosives, this is the first time we have pieces of the actual explosives involved in the demolition of the Twin Towers. This crucial discovery is not front-page news in the United States only because our "free press" is actually very tightly controlled. But the truth cannot be so easily controlled. Americans now live in an uncomfortable and conflicted state in which provable scientific evidence tells us that our leaders are complicit in a criminal cover-up of the truth of what really happened on 9-11. This is the state I have been in since September 2001.
U.S. Vice President Joe Biden was all grins during a community meeting in Los Angeles on May 15, 2009 until two 9-11 truth activists asked him about the evidence of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center. Presented with the paper by Steven E. Jones and eight other scientists Biden gave a terse one-word response and retreated to his security cordon. The truth of 9-11, however, will not be as easy to avoid.
The evidence that Jones and his team examined was in the form of very small particles found in five different samples of WTC dust. In each sample they found small chips that were composed of two layers, a red layer and a gray layer. The gray layer consisted mostly of iron oxide, while the red layer contained iron, oxygen, aluminum, silicon, and carbon -- all the components of super-thermite. The analysis and testing of the red and gray chips revealed that the super-thermite composite ignited at the surprisingly low temperature of 430 degrees Celsius and caused an explosive reaction which resulted in iron spheroids, exactly like thermite. In other words, the heat-producing explosive reaction created temperatures hotter than 1400 degrees Celsius, the melting point of iron.
The U.S.G.S. survey of the dust found large amounts of iron-rich spheres that were evidence that molten iron had accompanied the destruction of the World Trade Center. Nothing in the government version of the collapse of the Twin Towers explains the large amounts of molten iron found in the rubble. Thermite does.
The Jones paper concludes:
The small size of the iron oxide particles qualifies the material to be characterized as nanothermite or super-thermite...Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.
HOW DID SUPER-THERMITE GET INTO THE WORLD TRADE CENTER?
Super-thermite, which has been fabricated at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and other places, can be sprayed or even “painted” onto surfaces, effectively forming an energetic or even explosive paint, the study pointed out. “The sol-gel process is very amenable to dip-, spin-, and spray-coating technologies to coat surfaces," scientists from Lawrence Livermore wrote in a 2002 paper entitled "Energetic nanocomposites with sol-gel chemistry: Synthesis, safety, and characterization."
"The red chips we found in the WTC dust conform to their description of 'thin films' of 'hybrid inorganic/organic energetic nanocomposite'," the Jones paper says. "Indeed, the descriptive terms 'energetic coating' and 'nice adherent film' fit very well with our observations of the red-chips which survived the WTC destruction."
The published documentation of evidence of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center has taken the 9-11 truth movement to a new level. If Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida did not spray super-thermite in the Twin Towers, who did?
It is now evident that a solution of super-thermite had been applied to large sections of the World Trade Center, including walls, floor sections, structural beams, and columns in the core section. It may have been applied as a thin spray coating applied to the undersides of the floor pans under the guise of fire-proofing, asbestos abatement, or some other form of building maintenance. Super-thermite is safe to handle and only becomes dangerous when it is dry.
We need to find out who manufactured this nano-composite thermite and who applied the bi-layered film of super explosive to the interior surfaces of the buildings. This certainly must have been a task that involved a team of men working for weeks, if not months, and their presence must have been observed by security and other personnel involved in maintaining the buildings. Finding the source of the super-thermite and identifying the people who applied it to the Twin Towers will reveal the true culprits of 9-11.
Several years ago, I contacted Burton Fried, president of LVI Services, Inc., a demolition company that reportedly had done extensive "asbestos abatement" work in the twin towers. I considered LVI's work in the twin towers as suspicious because the company is primarily known for asbestos abatement and preparing structures for demolition. LVI has done millions of dollars of research and development for the U.S. Department of Defense. In 2000, for example, FedSpending.org shows that LVI Group, Inc. received $3.246 million worth of contracts with the U.S. Army, of which $2.967 million was for "Applied Research and Exploratory Development." It should be noted that the military is the main user and developer of super-thermite.
Burton Fried of LVI
LVI has also worked closely with Controlled Demolition Inc. on large demolition projects. LVI's role in these projects is reportedly preparing the structure for demolition prior to the placement of charges. LVI advertises that it sets up "turn key" demolition projects. Is this the kind of work LVI did at the World Trade Center? Although Mr. Fried denied having done the extensive "asbestos abatement" work in the towers as reported in Engineering News-Record on September 13, 2001, Debra Rubin, one of the journalists who wrote the piece, confirmed that the source of this information had been LVI. Fried's quick reaction, "I didn't do it," only increased my suspicions.
What happens from this point on depends a great deal on what the people do with the information about what really destroyed the towers on 9-11: The three buildings that collapsed were not brought down by the fires caused by the burning fuel of two airliners; they were demolished with pre-planted explosives, including large amounts of an extremely potent form of super-thermite, which had been applied to surfaces of the building in the months prior to 9-11. Osama Bin Laden and his gang of twenty certainly did not spray super-thermite throughout the towers of World Trade Center in the weeks and months before 9-11 – so who did?
What we have to do as concerned citizens with moral courage seeking the truth of what really happened on 9-11 is to spread this information to our local news media and ask them to publish the information about this crucial discovery. We also have to bring this discovery to the attention of our local politicians, representatives, and senators in the U.S. Congress. We the people have to use our power to force this issue to be discussed in the media and the halls of power. It is time for us to stand up against those who have hijacked the truth about 9-11.
Sources:
Bollyn, Christopher, "Super-Thermite Demolished TwinTowers on 9-11: Game Over for Criminals and Cover Up," April 14, 2009
Bollyn, Christopher, Did LVI Work in the TwinTowers Before 9/11? March 20, 2005
Bollyn, C., "Super-Thermite Found in World Trade Center Dust," April 5, 2009
Harrit, Niels H. et al, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," The Open Chemical Physics Journal, Volume 2, 2009, ISSN: 1874-4125, pp.7-31 (25) Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen
Harrit, Niels, Interview with Danish scientist and co-author of paper on evidence of super-thermite in the WTC dust, TV2 News, Denmark, April 6, 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o
Rubin, Debra, and Richard Korman and Gary Tulacz, "Industry Firms Pitch in for World Trade Cleanup While Others Account for Employees in Doomed Buildings," Engineering News-Record, September 13, 2001
The End of the Cover Up: The Discovery of Super-Thermite in the Rubble of 9-11, April 5, 2009
Final Edit – August 29, 2009
Latest Correction - February 24, 2010
Articles by Subject
The Book - Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World
