Back to Archive Print Donate
Send email link
to this report

LEE WANTA'S SETTLEMENT IS NOW 18 MONTHS++ OVERDUE

WORLD COURT ORDERS PARIBAS TO RELEASE OR BE SEIZED

Friday 25 January 2008 02:18

LAST-MINUTE BUSH-SARKOZY TRADES WERE REPORTEDLY THWARTED

MARKET TURBULENCE HAS BEEN EXCLUSIVELY TIED TO THE SETTLEMENTS

‘MAINSTREAM MEDIA’ PUNDITS, ANALYSTS, FLOUNDER IN EMPTY VERBIAGE:

HAVING IGNORED WANTAGATE, THEY HAVE HAD NO CLUE WHAT’S BEEN HAPPENING

WORLD REMAINS ON A KNIFE EDGE: IF ONE BANK GOES, ALL BANKS FACE COLLAPSE

CRISIS TRIGGERED BY RAMPANT CORRUPTION AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVEL

IF WANTA HAD BEEN PAID IN JUNE 2006, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO CRISIS:

SEE OUR REPORTS DATED 02 SEPTEMBER 2006, 18 & 27 JULY AND 08 SEPTEMBER 2007

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for 'Wantagate' reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story's ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Wantagate reports been calling all the shots, given the hijacking of Wanta's Settlement. This is the 90th Wantagate report: over a million+++ words to date.

CONTRAST BETWEEN CURRENT ‘RELEASE’ ASSERTIONS, AND WHAT WE KNOW
In the past few days, the impression has been fostered that the cascade of financial settlements, beginning with the G-8/G-10 (= First Tier) country recipients, finally began after the World Court ordered Paribas on 24th January to start releasing funds to the attorney for a key US Trustee (see below), and the World Court likewise made it plain to the US Supreme Court that relevant releases of funds must take place on 25th January and subsequently.

There was some unconfirmed indication that funds had started to be paid out, and that huge sums of money were being moved in accordance with known settlement requirements; but this Editor asserts, to the best of his information and belief, that there has been ZERO indication whatsoever that the funds that were stolen and illegally diverted from the Ambassador in June 2006 and ever since, have been remitted by Citibank to Lee Wanta’s corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley, New York, in accordance with the long outstanding Treasury Direct instruction, as of this date. Obviously, we can only report the situation as it stands at the time of reporting.

The transfer of these ‘stand-alone' funds, which technically have nothing whatsoever to do with any other settlement, takes 20 seconds to effect and is more than 18 months overdue.

Therefore, the open-ended securities fraud and other gross felonies that we have catalogued in successive reports in this Wantagate series for the past 18 months, have never ceased; and they would appear to be continuing with no respite, to this day.

THE EDITOR’S STANDING AND THE TRIGGER FOR THE CRISIS
Various unofficial assurances of imminent payment have been transmitted to the Editor of this service; but he operates necessarily at arms’ length from the Principals, is not a party to any of their private business transactions, is not a payee in respect any of the settlements addressed in these reports, and has no connection with these matters other than as a private reporter of the biggest financial corruption crisis in world history, and as a person of standing in that he provided $35,000 out of his scarce private savings in July 2005 to buy the end of the Ambassador’s illegal probation, pro bono publico as a remote friend of the Ambassador, and for no other reason.

Those funds were then fraudulently conveyed by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, although the Wisconsin Department of Corrections terminated Wanta’s illegal probation five years earlier than would otherwise have occurred: see our report [Archive] dated 6th August 2007 for details.

As a consequence of that payment, the Ambassador, whom the CIA had cruelly represented to be dead, ‘ceased to be dead’, causing reverberating shock and horror among corrupt elements of the international financial community, the corrupted banks that had all complacently assumed that the Ambassador’s funds could be used for their own purposes (since he was ‘dead’), the hyper-corrupt Central Intelligence Agency (= the George Bush Center for Global Corruption) and the specialists in fraudulent finance occupying the highest levels of the US Government.

These shocks and their consequences coalesced to bring about the reverse of what Ambassador Wanta had intended – namely, the worst financial crisis that humanity has ever faced: and the SOLE reason for this hazardous geofinancial instability is that the corrupt holders of the highest offices in the United States signalled to the world, by their serial criminal behaviour, that open-ended off-balance sheet, untaxed trading operations with stolen money would henceforth be considered the norm. In other words, the vicious environment of ‘anomie’ identified by Emile Dirkheim, whereby universal criminality is the ‘norm’ and the Rule of Law is aberrant, was given the presidential green light – the more so, if that is possible, under the Presidency of George W. Bush Jr. even than was the case during the corrupt Presidencies of the serial criminal William Jefferson Clinton and his predecessor and protector, Godfather George H. W. Bush Sr.

THE BASIC FACTS AS THEY STAND TODAY
As of the date and time of this posting and as reported to us at 3.10pm EST on 25th January:

The $4.5 trillion funds belonging to Ambassador Wanta that have been illegally and fraudulently withheld from him ever since June 2006 had not been remitted to Ambassador Lee Wanta's Morgan Stanley corporate account. The additional $352++ billion penalty interest payable by Citibank under Article 4A-305 of the Universal Commercial Code [see below] must be added on to the payment in accordance with the special 60-day terms arranged last fall.

No communication with the Ambassador and/or his colleagues indicating that the long delayed payment is to be made or has been made, had been received.

The offending financial institutions remain in gross breach of securities regulations and statutes routinely listed at the foot of all these reports; and since the corruption and illegal retention of the Ambassador’s $4.5 trillion++ represent innumerable, repeated ultra vires actions, the legal status of the institutions concerned remains dubious, while the institutions themselves remain vulnerable to action for massive damages. Although the Principals are supposed to 'walk away' from their injuries after Mr Wanta's Settlement, the longer this scandalous state of affairs continues, the less inclined they may well be, to comply with that fundamentally corrupt 'requirement', we guess. See our report on the fraudulent finance underlying the so-called ‘sub-prime’ crisis, dated 26th December 2007.

President George W. Bush Jr, Vice President Richard Cheney and the remaining and surviving criminal operatives clinging onto power by their dirty fingernails, continue to preside over corrupt financial operations on a scale without precedent, with Mr George W. Bush Jr. having crammed two centuries of white collar crime into his decadent and shameless Presidency. There are suggestions that these operatives’ hands have been tied, and that may be true: but since the Ambassador has not taken receipt of his funds, and there have been anecdotal reports to the effect that President Bush intervened to dislocate mandatory World Court-ordered transactions as late as 25th January, we doubt that the chains round his hands have been fastened tightly enough.

COMPARE THE ABOVE FACTUAL INFORMATION WITH WHAT FOLLOWS
Now, contrast the accurate statements summarised in general terms above, with what the Editor was being told late in the evening British time on 25th January 2008; and recall, too, that the Editor of International Currency Review is not a party to anything and therefore doesn’t need to be told any of this, given that the Principals have been told nothing and cannot confirm any of it:

The G-8/G-10 country recipients were paid following the release of funds on 24th January (by order of the World Court) from Paribas, after illegal transactions between Presidents Bush Jr. and Sarkozy had been thwarted or stopped [see also below].

Trustees were paying out funds, one US Trustee moved a huge amount of money on 25th January, and everything was honky (hunky?) dory and in good order.

The released funds are locked and cannot be traded over the weekend, in accordance with the usual corrupt practice whereby the banks and their associates typically manufacture fresh accruals overnight by illegally prolonging their retention of other people’s money and stolen funds.

Ambassador Wanta’s funds are safe, locked and will be made available to him for use on Monday. ISN’T THAT JUST GREAT? Questions: Why is the Editor of this service being told all this, and not the Principals themselves? Why were the funds belonging to Ambassador Wanta not made available to him in June 2006, and why was the US Treasury Direct instruction for the funds to be remitted to the Ambassador’s corporate securities account held with Morgan Stanley, not implemented by Citibank when it should have been, in breach both of the securities regulations listed below and, not least, of Article 4A-305 of the Universal Commercial Code?

Why is it implied that the Ambassador and his colleagues should now be grateful for the promised remittance, when (a) no undertakings given by any US party have any meaning given the history of this matter; (b) undertakings are given not to the Principals but to a British reporter who is resident 4,000 miles away and has nothing whatsoever to do with these transactions other than in pursuit of his reporting responsibility to our readers; and (c) the Principals have been fed such ‘information’ ten zillion times already?

Sources confirm that 'things are moving', but nothing will be 'factual' until the Principals have taken economic receipt of their funds, which was NOT the case at this posting.

‘There is a gag order’: Excuse us, please? How can a ‘gag order’ apply when we are dealing with serious, continuing gross securities fraud, repeated ongoing stealing and exploitation of usurped monies, the realities that the Supreme Court of the United States has been an accessory to the fact of these crimes, and that the ongoing crimes were directed and sanctioned by both the President and the Vice President of the United States – the two most corrupt holders of these high offices in American history? A gag order cannot be applied to the covering up of criminal acts.

When we pressed one source for an explanation as to why the Principals had not been told about the disposition of their funds, we were told: ‘Because too many ears are listening’. However it is a FACT that every single telephone conversation between Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. and other parties, including this benighted Editor, is listened to intently by Mossad, DVD, Munich, NSA, GCHQ, French intelligence, the KGB’s eavesdropping service, Chinese intelligence and the Man in the Moon.

So what’s new?

What is NOT NEW is that:

The Ambassador has not received the funds that were stolen from him 18 months ago.

The elaborate and detailed ‘information’ conveyed to the Editor of this service has not been conveyed to the Ambassador and his colleagues. WHY IS THAT?

Accordingly, the ONLY FACTS that we can verify are as follows:

1. The Ambassador has not received his stolen funds. No-one has notified the Principals that the AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley has received the funds belonging to Ambassador Wanta in accordance with the long-standing Treasury Direct instructions.

2. The criminal intel cadres, institutions, holders of high office, fraudulent finance specialists and assorted intelligence community sheisters who have collectively brought the whole world to the brink of a financial and economic catastrophe that would make 1929 seem like a skiing holiday in Davos, have continued with their securities and other financial frauds, i.e. business as usual.

REMEMBER:

The ‘Full Faith and Credit of the United States’ has long since been destroyed as a direct consequence of these serial financial frauds and thefts.

The financial institutions concerned are STILL committing ultra vires actions which is reason enough in US law for their entire business operations to be in jeopardy, not least since all their business transactions since the commission of the first ultra vires action (if the legal reality is taken to its logical conclusion) render all their subsequent transactions of questionable validity.

No undertaking today by any US office-holder, Supreme Court Justice, banker, securities house official, intelligence officer, or other interested party can be relied upon, in the light of the open-ended and UNCORRECTED corruption and thefts perpetrated by the parties concerned and named or listed in these lugubrious reports.

The reputation of the United States for business integrity stinks in the nostrils of the Rest of the World as a consequence of Wantagate, and is s(t)inking further and further into the mire every day that the Wanta remittance is criminally withheld and brazenly exploited by others.

There is not an icicle’s chance in Hades of any recovery for the United States until the funds belonging to Ambassador Wanta that were stolen/diverted in June 2006 are restored to him, and with appropriate compensation. On the basis of the Editor’s crude layman’s calculation, this should now exceed $450 billion, payable by Citibank under the Universal Commercial Code regulations; but if calculated on the proper basis of compounded overnight interest rates, the amount payable by Citibank, to be added to Mr Wanta's stolen $4.5 trillion, should by now be approaching $2.0 trillion.

SUMMARY OF THE SITUATION PREVAILING ON 26TH JANUARY 2008
The rest of this report was ready for publication early in the morning of 25th January, but was delayed pending clarifications that never materialised. Before proceeding with it, we add the following considerations:

Assertions that Tier One country recipients and Trustee payees have been paid could not be confirmed and were not reconcilable with, or accompanied by, any indications whatsoever that the Ambassador, who should be paid first, has been paid. The Principals have received no notification whatsoever to that effect.

The possibility must therefore exist that massive fraud is taking place ‘as we speak’ and that the Ambassador remains a victim of this fraud.

The best thing that could happen to the world on Monday is that President George W. Bush Jr. and his criminal MK-Ultra handler-controller Vice President Cheney, announce their resignations.

The Editor hates to have to agree with the Hungarian operative George Soros, but he is correct in stating that the world faces the worst financial and economic crisis in human history. What Mr Soros has of course omitted to elaborate is that this horrendous crisis has been brought about as a direct and exclusive consequence of the perverse, ongoing, ruthless, endless corruption of these American elected officials and their criminal collaborators, including the Clintons, who are their key associated operatives and co-conspiring perpetrators of High Crimes and Misdemeanours.

The ONLY way out of the crisis is to implement/complete the Wanta Settlement and the various settlements that have been lined up with it (even though the Ambassador's own funds should have been paid over to him on a stand-alone basis in June 2006, and should never have been held up). The resulting refinancing will rescue the world financial economy, but at the price of very rapidly accelerating inflation. The whole matter has been handled in the worst possible manner. On the other hand, had it not been for Wantagate, global awareness of the extent of the corruption would never have reached the proportions evident today: so this has to be counted as a 'benefit'.

As we pointed out in June 2006 and ad nauseam subsequently, if the Lee Wanta payment had been remitted back then as it should have been, the economic and financial position and prospects for the United States would by now have been massively transformed – as we further explained in our reports dated 2nd September 2006, 18th and 27th July 2007, and 8th September 2007.

Instead of which, the Ambassador’s funds were illegally seized in order to maximise the potential for fraudulent finance operations, on top of the misappropriation and the illegal exploitation of the Ambassador’s $27.5 trillion (of which he remains the sole principal to this day) and the duplicated $27.5 trillion raised from 200+ banks in 1992 using Wanta’s $27.5 trillion as collateral.

Given this state of affairs, may we politely remind the US military that every American officer swore to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, domestic and foreign? Or would that reminder fall on deaf ears also?

The foregoing does not represent ‘interference’ in the internal affairs of the United States, because this is an INTERNATIONAL CRISIS driven by the organised criminal cadres that have hijacked the American Government. If it were purely a national crisis, no doubt such a comment might be considered inappropriate, coming from a mere Brit. But this crisis affects the future of the whole world. As HM The Queen reminded the Group of Eight Meeting held in Germany last June, the Wanta Settlement needs to be completed ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’.

The original text of this report, which was to have been posted overnight 24th/25th January, now follows. It was delayed while we waited to see whether the Wanta payment would materialise:


THE EVENTS OF 23RD AND 24TH JANUARY 2008
On 23rd January, an ostensible trigger for Lee Wanta’s Settlement and the multiple settlements – the French lawyer for a key US Trustee – was standing by for funds to be released for his client from Paribas in the French capital, this being a primary ‘lever’ that needed to be ‘pulled’ for the multiple settlement releases to the ‘country recipients’, including the Group of Eight and the G-10 countries, to be paid. A banker equipped with the necessary powers to achieve this was to have attended at Paribas for that purpose, but failed to show up.

Given the ‘never-pay’ model designed intentionally by Godfather George Bush Sr. and his arch-crook henchman Greenspan, whereby remittances overdue to the payees, financial scam victims, investors and other recipients in the layered tiers below the top ‘country’ tier of official payees, could ‘always’ be frustrated by means of sabotaging one transaction and thereby destabilising all the intentionally ‘related’ payees and tiers, it followed that the Paribas remittance(s), the Citibank payment of Ambassador Wanta’s stolen/diverted $4.5 trillion – plus $352+ billion of agreed interest payable to Wanta by Citibank under Uniform Commercial Code Article 4A-305 (Liability for Late or Improper Execution or Failure to Execute Payment Order) – and finally the multiple payments to be executed by Bank of America (the United States’ apparent central bank-to-be) were thereby once again frustrated because of highest-level criminal interference.

WE WARNED ABOUT SARKOZY. NO-ONE PAID ANY ATTENTION...
On 11th January 2008, we reported, you may recall, as follows:

‘Godfather Bush Sr.’s long-established practice is, wherever possible, to perpetrate his financial crimes and thefts through a cut-out – in this case, the current CIA operative ‘bag man’ using the alias Marvin Davis, who has been paying off corrupt politicians at home and abroad. Beneficiaries of the largesse of the fake Mr Marvin Davis may well include present and former Presidents and Heads of Government, and possibly also Nicolas Sarkozy, Bush Jr.’s new highest-level partner in High Financial Crimes and Misdemeanours. Nicolas Sarkozy supervised receipt of the stolen $44 trillion at Paribas (see the preceding report) on behalf of Godfather Bush, we are told’.

On 24th January it was confirmed to the Editor of this service that the allegedly corrupt President of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, and his corrupt partner in High Crimes and Misdemeanours, President George W. Bush Jr., had indeed been engaged in illegal off-balance sheet trading operations, as explicitly implied in the final sentence of the preceding (requoted) paragraph, which apparently caused annoyance in certain US official/intelligence circles.

Let us pause here to consider the alternative reasons for such reported 'annoyance':

Either those up whose noses that sentence ‘got’ did not believe what we had stated: or:

They knew perfectly well that Sarkozy was President George Corruptissimo Bush’s new illegal off-the-books trading partner, and were apoplectic that we had deduced that this was indeed the case. However we had long since indicated that this was likely, as you will be reminded at the end of this report. But for the moment, we revert to the present/last two days:

WORLD COURT TO PARIBAS: RELEASE OR BE SEIZED:
BOARD COULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED ON TERRORISM CHARGES
On 24th January, Banque Paribas was served with notice by the World Court under the terms of which it was ORDERED to release the funds to the attorney for the US Trustee, or the bank would be seized by the World Court and would then be compelled to release the funds anyway. Here we must first digress back to an earlier report again, as follows:

It will be recalled that on 15th November 2007 we pointed out that bankers arrested under anti-terrorism laws and held in a European destination would be vulnerable to a minimum of 25 years in jail as terrorists with no hope of release within that period, or probably within their lifetimes.

This is what we stated on 15th November:

CROOKS ADVISE BUSH TO PAY, SO THEY WON’T BE ARRESTED
The situation is ‘so bad’ for these criminal people, all of them, that Bush Jr.’s ‘friends’ met with the President on the morning of 14th November and told him to make the Wanta payment ‘because they don’t want to be arrested’.

Please pause to take note of what this means:

These Bush ‘friends’ did NOT advise the President of the United States to ‘allow’ the payment to be made BECAUSE IT IS THE RIGHT AND LAWFUL THING TO DO, BUT IN ORDER TO AVOID THE STARK DANGER THAT THEY THEMSELVES WILL BE ARRESTED LIKE SO MANY OTHERS HAVE BEEN.

In other words, THEY NEVER INTENDED THAT MR WANTA SHOULD EVER GET PAID, AND THAT THE UNLAWFULLY LINKED PAYMENTS SHOULD EVER TAKE PLACE, and the payments will only happen BECAUSE THESE PEOPLE DON’T WANT TO BE ARRESTED AND TO BE SHIPPED OFF TO A EUROPEAN DESTINATION UNDER DRASTIC ANTI-TERRORISM LAWS.

Thus, as we always anticipated, the only reason the matter is going to be settled is that these criminals are being forced to do what they never intended to do, what they have never wanted to do and what they still don’t want to do, because they don’t like the idea of being confined for 25 years or life in a British. German or Swiss maximum security jail under the relevant anti-terrorism legislation. That is the ONLY factor that's driving them to settle.

FACED WITH SEIZURE + JAIL, PARIBAS ‘TRIGGERS RELEASE’ ON 24TH JANUARY
Reverting to the current context, relevant staff at Paribas realised, on 24th January 2008, that they themselves would be liable to precisely this treatment unless they complied at once with the World Court’s order. Earlier, a banker had been appointed to replace the selected banker who had failed to deliver, on the preceding day: but he had also reneged on his responsibilities, leaving the bank when the World Court officials arrived there, we believe (unconfirmed detail). Who knows, it may even have been borne in on the wayward and perverse French President that he had better take note of the fact that Paribas would no longer be paying attention to his duplicitous instructions for the payout to be frustrated (so that he could continue his illegal financial trading operations with his ‘Kennebunkport trading buddy’ (see below), the corrupt American President).

BANK WAS IN CONTEMPT OF WORLD COURT ORDER
Specifically, having again, on 24th January, aborted the aforementioned payout, Paribas was IN CONTEMPT OF THE WORLD COURT’S ORDER. When this became evident, an (unknown to us) US banking/Treasury official was despatched to Paris, arriving there in the evening of 24th January.

At about 9.10pm, and also some 20 minutes later, we were made aware of the fact that Paribas had suddenly reversed itself and that the necessary payout sequences had been triggered, in de facto defiance of the corrupt instructions attributed to the President of France, M. Sarkozy.

BOARD PREFERRED TO AVOID JAIL RATHER THAN TO OBEY SARKOZY
As noted above, the institution’s General Management, fearing that the bank would indeed be seized and that the Board would be arrested on terrorism charges along with co-conspiring staff, in accordance with the logic of the World Court’s order, decided to defy the President of France and to perform. It would appear that a suitably forceful message was (ironically) delivered by the US banker/official upon his arrival in Paris, not least to the effect that the French President had better understand that he was on his own, as the corrupt President of the United States’ ‘hands were tied’ in respect of any further illegal financial transactions. True, we have been told all this before, and the maniac has nonetheless continued to behave as though he is subject to no authority and can operate ad infinitum beyond the law. Nevertheless, the rug was pulled on 24th January, we believe.

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE 160 COUNTRIES FINALLY SWORN IN
Meanwhile, in the United States, the representatives of the 160 countries (see our earlier reports) were all sworn in en bloc at the relevant Bank of America branch in Connecticut (location of a key trustee) at 10.00am on 24th January, so that they could perform their allotted tasks under the mass settlement and refinancing operation.

Specifically, each representative had to swear absolute confidentiality, and that he or she would proceed to take full responsibility for making the necessary allotted payments under the complex layered tier structure, in accordance with their standing instructions.

The penalty awaiting these representatives in the event of their failure to perform in any respect whatsoever would be arrest and immediate deportation to The Hague, seat of the World Court. It is understood that the arresting powers are (a) Interpol and (b) Britain’s MI6.

No American law enforcement powers are involved.

THE MULTI-TIERED ‘PAYMENT DOMINO’ STRUCTURE
The tiered payee/recipient ‘domino’ payment structure, established as indicated above by Bush-Greenspan in such a way that (so they have long imagined) the interlocking transactions could be destabilised and thwarted at any stage by means of sabotaging one or more key targeted payouts – enabling the stolen funds and related accruals to be held and traded by their criminal networks indefinitely – was layered roughly as follows [please note that this outline information must not be construed as authoritative: it represents what we understand to be the case to the best of our knowledge and belief]:

Tier One: The Group of Eight/Group of Ten countries (incorporating Russia and China) and key ‘special’ recipients and trustees incorporated within Tier One. Tier One pays Tier Two.

Tier Two: The 160 national representatives referenced above. Tier Two pays Tier Three.

Tier Three: OMEGA Ponzi financial scam victims and investor trustees, thought to number about 420 trustees, with perhaps 20,000 recipients between them. Tier Three pays Tier Four.

Tier Four: Retired US Federal Government officials and their families who were scammed by their own Government and were never paid. Tier Four pays Tier Five.

Tier Five: Smaller bankers and institutions that invested funds (in $100 or $200 million increments) into high-yield investment programs and were never paid out (i.e. were scammed, in accordance with the Bush-Greenspan ‘never-pay’ model: see above). Tier Five pays Tier Six.

[Subsequent details unknown].

It is understood that there were originally eleven such Tiers, but that Tiers Nine, Ten and Eleven have been ‘cancelled’ or merged, as the funds in question may have been stolen by Bush Sr. (41) and by former President Clinton (42). The Katrina funds, as we pointed out in an earlier report, were stolen (worth $2.1 billion).

On 12th January, the Editor was advised that these persistent giga-crooks ‘can no longer steal paper off the books’. However as the brazen further illegal trading at presidential level between Sarokozycrook and Bushcrook over the ‘Martin Luther King weekend’ in the United States until 24th January has reconfirmed, if the cancer is blocked from spreading along one artery, it has hitherto found a way to travel down another one almost immediately. UP TILL NOW.

BACKGROUND NOISES
We omit references here to the massive Psy-Ops obfuscation operations conducted, we believe, by the disinformation apparat directed by the sinister Himmlerian ‘former’ MK-Ultra controller, Bush Sr. handler and operative Vice President Cheney, that materialised in recent weeks and days, to which we shall return with revealing details at an appropriate time of our choosing.

On 16th January, we were advised that the World Court had appointed their own bankers to function inside key paying banks, after they had undergone strict security and integrity checks, causing further delays. These people were selected because it was finally realised that no US banker can be trusted (a point that we have laboriously tried to convey these last 18+ months).

On 17th January, we received several reports that a batch of 150 bankers had been arrested.

On 18th January, the phrase ‘it’s a bloodbath’ was used in two telephone conversations, and when we asked whether such language was to be interpreted figuratively or literally, we were told: ‘Both’. The phrase ‘a lot of bloodletting’ was also used on that date by reliable telephone correspondents. Other comments received from informed non-British sources at 3.15pm on 18th January:

‘Many bankers have been arrested. Some have been eliminated. There’s a lot of yelling and screaming. The rats are shooting the rats’.

Undsoweiter…

Concerning the extreme market gyrations, here is an accurate general way of looking at what has been happening. The Editor wrote this broad assessment on 23rd January and updated it on 24th January, but it remains applicable as a generic explanation. Note that the explanation is completely detached from the vacuous, knee-jerk observations of commentators who spend all 100% of their time 'goofing at the numbers', whereas they should be trying to assess flow-of-funds patterns:

The reason the market went to hell (predicted: see posts dated 2nd September 2006, 18th and 27th July 2007 and 8th September 2007, specifically re choosing between the Wanta Plan and the 'train wreck') is (a) that they didn't do it when they should have done it, and (b) it has been done way after when it should have been done because of their continuing corrupt trading operations; but the money has finally been shifted, by and large, to the right wholesale places, so that it ceased to be in the wrong wholesale places which were supporting values; so with the funds finally shifted, the falsely supported values collapsed. Certain repositioned funds were then tapped to regalvanise the market, with huge profits (at the expense of uninformed panic-driven investors) accruing to institutions and investors, including criminalist cadres, who needed to 'restore' their positions.

Finally for this 'background noises' section, impeccable sources in contact with the only forces that matter advised overnight on 25th January 2008 that 'steps are being taken' so that 'things are to be changed permanently'. Put it this way: our sources confirm that the highest-level criminal American scamming operatives face their come-uppance as never before. But (a) because the Editor is a Brit and therefore cannot comment on the internal affairs of his beloved America and (b) for manifestly obvious reasons, no further advice in this department can be forthcoming at this juncture, a line has to be drawn here for the time being. It would be as well if anxious Internet trawlers would just relax a little, not get so het up, and instead follow the sound advice in Scripture: Watch and Pray.

Going back to what we posted earlier, our report of 9th November 2007 contained the following:

FOREIGN DIPLOMATS SNUB CRIMINAL U.S. PRESIDENT
As previously reported, none of the 160 diplomatic delegates from foreign countries who flew into New York over last weekend to take economic receipt of their payments answered any calls from President Bush and the White House.

The countries concerned regard George W. Bush as a criminal financial bandit who is facing his day of reckoning, and they wished to have nothing to do with him.

YET NICOLAS SARKOZIES UP TO THE U.S. PRESIDENT
The exception has been President Sarkozy, who arrived in New York on 6th November, to sign off on his country’s payment, and also to make sure that no further problems arose at Banque Paribas, where eight male and two female employees were arrested earlier (see the preceding report) in the presence of President Sarkozy himself. The French President, who signed his papers at 10.00 am on Tuesday, then departed for Washington, where, in a most bizarre encounter, he had dinner with the criminal President Bush Jr. at the White House.

So here was the new French President, who had been charged by the World Court with facilitating the Wanta (and linked) payments when he came to office (otherwise he himself could be arrested), dining with the arch criminal who has been systematically not only blocking the Wanta Settlement, but also creaming off, with the assistance of his corrupt associate Henry M. Paulson, vast amounts of money, including the $47 trillion that they diverted between 31st October and the 7th November. Whether M. Sarkozy was telling Bush that, whether he liked it or not, the game is up, has not been divulged to us given that we had no flies on the wall of the White House banqueting room.

SARKOZY A PERFECT SPECIMEN OF A DOUBLE-MINDED OPERATIVE
We also cited an article by Heather Timmons and Katrin Bennhold published in the International Herald Tribune on 30 August 07 entitled 'CALLS GROW LOUDER FOR INTERNATIONAL OVERVIEW OF U.S. MARKETS', which contained the following passage, projecting the ‘public face’ of French President Sarkozy:

‘In Europe, the credit crisis appears to have emboldened those who have pushed for stricter international rules for some time.

The German Government was rebuffed by Washington and London earlier when it pushed for an international code of conduct for hedge funds [at the G-8 Meeting in June – Editor]. Now some economic advisers to the German Government are going further, suggesting that rating agencies should be nationalized, that large-scale loans be registered publicly and that minimum standards be developed for complex debt securities.

The head of the French Council of Economic Analysis, which advises the Prime Minister, said hedge funds should be subject to stricter disclosure rules about their risk exposure.

Christian de Boissieu, President of the group and a member of the Committee for Credit and Investment Institutions, which helps regulate the French banking sector, is also calling for a global register of all hedge funds. In addition, he said, complex securities should be scrutinized before being authorized for banking portfolios.

President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, who has vowed to ‘moralize financial capitalism’ (a remarkable statement, in view of his alleged participation following his visit to Kennebunkport – Editor) has asked his Finance Minister, Christine Lagarde, to prepare a proposal for stricter disclosure rules on market participants before a meeting of the Group of 7 countries' Finance Ministers in October [at the IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings – Editor].

On Monday, in a foreign policy speech, Sarkozy called again for an enhanced global rule book to avoid financial crises.

Such crises could recur, “if the leaders of major countries fail to take resolute concerted action to foster transparency and regulation of international markets”, Sarkozy said’.

‘MORALISING FINANCIAL CAPITALISM’ = CARRYING ON STEALING
Hence, on the one hand, Sarkozy took it upon himself to signal that he intends to ‘moralise financial capitalism’ while also calling for ‘resolute concerted action to foster transparency and regulation of international markets’; while on the other hand, he has been engaged in corrupt, amoral, glaringly nontransparent geofinancial capitalistic transactions contrary to the ‘public façade’ of financial and moral rectitude that he has self-righteously invoked for public consumption.

In other words, President Sarkozy, like his corrupt erstwhile trading partner President G. W. Bush Jr., is the perfectly formed specimen, as one would expect, of a duplicitous, double-minded, two-faced Illuminati operative who typically speaks out of both sides of his mouth, whose actions are the opposite of his words, and vice versa, and who is ‘always right’ because these people operate on the basis of embedded double standards, governed by the Luciferian principles of ‘Do as Thou Wilt’ and ‘the end justifies the means’.

The exercise of this amorality is accompanied by an absence of any sense of shame, ‘perfectly possessed’ arrogance, disdain for all authority, and a mindset driven by the certainty that their behaviour can never be subject to any limitations or constraints whatsoever.

(By the way, Gordon Brown never mentions ‘the New World Order’ before a British audience. But while he was travelling in Asia, he mentioned this tell-tale phrase all the time, according to a family member who noticed such references inter alia in The Straits Times, Singapore.

Well, he couldn’t or wouldn’t answer the Editor’s straightforward question [see report dated 22nd January] as to whether he had read the Lisbon E.U. Treaty, which destroys what remains of British sovereignty in line with pan-German long-range deception strategy, before he signed it: so need we be surprised? Pity this man hasn't got any convictions of his own).

Amazingly, as we also pointed out on 9th November 2007, President Sarkozy had been made aware, prior to assuming the French Presidency last year, that he would indeed be required by the world community to fulfil France’s financial commitments with respect to the Wanta and other refinancing settlement commitments.

Although we suspected that the two suddenly pally Presidents were indeed up to no good, we couched the passages cited above in the most generous syntax possible, leaning over backwards to ‘assume’ that M. Sarkozy was not going to ‘enter into partnership’ with the Criminal President of the United States. Who, after all, were we to prejudge what appears to have been stitched up at Kennebunkport, concerning which little get-together we had reported on 10th Augsut 2007:

FRENCH PRESIDENT AIMING TO DISPLACE THE BRITISH
Given the alienation of the British from the United States due to this Presidency’s incompetence, ineptitude and obtuse certainty of its own depraved ‘rectitude’, the new French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, of Jewish Hungarian extraction, has been falling over backwards to ingratiate himself with the La Famille Bush.

Having been invited to Kennebunkport while he was ‘vacationing’ in nearby New Hampshire, the French President suddenly found his presence required back in France to attend the funeral of the (Jewish) Archbishop of Paris, Cardinal Jean-Marie Lustiger. The next day, he flew straight back to America, to attend what has been described as a ‘casual lunch’, with Bush I and II. A photograph of the two Bushes with Sarkozy during a boat ride, has been widely publicised.

What has not been reported at all is the fact that on one occasion when photographers appeared to be getting too close to the new French President while out boating with separate hosts on a New Hampshire lake, he flew into what appeared to be a rage, jumped into a boat that was full of media photographers, and gave them a severe tongue-lashing for getting too close to him.

A photograph appeared in Le Libre Journal of 16th April 2007 [Issue Number 405, page 6] in which Sarkozy is shown standing with both hands clasping a minora which he is holding against his chest, and flanked to his right by two orthodox Jews, complete with black hats, beards and black suiting, and to his left by two secular gentlemen. The article, and the photograph in which it appears, were sent to the Editor by a correspondent in Paris a few days ago.

FACT: The Editor has a good and kind, long-standing friend who is the Education Director of a Jewish establishment in a certain US State. In discussions with this friend over the years, your correspondent, citing the high incidence of Jewish participation observable in corrupt financial activities, has pointed out that this behaviour could well be described as being cumulatively very dangerous for the Jewish people, in view of their horrific historical experiences believed to have been triggered, in part, however inexcusably, by such perverse activities. The Editor’s dear friend responded that this behaviour caused his community continuing heartbreak and anxiety, not least for precisely the reason alluded to here. It is probably too much to expect that the community will learn anything at all from the fact that the entire world financial economy has been brought to the brink (literally) of irrecoverable meltdown by such serial aberrant behaviour (in which of course people from many backgrounds have been participating), masterminded inter alia by Henry M. Paulson, with disastrous consequences for him personally. But the point needs to be made.

Some years ago, a prominent individual from the community in New York alluded precisely to such a danger. His timely warning, which we seem to recall fell on deaf ears at that time, should belatedly, we suggest, be heeded now. There is no law that states that history must invariably repeat itself.

God forbid.

Finally, may we be so bold as to ‘remind’ Citibank/Citigroup of their additional agreed-upon financial obligations towards Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta/his Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation. AmeriTrust Groupe Inc. This passage is replicated from our report of 6th November:

CITIBANK MUST PAY $350 BILLION+ INTEREST UNDER U.C.C. REGULATIONS
Uniform Commercial Code: Article 4A – Funds Transfer: Section 4A-305:
LIABILITY FOR LATE OR IMPROPER EXECUTION OR FAILURE TO EXECUTE PAYMENT ORDER:

(a) If a funds transfer is completed but execution of a payment order by the receiving bank… results in delay in payment to the beneficiary, the bank is obliged to pay interest… to the beneficiary of the funds transfer for the period of delay caused by the improper execution.

As stated in our report dated 4th October, we then calculated that the amount of interest payable to the beneficiary by Citibank, given its delay in paying out the diverted funds since June 2006, was around $350 billion. This amount is rising BY THE DAY, and is now approaching $400 billion.

[As we revealed at the time] Citibank ‘agreed’ to pay $352 billion by way of interest, following our publication of the above statements. However, the Editor, not being a banker, merely made a rough guestimate at the amount of interest payable by Citibank, consequent upon its criminal frustration and diversion of the Settlement funds since June 2006.

The actual amount of interest payable by Citibank as an interest penalty, if calculated on the basis of overnight rates, might approximate well over $1.0 trillion. So the institution, having been made aware of our posting dated 1st November, grabbed the Editor’s rough estimate of $350 billion, and added a couple of billion on to make the figure look different. ENDS.


YOU CAN ORDER WANTAGATE ISSUES OF OUR FINANCIAL JOURNAL AS A PACKAGE
We sell, as a special package, the relevant recent back issues of International Currency Review, containing a massive amount of information and back-up documentation, for a flat fee of $750.00, payable in advance. Please use the CONTACT US facility to place your order and send check to the London office: World Reports Limited, 108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF, United Kingdom. Orders may also be emailed direct to the Editor at: [email protected].

Another way of ordering this package is to (a) forward us a CONTACT US email requesting the package, and then (b) to order International Currency Review via the ultra-safe ordering facility at the World Reports Limited section of this website.

Please state in the CONTACT US facility that you have ordered International Currency Review but that you specifically want to receive the Wantagate package only.


Editor's Note: We are still, from time to time, receiving emails from frustrated people seeking documentation to 'back up' what we publish in these reports. Such correspondents choose to overlook the well-known fact that we have published several huge issues of International Currency Review [SEE ABOVE] which contain hundreds of pages of facsimiles of relevant documents. Since we are a commercial operation, we cannot make these volumes available free of charge.

However copies are available in many university and other libraries around the world, and of course they can be ordered via this website at any time. But the main point here is that complaints along these lines reveal lack of knowledge of the background, which is that an immense volume of relevant documents has been published in our printed intelligence services.

LEGAL SECTION:
PLEASE READ THIS INFORMATION, AS IT INDICATES THE DEPTH OF THE DEPRAVITY THAT WANTAGATE HAS EXPOSED. REPETITION OF THIS BASIC DATA IS STILL NECESSARY...

We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.


LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the 'Saturday scam' described above and on 13th November:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

“ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

“THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

“FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

“The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

“Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

NASD Rule 3120, et al.
NASD Rule 2330, et al
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
Anti-Drug Abuse Act
Applicable international money laundering restrictions
Bank Secrecy Act
Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
Economic Espionage Act
Hobbs Act
Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
Maloney Act
Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
Money-Laundering Control Act
Money-Laundering Suppression Act
Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
Securities Act 1933
Securities Act 1934
Terrorism Prevention Act
Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.


U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.


Wicked Pedia Update dated 2nd December 2007:

WIKIPEDIA IS PART OF AN NSA DISCREDITING OPERATION
As previously reported, the Editor’s attention was drawn, in the second half of November 2007, to a pack of old lies, diversionary claptrap and disinformation posted on Wikipedia under ‘Leo Wanta’.

Although this posting appeared FOR THE FIRST TIME on 12th November 2007, it consisted almost entirely of ancient lies, including disinformation dredged out of ‘Thieves’ World’, a hatchet job published in 1994 by Simon and Schuster by the late Claire Sterling, a CIA operative.

Mrs Sterling died suddenly after being summoned for her second meeting with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under Clinton.

ANCIENT DISCREDITED LIES POSTED IN NOVEMBER 2007
The fact that the OLD Wikipedia lies appeared for the first time as late as 12th November 2007, and consisted almost totally of old, discredited lies, omitting the Master Lie that the CIA retailed after the Ambassador had been taken down, namely that he was DEAD, indicated quite clearly to the Editor and his advisers that this latest evil display of regurgitated disinformation represented a deliberate operation by the US intelligence community’s disinformation and lie machine, to begin, all over again, the process of discrediting Ambassador Leo Wanta – so that they can relieve him of his funds by some false pretext or other after a ‘gag order’ has been signed.

The definitive up-to-date information on the Ambassador’s affairs has been published on this website, and in several issues of International Currency Review, Economic Intelligence Review, Soviet Analyst and Arab-Asian Affairs, all published by World Reports Limited, for several years. Copies of these publications are in official, institutional and library hands all over the world. Therefore, any posting about Ambassador Wanta that relies upon ancient lies and fails to take account of the accurate information that we have published, can easily be demonstrated to represent yet another US intelligence community and NSA discrediting operation.

PRELUDE TO ‘SETTING UP’ WANTA ALL OVER AGAIN
We now understand that the Principals have been advised (for the past several weeks) that they will not be allowed to reveal that they have been paid. This loony state of affairs is designed to ‘set them up’ for a future discrediting operation whereby false witness will be deployed against them to the effect that they have stolen the money, or some such pack of lies, which they will be unable to refute because they will be bound by the ‘prerequisite’ gag order that is intended. Its purpose, of course, is to ‘legitimise’ the old and new lies that the US disinformation apparat will be preparing for future use. The likelihood is that the new discrediting operation will be extended to Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as well. We are prepared for this intended onslaught.

EDITOR’S TRUE REPORT REPEATEDLY REPLACED BY OLD LIES
On 19th November, the Editor posted on Wikipedia the accurate text about Leo Wanta that is now reproduced below. The Editor’s accurate text was then removed by Wikipedia, leaving the ‘old lies’ that had existed previously. When the Editor became aware of this, he reposted the accurate text below, and, given that his own copy had been deleted, he then deleted the pack of lies, leaving his own accurate text up on the Wikipedia site instead, without the lies.

On 2nd December, the Editor was advised by a monitor that the Editor’s accurate text had been removed and that the old discrediting lies had been reposted on the page by Wikipedia. When the Editor checked, he found that the page could no longer be edited because of what the site managers described as ‘vandalism’.

IT'S ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST THE TRUTH, NOT ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST LIES
It was not ‘vandalism’ to delete the truth and to replace the truth by old lies, but it was ‘vandalism’ to delete ‘old lies’ and replace them by the truth.

We are therefore able to conclude from this Wicked Pedia outrage, as follows:

1. Wikipedia, which purports to ‘change the world’, prefers lies to the truth.

2. Wikipedia is therefore, by definition, a source of disinformation and lies, and cannot be trusted as a source of reliable information in any context.

3. The only category of sick society that would have any interest in disseminating lies about Ambassador Wanta, the United States’ greatest living patriot, rather than the truth, is the mentally disturbed US counterintelligence disinformation apparat (a.k.a. the US STUPIDITY COMMUNITY) which, by its actions in deleting the Editor’s ACCURATE information and replacing it with old lies, and by its illegal behaviour in ‘snipping’ our website texts as stated above, thereby reveals the desperation of its concerns, which all have to do with covering up official criminality.

4. It is now far too late for the US stupidity community to repair the damage that it has done since June 2006, when the Ambassador’s funds were first hijacked by the criminal financial operative Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary. So it is laying the groundwork for a renewed discrediting operation against Ambassador Wanta and his colleagues.

We and others will see to it that this intention is defeated, and that such nefarious scheming is exposed for the amoral and disgusting Luciferian behaviour that it represents.

The ACCURATE text that the Editor posted on the Wikipedia site, follows. (The Editor, after all, PAID FOR AMBASSADOR WANTA’S EXIT FROM PROBATION, FOR GOODNESS SAKE, SO HE CAN HARDLY BE A SOURCE OF DISINFORMATION, CAN HE?). This information will be very widely distributed by other means, in order to provide all concerned with the necessary ‘heads-up’ as to what these US Dark Forces have in mind. They are out of their minds and in Satan’s mind:


The disinformation about Leo Wanta (Lee Wanta) below was first posted on 12th November 2007. It contains ancient CIA disinformation and long since exposed lies going back to the early 1990s, and obfuscates the truth. The report appended immediately below was added on 19th November 2007, to correct the disinformation contained in the original stub.

It was subsequently removed and is hereby replaced. This sequence of events, which suggests that egregious lies are preferred to the truth, has been recorded on www.worldreports.org, which contains all the updated and breaking Wanta material, that was ignored and traduced in the stub at the foot of this report.

THE ACCURATE TEXT THAT WIKIPEDIA REPEATEDLY DELETED
This is the correct information that we posted on 19th November 2007:

The 'information' posted below represents a deliberately malevolent, false disinformation picture which has no bearing on reality. It is a travesty of the truth of the matter and cites Christopher Story as the author of some of the disinformation, which is libellous and implies that Story, the veteran
Editor of International Currency Review of nearly 40 years' standing, is engaged in the egregious dissemination of lies, which is not the case.

This is such an egregiously malevolent stub of disinformation that readers should prudently dismiss it altogether; they should start afresh by accessing Christopher Story's website, which is: www.worldreports.org., reading from the Archive.

www.worldreports.org is the authoritative source for all updated information on Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta. The source 'Thieves' World' was a CIA disinformation work prepared by the late CIA disinformation operative Claire Sterling, published in 1994.

This stub regurgitates ancient lies perpetrated by the CIA, which lied for many years that Lee (Leo being his intelligence community name) Wanta was dead. The CIA proclaimed that he was dead so that corrupt cadres could ransack his funds (see below).

He 'ceased to be dead' with effect from 21st July 2005 after Christopher Story, a British private citizen, had paid $35,000 from his scarce private funds pro bono publico by way of 'restitution' to an American lawyer for onward payment to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections, to procure Mr Wanta's release from his illegal probation.

Despite his Ambassadorial status, Wanta had been illegally 'taken down' in Switzerland on 7th July 1993 without a warrant on a trumped-up Wisconsin State charge of having failed to pay $14,129 in falsely assessed Wisconsin State fabricated tax that he never owed because he had been resident in Vienna on US Presidential intelligence work since June 1988.

This data is all in the public domain, has been published for several years in International Currency Review, the Journal of the World Financial Community, and can be read on Mr Story's website.

International Currency Review is a banking and financial journal with a worldwide circulation:
ISSN 0020-6490. It is published by World Reports Limited, London.

Notwithstanding that this fabricated tax demand (orchestrated by US criminal intelligence) had been paid twice under protest by Lee Emil Wanta from abroad (in May and June 1992), the funds were improperly allocated by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue and were never credited to the false account maintained by them for the Ambassador. (Christopher Story holds documentary
proof of both payments). They were paid a third time by Christopher Story in June 2005, which action duly procured Mr Wanta's release from illegal probation effective 14th November 2005.

As a consequence of Wanta thus ceasing to be dead, the CIA's lie that he was dead collapsed in chaos, and all the subsidiary old false witness lies that the CIA had perpetrated, including those assembled for disinformation purposes in the stub below (which, in line with the standard false witness used throughout by detractors, attempts to portray Christopher Story as a source of disinformation) were discredited as well.

Why was Wanta taken down? So that the criminal intelligence cadres running the US Government could ransack the $27.5 trillion of funds assembled by Leo Wanta on President Reagan's orders, in the course of his Financial Warfare operations against the USSR.

Under Reagan's Executive Order 12333 of 1981, US intelligence officers were permitted to establish corporations which could thereafter contract with the CIA/DIA/DEA/NSA et al for the purpose of fulfilling allotted intelligence tasks allocated to them.

The financial proceeds of operations conducted by such corporations were consequently the property of the corporations and thus of their shareholders, a legal fact of life which has never been, and cannot be, disputed. This was not a good idea because almost all US intelligence
operatives are liars and do not function on the basis of the Rule of Law at all, if they can help it.

Lee Wanta is the well-known patriotic exception to this rule: he operates solely in accordance with US law, in contrast to the behaviour of other US operatives, which is why the kakocracy* needed to remove him from the scene, as duly occurred July 1993.

Once Wanta had been illegally arrested (contrary to international law, as a diplomat) and then thrown into a stinking Swiss jail on 7th July 1993, the criminal cadres inside the US official structures immediately ransacked Mr Wanta's bank accounts according to plan.

The history of this matter is, and has been, elaborated in great depth on Christopher Story's website www.worldreports.org. and has been extensively published, as mentioned, in International Currency Review and other World Reports Limited intelligence publications.

Students are advised perhaps to begin with the 'Wisconsingate' report dated 6th August 2007, which forensically dissects, with detailed documentary back-up, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue's tax fabrication operation against Wanta, stretching back for over 20 years, that has been exposed by Christopher Story in minute detail, and which formed the fabricated basis for Wanta's illegal takedown in 1993, despite the fact that Wisconsin has no jurisdiction beyond its borders.

The overall Wantagate crisis, which is the sole and continuing underlying cause of the prevailing global financial and economic day of reckoning that the world is now facing, has been triggered by the fact that the George W. Bush Jr. White House, aided and abetted by other senior office-holders, hijacked the compromise financial settlement of $4.5 trillion that the White House itself agreed (in a classified accord that was finalised in May 2006) should be paid over to Ambassador Wanta, so that the stolen and diverted remaining $23 trillion of his funds (and the many hundreds of trillions of dollars hypothecated upon them) could be released from a de facto lien arising from the collapse of the CIA's lie that Wanta was dead.

For clearly, since he had ceased to be dead, 100% of these funds (plus the hundreds of trillions of fiat ‘funny’ money generated by illegal leveraged operations from that base) belonged to Lee Wanta and to no-one else: a situation that the banks 'could not handle'.

The entire narrative of what has become the worst financial corruption crisis in world history (which this stub consisting of disinformation attempts to obfuscate) is set out in great detail on Christopher Story's website www.worldreports.org., to which all readers are directed in order for the accurate state of affairs to be understood. As indicated, this stub below is a travesty and a disgrace, as it regurgitates long since discredited CIA lies, presents a diversionary, distorted and misleading picture, and because it malevolently incorporates Christopher Story as a source for some of this disinformation.

It is a disgusting instance of ignorant and malevolent US counterintelligence disinformation and deceit at its very worst.

All the statements in the above commentary may be verified by reference to www.worldreports.org and International Currency Review. Another publication covering this matter in detail is Economic Intelligence Review, also published by World Reports Limited, London. Wanta students should access the Archive on the www.worldreports.org Home Page.

A book devoted to Ambassador Wanta and the Wantagate crisis is in preparation

The Wanta disinformation referred to above has been deleted from this page. ENDS.


DIPLOMATIC STATUS OF THE PRINCIPALS
The Ambassador and his colleagues now have special diplomatic status (conferred upon them by HM The Queen in 2007), which means that the Ambassador is now an Ambassador several times over. This factor greatly complicates the intended discrediting offensive that the mad US stupidity community’s Dark Forces contemplate, their sole objective being of course to cover up their own criminality, in line with pending ‘thought crime’ legislation which has the same Nazi-style objective.

*Note: ‘Kakocracy’: Governance by a clique representing the worst elements of society, in their interests and to the exclusion of all other interests, from the Greek, kakos, meaning foul, or filthy.


Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001.

Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.