• Why Are We Unable to Resist?
• The Christmas Bomber and the Fraudulent War on Terror
• False Flag Terror Risk High as Obama Ponders Afghan Fiasco
• Gitmo Gulag Fraud and Chaos
• Richard Holbrooke and the Zionist War on Terror
• Obama's Deception - 9-11 and Afghanistan

Why Are We Unable to Resist?

Updated: October 20, 2009

I often wonder why young Americans do nothing to protest the outrageous criminal regime that has taken control of the United States.  Where is the resistance?  Two illegal wars, a growing police state, and several trillion dollars stolen by criminal bankers from the American people in the past year alone -- why aren't they protesting, resisting - burning tires in the streets?

Why are Americans unable to protest against the criminal regime that has taken over their nation?  Here French farmers protest low grain prices in Paris on October 16, 2009.  Why don't we see such protests against the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, or against the trillion dollar rip-off for the big bankers?  Why is the resistance in the U.S. completely unorganized?

Having grown up during the Vietnam War, I was immersed in the protest movement and vibrant anti-war music and culture of the 1960s.  "Lucky Man" by Emerson, Lake, and Palmer is a good example of the anti-war music of the time.  I find it odd that there is no similar anti-war movement or music today.  Faced with never-ending wars in the Middle East, today's youth seem completely apathetic and apolitical.

During the years that I attended public school, the United States was engaged in an undeclared war of aggression in Southeast Asia that nobody really understood.  Every week, the American people saw actual photos from the war in LIFE magazine and could easily see through the deception that we were fighting "communism".   After 8 years of war in Afghanistan and 18 years in Iraq, however, there is no similar photo-journalism of comparable quality coming from the "embedded" journalists covering these wars.  Likewise, there is virtually no anti-war music or protest movement against the criminal wars being fought in our name.   Why?

We have to look at the media to understand the lack of a similar anti-war movement in the United States.  Today, there is no mass resistance because the U.S. media is now completely owned and controlled by Zionist Jews who actually support the fraudulent "War on Terror" and the illegal wars being fought by the United States and its allies.  These wars are being waged to benefit Israel and strengthen the Zionist hegemony in the Middle East and Central Asia.  The Zionist-controlled mass media in the United States now works full time to promote the war agenda - first Afghanistan, then Iraq, and now Iran.  In the Zionist-controlled media there is no room for any real criticism of the Zionist war agenda.

Paul Wolfowitz, one of the senior U.S. officials who conspired and planned the wars of aggression against both Afghanistan and Iraq, is now pushing for war against Iran in the pages of the Financial Times (U.K.), for example.  It needs to be understood that Wolfowitz is guilty of the most serious war crime, "a crime against peace" as defined by the Nuremberg Principles.  That his opinion is published in a leading financial paper illustrates my point that the mass media actively promotes the Zionist war agenda.  Wolfowitz has strong connections to the state of Israel.  He lived in Israel as a teenager when his Polish-born father, Jacob, worked at the Technion, and his sister, Laura, married an Israeli and lives in Jerusalem.

The controlled media today censors and sanitizes the images and information about the wars and the human suffering the aggression has caused to the people of Iraq and Afghanistan.  The public is kept in the dark about the true costs of the illegal wars, both human and financial.  Most importantly, the U.S. media keeps powerful images like these from the Vietnam and Iraq wars off the pages of our newspapers.

The famous photo of Vietnamese children burned with napalm changed U.S. public opinion about the war.


The photo of a summary execution by a South Vietnamese police chief showed the lawlessness of the war.


The U.S. evacuates after the fall of Saigon

After nearly 19 years of fighting and bombing Iraqis, very few images of the human cost of the war have been published.  The ones that have been seen are horrible beyond belief and reveal the criminal nature of the war of aggression.

A photo from the "Highway of Death" shows what happened to one of the thousands of retreating Iraqis who were incinerated by a U.S. gas-air MOAB (Mother of All Bombs) in 1991.

A U.S. Marine killing injured Iraqis in a mosque in Fallujah, November 13, 2004 (NBC/AP)

The Vietnam war was being fought, we were told, to keep Southeast Asia from falling to the communists.  Thousands of young men, including several of my relatives, went to Vietnam to fight "communism".  Many thousands of young Americans died in Viet Nam.  An untold number of Vietnamese died.

Vietnam eventually did fall to the communists and the last U.S. personnel had to flee from the roof of the embassy in Saigon with desperate people being pushed off the over-crowded helicopters.  Despite the fact that the U.S. lost the war in Vietnam, the world did not come to an end.  As a matter of fact, nobody even seemed to notice.  Most people were simply glad the 12-year old war was over.

I have often wondered why today's youth seem utterly unable to resist the blatant lies of the criminal government and controlled media, which are clearly extremely harmful to them and their nation.  I can't understand why the young people in America and Europe abuse themselves with tattoos and body piercings.  Don't they care about themselves?  I have seen people with screws coming through their eyebrows that look like construction accidents that should be sent to the nearest emergency room. 

Christopher J. Petherick, the former chief editor of the Spotlight and American Free Press, a weekly newspaper I wrote for in Washington, D.C., had an ugly metal stud sticking through his tongue that looked absolutely awful.  I had never seen such a thing.  He told me that he was a Satanist.  I thought he was just an East Coast trendie.  I sometimes told him that we were doing the Lord's work by spreading the Truth.  

Christopher J. Petherick, a self-avowed Satanist, was the editor of American Free Press and the former Spotlight, publications of the Liberty Lobby of Washington, D.C.  It makes no sense that a Satanist would be the chief editor of a newspaper that is purportedly written for patriotic Christian Americans, unless one understands that the Liberty Lobby is actually owned and controlled by a Zionist Jew named Mark Lane.  The paper is a controlled opposition outlet that acts like flypaper to create a list of active patriots -- for the Jewish intelligence organization Lane works for.

Petherick fired me after a three-man team of heavily-armed undercover police broke my arm and TASERed me in front of my family, but only after collecting many thousands of dollars from readers for the Bollyn "legal defense fund," which were kept by the so-called employee owned newspaper.  I later discovered that the newspaper and the organization behind it, the Liberty Lobby, are actually owned by the Jewish leftist lawyer, Mark Lane, and have been since the early 1990s when he bought the assets of Liberty Lobby with some of the $5 million he had been paid by Willis A. Carto in legal fees.

I learned this from L.T. Patterson, publisher of Criminal Politics of Cincinnati.  Patterson's newsletter is similar to the publications of the Mark Lane's Liberty Lobby, which is what led Lane to sue Patterson in the mid-1990s for some $10 million.  Lane, a Zionist Jew, wanted to have a monopoly in the patriotic newspaper business.  During the legal process Patterson learned that Lane had acquired the assets of the nearly bankrupt Liberty Lobby in the early 1990s.  Manfred Roeder, a German patriot who has been imprisoned often in occupied Germany, told me that such controlled opposition newspapers like National Zeitung are designed to skim the cream off of the nationalist movement.  They also serve as outlets of disinformation and have even more sinister purposes.

Jane Fonda and Mark Lane worked closely together in the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War.  Lane, who served in U.S. Army intelligence in post-war Germany, owns the assets of Liberty Lobby and American Free Press.

As the U.S. prepared for war in Kuwait and Iraq in the summer of 1990, I began organizing pro-Palestinian students at the University of California at Santa Cruz who were opposed to the war effort.  I learned a great deal through my anti-war efforts.  I saw how the anti-war movement was taken over by Jewish students from the Hillel organization (B'nai B'rith).  The issue of occupied Palestine was pushed to the side.  This is what controlled opposition means:  controlling both sides of the debate to control the message.

James B. Phillips, a devout Catholic and dear friend from Chicago who served in Vietnam, recently sent me a video from the mid-1980s that explains how Americans have been demoralized and why. 

James B. Phillips, (top row, 3rd from left) commanded a U.S. rifle platoon in Viet Nam. 

The information comes from a former agent of the Soviet K.G.B. who defected to the United States.

The former K.G.B. agents says:  "Exposure to true information does not matter anymore.  A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information.  The facts tell nothing to him."

This is exactly the problem we face in 2009.  Although Americans have the information that proves that their government has not been elected and is lying to them about 9-11 and everything else, the people do nothing to resist.  They have become enslaved to lies.  This video explains how this was done.

As the former Soviet journalist Yuri Bezmenov says in the video clip about the KGB's demoralization of American youth through the media, "Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate and open. You can see it with your own eyes.... It has nothing to do with espionage... in reality the main emphasis of the KGB is NOT in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85 percent is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American [so] that despite the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country."

Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass media is owned and controlled by Zionist Jews.  This is a statement of fact and should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way.  Zionist Jews control nearly all of the U.S. mass media: television and radio networks, major newspapers, book publishers and leading book stores, and the big film studios and chains of movie theatres.  They have taken control of the media for one reason - to manipulate public opinion by controlling the message.  It is the same with media as with pipelines:  He who owns the pipeline controls the product.  

Many of the Jewish media moguls are members of the secret organization of Freemasons, the International Order of B'nai B'rith.  Philip Morris Klutznick, the man who made Obama president, was the international president of B'nai B'rith.  The Sulzberger family who owns the New York Times was one of the founding families of Lodge No. 1 of the B'nai B'rith, which was started in New York City in 1843.  It is through this secret society, which is closed to all non-Jews, that the media moguls and Jewish financiers are able to conspire against the American people while living among them. 

The B'nai B'rith also started the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in the early 1900s.  The ADL is an organization that protects the Jewish criminal network by attacking those who expose their crimes.  The ADL has infiltrated police departments across the United States.  The B'nai B'rith also runs Hillel, an organization for promoting the Zionist agenda at every college campus in the United States.  Through their organizations like the ADL and Hillel, the secretive Elders of Zion of the B'nai B'rith are able to push their agenda into every community and college campus in America.  The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is certainly not a "hoary fake", and is most likely the protocols from a meeting of the leaders of the B'nai B'rith. 

Bezmenov's statement about the KGB being primarily occupied with disinformation and demoralization efforts aimed at Americans through the media is similar to the analysis by the German intelligence expert, Andreas von Bülow, who told me that 90 percent of the work done by the CIA and other intelligence agencies is disinformation and deception. 

It needs to be understood that communism and Zionism are fraternal twins from the same mother -- big Jewish capital of the Rothschild sort.  This relationship can be seen in Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, the most senior advisers of President Barack Hussein Obama II.  Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist, and Axelrod, the son of Jewish communists, were commissioned in 1992 by the daughter of Jewish financier Philip Morris Klutznick of Chicago to make Obama our "first black president."  Zionism and communism are two heads of the same evil beast.

Communism and Zionism emerged together in the Russian Empire in the late 1800s.  There were six communist parties, two of which were also Zionist.  Although the Rothschild family who created the state of Israel is capitalist, the Russian Jews who emigrated to Palestine in the late 1800s and early 1900s were ardent communists and socialists.  Most of the Ashkenazi (Khazar and Slavic) Jews who built the Zionist state and who run it to this day come from the communist and Zionist parties that created the kibbutz and moshav settlements in Palestine.  The Jews who were forced to emigrate to Palestine (later Israel) and the millions of people who have lived under communism are similar.  Zionists and communists are both merely the pawns of the Rothschilds; foot soldiers for international Jewish bankers.

Originally posted on September 30, 2009

The Christmas Bomber and the Fraudulent War on Terror

January 11, 2010

"Let's be clear about what this moment demands.  We are at war.  We are at war against Al Qaida."
- President Barack Obama, 7 January 2010 

For the people on the ground in Pakistan and elsewhere, Obama's "War on Terror" means only more U.S. aggression and terrorism - against them and their families.  Hundreds of innocent civilians have already been killed by Hellfire missiles fired by C.I.A. operated drones.  Is this not state-sponsored terrorism?

The Christmas Bomber and the Fraudulent War on Terror

by Christopher Bollyn
www.bollyn.com

 In Washington, President Obama is under pressure to take action. The Christmas Day attempted attack over Detroit may have failed, but it brought back instant memories of 9/11. Military action will continue.
- Jeremy Bowen, BBC Middle East Editor, 5 January 2010

On 18 November 2009 I published a warning in which I said there was a "very high" risk of a false-flag "Al Qaida" terror attack against Americans.  The warning was the thrust of my article, entitled “Terror Risk High as Obama Ponders Afghan Fiasco,” which begins with this sentence:  "The risk of another false-flag terror attack like the terror atrocities of 9-11 is currently very high."  (A "false-flag" terror incident is one that is designed to affect public opinion by being blamed on a third party by the real perpetrators.)  On Christmas Day, thirty-seven days after my article was published on Bollyn.com, the false-flag terror incident I predicted occurred on a passenger airliner approaching Detroit's Metro Airport.

The "attempted" bombing on Christmas Day was designed to garner support for President Obama's actions in support of the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror".

My November 18 warning of a false-flag terror attack was the first I have ever issued based on my own understanding of the political situation at hand.  I decided to publish the warning because I was absolutely convinced that the Zionist planners behind the fraudulent "War on Terror" desperately needed a high-profile terrorist incident involving Americans to gain public and political support to legitimize the actions the Obama administration has taken to advance the Zionist war on Islam.  As President Barack Obama called for a massive troop surge in Afghanistan there was clearly an urgent need to validate his ill-advised policies to increase U.S. force levels in the disastrous and costly eight-year-old war - a war of aggression which lacks any validity.  Since terrorism is the primary tool and tactic in the Zionist construct known as the "War on Terror" it seemed quite logical that a false-flag terror event involving "al Qaida" was imminent, so I published the warning.    

To be successful, a false-flag terror attack has to attract a huge amount of attention around the world and be immediately interpreted by the mass media in such a way to sway public opinion in the direction desired by the terror planners.  The propaganda value of a false-flag terror attack is the real reason behind the architectural planning of such an event.  This is the main difference between the two major attacks that occurred during the Christmas holiday period.  The suicide bombing on December 30 of the C.I.A.'s Forward Operating Base Chapman in Khost, Afghanistan, in which seven high-level U.S. intelligence officers and a spy chief from the Kingdom of Jordan were killed was obviously more lethal, but it was not a false-flag terror attack and has no propaganda value, quite the contrary, it revealed that the King of Jordan is an active member of the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  The suicide bombing of the C.I.A. base was a military attack reportedly carried out by the Taliban and meant to take revenge for the C.I.A.'s killing of hundreds of innocent people in Afghanistan and Pakistan with the agency's current weapon of terror, the drone loaded with Hellfire missiles.  

Death from Above: A C.I.A. remote-controlled Predator drone fires a Hellfire missile.  This is fundamentally the same terror tactic that was used to kill thousands of Americans on 9-11.  Who has decided that the people on the ground deserve to die?  What is their crime?  Defending their homeland from foreign occupation?


Funeral in Pakistan for a victim of a C.I.A. drone attack.  Who determines who is a militant and who is a civilian?

The “failed al-Qaida bombing attempt” on Christmas Day in Detroit, on the other hand, is exactly the kind of false-flag terror attack I meant in my warning, although I hadn't anticipated the possibility of an "intentional dud," which this incident evidently was.  Readers of Bollyn.com know that this was the first and only time I have published a false-flag terror warning based on my own understanding of the logic and players in the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror."

As I wrote on November 18:

The risk of another false-flag terror attack like the terror atrocities of 9-11 is currently very high…An Israeli-designed terror attack that is seen by the public as having been committed by Al Qaida would serve as an effective decision maker for Obama and swing public opinion behind sending more troops to the eight-year-old war of occupation in Afghanistan.  This is why I consider the chances of another terror attack to be blamed on Al Qaida to be very high at the moment.

The Christmas Day attack of the so-called Underwear Bomber on Delta’s Northwest Airlines Flight 253 is Mossad's idea of a joke but it is certainly meant to be taken with all seriousness by the Zionist-controlled media and corrupt politicians who make policy decisions based on such events.  Jeremy Bowen, Middle East Editor for the BBC, distilled the propaganda message of the Christmas Day bomber down to its simplest form for public consumption on January 5:

In Washington, President Obama is under pressure to take action. The Christmas Day attempted attack over Detroit may have failed, but it brought back instant memories of 9/11. Military action will continue.

MILITARY ACTION WILL CONTINUE

One can imagine that the Israeli leaders Shimon Peres, Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak, and their fellow terrorists who planned this false-flag terror scenario, got a good laugh out of the inept Underwear Bomber – only at his expense and ours.  The level of false-flag terror absurdity in the United States has truly reached the level depicted in Brazil, the futuristic film of a world dominated by terrorism.  The Terry Gilliam film was actually produced by the Israeli weapons dealer and senior Mossadnik, Arnon Milchan (or Milchen), a close friend of Peres, Netanyahu, and Barak.  The Zionist terrorist masterminds chose Christmas Day for several reasons, primarily because of the increased psychological effect on Christians, but also because it is the one day of the year on which the security and passenger-screening crews would be largely staffed by people who don't celebrate Christmas.

The Israeli terror masterminds Shimon Peres, Bibi Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak

The attempted bombing of Flight 253 by the 23-year-old Nigerian was obviously not meant to destroy the plane.  Had Abdul Mutallab actually exploded his "explosive device" the terror event would have had no immediate propaganda value.  First, the wreckage would have to be found in the depths of the North Atlantic or expanses of eastern Canada and then an official investigation conducted to determine what had happened to the Delta flight that had suddenly disappeared from the radar screen.  It could take weeks or months before anyone would even be blamed for the attack.  That certainly wouldn't help the Zionist planners advance their "War on Terror" so it was decided to carry out an "attempted" bombing, like the earlier "shoe bomber," in which the inept bomber would be caught red-handed in the act of committing a terror atrocity.  

If the Underwear Bomber had really intended to destroy the flight, why would he have waited until the plane was making its final descent into the Detroit area before trying to detonate the explosive device?  Why was he so inept in his efforts with an explosive that required a different sort of detonation device?  Why did he seem like a person who had been mind-controlled to carry out the attempted bombing?  What possible motivation can the young son of a wealthy Nigerian banker have to kill innocent people over the skies of Detroit?  He is, after all, a devout Muslim.  Can we expect to get real answers to these questions?

Abdul Mutallab (in red), here in London, is known to be a devout Muslim.  What would be his motive to commit a terror crime against innocent people?  It simply does not make sense.

A group of Republican senators, led by the pro-Israel Republican John McCain (who visited Israel over the weekend of January 9-10) are seeking to transfer the Abdul Mutallab case to a military court.  Why would a pro-Israeli senator like McCain want this young Nigerian tried by a military tribunal?  McCain and others argue that critical questions such as the identities of those who assisted and trained Abdul Mutallab remain unanswered.  Indeed, they are and will probably remain so.  Did he receive funding and support from others, and if so, from whom?  The first question should be whether Abdul Mutallab was really in his right mind or whether he had been subjected to mind-control methods that made him an unwitting Manchurian Candidate.  Eyewitness reports about his appearance and initial responses strongly suggest that he was under some form of mind-control.  Will a trial in a U.S. District Court really get to the bottom of who is behind Abdul Mutallab?

MOSSAD IN YEMEN

To understand who is behind the Christmas Day bombing attempt one need only understand that the "War on Terror" is a complete Zionist fraud designed to drag the United States and other nations into a global war against Islamic movements seeking social justice in the Middle East and elsewhere.  Across the region there are many Islamic organizations, like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, which challenge the corrupt dictatorships that oppress their people and prevent real development.  The Mubarak dictatorship in Egypt, for example, is supported and funded with billions of dollars by the U.S. government to maintain a police state that is paid to support Israel while repressing the people of Egypt.  Such arrangements of maintaining political control through corruption are certainly not sustainable for the long term.  

The U.S. war in Afghanistan is supposedly being waged against Al Qaida because of their role in the terror attacks of 9-11, but the actual target has always been the Taliban, an Islamic movement.  Islamic movements of this type are naturally anti-Zionist.  The Israeli planners of the War on Terror seek to inflame passions on both sides to the point that the U.S. war on Islam takes on its own dynamic but that has not yet happened so the Zionist terrorists stoke the fire by creating false-flag terror events like 9-11 - and the attempted bombing of the Delta flight on Christmas Day.

The Mossad, Israel's secret service, has been operating in Yemen since the 1940's.  In 1949, the Mossad arranged for the removal of some 49,000 Yemenite Jews to Israel with the approval of Yemen's leader.  Michael Chertoff's "Mossadnik" mother, Livia Eisen, played a key role in this secret airlift, code-named Operation Magic Carpet, which involved some 380 flights on British and American aircraft.  Today, there are some 360,000 Yemenite Jews living in Israel.

Nearly all of Yemen's 49,000 Jews were taken to Israel in a Mossad operation in 1949-50 called Operation Magic Carpet.

The Israeli Mossad continues to operate in Yemen, as the President of Yemen Ali Abdullah Saleh revealed openly in early October 2008:  "A terrorist cell was arrested five days ago and will be referred to the judicial authorities for its links with the Israeli intelligence services."

The AFP and global press reported that the Israeli "terrorist cell" discovered by Yemeni authorities in 2008 had been involved in a deadly attack against the U.S. embassy in the Yemeni capital the previous month.  President Saleh said the Israeli terror cell operated under the "slogan of Islam."  Sources close to the Yemeni investigation told AFP that Saleh was thought to have been referring to six men rounded up in Sanaa after the 17 September 2008 attack on the U.S. Embassy which left 18 people dead.

An Israeli "Al Qaida" terror cell in Yemen is probably behind the kidnapping and mind-control operation that resulted in the devout Muslim Abdul Mutallab trying to detonate an explosive device on Delta's Northwest Flight 253.  The fact that Abdul Mutallab flew through Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport is a further indication that the Mossad is involved.  Both the Schiphol Airport and Delta Airlines are clients of ICTS (International Consultants on Targeted Security), the Mossad-controlled airport security company that oversaw passenger screening at the airports involved in the 9-11 attacks through its wholly-owned subsidiary Huntleigh USA.  While ICTS Europe is officially headquartered in Amsterdam, its real Mossad management is based in Israel.

Abdul Mutallab bought his tickets in Accra, Ghana, on December 16, eight days before he departed.  Although he flew to Detroit via Nigeria, his homeland, he did not visit or speak with his family.  This suggests that the young devout Muslim was being chaperoned and is simply another victim of a devious Israeli intelligence plot designed to promote the Zionist-managed "War on Terror" and legitimize President Obama's increased U.S. military involvement in Yemen, Afghanistan, and beyond.  We must not allow ourselves to be deceived by this most absurd and evil Israeli terror spectacle.  It is high time for the real culprits behind 9-11 and the false-flag terror of the past decade to be exposed and stopped.   

The young Abdul Mutallab in 2001

Finis

False Flag Terror Risk High as Obama Ponders Afghan Fiasco

November 18, 2009

The risk of another false-flag terror attack like the terror atrocities of 9-11 is currently very high.  This is not a prediction but a warning based on my analysis of 9-11 and the predicament that the U.S. and NATO find themselves in as they try to "pacify" occupied Afghanistan, a nation of fighting men who have always resisted foreign occupiers since Alexander the Great conquered the region and built Kandahar (Alexandria) in 330 B.C. 

The U.S. occupaton of Afghanistan has led to a huge increase in opium production.
(Photo - New York Times)

Unlike Alexander the Great, the U.S. has not built any new cities in Afghanistan and they are having a very hard time holding on to the capital, Kabul, which is the only place their installed puppet Hamid Karzai has any political power whatsoever.  The fact that Karzai stole the recent election through massive vote fraud exposes the lie that the U.S. is fighting to bring democracy to Afghanistan.  Thus far the U.S.-led occupation has only succeeded in producing bumper crops of opium for the illegal drug trade and putting in power one of the most corrupt regimes on Earth.  The cost of the illegal invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq is already more than $1 trillion, when one factors in the future costs that will be incurred from the long-term care for the thousands of seriously wounded and mentally disturbed U.S. veterans, which already number in the tens of thousands.  Pray tell, Mr. Obama, exactly what benefits have these illegal wars brought to the American people to justify such huge costs?  Why are we still slogging away against the people of Afghanistan?

An Afghan fighting man at a funeral of a fallen comrade.  The men of Afghanistan, mainly Pashtuns of Aryan stock, are fighting the U.S.-led occupation of their nation.  What would you do if your country were occupied?  Would you take up arms and fight to free your nation from occupation or would you submit to the occupying power?  This question is much more pertinent than most Americans realize.

As President Barack Hussein Obama ponders what to do about the fiasco in Afghanistan, the risk of a false-flag terror attack that forces his hand is greatly increased.  An Israeli-designed terror attack that is seen by the public as having been committed by Al Qaida would serve as an effective decision maker for Obama and swing public opinion behind sending more troops to the eight-year-old war of occupation in Afghanistan.  This is why I consider the chances of another terror attack to be blamed on Al Qaida to be very high at the moment.

The false-flag terror attack may not happen in the United States.  The U.S.-occupied nations of Iraq and Afghanistan (as well as Pakistan) suffer false-flag terror attacks on a weekly basis, especially when there is a foreign dignitary like Hillary Clinton around to impress.  These nations suffer terror casualties on the scale of 9-11 every year.  A spectacular terror attack during a high profile diplomatic visit is typical of Israeli-designed terror attacks.  They carried out one like this in Israel a few years ago across the street from the hotel of a visiting American diplomat to press their point.  The victims were mainly Russian immigrants.  Because it is much easier for the Zionists to carry out large scale false-flag terror attacks in these occupied nations there might be a terror attack on U.S. forces that compels Obama to send more forces.  What the architects of the "War on Terror" clearly need to do is try to get U.S. and Euopean public opinion behind their fraudulent war in Afghanistan.  They would be aiming to carry out a false-flag attack that decisively swings public opinion behind a massive increase in troops on the ground in occupied Afghanistan.

Why has Obama waited so long to decide what to do in Afghanistan?  The Zionist-controlled president obviously does not intend to bring the troops home and the status quo is clearly not working.  Obama, who will soon receive the Nobel Peace Prize, and his Zionist handlers are obviously reluctant to send tens of thousands more U.S. troops to a war of occupation that is very unpopular with Americans.  Fearing defeat and "mission failure", the U.S. military, NATO, and the Zionist-controlled media are clamoring for more troops to be sent as soon as possible, but if Obama were to send more troops he would lose even more support among his political base, which is really much weaker than the controlled media would have you believe.

The administration's plan to bring Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged "mastermind of 9-11," to New York City to stand trial may be part of this plan.  Why has it taken the Obama administration one year to come to this decision?  If Obama were truly serious about closing Guantanamo and seeing justice served, he would have made these moves last spring.  A trial for the person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed would provide an ideal possibility for another false-flag terror attack in New York City.  One that killed the  9-11 terror suspects before they had a chance to be thoroughly interrogated in an open trial would probably be the desired outcome for the planners of the terror attack.

The person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the "mastermind of 9-11," may arrive in New York City before Christmas.  The question is whether he is the real Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who earned an engineering degree in North Carolina, or not.  Is he the same man as the person in the photographs below?  The Santa Claus beard and turban make a positive identification difficult.

Earlier images of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

One has to remember that the real goal of the war in Afghanistan has nothing to do with democracy or the terrorism of 9-11.  The U.S.-led invasion and occupation is meant to occupy and pacify the country to allow for the construction of the TAPI pipeline to transport the Mossad-owned gas of Turkmenistan to India and China.  When this pipeline is built, the Mossadnik Yosef Maiman and his Israeli partners will become tremendously wealthy selling the gas resources of Turkmenistan, which they own and control. 

The TAPI pipeline will carry Israeli-owned gas of Turkmenistan to India and China bringing huge profits for the Mossad gangsters behind 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror".

The Israelis certainly have not shelved this plan because of the high casualties being suffered by U.S. and NATO forces.  The Israeli terrorists who masterminded 9-11, the invasion of Afghanistan, and the utterly fraudulent "War on Terror" (e.g. Shimon Peres, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak) are at the top of their game -- and running the Israeli government.

The Zionist Terror Troika - Shimon Peres, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak

The current Israeli government is very close to the Obama administration.  With Rahm Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist, running the White House, one might think that the Israeli government is calling the shots in the Oval Office.  As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Lally Weymouth, senior editor of Newsweek and The Washington Post  (both owned by her family, the descendants of the Zionist and German Jewish banker Eugene Meyer), in late October 2009:

There is much greater cooperation and transparency between the Obama administration and my government than people know. We speak openly and I greatly appreciate steps taken by the Obama administration against the distorted Goldstone report and their pressure on Iran to stop its military nuclear program as well as the ongoing efforts we are making to re-launch the peace negotiations between us and the Palestinians.

Rahm Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist from the Stern Gang, runs the Obama White House.  The president is kept in an information bubble and handled like a puppet by his Zionist handlers who have managed him since 1992.

David Axelrod was commissioned by Chicago-based Elder of Zion Philip M. Klutznick to be Obama's adviser in 1992.  Axelrod created Obama the candidate by crafting his political strategy and writing his speeches.  He still performs these functions for Obama the president.  But who does Axelrod, the son of a Jewish communist, take his orders from?

Lally Weymouth is the daughter of Katharine (Meyer) Graham and grandaughter of Eugene Isaac Meyer, the Zionist Jew banker of Lazard Freres who served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1930 to 1933 and who bought The Washington Post at a bankruptcy auction in 1933.  Like most U.S. news outlets, both the New York Times and Washington Post are owned by Zionist Jewish families.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Christopher Bollyn, "Why Afghanistan?" September 28, 2009
http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_11438

Bollyn, "The Great Game - The War For Caspian Oil And Gas," October 14, 2001
http://www.bollyn.com/the-great-game-14-oct-2001

Bollyn, "Gitmo Gulag Process Falls into Chaos," July 16, 2009
http://www.bollyn.com/gitmo-gulag-process-falls-into-chaos

Bollyn, "Terror Mastermind KSM is an Imposter - The Confession is Fake," March 16, 2007
http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Bollyn-Ahmed-Abdul-Qadus.html

Bollyn, "The Absence of Justice for 9/11 Victims," March 20, 2007
http://www.bollyn.com/index.php?id=10665

Bollyn, "When and Where was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Captured - or Killed?" March 16, 2007
http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Bollyn-Ahmed-Abdul-Qadus-arrest.html

Gitmo Gulag Fraud and Chaos

July 16, 2009

An image of the person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the "mastermind of 9-11," and the feeble-minded scapegoat Ahmed Qadus.  Are they the same person?  I asked Dr. David E. Klett, a retired professor of thermodynamics, who had the real KSM in several of his classes, if he recognized the person said to be KSM. "I did not recognize that person," Klett said.  "I never saw that face before."

The BBC is reporting that the fraudulent Soviet-style military tribunals in Gitmo have fallen into chaos (not a big fall for such a seriously flawed process).  The article, "Chaos besets 9/11 court hearing," reports:

Scenes of chaos have gripped a US military court in Guantanamo Bay where five alleged 9/11 plotters were due to appear together before a judge.  All five, including alleged mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, initially refused to attend the hearing.  The judge rejected prosecution calls for them to be compelled to attend but three did appear after a recess.  The hearing focuses on whether two of the accused are mentally competent to represent themselves...

Thursday's hearing was meant to focus on whether Mr Hawsawi and a fourth defendant, Ramzi Binalshibh, were mentally competent to represent themselves.  The US military lawyer representing Mr Binalshibh said he suffered from a delusional disorder.  When the lawyer went into detail about how he had been deprived of sleep, her microphone was cut off...

The fifth defendant, Mr Sheikh Mohammed, refused to attend the hearing.  Described by US intelligence as "one of history's most infamous terrorists", he earlier admitted being responsible "from A to Z" for 9/11.  Believed to be the number three al-Qaeda leader before his capture in Pakistan in March 2003, he told a pre-trial hearing at Guantanamo in December 2008 that he wanted to plead guilty to all charges against him.

It should be noted that the person who is said by the U.S. government to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is clearly not who they say he is.  My research has found that the evidence indicates that he is another person, a feeble-minded person who is being scape-goated as the "mastermind of 9-11."  I have written about this in several articles.  I spoke with a former professor who taught KSM at a university in North Carolina.  Shown the photos of the person said to be KSM, the professor said he had never seen that face before.

Images of the real Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

The three articles (No. 6,7, and 8) about the hoax of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed can be read near the end of the webpage with my articles from 2007 about 9-11:
http://www.bollyn.com/911#article_11206

No. 6  "Terror Mastermind KSM is an Imposter - The Confession is Fake," 16 March 2007

No. 7  "When and Where was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Captured - or Killed?" 16 March 2007

No. 8  "The Absence of Justice for 9-11 Victims," March  2007

Richard Holbrooke and the Zionist War on Terror

July 7, 2009 

Obama's Deception - 9-11 and Afghanistan

June 5, 2009

St. Michael the Archangel slaying the devil, the father of all lies and deception.

"DEMOCRACY" IN AFGHANISTAN - CODE FOR OCCUPATION

"Zoya," a member of the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA), received international acclaim with the 2003 publication her dramatic life story: "Zoya's Story: An Afghan Woman's Battle for Freedom," with John Follain and Rita Cristofari.  In 2008, Zoya was interviewed in Berlin by Elsa Rassbach.  Zoya explained how she viewed the U.S. and NATO occupation of Afghanistan:

RAWA supports the call for the withdrawal of the U.S. and NATO troops because occupation is not a solution. They are constantly killing civilians, even at a wedding party. Do you think we are not human beings and don't have hearts? What would Americans do if an occupier were killing so many civilians in the U.S.? …

In 2001, the U.S. and its allies occupied Afghanistan under the beautiful slogans of "war on terror," "women's rights," "liberation" and "democracy." But when they installed the brutal and criminal warlords after the fall of the Taliban, everyone knew that Afghanistan had once again become a chessboard for world powers. The plight of our people, and especially of women, has been misused to legitimize the foreign military presence in our country.

Afghan people have been badly betrayed by the U.S. and NATO in the past few years. Despite billions in aid, Afghan people are living under awful conditions that are worse than they were under the Taliban medieval rule. Afghanistan still faces a women's rights tragedy, and the everyday hardships of our masses are beyond imagination.

Everyone knows that the U.S., a superpower, together with the biggest military pact in the world, NATO, could in a matter of days, if not hours, defeat the Taliban and arrest Mullah Omer and Osama. But today they need such enemies to justify keeping their military machine in Afghanistan.

We don't want their so-called liberation and democracy. If these troops do not withdraw, we are sure that the Afghan people will have no other option but to rise up against them. Our people are already deeply fed up with the situation. The jokes being made in Afghanistan are that the Taliban is getting the most from this situation.